{
"query": "Was ist die Taktzeit der Linie? Was sind die geforderte Zykluszeiten des Automationssystems? Was ist die geforderte Wechselzeit der Maschinen? Was ist die geforderte Verf\u00fcgbarkeiten der Linie? Was ist die geforderte Verf\u00fcgbarkeiten der angefragten Komponenten? Bitte liste mir alle Informationen als Tabelle auf - leere Felder bitte mit \"nicht spezifiziert\" ausgeben",
"namespace": "9f0c30c1-529e-4fd1-8833-bd9bdd5e463a",
"messages": [],
"stream": false,
"language_level": "",
"chat_channel": ":434:1029",
"language": "German",
"tone": "neutral",
"writing_style": "standard",
"model": "gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
"knowledgebase": "ki-dev-large",
"seed": 1029,
"client_id": 1029,
"all_context": true,
"follow_up_for": null,
"knowledgebase_files_count": 20,
"override_command": "",
"disable_clarity_check": true,
"high_consistency": false,
"custom_primer": "",
"logging": true,
"query_route": "",
"web_search": false
}
QUERY ROUTE
Query Route: research
==================================================
**Elapsed Time: 1.43 seconds**
==================================================
RAG PARAMS
RAG Parameters: {'dynamically_expand': False, 'top_k': 120, 'actual_k': 120, 'satisfying_score': 0}
==================================================
**Elapsed Time: 0.00 seconds**
==================================================
VECTOR SEARCH RESULTS
Results: {'main_results': [{'id': 'd6f5360f-c9d6-48ca-b432-c654e3d0f455-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '0qa_901_108-sspha_mg_ftz.pdf',
'page': 1.0,
'text': '# Allgemeine Informationen\n'
'**Baugruppe:** _Insell SV '
'02/03/12/10-15_ \n'
'**Fahrzeugnummer:** _Zugelassen '
'wie VW 0600 401 099_ \n'
'**Verwendung für:** '
'_Fahrzeuge bis 2,4 L Hubraum._ \n'
'\n'
'## Technische Merkmale\n'
'- **Typ:** '
'_Passat_ \n'
'- **Modell:** '
'_B3/4_ \n'
'- **Bauart:** '
'_Limousine/ Variant_ \n'
'\n'
'### Antragsnummer\n'
'**Antrag:** '
'_E-Maschinen-Rabatt (G) - 2_ \n'
'**Zulassungsnummer:** _01890 - 1 '
'[max. 2]_ \n'
'**Antrags-Gültigkeit:** _Gültig '
'bis 19.05.2023_ \n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'# Tabelle 1: Allgemeine Daten\n'
'| Parameter | Wert |\n'
'|---------------------------------|--------------|\n'
'| Motorleistung | 85 kW (115 PS) |\n'
'| Hubraum | 2393 cm³ |\n'
'| Zylinderanzahl | 5 |\n'
'| Verdichtung | 10:1 |\n'
'| Max. Drehmoment | 210 Nm (1400-3000 '
'min⁻¹) |\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'## 1. Motoröl / Fluid Niveau\n'
'- Empfohlene Ölstand für Betriebsdruck: \n'
' - Hohes Niveau: _0,5 L_ \n'
' - Niedriges Niveau: _1,8 L_ \n'
'- Geschätzter Ölwechselintervall: \n'
' - Standard: _15.000 km_ \n'
' - Intensiver Betrieb: _10.000 km_ \n'
'\n'
'## 2. Elektrisches System\n'
'- Nennspannung: _12 V_ \n'
'- Batteriekapazität: _60 Ah_ \n'
'- Starterbatterietyp: _Blei-Säure_ \n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'### Verbindungen und Spezifikationen\n'
'- **Masse der elektrischen Verbindung:** \n'
' - Anforderungskraft: _5 N_ \n'
' - Maximalleistung: _700 W_ \n'
'- **Kabelquerschnitt:** \n'
' | Typ | Querschnitt |\n'
' |-------------------|-------------|\n'
' | Massse | 2,5 mm² |\n'
' | Leitung (vorne) | 1,5 mm² |\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'## 3. Motorparameter\n'
'- Kaltstartleistungsbedarf: _1000 W_ \n'
'- Zündsystem: \n'
' - Brennstoff: _Benzin_ \n'
' - Kompression: _12:1_ \n'
'- Zündkerzen: _1,2 mm (Wäremeschluss)_ \n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'## Hinweise und Kommentierungen\n'
'- **Wartung:** \n'
' - Erforderlich alle _20.000 km_ oder jährlich \n'
'- **Überprüfung von:**\n'
' - Ölstand und -qualität\n'
' - Kühlmitteltemperatur\n'
'\n'
'## Technische Details nach VN 06C64\n'
'- **Motorkennnummer:** _ABF_ \n'
'- **Historie:** _Fehlermeldung 319_ \n'
'- **Auslieferungsdatum:** _15.05.2019_ \n'
'\n'
'### Zubehör\n'
'1. **Werkzeug:** \n'
' - Ratsche (8-17 mm) \n'
' - Schraubenschlüssel (6-21 mm) \n'
'2. **Ersatzteile:** \n'
' - Filter \n'
' - Dichtungen \n'
'\n'
'## Zusätzliche Informationen\n'
'- **Toleranzen:** \n'
' - Ölwechselintervall: ± 1000 km \n'
'- **Temperaturen:** \n'
' - Betriebstemperatur: _90 °C_ \n'
' - Kühlmitteltemperatur: _75-85 °C_ \n'
'\n'
'--- \n'
'\n'
'### Weitere Anmerkungen\n'
'- Dokumentation erforderlich bis zur Einsichtnahme in '
'die Motorensystematik. \n'
'- Besondere Beachtung auf die Kalibrierung und '
'Instandhaltung.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '38034581-bb1d-41df-a748-db54d9717e3f-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '0qa_901_108-sspha_mg_ftz.pdf',
'page': 3.0,
'text': "I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that."},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '28aa62d9-1f1a-4aa5-aa2d-1733aabdbb5d-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '0qa_901_108-sspha_mg_ftz.pdf',
'page': 4.0,
'text': "I'm unable to assist with that."},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '0bcd1484-f20d-4a57-8874-3186af37c534-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '0qa_901_108-sspha_mg_ftz.pdf',
'page': 5.0,
'text': "I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that."},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'fd7a0f11-54e6-4ceb-a0a8-31c8b59070fd-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '0qa_901_108-sspha_mg_ftz.pdf',
'page': 6.0,
'text': "I'm unable to assist with that."},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'fcea422e-3a2b-489a-a9be-8f19f9ba5685-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '0qa_901_108-sspha_mg_ftz.pdf',
'page': 7.0,
'text': "I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that."},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '19c1b8d9-b32b-41ee-81b6-b44a234c82fb-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'Anfrage%20Mail.pdf',
'page': 2.0,
'text': '# Aufsichtsrat / Supervisory Board\n'
'\n'
'**Dr. Hans Ulrich Golz (Chairman)**\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche oder rechtlich '
'geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der '
'beabsichtigte Empfänger sind, informieren Sie bitte '
'sofort den Absender und löschen Sie diese E-Mail. Das '
'unbefugte Kopieren dieser E-Mail oder die unbefugte '
'Weitergabe der erhaltenen Informationen ist nicht '
'gestattet.\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'The information contained in this message is '
'confidential or protected by law. If you are not the '
'intended recipient, please contact the sender and '
'delete this message. Any unauthorised copying of this '
'message or unauthorised distribution of the information '
'contained herein is prohibited.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'd070edce-6426-43c8-a8ba-f4cb6cc29b14-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pdf',
'page': 1.0,
'text': '# Skoda SSP Getriebegehäuse (GGH) Automation\n'
'\n'
'**Date:** 2024-09-13 \n'
'**Presenter:** Ralf Haug \n'
'\n'
'## Companies Involved\n'
'\n'
'- VDF Boehringer \n'
'- Corcom \n'
'- DMC \n'
'- Feelers \n'
'- Hessapp \n'
'- IMRS \n'
'- Jobs \n'
'- Leadwell \n'
'- AG \n'
'- Meccanodora \n'
'- Morara \n'
'- Pfiffner \n'
'- Rambaldi \n'
'- Sachman \n'
'- Sigma \n'
'- SMS \n'
'- SNK \n'
'- Tacchella \n'
'- Witzig & Frank \n'
'\n'
'### Overview\n'
'\n'
'This presentation covers the automation of the Skoda '
'SSP Getriebegehäuse (GGH) including the various '
'technologies and companies involved in the process. \n'
'\n'
'### Key Topics\n'
'\n'
'1. **Introduction to GGH Automation**\n'
'2. **Technological Innovations**\n'
'3. **Collaboration between Companies**\n'
'4. **Future Prospects**\n'
'\n'
'### Conclusion\n'
'\n'
'The advancement in automation technologies greatly '
'enhances productivity and efficiency in manufacturing '
'processes.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'Here’s a comprehensive examination based on the visual '
'content provided:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution:\n'
'- **Image Location:** The image is centrally located on '
'the page.\n'
'- **Image Number:** Image 1.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification:\n'
'- **Detected Objects:** The image depicts an industrial '
'layout.\n'
'- **Classification:** Industrial equipment, machinery, '
'and architecture.\n'
'- **Key Features:**\n'
' - Various machines, possibly for manufacturing.\n'
' - Layout design indicating workflow and production '
'areas.\n'
' \n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:\n'
'- **Scene Description:** The image shows a large-scale '
'industrial environment.\n'
'- **Activities:** The layout suggests an automated '
'production process.\n'
'- **Main Actors:** Not specifically identifiable; '
'implied to be industrial machinery.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis:\n'
'- **Detected Text:**\n'
' - Title: "Skoda SSP Getriebegehäuse (GGH) '
'Automation"\n'
' - Subtitle: "2024-09-13, Ralf Haug"\n'
'- **Content Significance:** Indicates a presentation '
'topic focused on automation technology related to '
'gearbox housings.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:\n'
'- **Diagrams/Charts:** The image primarily depicts an '
'industrial layout rather than a standard diagram or '
'chart.\n'
'- **Data Trends:** Not applicable in this context.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis:\n'
'- **Products Depicted:** Industrial machines and '
'components.\n'
'- **Features:** The layout suggests various types of '
'manufacturing processes and machinery.\n'
'- **Comparison:** Visual differences include machine '
'sizes and functions, though specifics are hard to '
'determine.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection:\n'
'- **Anomalies:** No overt anomalies detected. The '
'layout appears organized and systematic.\n'
' \n'
'### 8. Color Analysis:\n'
'- **Color Composition:** Dominant colors are greens and '
'blues.\n'
'- **Impact on Perception:** The cool color scheme '
'conveys a professional and industrial atmosphere.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition:\n'
'- **Perspective:** The image appears to have a bird’s '
'eye view.\n'
'- **Composition:** Elements are arranged systematically '
'to suggest an efficient workflow.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance:\n'
'- **Overall Context:** The image is likely part of a '
'presentation or report on industrial automation.\n'
'- **Contribution to Theme:** The layout supports the '
'theme of modern manufacturing and automation '
'processes.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis:\n'
'- **Metadata Review:** Specific metadata details are '
'not visible, but capture date and author information '
'are presented.\n'
' \n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:\n'
'- **Graphs:** No graphs included in the image.\n'
' \n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers:\n'
'- **Data Points:** Not applicable since there are no '
'graphs.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects:\n'
'\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):** The layout of '
'machinery suggests possible process flows in '
'manufacturing, though not explicitly detailed.\n'
' \n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):** '
'There are implied processes in automation but no '
'detailed descriptions provided in the image.\n'
' \n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):** Various '
'industrial machines could denote different types of '
'manufacturing processes.\n'
'\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation:** The image reflects a '
'trend towards automation in the manufacturing sector.\n'
'\n'
'- **Tables:** No tables present in the image.\n'
'\n'
'This analysis encompasses various aspects as requested '
"and offers insights into the image's content and "
'significance.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'a7d27e2b-5d06-47d5-9dd2-44f56ac2bda5-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pdf',
'page': 2.0,
'text': '# Projektdaten\n'
'\n'
'**Kunde:** \n'
'Skoda, Mlada Boleslav\n'
'\n'
'**Werkstück:** \n'
'Getriebegehäuse (GGH) SSP\n'
'\n'
'**Taktzeit:** \n'
'75s\n'
'\n'
'**Terminplan:** \n'
'siehe Folgeseite\n'
'\n'
'**RFQ Dokumente:** \n'
'- Skoda Lastenheft \n'
'- TZ_Link abarbeiten skrine prevodovky elektropohon SSP '
'v2_DE\n'
'\n'
'**Others:**\n'
'\n'
'**Kontakt MAG EK:** \n'
'Sonja Haas; '
'[sonja.haas@mag-ias.com](mailto:sonja.haas@mag-ias.com)\n'
'\n'
'**Kontakt MAG Planung:** \n'
'Ralf Haug; '
'[ralf.haug@mag-ias.com](mailto:ralf.haug@mag-ias.com)\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'Here’s a comprehensive analysis based on the content '
'provided:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution\n'
'- **Image 1:** The entire visual content is presented '
'on a single page.\n'
' \n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification\n'
'- **Objects Detected:**\n'
' - Text elements: Various labels and descriptions.\n'
' - Logos: VDF Boehringer and MAG.\n'
' \n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis\n'
'- **Scene Description:**\n'
' - The image presents project data related to Skoda '
'Mlada Boleslav, likely within an industrial or business '
'context.\n'
' - **Main Actors:** Skoda as the client and MAG '
'representatives.\n'
' \n'
'### 4. Text Analysis\n'
'- **Extracted Text:**\n'
' - Key information about the project: Customer, '
'workpiece, cycle time, schedule, RFQ documents, and '
'contacts.\n'
'- **Significance:**\n'
' - This information outlines project essentials and '
'contact points for stakeholders involved.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis\n'
'- **Not Applicable:** No diagrams or charts are present '
'in the image.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis\n'
'- **Products Depicted:** None specifically mentioned; '
'the content is project-related rather than '
'product-focused.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection\n'
'- **Noticeable Elements:** The word "vorab" is '
'highlighted in red, potentially indicating urgency or a '
'topic of importance. Its prominence suggests it may '
"require the reader's immediate attention.\n"
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis\n'
'- **Color Composition:**\n'
' - Predominant colors: Various shades of teal and '
'white, combined with red for emphasis.\n'
'- **Impact on Perception:** The color scheme is '
'professional, evoking a corporate feel, while the red '
'draws attention.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition\n'
'- **Perspective:** Straightforward layout; text is '
'presented cleanly in a structured format.\n'
'- **Composition:** Organized with clear sections for '
'easy reading, using headers and bullet points for '
'clarity.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance\n'
'- The image serves as a part of project documentation, '
'contributing to a structured presentation of key '
'project details for stakeholders.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis\n'
'- **Metadata:** Not available in the visual provided '
'for analysis.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis\n'
'- **Not Applicable:** No graphs are included in the '
'image.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers\n'
'- **Not Applicable:** No graphs present.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects\n'
'\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):** \n'
' - **Not Applicable:** No process flows shown.\n'
' \n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):**\n'
' - **Not Applicable:** No specific processes '
'described.\n'
' \n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):**\n'
' - Categories mentioned include RFQ documents and '
'contacts.\n'
'\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation:**\n'
' - **Not Applicable:** No trends identifiable from the '
'given content.\n'
'\n'
'- **Tables:**\n'
' - **Not Applicable:** No tables are included.\n'
'\n'
'This analysis provides an overview of the available '
'content, highlighting its purpose and structure within '
'a corporate project context.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'faf93160-dd72-45f9-95b8-6aaf29fdcf25-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pdf',
'page': 3.0,
'text': '# Werkstück\n'
'\n'
'## 1. Angaben über das zu bearbeitende Bauteil\n'
'\n'
'| Bauteil | Getriebegehäuse SSP HA LK3.4 |\n'
'|------------------|-------------------------------|\n'
'| Gewichtsnumer | 0,450 kg |\n'
'| Zeichnungsnummer | 4,635,198 |\n'
'| Gewicht der bearbeiteten Teile | 2,839 kg |\n'
'| Material | EN 1706 (ZAlSi9Cu3 (Al)) |\n'
'| Grundlage | siehe Zeichnung | \n'
'\n'
'## 2. Abbildungen\n'
'\n'
'### Abbildung 1\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'### Abbildung 2\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'### Abbildung 3\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'#### Hinweise \n'
'- Hinweis 1: [Link zu den Details](Link_to_details)\n'
'- Hinweis 2: [Link zu den '
'Spezifikationen](Link_to_specifications)\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'Sure! Here’s an analysis based on the provided '
'aspects:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution:\n'
'- **Image 1**: Left image depicting a 3D rendering of a '
'mechanical part (cast part).\n'
'- **Image 2**: Right image showing a schematic or '
'technical drawing related to the mechanical part.\n'
'- **Image 3**: Table of specifications located below '
'the images.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification:\n'
'- **Image 1**: \n'
' - Objects: Mechanical part (likely a casting), '
'colored seals (orange, purple).\n'
' - Features: Shiny metallic finish, hollowed sections, '
'colored grooves for seals.\n'
'- **Image 2**: \n'
' - Objects: Technical drawing with callouts.\n'
' - Features: Lines and annotations indicating '
'materials and dimensions.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:\n'
'- **Image 1**: \n'
' - Scene: A detailed depiction of a mechanical part.\n'
' - Main Action: None; it’s a static visualization '
'meant for identification.\n'
'- **Image 2**: \n'
' - Scene: Technical drawing showing measurements and '
'specifics of the part.\n'
' - Main Action: Provides information for manufacturing '
'or assembly.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis:\n'
'- **Table**: Contains specifications such as part '
'number, weight, material, and source.\n'
' - Significance: Essential for understanding the '
"component's application and standards.\n"
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:\n'
'- **Image 2**: The schematic is a diagram illustrating '
'part features but lacks traditional data trends as it '
'is technical.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis:\n'
'- **Image 1**:\n'
' - Description: A mechanical part (housing) decorated '
'with seals in various colors.\n'
' - Features: Specific materials mentioned in the '
'table.\n'
' \n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection:\n'
'- No noticeable anomalies present; all elements appear '
'consistent with engineering standards.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis:\n'
'- **Image 1**: \n'
' - Dominant Colors: Metallic gray for the part, bright '
'orange and purple for the seals.\n'
' - Impact: The colors help differentiate essential '
'features and provide visual clarity.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition:\n'
'- **Image 1**: \n'
' - Perspective: A 3D view showcasing depth and '
'contour.\n'
' - Composition: Elements arranged to emphasize the '
"part's significant features.\n"
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance:\n'
'- The images contribute to an engineering document, '
'likely detailing specifications for manufacturing a '
'part.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis:\n'
'- No visible metadata information has been provided; '
'analysis is limited without it.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:\n'
'- Not applicable as there are no graphs present.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers:\n'
'- Not applicable, no graphs available.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects:\n'
'\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: Not depicted in '
'the images.\n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: Not '
'illustrated; focus is on parts.\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: The part '
'is identified by its part designation in the table.\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation**: No specific trends are '
'identified from the images.\n'
'- **Tables**: The table outlines technical '
'specifications vital for engineers.\n'
'\n'
'This structured analysis encapsulates the information '
'available in the images provided.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'd7a7f7c9-c46c-4b60-8acc-234f4fb6c35c-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pdf',
'page': 4.0,
'text': '# Terminplan\n'
'\n'
'## 7. Terminplan\n'
'\n'
'| Activity | 2024 | '
'2025 | 2026 | 2027 |\n'
'|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|\n'
'| Bestellungen | '
'| | | |\n'
'| Lieferung, Inbetriebnahme und Übergabe | 01/26 | '
'14/26 | 18/26 | |\n'
'| 1.BAZ pro OP + komplette Automatisierung | 28/26 '
'| | | |\n'
'| TBT-PVS | 27/26 '
'| | | |\n'
'| PVS | | '
'47/26 | | |\n'
'| Neulifier | | '
'06/27 | | |\n'
'| Lieferung, Inbetriebnahme und Übergabe | '
'| | 07/27 | 11/27 |\n'
'| Restliche BAZ für erforderliche Kapazität | '
'| | | |\n'
'| 2 Tape Produktion | '
'| | | |\n'
'| SCP | '
'| | | |\n'
'\n'
'MAG TP folgt\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'Here’s a comprehensive analysis of the visual content '
'provided, structured according to the specified '
'aspects:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. **Localization and Attribution**\n'
'- **Image Number**: Image 1\n'
'- **Location**: The visual content consists of a table '
'labeled "Terminplan," located towards the center-left '
'portion of the image.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. **Object Detection and Classification**\n'
'- **Objects Detected**: \n'
' - Table\n'
' - Text labels\n'
' - Horizontal and vertical lines \n'
' - Checkmarks\n'
' - Symbols (triangles)\n'
'- **Key Features**:\n'
' - The table features rows and columns that contain '
'activities and scheduled dates.\n'
' - The lines define the structure of the table, making '
'the information organized.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. **Scene and Activity Analysis**\n'
'- **Scene Description**: \n'
' - The table displays a timeline of activities '
'scheduled from 2024 to 2027.\n'
' - Various tasks are listed with corresponding '
'projected completion dates.\n'
'- **Main Actors**: \n'
' - The activities suggest project stakeholders '
'involved in the automation process.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. **Text Analysis**\n'
'- **Extracted Text**: \n'
' - Activities such as "Bestellungen," "Lieferung, '
'Inbetriebnahme und Übergabe," and dates in format '
'"MM/YY."\n'
'- **Significance**:\n'
' - The text outlines key milestones in the project '
'timeline, indicating planned phases of project '
'implementation.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis**\n'
'- **Table Analysis**: \n'
' - The table functions as a Gantt-like chart, visually '
'representing scheduled activities over several years.\n'
'- **Axes, Scales, and Legends**: \n'
' - The vertical axis lists activities while the '
'horizontal axis represents years.\n'
'- **Key Insights**: \n'
' - Timeframes for completion are crucial for project '
'management and planning.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. **Product Analysis**\n'
'- **Products Depicted**: \n'
' - The table does not depict tangible products but '
'rather activities related to automation projects.\n'
'- **Comparison**: \n'
' - N/A—no visual products to compare.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. **Anomaly Detection**\n'
'- **Identified Anomalies**: \n'
' - The "MAG TP folgt" note at the bottom is somewhat '
'vague.\n'
'- **Impact**: \n'
' - This could indicate future updates or uncertainties '
'in planning.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. **Color Analysis**\n'
'- **Dominant Colors**: \n'
' - Predominantly white table background with green and '
'red highlights for completion dates.\n'
'- **Impact on Perception**: \n'
' - The use of green for future dates suggests '
'positivity, while red may indicate urgency or '
'importance.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. **Perspective and Composition**\n'
'- **Perspective**: \n'
' - The image is presented in a straightforward, '
'top-down view focused on the table layout.\n'
'- **Composition**: \n'
' - The table is neatly arranged, allowing for clear '
'visibility of data and organization of information.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. **Contextual Significance**\n'
'- **Contribution to Overall Document**: \n'
' - This image is likely part of a project management '
'presentation detailing timelines for automation '
'processes, contributing to the overall planning theme.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. **Metadata Analysis**\n'
'- **Metadata**: \n'
' - Capture date is noted as "13.09.2024."\n'
'- **Contribution to Analysis**: \n'
' - Knowing the date allows analysis of how recent the '
'data is and its relevance to ongoing projects.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. **Graph and Trend Analysis**\n'
'- **Graphs Not Included**: \n'
' - The content is primarily a table rather than a '
'graphical representation but conveys scheduling '
'trends.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. **Graph Numbers**\n'
'- **Data Points from the Table**:\n'
' - Activities associated with specific dates (e.g., '
'"01/26," "14/26," etc.) are indicative of project '
'timelines.\n'
'\n'
'### **Additional Aspects:**\n'
'\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: \n'
' - The table encapsulates the flow of activities '
'within the timeline but does not detail specific '
'processes.\n'
' \n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**:\n'
' - Each activity could represent a process with '
'specific tasks within the overall automation project.\n'
'\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: \n'
' - Activities are categorized by their nature and '
'completion dates, indicating their importance in the '
'overall project.\n'
'\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation**: \n'
' - The timeline suggests a structured approach to '
'project management, showing clear phases and expected '
'completion dates.\n'
'\n'
'- **Tables**: \n'
' - The table serves as a timeline of project '
'activities, essential for project tracking and '
'management oversights.\n'
'\n'
'This comprehensive analysis covers the key aspects of '
'the presented visual content while adhering to the '
'specified instructions.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '9b9d4ea4-dc3a-413f-8c84-7923c93da124-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pdf',
'page': 5.0,
'text': '# Layout\n'
'\n'
'## Manufacturing Line for VW SSP GGH\n'
'\n'
'**Basis - WET - Central coolant filtration** \n'
'**OPF DPT ROD LMD** \n'
'**AG - A**\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'### Extension\n'
'\n'
'#### MAG Content\n'
'\n'
'- **MAC** Content\n'
'- **Supplied by customer**\n'
'\n'
'| Workbench / Workpart | Description '
'|\n'
'|----------------------|------------------------------|\n'
'| ID | QDA-R53-103 '
'|\n'
'| Material / Collis | 38 = 80 mm '
'|\n'
'\n'
'#### Cycle Time\n'
'\n'
'- **Step 1:** 12 s\n'
'- **Production Volume:** 2017 pcs/h\n'
'\n'
'--- \n'
'\n'
'**Date:** 13.09.2024 \n'
'**Company Logo:** VDF BOEHRINGER | AG \n'
'**Logo:** SKODA SSP GGH Automation\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"Here's a comprehensive examination of the attached "
'visual content:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution:\n'
'- **Image Identification**: The image is identified as '
'**Image 1**.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification:\n'
'- **Objects Identified**: There are multiple components '
'identifiable in the diagram:\n'
' - **Machines**: Several machines labeled for coolant '
'filtration.\n'
' - **Flow Lines**: Lines indicating the movement of '
'coolant.\n'
' - **Labels**: Various annotations denoting sections '
'and instructions.\n'
'- **Key Features**: Machines appear standardized with '
'specific dimensions and operational labels.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:\n'
'- **Scene Description**: The diagram depicts a '
'manufacturing layout for a coolant filtration line '
'intended for VW.\n'
'- **Main Actors**: The machines, operational flow '
'components, and labels serve as the main actors '
'involved.\n'
'- **Activities**: The image describes the arrangement '
'and functioning of the filtration process.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis:\n'
'- **Text Detected**: Key text includes titles, labels '
'for machinery, and instructions.\n'
'- **Significance**: The text provides essential context '
'about the manufacturing process, including operational '
'details necessary for understanding the filtration '
'system.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:\n'
'- **Data Presentation**: The layout diagram functions '
'to convey the spatial organization of machinery.\n'
"- **Axes and Scales**: Not applicable as it's a layout "
'diagram, not a traditional graph.\n'
'- **Key Insights**: The layout reveals the extension '
'area indicated in green for potential future '
'development.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis:\n'
'- **Products Depicted**: The main products here are the '
'various machines and systems for coolant filtration.\n'
'- **Features**: Each machine is likely to have distinct '
'operational features but specific details are not '
'provided in the image.\n'
'- **Visual Differences**: Differences may include sizes '
'and configurations, although specifics are not '
'explicitly detailed.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection:\n'
'- **Identified Anomalies**: The "Extension" section '
'indicated in green may stand out as it suggests future '
'developments.\n'
'- **Impact**: This may signify an expansion or '
'modification in operations, which could be relevant for '
'planning purposes.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis:\n'
'- **Color Composition**: The diagram predominantly uses '
'blue, green, and black.\n'
'- **Impact on Perception**: The use of green highlights '
'the extension area, drawing attention to potential '
'future enhancements in the layout.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition:\n'
'- **Perspective**: The diagram appears to be a top-down '
'view of the manufacturing line layout.\n'
'- **Composition**: Elements are arranged spatially to '
'reflect the operational flow and relationship between '
'components effectively.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance:\n'
'- **Overall Contribution**: The image contributes '
'significantly to understanding the manufacturing line '
'being discussed in a broader context of facility design '
'and operational efficiency.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis:\n'
'- **Metadata Review**: No specific metadata is '
'available in the visual provided, so this aspect cannot '
'be analyzed.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:\n'
'- **Graphs Present**: No graphs are present in the '
'diagram; therefore, this aspect cannot be elaborated '
'on.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers:\n'
'- **Data Points for Graph**: Not applicable due to the '
'absence of a graph.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects:\n'
'- **Process Flows**: The flow lines illustrate the '
'movement of coolant through the filtration process, '
'indicating its operational significance.\n'
'- **Process Descriptions**: The layout implies a '
'structured process for coolant filtration which is '
'essential for the efficiency of manufacturing.\n'
'- **Type Designations**: Different machine types are '
'implied by labels for specific functions, though no '
'explicit types are described.\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation**: The focus on future '
'expansion (seen in the "Extension") suggests ongoing '
'development and adaptation in manufacturing processes.\n'
'- **Tables**: Not applicable as no tables are present '
'in the diagram.\n'
'\n'
'This comprehensive analysis addresses the specified '
'aspects based on the visual content provided.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '070d8448-84c9-4f3b-a787-fb5698eca61c-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pdf',
'page': 6.0,
'text': '# Lieferumfang\n'
'\n'
'## MAG Umfang\n'
'\n'
'### Linie 1\n'
'- Portal mit H-Lader und 2 Doppelgreifern\n'
'- Rohteilgreifer in Hauptbohrungen zur '
'Positionierung/Orientierung bei Übergabe in '
'Vorrichtung\n'
'- Nassbearbeitung\n'
' - Kübelablage für Ablegen WST auf FT-Band\n'
'- 1 SPC-Schublade mit DMC-Handleser\n'
'- 2 DMC-Kameras am RT-Band\n'
'- Zellensteuerung\n'
' - Schnittstelle zum Kundenrechner\n'
'- Mobile Wartungsbühne, elektrisch abgeschaltet\n'
'- Keine Teststelle bei MAG in EIS\n'
'\n'
'### Option\n'
'- 1 Woche Produktionsbegleitung\n'
'- Schulungspaket\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'## Option Erweiterung auf 39s\n'
'- Termin unbekannt\n'
'- Portalerweiterung\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'## Skoda Umfang\n'
'- RT/FT Paletten-Bänder\n'
'- Schutzumhausung für Bänder\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'Here’s an analysis of the provided visual content based '
'on the specified aspects:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution:\n'
'- **Image Location**: The image is located on the page '
'designated as slide 6 of a presentation titled "Skoda '
'SSP GGH Automation."\n'
'- **Image Numbering**: The image is designated as '
'**Image 1**.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification:\n'
'- **Objects Identified**: The image contains a detailed '
'technical diagram.\n'
' - **Categories**: Mechanical components (e.g. portal '
'loader, cameras, conveyor systems).\n'
'- **Key Features**:\n'
' - The portal with L-loader and dual grippers.\n'
' - DMC cameras and various control mechanisms.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:\n'
'- **Scene Description**: The image depicts an '
'industrial setup or automation process for material '
'handling.\n'
'- **Main Actors**: The outlined machinery and '
'equipment, specifically the portal loader and DMC '
'camera systems.\n'
'- **Activities**: The diagram showcases how the '
'equipment integrates for tasks such as loading and '
'camera monitoring.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis:\n'
'- **Text Extracted**:\n'
' - "MAG Umfang" (MAG Scope)\n'
' - "Skoda Umfang" (Skoda Scope)\n'
'- **Content Significance**: The text outlines the '
'features and functional components of the automation '
'line, indicating a focus on efficiency and '
'technological capability.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:\n'
'- **Diagram Analysis**: This diagram represents a '
'layout for an automation system.\n'
'- **Axes and Legends**: \n'
' - The image does not contain specific axes like a '
'traditional graph but organizes information vertically '
'and horizontally.\n'
'- **Key Insights**: \n'
' - The structured approach provides clarity on the '
"system's components, including optional expansions.\n"
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis:\n'
'- **Product Features**:\n'
' - **Portal**: Equipped with dual grippers for '
'handling items.\n'
' - **Cameras**: Two DMC cameras for monitoring.\n'
' - **Control Systems**: Leads to effective '
'automation.\n'
'- **Visual Differences**: Variations in structural '
'components are noted, suggesting different functional '
'roles.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection:\n'
'- **Anomalies**: No clear anomalies were detected; '
'however, optional components are indicated which may '
'suggest flexibility in design.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis:\n'
'- **Color Composition**: \n'
' - **Dominant Colors**: Predominantly blue and green '
'hues with white backgrounds.\n'
'- **Perception Impact**: The color scheme is '
'functional, aligning with technical documentation, '
'enhancing readability.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition:\n'
'- **Perspective**: The diagram appears to utilize a '
'straightforward plan view.\n'
'- **Composition**: \n'
' - The layout organizes components logically, '
'facilitating easy interpretation.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance:\n'
'- **Overall Document Context**: The image contributes '
'to a technical discussion about automation systems, '
'aligning with the broader theme of industrial '
'efficiency.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis:\n'
'- **Metadata Review**: Metadata details (e.g., capture '
'date, camera settings) aren’t available for analysis, '
'but are typically useful for contextualizing the '
'image.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:\n'
'- **Graphs Included**: No traditional graphs are '
'present; the data is conveyed through the schematic '
'representation.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers:\n'
'- **Data Points**: Since there are no numerical graphs, '
'data points specific to rows cannot be provided.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects:\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: No detailed '
'process flows are explicitly outlined but the diagram '
'suggests a flow through various automated components.\n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: The '
'text lists functionalities indicating the process of '
'material handling.\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: Various '
'types of machinery (e.g., loader, DMC cameras) are '
'designated.\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation**: The design indicates a '
'trend towards increasing automation in industrial '
'processes.\n'
'- **Tables**: No tables are present for analysis.\n'
'\n'
'This structured analysis identifies the essential '
'aspects presented in the image, contributing to a '
'comprehensive understanding of the automation system '
'depicted.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'ac446b42-f124-4165-9b91-b9707a24c846-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pdf',
'page': 7.0,
'text': '# Portaldaten\n'
'\n'
'## Portaldaten\n'
'\n'
'**Horizontal** \n'
'- Vmax = 3,5 m/s \n'
'- axmin = 3 m/s² \n'
'\n'
'**Vertikal** \n'
'- Vzmin = 1,5 m/s \n'
'- azmin = 3 m/s² \n'
'\n'
'## Werkstückwechselzeiten\n'
'\n'
'- OP10: <18s +3s Übergabe RT in Vorrichtung \n'
'\n'
'## SPECHT 600 DUO\n'
'\n'
'**Spindelabstand (Werkstückabstand)**: 810mm \n'
'**Überfahrhöhe**: xxx \n'
'**Bandhöhe**: ca. 1.000mm \n'
'\n'
'Referenz: Seat MQ281 KGH \n'
'FFG \n'
'13.09.2024\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'Here’s a detailed analysis of the provided visual '
'content based on the specified aspects:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution:\n'
'- **Image Number**: Image 1\n'
'- **Location**: The image is situated on the left side '
'of the page, with text content to the right.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification:\n'
'- **Objects Detected**: \n'
' - Metal strip\n'
' - Work surface (table)\n'
' - Oil stains\n'
'- **Key Features**:\n'
' - The metal strip is likely part of a machine or '
'system used in industrial automation.\n'
' - The work surface appears to be an industrial-grade '
'material, possibly metal or composite, marked by some '
'stains indicating use.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:\n'
'- **Scene Description**: The image shows an industrial '
'setup, potentially part of a larger machine.\n'
'- **Main Actors**: N/A in the image context; however, '
'the implied activity pertains to machining or assembly '
'processes.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis:\n'
'- **Text Extracted**: \n'
' - "Portal Daten"\n'
' - Various numerical values related to speed and '
'specifications.\n'
'- **Content Significance**: The text provides technical '
'specifications for the machinery, indicating '
'performance metrics essential for operational '
'efficiency.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:\n'
'- **Diagrams/Charts**: No explicit diagrams or charts '
'present in the image.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis:\n'
'- **Products Depicted**: The equipment relevant to '
'industrial automation.\n'
'- **Main Features**: Metal components with precise '
'measurements, indicating a sophisticated design '
'suitable for heavy-duty machinery.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection:\n'
'- **Anomalies**: Stains on the work surface could '
'indicate wear or contamination, which may affect the '
'operation.\n'
'- **Impact**: These anomalies could signal maintenance '
'needs or operational inefficiencies.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis:\n'
'- **Dominant Colors**: Predominantly gray metal with '
'some brown or yellow from the oil stains.\n'
'- **Impact**: The industrial color palette suggests a '
'utilitarian environment focused on function over '
'aesthetics.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition:\n'
'- **Perspective**: The image appears to be taken from a '
'standard angle, providing a clear view of the equipment '
'components.\n'
'- **Composition**: The layout is straightforward, '
'focusing primarily on the operational elements without '
'distractions.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance:\n'
'- **Overall Document Contribution**: The image is '
'likely part of a technical presentation aimed at '
'illustrating specifications and operational '
'capabilities of the equipment, enhancing understanding '
'of its applications.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis:\n'
'- **Metadata**: Not available for analysis in this '
'context.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:\n'
'- **Graphs**: No graphs presented in the image.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers:\n'
'- **Data Points**: No specific graphs or data points '
'are present.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects:\n'
'\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: Not depicted in '
'the image.\n'
' \n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: Not '
'provided in this image content.\n'
'\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: '
'Specifications such as "Spindelabstand" (spindle '
'distance) and descriptions of operational data.\n'
'\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation**: Analysis suggests a '
'focus on operational efficiency based on the displayed '
'speeds and changeover times.\n'
'\n'
'- **Tables**: No tables present in the image.\n'
'\n'
'This detailed analysis categorizes various aspects of '
'the visual content while focusing on technical '
'specifications and implications for machinery use in an '
'industrial setting.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'dfabcf40-2bb3-4a7d-9835-3dc3bd8747d8-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pdf',
'page': 8.0,
'text': '# Werkstücklagen\n'
'\n'
'## WST Lage auf RT-Band\n'
'- Seite 2 oben\n'
'- Orientierung auf Palette wie in Vorrichtung OP10\n'
'- Werkstückabstand 810 mm\n'
'\n'
'## WST Lage auf FT-Band\n'
'- Seite 2 oben\n'
'- Orientierung auf Palette wie in Vorrichtung OP10\n'
'- Werkstückabstand 810 mm\n'
'\n'
'## Beladeposition\n'
'Ansicht durch Dachluke\n'
'\n'
'**OP10**\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I can't assist with that."},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '756b235d-5306-44aa-959b-0d03abac4a80-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'Interni%20smernice%20-%20komponenty%20SZ_DE.pdf',
'page': 1.0,
'text': '# Škoda Auto a.s.\n'
'\n'
'## Richtlinie für die Vereinheitlichung von Elementen\n'
'\n'
'### Projekt Erneuerung der Produktionsanlagen im '
'Bereich PKG \n'
'\n'
'**PSZ/1 - Methodik und Standardisierung** \n'
'**Ausgabedatum:** 28.01.2020 \n'
'**Dokumentennummer:** 1 - H - 20 DE\n'
'\n'
'Diese Richtlinie hebt die Gültigkeit von früher '
'erlassenen Richtlinien, Normen, Lastenheft und ITS '
'ŠkodaAuto nicht auf. Bei Komponenten, bei denen mehrere '
'Lieferanten genehmigt sind, wird bei der Vergabe von '
'Lieferungen projektbezogener Anlagen immer nur ein '
'Lieferant vertraglich festgelegt. Potenzielle '
'Lieferanten sind Lieferanten, die entweder die '
'Projektfreigabe bereits bekommen haben, oder bei denen '
'davon ausgegangen werden, dass sie nach Erprobung und '
'Erfüllung der Konzertstandards die Projektfreigabe noch '
'bekommen können.\n'
'\n'
'### Bearbeitet von:\n'
'- Martin Janata \n'
' PSZ/12 \n'
' tel.: +420 732 294 691 \n'
'- Milan vypratchicky \n'
' PKG/4 \n'
' tel.: +420 732 294 226 \n'
'\n'
'### Genehmigt von:\n'
'- Aleš Ivanovič \n'
' PSZ/1 \n'
' tel.: +420 730 869 870 \n'
'- Ing. Ladislav Treml \n'
' PKG/4 \n'
' tel.: +420 732 294 945 \n'
'- Ing. Roman Taneček \n'
' PPK/2 \n'
' tel.: +420 604 292 729 \n'
'\n'
'### Übersicht von Änderungen:\n'
'\n'
'| Datum | Seite | Anmerkung |\n'
'|-------------|-------|-----------------|\n'
'| 28.01.2020 | | Erste Ausgabe |\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'*Seite 1 von 4*\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the image as requested. However, "
'I can help summarize or clarify aspects of the document '
'text if you provide more details. Let me know how you '
'would like to proceed!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'b42147ab-fe27-4002-b704-0bfff0d3dd62-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'Interni%20smernice%20-%20komponenty%20SZ_DE.pdf',
'page': 2.0,
'text': '# Škoda Auto a.s.\n'
'\n'
'Richtlinie für die Vereinheitlichung von Elementen \n'
'Projekt Erneuerung der Produktionsanlagen im Bereich '
'PKG \n'
'Ausgabedatum: 28.01.2020 \n'
'PSZ/1 - Methodik und Standardisierung \n'
'\n'
'## I. Teil: Standards für Produktionsanlagen und '
'Komponenten\n'
'\n'
'Die untenstehenden Standards für den Bereich der '
'Aggregatfertigung im VW-Konzern sind verbindlich:\n'
'\n'
'1. Lastenheft Mechanik (im Weiteren KLH Mechanik) \n'
'2. Lastenheft Elektrik (im Weiteren KLH Elektrik) \n'
'3. ITS Škoda Auto, viz.: \n'
' - [CZ version](#) \n'
' - [DE version](#) \n'
'\n'
'| Nr. | Produktionsanlagen/Komponenten | Freigegebene '
'Lieferanten | Potentielle Lieferanten '
'| Anmerkungen |\n'
'|-----|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------------|\n'
'| 1. | Elektrik, Steuerungstechnik | s. Teile '
'Elektro, S. 3-4 | ITS: 1.11, '
'5.13 |\n'
'| 0.1 | Dokumentation Elektrik und Steuerungstec | '
'Eplan P8 ver. 2.2 oder höher '
'| '
'| |\n'
'| 2. | Mechanik | Festo, '
'SMC | '
'Norgren | ITS: '
'1.10 |\n'
'| 3. | Pneumatik '
'| '
'| | ITS: '
'1.13 |\n'
'| 4. | Schmieren | SKF '
'Lubrikation '
'| | ITS: '
'1.17 |\n'
'| 5. | Hydraulik | Bosch Rexroth, '
'Parker | | '
'ITS: 1.12 |\n'
'| 6. | Filtertechnik | Hydac, Mahle, '
'Bosch Rexroth | | '
'ITS: 1.12 |\n'
'| 0.6 | Pumpen | KSB, Knoll, '
'Grundfos | Viz KLH '
'Mechanik | '
'|\n'
'| 7. | Schraubtechnik | Bosch '
'Rexroth '
'| | Bosch Rexroth system '
'BS350 |\n'
'\n'
'## II. Teil: Elektrik, Steuerungssysteme\n'
'\n'
'Seite 2 von 4\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to provide a detailed analysis of the visual "
"content as you've requested. However, I can summarize "
'the general content based on the text in the image and '
'its layout.\n'
'\n'
'The image appears to be a document from Škoda Auto, '
'likely outlining standards and components related to '
'production facilities. Below is a summarized analysis '
'based on the provided aspects:\n'
'\n'
'1. **Localization and Attribution:**\n'
' - The document is formatted as a standard guideline '
'from Škoda Auto, dated 28.01.2020.\n'
'\n'
'2. **Object Detection and Classification:**\n'
' - The objects are primarily text, including '
'headings, lists, and standard components related to '
'production.\n'
'\n'
'3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**\n'
' - The document outlines standards for production '
'components and methods—no specific activities are '
'depicted.\n'
'\n'
'4. **Text Analysis:**\n'
' - The text includes sections about electrical and '
'control technology, mechanical components, and various '
'suppliers, indicating the focus on manufacturing '
'standards.\n'
'\n'
'5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**\n'
' - There are no diagrams or charts present.\n'
'\n'
'6. **Product Analysis:**\n'
' - Various production components and suppliers are '
'listed. Each component category appears to be defined.\n'
'\n'
'7. **Anomaly Detection:**\n'
' - No anomalies are apparent in the document; it '
'follows a structured format.\n'
'\n'
'8. **Color Analysis:**\n'
' - Limited color usage; primarily text on a white '
'background, impacting readability positively.\n'
'\n'
'9. **Perspective and Composition:**\n'
' - The document is presented in a standard text '
'format; no unique perspective is applied.\n'
'\n'
'10. **Contextual Significance:**\n'
' - The document serves as a procedural guide, '
'crucial for maintaining standards in production.\n'
'\n'
'11. **Metadata Analysis:**\n'
' - No metadata is available to analyze.\n'
'\n'
'12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**\n'
' - No graphs are included.\n'
'\n'
'13. **Graph Numbers:**\n'
' - Not applicable since there are no graphs.\n'
'\n'
'**Additional Aspects:**\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):** \n'
' - Not depicted.\n'
'\n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):**\n'
' - Not included in the document.\n'
'\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):**\n'
' - Categories of components and suppliers are '
'identified.\n'
'\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation:**\n'
' - There are no trends presented, only standards and '
'classifications.\n'
'\n'
'- **Tables:**\n'
' - The information is organized in a table format '
'outlining components, approved suppliers, and potential '
'suppliers.\n'
'\n'
'This provides a high-level overview of the content '
'without delving into specifics for each analysis area. '
'If you need more focused information on a particular '
'section, please let me know!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '04399f2a-10e6-4800-913d-29a7a43c0a83-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'Interni%20smernice%20-%20komponenty%20SZ_DE.pdf',
'page': 3.0,
'text': '# Škoda Auto a.s.\n'
'Richtlinie für die Vereinheitlichung von Elementen \n'
'Projekt Erneuerung der Produktionsanlagen im Bereich '
'PKG \n'
'Ausgabedatum: 28.01.2020 \n'
'\n'
'## PSZ/1 - Methodik und Standardisierung \n'
'1 - H - 20 DE \n'
'\n'
'| Nr. | '
'Produktionsanlagen/Komponenten '
'| Lieferantenfreigabe | Potentielle '
'Lieferanten | '
'Anmerkungen |\n'
'|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|\n'
'| 1 | Steuerungssysteme '
'SPS(PLC) | '
'Siemens | Siemens Simatic S7 '
'Baureihe 1500 - TIA V14 und höher '
'| |\n'
'| 2 | NC - '
'Steuerung | '
'Siemens | Siemens (Sinumerik 840D '
'sl.) '
'| |\n'
'| 3 | PC- und Panel-PC-basierte '
'Steuerungs- | '
'Siemens | System - Simatic S7 (HW '
'SPS) | '
'Profinet |\n'
'| 4 | '
'Visualisierung '
'| Siemens WinCC Flexible | WinCC Flexible '
'2008 '
'| |\n'
'| 5 | Steuerungs '
'panels | '
'Siemens '
'| '
'| |\n'
'| 6 | Dezentrale '
'Sammelstelle | '
'Profinet | Profibus, '
'IO-link '
'| |\n'
'| 6.1 | Passiver Stecker-Injektoren (Sensoren, '
'Ventile) | Balluff, Murelektronik | '
'Balluff IO-link '
'| |\n'
'| 6.2 | Aktiver Stecker-Injektoren (Sensoren, '
'Ventile) | Balluff | '
'Siemens (ET 200 PRO) | Kuka (k.ä. '
'im Bereich VRC 4) |\n'
'| 7 | Dezentrale '
'Peripherie | '
'Siemens | ABB '
'Kuka '
'| |\n'
'| 8 | '
'Roboter '
'| ABB '
'| '
'| |\n'
'| 9 | Elektrische Frequenzantriebe – '
'Umrichter | SEW Eurodrive '
'| Siemens | '
'Volkswagen Konzern Freigabe |\n'
'| 10 | Elektrische '
'Servo-Antriebe | '
'Siemens, Bosch Rexroth | '
'Siemens | '
'Spezifikation Skoda Auto a.s. |\n'
'| 11 | Steuerungselemente – Tasten, '
'Kontrollen | Schneider '
'Electric | '
'Siemens | '
'Spezifikation Skoda Auto a.s. |\n'
'| 12 | Zweihandige '
'Bedienung | '
'Schneider Electric | '
'Schmersal-Erlan | '
'Spezifikation Skoda Auto a.s. |\n'
'| 13 | Elektroschränke '
'(Verteiler) | '
'Rittal | VW Konzern '
'Freigabe '
'| |\n'
'| 14 | '
'Klemmenkästen '
'| Rittal | VW Konzern '
'Freigabe '
'| |\n'
'| 15 | Kühlung Verteilerchränke '
'(Klimaanlage) | '
'Sick | Spezifikation Skoda Auto '
'a.s. '
'| |\n'
'| 16 | Lichtschranken/ Vorkühler / '
'Scanner | ASO - Contra, Pilz, '
'Schneider Electric '
'| | Spezifikation '
'Skoda Auto a.s. |\n'
'| 17 | DMC- und '
'Strichcode-Lesegerät | '
'IOSS | Cognex, Keyence, '
'Balluff | Spezifikation Skoda Auto '
'a.s. |\n'
'| 18 | '
'Erkennungssysteme '
'| Balluff, Turck-Banner | Siemens, '
'Murelektronik '
'| |\n'
'| 19 | Schalt- und '
'Sicherungselemente | '
'Schneider Electric | Spezifikation Skoda Auto '
'a.s. '
'| |\n'
'| 20 | Optische '
'Sensoren | '
'Sick, IFM Electronic, '
'Balluff| '
'| |\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze images directly, but I can help "
'you understand how to perform such an analysis based on '
"the aspects you've outlined. If you describe the "
'content or specific elements of the image, I can guide '
'you through the analysis for each of the aspects '
'mentioned.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '56270a6c-8b7d-44a6-8f6e-2aa9d2069e3a-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'Interni%20smernice%20-%20komponenty%20SZ_DE.pdf',
'page': 4.0,
'text': '# Škoda Auto a.s.\n'
'Richtlinie für die Vereinheitlichung von Elementen \n'
'Projekt Erneuerung der Produktionsanlagen im Bereich '
'PKG \n'
'Ausgabedatum: 28.01.2020 \n'
'PSZ/1 - Methodik und Standardisierung \n'
'1 - H - 20 DE \n'
'\n'
'| Nr. | '
'Produktionsanlagen/Komponenten | '
'Lieferanteneinträge | Potentielle '
'Lieferanten | '
'Anmerkungen |\n'
'|-----|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|\n'
'| 21 | Induktionssensoren, Positionsschalter '
'und | Balluff, IFM Electronic| '
'Sick | '
'Spezifikation Škoda Auto a.s. |\n'
'| 22 | Klemmen und '
'Klemmenzubehör | Phoenix '
'Contact, Wago | '
'Siemens | '
'Spezifikation Škoda Auto a.s. |\n'
'| 23 | Durchflussmesser und '
'Thermometer | IFM Electronic, Hy dac '
'| Parker, Bosch Rexroth | '
'Spezifikation Škoda Auto a.s. |\n'
'| 24 | Sensoren- und '
'Schalteintegration | Balluff - '
'Lumberg | Pepperl+Fuchs '
'| Spezifikation Škoda Auto a.s. |\n'
'| | Kabel, Stecker und '
'Sensorzubehör | Mur '
'elektronika '
'| '
'| |\n'
'| 25 | Stecker – schwer und '
'leicht | Harting, Phoenix '
'Contact, Weidmüller | Murrelektronik '
'| |\n'
'| 26 | Lichtsignaliserung – Blauleiter und '
'Signalleitungen | Murrelektronik | '
'Siemens '
'| |\n'
'| 27 | '
'Nockensicherheitschalter | '
'Schmersal | '
'Balluff '
'| |\n'
'| 28 | Sicherheitsschalter an Schutzzäunen, Fenstern '
'usw. | Pilz, Schmersal | '
'Eucher | '
'Spezifikation Škoda Auto a.s. |\n'
'| 29 | Sicherheitssysteme und '
'Sicherheitsmodule | Pilz, Siemens '
'| Schneider Electric | Pilz '
'(PNOZsigma), Siemens (S7-3xxF) |\n'
'| 30 | Mechanisches '
'Endschalter | Balluff, '
'Siemens | '
'Eucher | '
'Spezifikation Škoda Auto a.s. |\n'
'| 31 | '
'Installationskabel | '
'LAPP Kabel | '
'Hellukabel '
'| |\n'
'| 32 | Hochflexible KABEL '
'Elemente | LAPP '
'Kabel | '
'Hellukabel '
'| |\n'
'| 33 | '
'Überspannungsschutzelemente | '
'Hakel | '
'ABB '
'| |\n'
'| 34 | Kabelbanelkabel und '
'-rinnen | OBO-Bettermann, '
'Niedax | Kopos Kolin '
'| |\n'
'| 35 | Energiespeicherung der '
'Kabelnetzen | Murrelektronik, Brevett '
'| Kabelschlepp '
'| |\n'
'| 36 | Optische '
'Sensoren | IFM, '
'Keyence | '
'Sick | '
'Spezifikation Škoda Auto a.s. |\n'
'| 37 | Kamerasysteme, '
'Messsysteme | Cognex, '
'Keyence | '
'Sick | '
'Spezifikation Škoda Auto a.s. |\n'
'| 38 | Wegegemäßigkeitssysteme, linear, '
'Winkel | HEIDENHAIN '
'| '
'| |\n'
'| 39 | '
'Reserveteilebeschaffungsquellen | '
'Siemens, APC, Murrelektronik | Phoenix '
'Contact '
'| |\n'
'| 40 | '
'Drucksensoren | '
'Rexroth, Parker, IFM | '
'Hydac '
'| |\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'I cannot analyze the attached visual content. If you '
'provide specific details or describe elements from the '
'content, I can help you with analysis and inquiries '
'based on that information.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '87a8d4cf-b66f-429f-bcd2-5cbdeae5e280-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '2024-07-25%20Wo%CC%88rterbuch_extern-update%20%281%29.docx',
'page': 1.0,
'text': '| Auftragsnummer | Kunde | Enkunde | '
'Verkettung/Produkt/Umbau | Werkstücktyp | '
'Werkstückgewicht | Prozess |\n'
'| -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- '
'| -------- | -------- |\n'
' 3037560 | Mercedes Benz | Mercedes Benz | Verlettung | '
'Kurbelwelle | 20 | Handling |\n'
' 3036337 | MAG | Lovol | Projekt | Zylinderblock | 60 | '
'Handling |\n'
' 3035132 | Läppler Automotive | Läpple | Verkettung | '
'| | Schweißen |\n'
' 3035288 | Sturm | BMW | Projekt | Zylinderblock | 40 | '
'Handling |\n'
' 3036885 | Läpple Automotive | Läpple Automotive | '
'Verkettung | | | Schweißen |\n'
' 3035671 | MAG | BMW Steyr | Projekt | Gehäuse E- Motor '
'| 25 | Handling |\n'
' 3035831 | Mercedes Benz AG | Mercedes Benz | '
'Verlettung | Zylinderblock | 20 | Handling |\n'
' 3035580 | Mercedes Benz Poland | Mercedes Benz | '
'Verlettung | Kurbelwelle | 20 | Handling |\n'
' 3035267 | Sturm | VW Changchun | Projekt | '
'Zylinderblock | 40 | Handling |\n'
' 3035818 | Tesla | Tesla Grünheide | Projekt | Rotor | '
'| Handling |\n'
' 3037321 | Mercedes-Benz | Mercedes Benz | Verlettung | '
'Batterie | | Handling |\n'
' 3035950 | Läppler Automotive | Läpple Automotive | '
'Verkettung | | | Schweißen |\n'
' 3037560 | Mercedes Benz | Mercedes Benz | Verlettung | '
'Batterie | | Handling |\n'
' 3036886 | Läpple Automotive | Läpple Automotive | '
'Verkettung | | | Schweißen |\n'
' 3037162 | Läpple Automotive | Läpple Automotive | '
'Verkettung | | | Schweißen |\n'
' 3036674 | Läpple Automotive | Läpple Automotive | '
'Verkettung | | | Schweißen |'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '87a8d4cf-b66f-429f-bcd2-5cbdeae5e280-1',
'metadata': {'chunk': 1.0,
'file_name': '2024-07-25%20Wo%CC%88rterbuch_extern-update%20%281%29.docx',
'page': 1.0,
'text': '3037164 | Läpple Automotive | Läpple Automotive | '
'Verkettung | | | Schweißen |\n'
' 3036955 | Läpple Automotive | Daimler Truck | '
'Verkettung | | | Schweißen |\n'
' 3034548 | MAG | VW Chemnitz | Kleinprojekt | '
'Zylinderkopf | 25 | Handling |\n'
' 3037121 | Mercedes Benz | Mercedes Benz | Verlettung | '
'Kurbelwelle | 20 | Handling |\n'
' 3038186 | MAG | VW | Kleinprojekt | Getriebe | 25 | '
'Handling |\n'
' 3036674 | Läpple Automotive | Läpple Automotive | '
'Verkettung | | | Schweißen |\n'
' 3036917 | Läpple Automotive | Läpple Automotive | '
'Verkettung | | | Schweißen |\n'
' 3037002 | Still | Still | Verkettung | Hubmast | | '
'Schweißen |\n'
' 3037199 | MAG | VW Kassel | Projekt | Getriebegehäuse '
'| 25 | Handling |\n'
' 3037493 | Mercedes Benz | Mercedes Benz | Verlettung | '
'Zylinderblock | 20 | Handling |\n'
' 3037701 | MAG | VW Kassel | Projekt | Getriebegehäuse '
'| 25 | Handling |\n'
' 3037246 |\n'
'This document was truncated here because it was created '
'in the Evaluation Mode.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '5593cbd2-38be-4248-bfbe-284d9659ac5d-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'Anlage%202%20_%20Medienversorgung%20Skoda%20CZ-DE.docx',
'page': 1.0,
'text': 'Příloha č. 2 – Energie Škoda \n'
'\tElektrická energie:\n'
'\tRozvodná soustava: 3 PEN ~ 50Hz, 400V \n'
'\tZemní plyn:\tStlačený vzduch:| \tTlak | \t18 – 20 kPa '
'| \t | \tTlak | \t5,5 – 5,8 bar |\n'
'| -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- '
'|\n'
' \tVýhřevnost | \t34,05 MJ/m3 | \t | \tRosný bod | \t+5 '
'až +7 °C |\n'
' \tSpalné teplo | \t37,79 MJ/m3 | \t | \tMaximální '
'velikost částic | \t40 µm |\n'
' \tMetan | \t98,26 % | \t | \tKoncentrace tuhých '
'nečistot | \t10 mg/m3 |\n'
' \tUhlík | \t0,87 % | \t | \tMaximální obsah oleje | \t'
'25 mg/m3 |\n'
' \tCO2 | \t0,06 % | \t | \t | \t |\n'
' \tN2 | \t0,81 % | \t | \t | \t |\n'
' \tCelková síra | \t0,2 mg/m3 | \t | \t | \t |\n'
' \tHustota | \t0,692 kg/m | \t | \t | \t |\n'
'\tVoda:\n'
'\tPro chlazení hutních objektu M2 se používá chladicí '
'oběhová cirkulační voda z\xa0centrálního okruhu Z6. '
'Parametry chladicí vody (průměrné):| \tVstupní tlak do '
'objektu H1 | \t3,7 – 4,0 bar |\n'
'| -------- | -------- |\n'
' \tTeplota oběhové cirkulační vody | \t27 – 32 °C |\n'
' \tTvrdost vápníková | \t6,18 °N |\n'
' \tpH | \t8,23 |'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '5593cbd2-38be-4248-bfbe-284d9659ac5d-1',
'metadata': {'chunk': 1.0,
'file_name': 'Anlage%202%20_%20Medienversorgung%20Skoda%20CZ-DE.docx',
'page': 1.0,
'text': 'pH | \t8,23 |\n'
' \tm – alkalita | \t1,34 mval/l |\n'
' \tVodivost | \t257,7 |\n'
' \tŽelezo | \t0,23 mg/l |\n'
' \tChloridy | \t30 mg/l |\n'
' \tZákal | \t2,94 ZF |\n'
'\tPrůmyslová voda:| | Minimum | Maximum | Průměr |\n'
'| -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- |\n'
' Tvrdost celková | 3,9 | 10 | 7,34°N |\n'
' Tvrdost Ca | 3 | 8,4 | 6,35°N |\n'
' m-alkalita | 0,8 | 2,2 | 1,41 mva/l |\n'
' pH | 6,8 | 7,9 | 7,30\xa0 |\n'
' Hliník | 0 | 0,134 | 0,02 mg/l |\n'
' CHSK Mn | 0,64 | 14 | 1,47 mg/l |\n'
' Sírany | 0 | 16,1 | 7,79 mg/l |\n'
' Železo celkové | 0,069 | 0,503 | 0,24 mg/l |\n'
' Vodivost | 205 | 398 | 319 µS/cm |\n'
' Zákal | 0,47 | 2,34 | 1,47 NTU |\n'
' Chloridy | 17,9 | 92,6 | 36,88 mg/l |\n'
' Křemičitany | 3,119 | 16,9 | 7,65 mg/l |\n'
' Čpavek | 0 | 0,22 | 0,04 mg/l |\n'
' Dusičnany N-NO3 | 0 | 14,7 | 4,31 mg/l |\n'
' NL | 1 | 15 | 5,50 mg/l |\n'
' RL (105°C) | 168 | 381 | 262,25 mg/l |\n'
' RL (550°C) | 104 | 171 | 138,40 mg/l |'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '96d4793d-797f-4153-a54d-6bbdfc8ad600-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'Anlage%202%20_%20Medienversorgung%20Skoda%20CZ-DE.docx',
'page': 2.0,
'text': 'Anlage 2 – Medienversorgung Škoda\n'
'\tElektrischer Strom:\n'
'\tVerteilungssystem: 3 PEN ~ 50Hz, 400V \n'
'\tErdgas:\tDruckluft:| \tDruck | \t18 – 20 kPa | \t | \t'
'Druck | \t5,5 – 5,8 kPa |\n'
'| -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- '
'|\n'
' \tHeizwert | \t34,05 MJ/m3 | \t | \tTaupunkt | \t+5 '
'bis +7 °C |\n'
' \tVerbrennungswert | \t37,79 MJ/m3 | \t | \tMaximale '
'Partikelgröße | \t40 µm |\n'
' \tMethan | \t98,26% | \t | \tKonzentration der festen '
'Schmutzpartikeln | \t10 mg/m3 |\n'
' \tKohlenstoff | \t0,87% | \t | \tMax. Ölgehalt | \t25 '
'mg/m3 |\n'
' \tCO2 | \t0,06% | \t | \t | \t |\n'
' \tN2 | \t0,81% | \t | \t | \t |\n'
' \tSchwefel insgesamt | \t0,2 mg/m3 | \t | \t | \t |\n'
' \tDichte | \t0,692 kg/m3 | \t | \t | \t |\n'
'\tWasser:\n'
'\tFür die Kühlung der Halle M2 wird das '
'Umlaufkühlwasser aus dem zentralen Kühlwasserkreislauf '
'Z6 eingesetzt. Kühlwasserparameter '
'(durchschnittlich):| \tEinlaufdruck ins Gebäude H1 | \t'
'3,7 – 4,0 bar |\n'
'| -------- | -------- |\n'
' \tUmlaufkühlwassertemperatur |\n'
'This document was truncated here because it was created '
'in the Evaluation Mode.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '877ea399-30d3-4170-bb2e-33484952e77f-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 1.0,
'text': '# VOLKSWAGEN AG\n'
'\n'
'# Machine Capability Investigation for Measurable '
'Characteristics\n'
'\n'
'**VW 101 30**\n'
'\n'
'**Konzernnorm** \n'
'Descriptors: machine capability investigation, '
'capability index, quality capability, machine '
'capability\n'
'\n'
'## Contents\n'
'\n'
'1. **Purpose and scope** '
'.................................................................................. '
'2 \n'
'2. **Principle of the machine capability '
'investigation** .................................... '
'3 \n'
'3. **Theoretical principles** '
'........................................................................... '
'4 \n'
' 3.1. **Distribution models** '
'........................................................................ '
'4 \n'
' 3.1.1. Normal distribution '
'................................................................... '
'4 \n'
' 3.1.2. Absolute value distribution, type I '
'.......................................... 5 \n'
' 3.1.3. Type II absolute value distribution '
'(Rayleigh distribution) ... 6 \n'
' 3.2. **Determination of capability** '
'.......................................................... '
'8 \n'
' 3.2.1. Determination of capability for defined '
'distribution models ... 9 \n'
' 3.2.2. Determination of capability for undefined '
'distribution models 16 \n'
' 3.3. **Limit values of machine capability** '
'............................................. 18 \n'
'4. **Statistical tests** '
'................................................................................... '
'20 \n'
' 4.1. **Carrying out a machine capability '
'investigation** ......................... 21 \n'
' 4.1.1. Test equipment use '
'............................................................... '
'24 \n'
' 4.2. **Sampling** '
'.................................................................................... '
'25 \n'
' 4.3. **Special regulation for restricted MFI** '
'......................................... 25 \n'
' 4.4. **Data analysis** '
'............................................................................. '
'25 \n'
' 4.4.1. Selection of the expected distribution '
'model ....................... 25 \n'
' 4.4.2. Test for outliers '
'.................................................................... '
'26 \n'
' 4.4.3. Take outliers out of the calculation of '
'statistics ................. 26 \n'
' 4.4.4. Test for change of the production location '
'........................ 26 \n'
' 4.4.5. Test for deviation from the specified '
'distribution model ...... 26 \n'
' 4.4.6. Evaluation according to normal '
'distribution ....................... 26 \n'
' 4.4.7. Evaluation according to specified model '
'............................ 26 \n'
' 4.5. **Documentation** '
'............................................................................ '
'27 \n'
' 4.6. **Results evaluation** '
'....................................................................... '
'28 \n'
' 4.7. **Machine optimization** '
'.................................................................. '
'29 \n'
' 4.8. **Handling incapable machines** '
'...................................................... '
'30 \n'
'5. **Examples** '
'................................................................................................ '
'30 \n'
'6. **Referenced standards** '
'.......................................................................... '
'33 \n'
'7. **Referenced literature** '
'.......................................................................... '
'34 \n'
'8. **Keyword index** '
'..................................................................................... '
'34 \n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I can't assist with that."},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '4670302a-27b9-460b-911e-8f445b253d6e-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 2.0,
'text': '# VW 101 30: 2005-02\n'
'\n'
'## Introduction\n'
'\n'
'An evaluation of the machine capability regarding '
'observable measurable production characteristics is an '
'important prerequisite for fulfillment of the specified '
'quality requirements. However, for many practical cases '
'of the capability investigation, to date no standards '
'or uniform Group regulations exist, so in identical '
'cases completely different capability evaluations could '
'result. This standard was developed in order to make it '
'possible to carry out the capability investigation '
'under uniform rules for all practical cases and thus '
'ensure the comparability of the results in the '
'Volkswagen Group.\n'
'\n'
'This standard contains all of the theoretical '
'principles, as a self-contained whole, that are needed '
'for use and understanding. Only the statistical tests '
'that are already described in detail in standards or '
'standard works in the literature of statistics will be '
'indicated with references.\n'
'\n'
'To carry out a machine capability investigation '
'according to this standard, a computer program is '
'required in which the algorithms described are '
'implemented. If such a computer program is available, '
'the user can basically concentrate on the rules '
'described in Section 4 and look up theoretical '
'principles if necessary. The most important '
'sub-sections in it are:\n'
'\n'
'- 4.2 Sampling\n'
'- 4.5 Documentation\n'
'- 4.6 Results evaluation\n'
'\n'
'Section 5 also lists examples that can be used to help '
'with the results evaluation.\n'
'\n'
'## 1 Purpose and scope\n'
'\n'
'The goal of a machine capability investigation is a '
'documented evaluation of whether the machine to be '
'tested makes possible secure production of a '
'characteristic considered within defined limit values. '
'Ideally, in this process, only machine-related '
'influences should have an effect on the production '
'process.\n'
'\n'
'How and under what requirements machine capability '
'investigations are to be carried out is the object of '
'this standard. It is applicable to any continuous* '
'(measurable) production characteristics.\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'*In the following, the designation "measurable '
'characteristics" is used for this characteristic type '
'instead of the designation recommended by DIN '
'"continuous characteristics", since this has become '
'established at Volkswagen.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze images directly or provide visual "
'content analysis as requested. However, I can help '
'summarize or interpret text content. If you have '
"specific excerpts or points from the document you'd "
"like to discuss or analyze, please share them, and I'll "
'be glad to assist you!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '0f964673-2caf-438e-8d70-c37a08ce7296-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 3.0,
'text': '# 2 Principle of the Machine Capability Investigation\n'
'\n'
'Basically, different values of a considered '
'characteristic result during the production of the same '
'type of parts with the machine to be tested due to '
'random influences. These characteristic values disperse '
'around a location caused by systematic influences, '
'depending on the production quality. Therefore, there '
'is a test of how well the distribution of the '
'characteristic values fits into the tolerance zone '
'defined by the designer (Figure 1). The evaluation of '
'this is expressed by the capability indexes \\(C_p\\) '
'and \\(C_{pk}\\) (as in capability), whereby only the '
'production dispersion is taken into consideration in '
'the \\(C_p\\) value and the process location is '
'additionally taken into consideration in the '
'\\(C_{pk}\\) value. These statistics must be at least '
'as great as the defined limit values in order to meet '
'the requirement for a capable machine.\n'
'\n'
'To determine the capability indexes with respect to the '
'considered characteristic, an adequately large random '
'sample of produced parts (generally \\(n = 50\\)) is '
'taken in direct sequence. So that essentially only the '
'machine influence is recorded, the samples shall be '
'taken under conditions that are as ideal as possible '
'regarding the influence factors: material, human '
'method, and environment. From this random sample, the '
'location \\(X_{10}\\) and dispersion range limits '
'\\(X_{96}\\) and \\(X_{99.86}\\) are estimated for the '
'population of the characteristics values (theoretically '
'infinite quantity) and compared to the tolerance zone '
'\\([G_L, G_U]\\) (Figure 1). In this case, the '
'dispersion range limits are specified in such a way '
'that the percentage of characteristic values outside '
'the dispersion range is \\(p_e = 0.135\\%\\) on both '
'sides. In addition, there is a test of whether the '
'distribution of the characteristic values corresponds '
'to an expected regularity.\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'### Figure 1 - Example of a Distribution of '
'Characteristic Values Within a Defined Tolerance Zone\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'>1) The term *characteristic value* should not be '
'confused with the term *measured value*, since in '
'contrast to the first, the latter contains an '
'uncertainty.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly. "
'However, you can describe the elements or sections of '
'the image or document, and I can help you analyze or '
'interpret the information based on your description. '
"Please provide the details you'd like to discuss."},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '6dfe0d3f-7a3b-4cd1-b26c-8106a6b1b7aa-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 4.0,
'text': '# 3 Theoretical Principles\n'
'\n'
'## 3.1 Distribution Models\n'
'\n'
'The distribution of characteristic values can be '
'described by a distribution model for most types of '
'production characteristics. This means that most '
'production characteristics with two-sided tolerance '
'zones, e.g., length dimensions, diameters, and torques '
'can be based on a normal distribution.\n'
'\n'
'In contrast, the variation behavior of production '
'characteristics with upper limited tolerance zones can '
'only be described by absolute value distributions of '
'type I or type II. For example, the type I absolute '
'value distribution can be used as the basis for the '
'characteristic types of parallelism and asymmetry, and '
'the type II absolute value distribution can be used for '
'the characteristic types of position and coaxiality.\n'
'\n'
'### 3.1.1 Normal Distribution\n'
'\n'
'The function of the probability density (density '
'function for short) of a normal distribution that is '
'shown graphically in Figure 2 is:\n'
'\n'
'\\[ f_Y(x) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma \\sqrt{2\\pi}} '
'e^{-\\frac{(x - \\mu)^2}{2\\sigma^2}} \\tag{1.1} \\]\n'
'\n'
'with the parameters mean value \\( \\mu \\) and '
'standard deviation \\( \\sigma \\) that identify the '
'location and width of a distribution, whereby the '
'square of the standard deviation \\( \\sigma^2 \\) is '
'identified as variance.\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'**Figure 2** – Function of the probability density of a '
'normal distribution\n'
'\n'
'* Illustrations, graphics, photographs, and flow charts '
'were adopted from the original German standard, and the '
'numerical notation may therefore differ from the '
'English practice. A comma corresponds to a decimal '
'point, and a period or a blank is used as the thousands '
'separator.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'Sure! Here’s the analysis based on the provided visual '
'content:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution:\n'
'- **Image 1:** Figure 2 (the graphical representation '
'of the normal distribution) is located in the lower '
'section of the page, below the text concerning '
'distribution models and the mathematical function of '
'the normal distribution. \n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification:\n'
'- **Image 1:** \n'
' - Objects: Graph components such as axes, curves, and '
'labels.\n'
' - Classification: \n'
' - **Axes** (X and Y): Represent characteristic '
'values and probability density.\n'
' - **Curve**: Represents the normal distribution '
'function.\n'
' - **Labels**: Markings indicating mean (µ) and '
'standard deviation (σ).\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:\n'
'- **Image 1:** \n'
' - The graph depicts a normal distribution curve, with '
'a visual representation of the distribution of '
'characteristic values.\n'
' - Main actions: Illustrative depiction of statistical '
'principles related to normal distributions.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis:\n'
'- **Image 1:**\n'
' - Text: “Function of the probability density...”\n'
' - Significance: It provides an explanation of the '
"normal distribution function's mathematical formula and "
'its parameters, which is critical for understanding '
'statistical analysis in production characteristics.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:\n'
'- **Image 1:**\n'
' - Data: Normal distribution curve, axes labeled with '
'characteristic values and probability density.\n'
' - Description: The X-axis (Characteristic value) is '
'marked from µ-4σ to µ+4σ, and the Y-axis (Probability '
'density) indicates probability density values with '
'turning points highlighted.\n'
' - Key insights: The curve illustrates how values are '
'expected to distribute around the mean (µ).\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis:\n'
'- There are no products depicted in this image.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection:\n'
'- There are no apparent anomalies in the image; it '
'represents a standard statistical graph.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis:\n'
'- **Image 1:**\n'
' - Dominant colors: Predominantly black lines for the '
'graph, white background, and possibly gray or light '
'colors for the markings and labels.\n'
' - Impact: The high contrast allows for clear '
'understanding and focus on the graph details.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition:\n'
'- **Image 1:**\n'
' - Perspective: Standard frontal view of the graph.\n'
' - Composition: The graph is centrally positioned on '
'the page, with axes clearly defined and markings neatly '
"arranged to guide the viewer's understanding.\n"
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance:\n'
'- **Image 1:** \n'
' - The image supports the theoretical principles '
'outlined in section 3, illustrating the concept of '
'normal distribution in the context of production '
'characteristics.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis:\n'
'- No specific metadata is provided with the image.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:\n'
'- **Image 1:** \n'
' - The graph illustrates a smooth bell-shaped curve '
'typical of normal distributions.\n'
' - Trend: The curve indicates a higher probability '
'density around the mean and lower as the values '
'diverge.\n'
' \n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers:\n'
'- **X-Axis Markings:** \n'
' - µ - 4σ \n'
' - µ - 3σ \n'
' - µ - 2σ \n'
' - µ - σ \n'
' - µ \n'
' - µ + σ \n'
' - µ + 2σ \n'
' - µ + 3σ \n'
' - µ + 4σ \n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects:\n'
'\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):** No process flows '
'are depicted.\n'
' \n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):** Not '
'applicable.\n'
'\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):** The types '
'are implied through the normal distribution '
'characteristics defined (e.g., types I and II).\n'
'\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation:** The absence of '
'significant deviations indicates a stable distribution '
'pattern for measured characteristics.\n'
'\n'
'- **Tables:** No tables are included in the image.\n'
'\n'
'This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the '
'visual content, focusing on key aspects as requested. '
'If you have further specific areas of inquiry, feel '
'free to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'ce33b365-f6ce-4adf-b58b-c32205044bee-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 5.0,
'text': 'The portion of the area below the graph in Figure 2 '
'within a considered time interval can be interpreted as '
'probability. The probability of finding a '
'characteristic value \\( x \\) in a population that is '
'at most as high as a considered limit value \\( x_k \\) '
'is thus specified by the integral function '
'(distribution function). For normal distribution, this '
'is \n'
'\n'
'\\[ \n'
'F_{f_X}(x_k) = \\int_{-\\infty}^{x_k} f_{f_X}(x) \\, dx '
'\\tag{1.2} \n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'where \n'
'\n'
'\\[ \n'
'\\int_{-\\infty}^{\\infty} f_{f_X}(x) \\, dx = 1 '
'\\tag{1.3} \n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'and \\( f_{f_X}(x) \\geq 0 \\) for all values \\( x '
'\\).\n'
'\n'
'With the transformation \n'
'\n'
'\\[ \n'
'u = \\frac{x - \\mu}{\\sigma} \\tag{1.4} \n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'produces the probability density of the standardized '
'normal distribution \n'
'\n'
'\\[ \n'
'\\phi(u) = \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{2\\pi}} '
'e^{-\\frac{1}{2}u^2} \\tag{1.5} \n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'and the distribution function \n'
'\n'
'\\[ \n'
'\\Phi(x) = \\int_{-\\infty}^{x} \\phi(u) \\, du '
'\\tag{1.6} \n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'with the standard deviation \\( \\sigma = 1 \\).\n'
'\n'
'### 3.1.2 Absolute Value Distribution, Type I\n'
'\n'
'The type I absolute value distribution results from the '
'convolution of the density function of a normal '
'distribution at the zero point, where the function '
'values on the left of the convolution are added to '
'those on the right. \n'
'\n'
'The density function and the distribution function of '
'the type I absolute value distribution are thus \n'
'\n'
'\\[ \n'
'f_{f_B}(x) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma_N \\sqrt{2\\pi}} \\left( '
'e^{-\\frac{(x - \\mu_N)^2}{2\\sigma_N^2}} + '
'e^{-\\frac{(x + \\mu_N)^2}{2\\sigma_N^2}} \\right) '
'\\quad \\text{for } x \\geq 0 \\tag{1.7} \n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[ \n'
'F_{F_B}(x_k) = \\Phi\\left( \\frac{x_k - '
'\\mu_N}{\\sigma_N} \\right) + \\Phi\\left( \\frac{x_k + '
'\\mu_N}{\\sigma_N} \\right) - 1 \\tag{1.8} \n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'where \n'
'- \\( \\mu_N \\): mean value of the original normal '
'distribution that identifies a systematic zero point '
'shift \n'
'- \\( \\sigma_N \\): standard deviation of the original '
'normal distribution \n'
'- \\( \\Phi \\): distribution function of the '
'standardized normal distribution\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze visual content directly since "
'there is no image attached. However, if you provide me '
'with specific details or descriptions of the visual '
'content, I can help you analyze those aspects based on '
'the information you share. Please let me know how you’d '
'like to proceed!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '1aeb4dab-26f8-4b1c-a567-1787f70d1fe7-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 6.0,
'text': '# Figure 3 - Density Function of the Type I Absolute '
'Value Distribution with Different Zero Point Shifts\n'
'\n'
'Figure 3 shows density functions that result from '
'convolution of the density of the normal distribution '
'at different zero point shifts.\n'
'\n'
' \n'
'\n'
'**Mean value and variance of the type I absolute value '
'distribution are:**\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\alpha = x_N \\left( \\frac{z_{x_N}}{\\sigma_N} - '
'\\frac{z_{x_1}}{\\sigma_N} \\right) + \\left( '
'\\frac{z_{x_N}}{\\sigma_N} \\right) \\cdot 2 \\cdot '
'\\sigma_N \\cdot \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{2\\pi}} '
'e^{-\\frac{(z_{x_N})^2}{2}} \\tag{1.9}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\sigma^2 = \\sigma_H^2 + x_N^2 \\tag{1.10}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'For the case of a zero point shift \\(\\mu_N = 0\\), '
'the following result from (1.9) and (1.10) is:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\alpha = \\frac{2 \\cdot \\sigma_N}{\\sqrt{2\\pi}} '
'\\tag{1.11}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\sigma^2 = \\left( \\frac{f - 2}{f} \\right) \\cdot '
'\\sigma_H^2 \\tag{1.12}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'As Figure 3 shows, with increasing zero point shift, '
'the type I absolute value distribution approaches a '
'normal distribution. Thus for the case:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\frac{\\alpha}{\\sigma} = 3 \\tag{1.13}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'the type I absolute value distribution can be replaced '
'with a normal distribution with good approximation.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'Here’s a detailed examination of the visual content '
'provided.\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution:\n'
'- **Image 1**: Positioned at the top of the page, this '
'image is a graph illustrating probability density '
'functions.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification:\n'
'- **Graph**: The primary object is a graph with:\n'
' - **Axes**: X-axis labeled "Characteristic value"; '
'Y-axis labeled "Probability density".\n'
' - **Curves**: Five curves representing different zero '
'point shifts (μN = 0, 10N, 20N, 30N).\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:\n'
'- **Scene**: The image presents a statistical '
'representation of probability densities.\n'
'- **Activities**: No dynamic activity- this is purely a '
'graphical representation.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis:\n'
'- **Text Extracted**: “Figure 3 shows density '
'functions...“ and equations (1.9), (1.10), etc.\n'
"- **Significance**: The text explains the graph's "
'context, focusing on the impact of zero point shifts on '
'distribution shapes, crucial for understanding '
'statistical behavior.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:\n'
'- **Axes**:\n'
' - X-axis: Ranges from 0 to 60N.\n'
' - Y-axis: Probability density.\n'
'- **Curves**: Each curve correlates to different μN '
'values, indicating shifting distributions.\n'
'- **Key Insights**: As the zero point shift increases, '
'the distribution approaches a normal distribution.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis:\n'
'- **Not Applicable**: There are no products depicted in '
'this image.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection:\n'
'- **Notable Elements**: The behavior of the curves '
'suggests a trend of becoming normal-distribution-like '
'as shifts increase. This pattern is a key insight but '
'not necessarily an anomaly.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis:\n'
'- **Color Composition**: The graph features a simple '
'monochromatic scheme, possibly black for curves and '
'grey for the background, enhancing clarity and focus on '
'data representation.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition:\n'
'- **Perspective**: Standard view of a graph; no unique '
'perspective.\n'
'- **Composition**: The curves are well-organized and '
'labeled, facilitating easy comparison against '
'characteristic values.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance:\n'
'- **Context**: This image is part of a larger '
'statistical discussion, illustrating the effect of '
'varying parameters on distribution, important for data '
'analysis.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis:\n'
'- **Not Available**: No metadata to analyze regarding '
'capture date or camera settings.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:\n'
'- **Trends**: The graph indicates that as zero point '
'shifts increase, distributions transition towards a '
'normal shape.\n'
'- **Data Points**: Curve shapes and their implications '
'on statistical properties are noted.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers:\n'
'- **Data Points**: Specific numerical values from the '
'curves are not provided; the graph illustrates a '
'general trend rather than discrete data points.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects:\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: Not applicable as '
'there are no depicted processes.\n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: Not '
'applicable for similar reasons.\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: The curves '
'indicate categories of distributions based on zero '
'point shifts.\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation**: As shifts increase, '
'normality is approached; this finding is significant '
'for statistical modeling.\n'
'- **Tables**: Not applicable, as no tables are '
'included.\n'
'\n'
'This analysis captures essential features of the visual '
'content, focusing on its statistical and graphical '
'implications without additional elements.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '92d4cbe3-0bae-4317-870c-9a062b6e827e-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 7.0,
'text': '# 3.1.3 Type II Absolute Value Distribution (Rayleigh '
'Distribution)\n'
'\n'
'The type II absolute value distribution results from '
'the vectorial values of the orthogonal components \\( x '
'\\) and \\( y \\) of a two-dimensional normal '
'distribution, where equal standard deviations are '
'assumed for the components. This case is present for '
'many production characteristics in the form of radial '
'deviations \\( r \\) from a considered point or a '
'considered axis.\n'
'\n'
'The density function and the distribution function of '
'the type II absolute value distribution are generally:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'f_{B_2}(r) = \\frac{r}{2\\pi \\sigma_h^2} '
'e^{-\\frac{1}{2\\sigma_h^2}(r^2)} \\int_0^{\\frac{2\\pi '
'\\cos \\alpha}{\\sigma_h^2}} e^{-\\frac{z^2}{2}} '
'd\\alpha \\quad \\text{for } r \\geq 0 \\tag{1.14}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'F_{B_2}(r) = \\int_0^{r} f_{B_2}(t) \\, dt \\tag{1.15}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'where:\n'
'\n'
'- \\( \\sigma_h \\): Standard deviation of the '
'orthogonal components \\( x \\) and \\( y \\), from '
'which the radial deviation \\( r \\) of a reference '
'point or reference axis results \n'
'- \\( z \\): Eccentricity; distance between coordinate '
'origin and frequency midpoint\n'
'\n'
'Figure 4 displays density functions of the type II '
'absolute value distribution that result in units of \\( '
'\\sigma_h \\) for different eccentricities.\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'Mean value and variance of the type II absolute value '
'distribution are:\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly as "
'you requested. However, I can help summarize or explain '
'the content if you have questions about it, or if you '
"describe it to me. Please let me know how you'd like to "
'proceed!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '4d195646-5544-4d19-bb63-e1c1d618f605-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 8.0,
'text': '# Page 8\n'
'**VW 101 30: 2005-02**\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\alpha = \\int f_{2}(r) \\cdot r \\, dr \\tag{1.16}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\sigma^{2} = 2\\sigma_{N}^{2} + z^{2} - x^{2} '
'\\tag{1.17}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'For an eccentricity \\( z = 0 \\), (1.14) and (1.15) '
'density function and distribution function of the '
'Weibull distribution, with the shape parameter value 2 '
'yield:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'f_{2}(r) = \\frac{r}{\\sigma_{H}} \\cdot e^{-\\left( '
'\\frac{r}{\\sigma_{H}} \\right)^{2}} \\tag{1.18}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'F_{2}(y) = 1 - e^{-\\left( \\frac{y}{\\sigma_{H}} '
'\\right)^{2}} \\tag{1.19}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'and from them, in turn, mean value and variance:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\mu = \\sigma_{H} \\cdot \\sqrt{\\frac{\\pi}{2}} '
'\\tag{1.20}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\sigma^{2} = \\left( 2 - \\frac{\\pi}{2} \\right) '
'\\cdot \\sigma_{N}^{2} \\tag{1.21}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'As Figure 4 shows, with increasing eccentricity, the '
'type II absolute value distribution approaches a normal '
'distribution. Thus for the case:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\frac{\\bar{x}}{\\sigma} \\geq 6 \\tag{1.22}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'the type II absolute value distribution can be replaced '
'with a normal distribution with good approximation.\n'
'\n'
'## 3.2 Determination of Capability\n'
'\n'
'The capability indexes \\( C_n \\) and \\( C_{mk} \\) '
'indicate how well the production results comply with '
'the tolerance zone of a considered characteristic. In '
'this process, only the production dispersion is taken '
'into consideration in the \\( C_n \\) value. The '
'production location is taken into consideration by the '
'\\( C_{mk} \\) value. Because of this, on the one hand, '
'there can be an expression of what value is possible in '
'an ideal production location, and on the other, a '
'comparison of the two values makes it possible to '
'express how much the production location deviates from '
'the specified value. The higher the capability indexes '
'determined, the better the production.\n'
'\n'
'There are different evaluation formulas, which have to '
'be selected appropriately in the individual case, for '
'determining the capability indexes. Since the '
'determination of the capability indexes can only be '
'carried out using random sample values, the results '
'only represent estimates of the values for the '
'population which are to be determined and are thus '
'identified by a roof symbol³. \n'
'\n'
'³ The identification of the estimated capability '
'indexes by a roof symbol is only important for '
'understanding the theory, so they can be dispensed with '
'during the evaluations in practice.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to process the visual content as you've "
'requested. However, if you have specific questions '
'about any part of the content or if you need assistance '
'with a different type of analysis, feel free to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '293fca09-e701-4077-96cf-4d60f928c9e4-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 9.0,
'text': '# 3.2.1 Determination of capability for defined '
'distribution models\n'
'\n'
'## 3.2.1.1 Capability indexes\n'
'\n'
'For a production characteristic which is to be examined '
'and whose random sample values are not in contradiction '
'to a theoretically expected distribution model, the '
'capability indexes are estimated in a manner '
'appropriate to the respective case (see also examples 1 '
'and 2 in Section 5) according to the following '
'formulas:\n'
'\n'
'### Capability indexes for characteristics with '
'two-sided tolerance zones (according to DIN 55319, '
'measuring method M4), e.g. for length dimension:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{C_m} = \\frac{G_u - G_l}{C_{99.865\\%} - '
'C_{0.135\\%}} \\tag{2.1}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{C_{mk}} = \\min \\left( \\frac{G_u - '
'\\bar{x}}{C_{99.865\\%} - \\bar{x}^2}, \\frac{\\bar{x} '
'- G_l}{\\bar{x} - C_{0.135\\%}} \\right) \\tag{2.2}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'### Capability indexes for characteristics with upper '
'limited tolerance zone and natural lower limit value '
'zero, e.g. for radial runout deviation:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{C_m} = \\frac{G_u}{C_{99.865\\%} - C_{0.135\\%}} '
'\\tag{2.3}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{C_{mk}} = \\frac{G_u - \\bar{x}}{C_{99.865\\%} - '
'\\bar{x}} \\tag{2.4}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'### Capability indexes for characteristics with lower '
'limited tolerance zone only, e.g. for tensile '
'strength:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{C_{mk}} = \\frac{\\bar{x} - G_l}{\\bar{x} - '
'C_{0.135\\%}} \\tag{2.5}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'where:\n'
'\n'
'- \\(G_s, G_u\\): Upper and lower limiting value, '
'respectively \n'
'- \\(\\bar{x}\\): Estimated mean value \n'
'- \\(C_{0.135\\%}\\) and \\(C_{99.865\\%}\\): Estimated '
'values for dispersion range limits (quantiles, below '
'which the specified percentage \\(p\\) of measured '
'values lie) \n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze or examine visual content "
'directly, including images. However, I can help you '
'with information about image analysis concepts or guide '
'you on how to conduct an analysis based on the aspects '
"you've mentioned. If you have any questions or need "
'specific explanations, feel free to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '7cd213c0-020f-4759-bdab-3348db51ed66-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 10.0,
'text': '```markdown\n'
'# 3.2.1.2 Estimation of the statistics\n'
'\n'
'The statistics mean value \\( \\bar{x} \\) and standard '
'deviation \\( \\sigma \\) of a population can be '
'estimated, independently of the distribution model, '
'from the measured values of a random sample according '
'to expectation, by\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\bar{x} = \\frac{1}{n_e} \\sum_{i=1}^{n_e} x_i '
'\\tag{2.6}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\sigma^2 = s^2 = \\frac{1}{n_e - 1} \\sum_{i=1}^{n_e} '
'(x_i - \\bar{x})^2 \\tag{2.7}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'where\n'
'- \\( n_e = n - n_a \\): effective random sample size \n'
'- \\( n \\): defined random sample size \n'
'- \\( n_a \\): number of outliers \n'
'- \\( x_k \\): ith characteristic value \n'
'\n'
'In the case of data to be evaluated in the form of a '
'frequency distribution of classified measured values, '
'e.g. from manual recordings (tally) in a class '
'subdivision of the value range, the statistics \\( \\mu '
'\\) and \\( \\sigma \\) can be estimated by\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\bar{x} = \\frac{1}{n_e} \\sum_{k=1}^{K_{max}} a_k '
'\\cdot x_k \\tag{2.9}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\bar{s} = \\frac{1}{n_e - 1} \\sum_{k=1}^{K_{max}} a_k '
'\\cdot (x_k - \\bar{x})^2 \\tag{2.10}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'where\n'
'- \\( x_k \\): mean value of the kth class \n'
'- \\( a_k \\): absolute frequency of the measured '
'values in the kth class (without outliers) \n'
'- \\( K \\): maximum number of measured value classes \n'
'\n'
'## 3.2.1.3 Estimation of the dispersion range limits\n'
'\n'
'The dispersion range limits depend on the distribution '
'model and are estimated as follows:\n'
'\n'
'**Dispersion range limits for normal distribution:**\n'
'\n'
'If the normal distribution model is the fitting '
'distribution model, the values \\( \\bar{x} \\) and \\( '
'\\sigma \\) determined according to (2.6) and (2.7) or '
'(2.9) and (2.10) respectively result as estimated '
'values for the dispersion range limits\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'x_{0.8965} \\quad x_{0.0135} : \\quad \\bar{x} \\pm '
'3\\sigma \\tag{2.11}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'which, when used in formulas (2.1) and (2.2), result in '
'the classical formulas for calculating the capability '
'indexes (see also example 1 in Section 5).\n'
'```\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze or extract details from the "
'visual content you referenced. However, if you can '
'provide a text description or specific questions about '
"the content, I'd be happy to help with that!"},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '75a969b9-4ffa-4def-9314-2c493234c06c-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 11.0,
'text': '# Dispersion Range Limits of the Type I Absolute Value '
'Distribution\n'
'\n'
'To determine the dispersion range limits for a type I '
'absolute value distribution, first the statistics \\( '
'\\mu \\) and \\( \\sigma \\) are estimated according to '
'formulas (2.6) and (2.7) or (2.9) and (2.10) '
'respectively.\n'
'\n'
'For the case \\( \\frac{2}{d} < 3 \\), the estimated '
'statistics \\( \\mu \\) and \\( \\sigma \\) are used to '
'estimate the parameter values \\( \\mu_N \\) and \\( '
'\\sigma_N \\) to be determined for the type I absolute '
'value distribution to be fitted, in the following '
'manner:\n'
'\n'
'**Equation (1.9)** yields the function\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\frac{\\partial \\hat{N}}{\\partial N} = \\psi_{N} '
'\\left( \\frac{\\partial \\hat{N}}{\\partial N} - '
'\\frac{\\partial \\hat{d}}{\\partial N} \\left( '
'\\frac{d - \\hat{N}}{N} \\right) - \\left( '
'\\frac{\\partial \\hat{N}}{\\partial N} \\right) '
'\\right) + 2 \\cdot \\frac{\\partial '
'\\hat{f}}{\\partial N} \\cdot e^{- '
'\\frac{d^2}{2\\eta}}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'With equation (1.10), this yields the following '
'function:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\frac{\\partial \\hat{N}}{\\partial N} = \\gamma_{N} '
'\\left( \\frac{\\partial \\hat{N}}{\\partial N} \\left( '
'\\sqrt{1 + \\left( \\frac{\\xi_{N}}{\\sigma_{N}} '
'\\right)^2} \\right) - \\left( \\psi_{N} \\left( '
'\\frac{\\xi_{N}}{\\sigma_{N}} \\right) \\right) '
'\\right) \\right)^2\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'**Equations (1.11) and (1.12)** result in the '
'condition\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\frac{\\partial \\hat{N}}{\\sigma^2} = \\frac{2}{\\pi '
'- 2} = 1.3236\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Under the condition (2.14), the parameter values to be '
'determined for the type I absolute value distribution '
'can be estimated using:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{\\sigma}_N = \\hat{\\sigma} \\cdot \\left( '
'\\frac{1 + \\left(\\frac{d}{\\sigma}\\right)^2}{1 + '
'\\left(\\xi_{N} \\cdot \\frac{d}{\\sigma}\\right)^2} '
'\\right)\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{Z}_N = \\xi_{N} \\left( \\frac{d}{\\sigma} '
'\\right) \\cdot \\hat{\\sigma}_N\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'where \n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\xi_{F} \\left( \\frac{d}{\\sigma} \\right): '
'\\text{inverse function of (2.13)}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'In the case where the ratio \\( \\frac{2}{d} \\) is '
'lower than the limit value 1.3236 from condition (2.14) '
'because of random deviations of the random sample '
'statistics, the ratio \\( \\frac{2}{d} \\) is set to '
'this limit value, at which the following parameter '
'values result:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{Z}_N = 0 \n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'according to formula (1.12):\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{\\sigma}_N = \\frac{\\pi}{\\pi - 2} \\cdot '
'\\hat{\\sigma} - 1.659 \\cdot \\hat{\\sigma}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze or describe the specific visual "
'content you provided since no image or visual content '
'was attached. However, if you have specific text or '
'diagrams you want analyzed, please describe them, and I '
'can help interpret or summarize the information based '
'on the content you provide!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'bb8f85ac-ea0f-49ca-8e24-95086dfb0127-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 12.0,
'text': 'The connection between the parameter values μH and σH '
'of the type I absolute value distribution and the '
'statistics μ and σ is shown graphically in Figure 5, '
'related to σ.\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'**Figure 5 - Relative parameter values of the type I '
'absolute value distribution in relationship to the '
'relative location**\n'
'\n'
'For the fitted type I absolute value distribution, the '
'dispersion range limits can then be determined '
'numerically and their relationships with the relative '
'location are shown in Figure 6.\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'**Figure 6 - Relative dispersion range limits of the '
'type I absolute value distribution in relationship to '
'the relative location**\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'1) Illustrations, graphics, photographs and flow charts '
'were adopted from the original German standard, and the '
'numerical notation may therefore differ from the '
'English practice. A comma corresponds to a decimal '
'point, and a period or a blank is used as the thousands '
'separator.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'### Analysis of Visual Content\n'
'\n'
'#### 1. Localization and Attribution\n'
'- **Image 1**: Graph from Figure 5\n'
'- **Image 2**: Graph from Figure 6\n'
'\n'
'#### 2. Object Detection and Classification\n'
'- **Image 1**: Contains a graph displaying mathematical '
'relationships (parameters α and σ).\n'
'- **Image 2**: Contains another graph depicting '
'dispersion range limits.\n'
'\n'
'#### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis\n'
'- **Image 1**: The scene is analytical, focusing on the '
'relationship between statistical parameters in a '
'mathematical context.\n'
'- **Image 2**: Similar analytical context, illustrating '
'dispersion limits of value distribution based on the '
'relative location.\n'
'\n'
'#### 4. Text Analysis\n'
'- Text in Image 1: "Relative parameter values of the '
'type I absolute value distribution."\n'
' - Significance: It indicates the mathematical nature '
'of the data presented.\n'
'- Text in Image 2: "Relative dispersion range limits of '
'the type I absolute value distribution."\n'
' - Significance: Explains that the graph shows how '
'dispersion varies in relation to the parameters '
'defined.\n'
'\n'
'#### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis\n'
'- **Image 1**: \n'
' - Axes: Relative location (μ/σ) on the X-axis; '
'Relative distribution parameter on the Y-axis.\n'
' - Key Insights: As μ/σ increases, α/σ increases.\n'
' \n'
'- **Image 2**: \n'
' - Axes: Relative location (μ/σ) on the X-axis; '
'Relative scatter range limit on the Y-axis.\n'
' - Key Insights: Indicates how the dispersion limits '
'change with the parameters.\n'
'\n'
'#### 6. Product Analysis\n'
'- Not applicable as there are no physical products '
'depicted apart from the graphs.\n'
'\n'
'#### 7. Anomaly Detection\n'
'- No notable anomalies detected; both visuals present '
'expected mathematical trends.\n'
'\n'
'#### 8. Color Analysis\n'
'- Dominant colors include shades of blue and black for '
'graph lines and axes.\n'
'- Impact: Color choice creates a professional and clear '
'presentation, facilitating data comprehension.\n'
'\n'
'#### 9. Perspective and Composition\n'
'- Perspective: Standard two-dimensional view common in '
'graph presentation.\n'
'- Composition: Both images are well-structured with '
'labels, scaled axes, and consistent formatting.\n'
'\n'
'#### 10. Contextual Significance\n'
'- The images contribute to a statistical analysis '
'within the document, aiding in understanding absolute '
'value distributions.\n'
'\n'
'#### 11. Metadata Analysis\n'
'- No metadata is accessible for review.\n'
'\n'
'#### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis\n'
'- **Image 1**: Depicts an increasing trend in relative '
'parameters with respect to relative location.\n'
'- **Image 2**: Shows both increasing and decreasing '
'trends in dispersion limits across the relative '
'location.\n'
'\n'
'#### 13. Graph Numbers\n'
'- **Image 1**: \n'
' - (1.2, 0.0), (1.4, 1.5), (1.6, 2.5), (1.8, 3.0), '
'(2.0, 3.5), (2.2, 3.0), (2.4, 2.0), (2.6, 1.0), (2.8, '
'0.5), (3.0, 0.0)\n'
' \n'
'- **Image 2**: \n'
' - (1.2, 1.0), (1.4, 5.0), (1.6, 6.5), (1.8, 6.0), '
'(2.0, 5.0), (2.2, 4.0), (2.4, 3.0), (2.6, 2.0), (2.8, '
'1.0), (3.0, 0.0)\n'
'\n'
'#### Additional Aspects\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: Not applicable; '
'no process flows depicted.\n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: Not '
'applicable; no processes are illustrated.\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: Both '
'images focus on the type I absolute value distribution, '
'emphasizing mathematical categories.\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation**: Trends in both graphs '
'indicate how parameters and limits shift based on '
'statistical relations.\n'
'- **Tables**: Not applicable; no tables are included.\n'
'\n'
'This examination summarizes the key aspects and '
'implications of the visual content present.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '1d5ae726-6f6d-4e6e-bd04-8e868a89c815-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 13.0,
'text': 'For direct determination of the statistics \\( \\mu_N '
'\\) and \\( \\sigma_N \\) from the statistics \\( \\mu '
'\\) and \\( \\sigma \\), for \\( 1.3236 \\leq '
'\\frac{\\sigma}{\\theta} < 3 \\) the following '
'approximation can also be used as an inverse function '
'of (2.13) with adequate precision (error related to '
'less than 0.01):\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{\\xi} \\left( \\frac{\\sigma}{\\theta} \\right) = '
'1.64 \\left( \\frac{\\sigma}{1.3236} \\right)^{0.268} + '
'0.634 \\left( \\frac{\\sigma}{\\theta} - 1.3236 '
'\\right)^{1.05}\n'
'\\] \n'
'(2.18)\n'
'\n'
'In addition, the determination of the dispersion range '
'limits for \\( 1.3236 \\leq \\frac{\\sigma}{\\theta} < '
'3 \\) is carried out directly with the use of the '
'following approximation (error related to less than '
'0.02):\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{\\xi}_{90.86\\%} = -2.47 \\left( '
'\\frac{\\sigma}{\\theta} - 1.3236 \\right)^{0.67} + '
'2.505 \\left( \\frac{\\sigma}{\\theta} - 1.3236 '
'\\right) + 5.3711\n'
'\\] \n'
'(2.19)\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{\\xi}_{10.13\\%} = 0.018 \\left( '
'\\frac{\\sigma}{\\theta} - 1.3236 \\right) + 0.0028\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'For \\( \\frac{\\sigma}{\\theta} \\geq 3 \\) the '
'calculation of the dispersion range limits is carried '
'out according to formula (2.11).\n'
'\n'
'## Dispersion range limits of the type II absolute '
'value distribution:\n'
'\n'
'To determine the dispersion range limits for a type II '
'absolute value distribution (see also example 2 in '
'Section 5) first the statistics \\( \\mu \\) and \\( '
'\\sigma \\) are estimated according to formulas (2.6) '
'and (2.7) or (2.9) and (2.10) respectively. For the '
'case \\( \\frac{\\sigma}{\\theta} < 6 \\), the '
'estimated statistics \\( \\mu \\) and \\( \\sigma \\) '
'are then used to estimate the parameter values \\( z_2 '
'\\) and \\( \\sigma_0 \\) to be determined of the type '
'II absolute value distribution to be fitted, in the '
'following manner:\n'
'\n'
'Equations (1.14) and (1.16) yield the function \n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\frac{\\hat{\\sigma}}{\\sigma_N} = \\psi_{g2} \\left( '
'\\frac{\\hat{\\sigma}}{\\sigma_N} \\right) '
'\\frac{1}{\\sqrt{2\\pi}} e^{-\\frac{1}{2} \\left( '
'\\frac{\\hat{\\sigma}}{\\sigma_N} \\right)^2} '
'\\int_0^{\\infty} \\sqrt{2} \\cdot e^{-t^2} \\cdot 2 '
'\\int_0^{c} e^{-\\frac{v^2}{2}} \\, dv\n'
'\\] \n'
'(2.20)\n'
'\n'
'where \n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'v = \\frac{r}{\\sigma_N}\n'
'\\] \n'
'(2.21)\n'
'\n'
'With equation (1.17), this yields the following '
'function \n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\frac{\\hat{\\sigma}}{\\sigma} = \\psi_{g2} \\left( '
'\\frac{\\hat{\\sigma}}{\\sigma_N} \\right) '
'\\frac{\\psi_{g2} \\left( '
'\\frac{\\hat{\\sigma}}{\\sigma_N} \\right)}{2} '
'\\sqrt{2} \\left( \\frac{\\hat{\\sigma}}{\\sigma_N} '
'\\right)^2 - \\left( \\psi_{g2} \\left( '
'\\frac{\\hat{\\sigma}}{\\sigma_N} \\right) \\right)^2\n'
'\\] \n'
'(2.22)\n'
'\n'
'Equations (1.20) and (1.21) result in the condition \n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\frac{\\hat{\\sigma}}{\\sigma} = \\frac{\\pi}{4 - '
'\\pi} = 1.9131\n'
'\\] \n'
'(2.23)\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the attached visual content or "
'the details you provided. Please let me know how else I '
'can assist you!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'a82776fb-326d-4691-9be9-a1a2605acb46-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 14.0,
'text': '# Page 14\n'
'VW 101 30: 2005-02\n'
'\n'
'Under the condition (2.23), the parameter values to be '
'determined of the type II absolute value distribution '
'can be estimated using:\n'
'\n'
'$$\n'
'd_N = \\bar{d} \\left( 1 + \\frac{z^2}{2 \\left( '
'\\frac{\\sigma}{\\bar{d}} \\right)^2} \\right) \n'
'\\tag{2.24}\n'
'$$\n'
'\n'
'$$\n'
'\\bar{z} = \\frac{ \\sigma_{Z_2} }{\\left( '
'\\frac{\\sigma}{\\bar{d}} \\right)} \\cdot \\bar{d}_N \n'
'\\tag{2.25}\n'
'$$\n'
'\n'
'where \n'
'\n'
'$$\n'
'\\sigma_{Z_2} \\left( \\frac{\\sigma}{\\bar{d}} '
'\\right) : \\text{inverse function of (2.22)}\n'
'$$\n'
'\n'
'In the case where the ratio $\\frac{z}{\\sigma}$ is '
'lower than the limit value 1.9131 from condition (2.23) '
'because of random deviations of the random sample '
'statistics, the ratio $\\frac{z}{\\sigma}$ is set to '
'this limit value, at which the following parameter '
'values result:\n'
'\n'
'$$\n'
'\\bar{z} = 0 \n'
'$$\n'
'\n'
'and according to formula (1.21):\n'
'\n'
'$$\n'
'd_N = \\frac{2}{\\sqrt{4 - \\pi}} \\cdot \\sigma \\cdot '
'1.526 \\cdot \\bar{d} \n'
'\\tag{2.26}\n'
'$$\n'
'\n'
'The connection between the parameter values $z$ and '
'$d_N$ of the type II absolute value distribution and '
'the statistics $\\mu$ and $\\sigma$ is shown '
'graphically in Figure 7, related to $\\sigma$.\n'
'\n'
'## Figure 7 - Relative parameter values of the type II '
'absolute value distribution in relationship to the '
'relative location7\n'
'1) Illustrations, graphics, photographs and flow charts '
'were adopted from the original German standard, and the '
'numerical notation may therefore differ from the '
'English practice. A comma corresponds to a decimal '
'point, and a period or a blank is used as the thousands '
'separator.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly as "
"you've requested. However, if you describe the content "
'or provide specific details from the visual, I can help '
'you interpret or analyze that information based on the '
"aspects you've mentioned. Please provide any text, "
"data, or context you're interested in discussing!"},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'f56fb35c-767b-47ce-b9e2-95695971de60-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 15.0,
'text': '# Relative Dispersion Range Limits of the Type II '
'Absolute Value Distribution\n'
'\n'
'For the fitted type II absolute value distribution, the '
'dispersion range limits can then be determined '
'numerically and their relationships with the relative '
'location are shown in Figure 8.\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'For direct determination of the statistics \\( z \\) '
'and \\( \\sigma \\), from the statistics \\( \\mu \\) '
'and \\( \\sigma \\), for \\( 1.9131 \\leq '
'\\frac{z}{\\sigma} \\leq 6 \\), the following '
'approximation can also be used as an inverse function '
'of (2.22) with adequate precision (error related to \\( '
'o \\) less than 0.02):\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\xi_{82} \\left( \\frac{z}{\\sigma} \\right) \\approx '
'2.1 \\left( \\frac{z}{\\sigma} - 1.9131 '
'\\right)^{0.913} + 0.466 \\left( \\frac{z}{\\sigma} - '
'1.9131 \\right)^{1.22} \\tag{2.27}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'In addition, the determination of the dispersion range '
'limits for \\( 1.9131 \\leq \\frac{z}{\\sigma} < 6 \\) '
'is carried out directly with the use of the following '
'approximation (error related to \\( o \\) less than '
'0.03):\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\xi_{X, 99.8655} = -1.64 \\cdot \\left( '
'\\frac{z}{\\sigma} - 1.9131 \\right)^{0.62} + 2.075 '
'\\cdot \\left( \\frac{z}{\\sigma} - 1.9131 '
'\\right)^{0.9} + 5.5485 \\tag{2.28}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\xi_{X, 0.1355} = 2.6 \\cdot \\exp\\left(-\\left( '
'\\frac{z}{\\sigma} - 1.7031 \\right) \\cdot 0.8\\right) '
'+ 1.425 \\cdot \\left( \\frac{z}{\\sigma} - 1.9131 '
'\\right)^{0.9} - 2.1206\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'For \\( \\frac{z}{\\sigma} \\geq 6 \\), the calculation '
'of the dispersion range limits is carried out according '
'to formula (2.11).\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'**Notes:**\n'
'1. Illustrations, graphics, photographs, and flow '
'charts were adopted from the original German standard, '
'and the numerical notation may therefore differ from '
'the English practice. A comma corresponds to a decimal '
'point, and a period or a blank is used as the thousands '
'separator.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the attached visual content "
'directly, but I can guide you on how to conduct a '
'comprehensive examination of the image based on the '
"aspects you've listed. Here's a structured approach you "
'can use:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution:\n'
'- **Number the Images**: As you analyze multiple '
'images, assign numbers (Image 1, Image 2, etc.) '
'according to their positions on the page.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification:\n'
'- **Identify Objects**: Look for distinct objects in '
'each image. Categorize them (e.g., people, vehicles, '
'buildings).\n'
'- **Key Features**: Note details like color, size, and '
'any other distinguishing characteristics.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:\n'
'- **Describe the Scene**: Summarize the setting and '
'background.\n'
'- **Main Actors and Actions**: Identify who is present '
'and what activities are occurring.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis:\n'
'- **Extract Text**: Look for any text within the '
'images. \n'
'- **Interpret Content**: Analyze its significance and '
'how it relates to the overall context.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:\n'
'- **Analyze Diagrams**: Identify the types of diagrams '
'or charts present, noting axes, legends, and data '
'represented.\n'
'- **Key Insights**: Summarize findings or trends '
'depicted.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis:\n'
'- **Describe Products**: If products are shown, detail '
'their features, materials, and colors.\n'
'- **Visual Comparison**: Highlight differences and '
'similarities among products.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection:\n'
'- **Identify Unusual Elements**: Spot and describe any '
'anomalies.\n'
'- **Explain Impact**: Discuss why these elements stand '
'out and their implications.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis:\n'
'- **Analyze Color Composition**: Identify dominant '
'colors and their emotional or psychological impacts.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition:\n'
'- **Describe Perspective**: Note the angle or viewpoint '
'from which the image was taken.\n'
'- **Analyze Composition**: Consider how elements are '
'arranged and their visual balance.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance:\n'
'- **Overall Context**: Explain how the image relates to '
"the broader document's theme or message.\n"
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis:\n'
'- **Review Metadata**: If available, look into capture '
'dates, settings, and how they relate to the analysis.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:\n'
'- **Identify Trends**: Look for patterns in the graph '
'data, interpreting their significance.\n'
'- **Data Breakdown**: Give detailed information on the '
'data points.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers:\n'
'- **List Data Points**: For any graphs, provide '
'numerical data for each relevant item.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects\n'
'- **Process Flows and Descriptions**: Detail any '
'depicted processes and their significance.\n'
'- **Type Designations**: Describe categories or types '
'present in images or charts.\n'
'- **Trend Interpretation**: Analyze trends and provide '
'interpretations.\n'
'- **Tables**: If present, describe their content and '
'data.\n'
'\n'
'Using this framework, you can conduct a thorough '
'analysis of the visual content. Let me know if you need '
'assistance in any particular area!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '829cca84-f0d8-4405-b00b-77d0ce6c3080-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 16.0,
'text': '# 3.2.2 Determination of capability for undefined '
'distribution models\n'
'\n'
'If no fitting distribution model can be assigned to a '
'production characteristic or the measured values from '
'the random samples contradict the assumed distribution '
'model, a distribution-free estimation of the capability '
'indexes is carried out according to the range method, '
'in the following modified form under consideration of '
'the random sample size (see also example 3 in Section '
'5):\n'
'\n'
'## Capability indexes for characteristics with '
'two-sided tolerance zones:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{c}_m = \\frac{G_o - \\bar{G}_u}{\\bar{x}_o - '
'\\bar{x}_u} \\tag{2.29}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{c}_m = \\min \\left\\{ \\frac{G_o - '
'\\bar{x}_{50\\%}}{\\bar{x}_o - \\bar{x}_{50\\%}}, '
'\\frac{\\bar{x}_{50\\%} - G_l}{\\bar{x}_{50\\%} - '
'\\bar{x}_u} \\right\\} \\tag{2.30}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'## Capability indexes for characteristics with upper '
'limited tolerance zone and natural lower limit zero:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{c}_m = \\frac{G_o}{\\bar{x}_o - \\bar{x}_u} '
'\\tag{2.31}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{c}_m = \\frac{G_o - \\bar{x}_{50\\%}}{\\bar{x}_o '
'- \\bar{x}_{50\\%}} \\tag{2.32}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'## Capability indexes for characteristics with lower '
'limited tolerance zone only:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{c}_{mk} = \\frac{\\bar{x}_{50\\%} - '
'\\bar{G}_u}{\\bar{x}_{50\\%} - \\bar{x}_u} \\tag{2.33}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'where:\n'
'- \\(\\bar{x}_o, \\bar{x}_u\\): estimated values of the '
'upper and lower dispersion range limits\n'
'- \\(\\bar{x}_{50\\%}\\): estimated value of the 50% '
'quantile\n'
'\n'
'In the case of single values:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\bar{x}_{50\\%} = \\bar{x} \\tag{2.34}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'where \\(\\bar{x}\\) is the median value, the value '
'that lies in the middle of an ordered sequence of '
'measurements.\n'
'\n'
'The dispersion range limits are estimated with:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\bar{x}_o, \\bar{x}_u = x_c \\pm k \\cdot \\frac{R}{2} '
'\\tag{2.35}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'where:\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content as you've "
'requested. However, I can summarize or explain specific '
"topics related to the text you've mentioned, such as "
'capability indices and statistical methods in quality '
'control. Let me know how else I might assist you!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '941c6f68-65a2-453c-87f1-d444c8eee61d-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 17.0,
'text': 'x_c = \\frac{x_{max} + x_{min}}{2} (2.36) \n'
'R = x_{max} - x_{min} : \\text{ range} (2.37) \n'
'x_{max}, x_{min} : \\text{ maximum and minimum measured '
'value, respectively, of the effective total random '
'sample} \n'
'\n'
'By the correction factor \n'
'k = \\frac{6}{d_n} (2.38) \n'
'\n'
'the effective random sample size n_e is taken into '
'consideration, where \n'
'd_n : \\text{ expected value of the } w \\text{ '
'distribution}\\footnote{5} \n'
'\n'
'The value d_n is given in Table 1 for a few random '
'sample sizes n_e. \n'
'\n'
'| n_e | d_n |\n'
'|-----|-----|\n'
'| 20 | 3.74 |\n'
'| 25 | 3.93 |\n'
'| 30 | 4.09 |\n'
'| 35 | 4.21 |\n'
'| 40 | 4.32 |\n'
'| 45 | 4.42 |\n'
'| 50 | 4.50 |\n'
'\n'
'For random sample sizes that are greater than 20, the '
'expected values of the w distribution can be determined '
'according to the following approximation formula: \n'
'd_n \\equiv 1.748 \\cdot \\ln(n_e) )^{0.688} (2.39) \n'
'\n'
'In the case of a frequency distribution of classified '
'measured values \n'
'\\hat{x}_0, \\hat{x}_d \\text{ are the upper limit, '
'lower limit, respectively, for the top/bottom occupied '
'class} \n'
'\n'
'and \n'
'\\hat{x}_{90\\%} = \\hat{x}_k + \\frac{n/2 - A_k}{a_k} '
'\\cdot \\Delta x \\text{ for } A_k < \\frac{n}{2} < A_k '
'+ a_k (2.40) \n'
'\n'
'where \n'
'x_k : \\text{ lower limit of the kth class} \n'
'\\Delta x : \\text{ class width} \n'
'a_k : \\text{ absolute frequency of the measured values '
'in the kth class} \n'
'A_k : \\text{ absolute cumulative frequency of the '
'measured values to the lower limit of the kth class} \n'
'\n'
'\\footnote{5} \\text{Strictly speaking, a normally '
'distributed population of the individual values is a '
'prerequisite for the expected value of the w '
'distribution. However, this prerequisite is not taken '
'into consideration due to the lack of a suitable method '
'for the distribution-free calculation of the capability '
'indexes.}\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the provided visual content "
'directly. However, I can guide you on how to approach '
"an analysis based on the aspects you provided. Here's a "
'breakdown of how to examine each aspect:\n'
'\n'
'1. **Localization and Attribution:**\n'
' - Note the position of each image as you view them, '
'labeling them as Image 1, Image 2, etc.\n'
'\n'
'2. **Object Detection and Classification:**\n'
' - Identify and categorize all significant objects '
'within each image. Describe distinctive features '
'relevant to their classification.\n'
'\n'
'3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**\n'
' - Observe the overall scene in each image, noting '
'the activities that occur and the main subjects '
'involved.\n'
'\n'
'4. **Text Analysis:**\n'
' - If text appears in the images, document its '
'content and discuss its relevance in relation to the '
'overall theme.\n'
'\n'
'5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**\n'
' - For any diagrams or charts present, assess what '
'data they display, including scale and axes, and '
'summarize key trends.\n'
'\n'
'6. **Product Analysis:**\n'
' - If products are shown, describe their '
'characteristics, including materials and colors, and '
'compare any differences.\n'
'\n'
'7. **Anomaly Detection:**\n'
' - Look for any odd or unexpected elements within '
'each image and explain why they stand out.\n'
'\n'
'8. **Color Analysis:**\n'
' - Analyze the color schemes prevalent in each image, '
'noting which colors dominate and their psychological '
'effects.\n'
'\n'
'9. **Perspective and Composition:**\n'
' - Determine the angle and composition of the image, '
"and evaluate how the arrangement affects the viewer's "
'perception.\n'
'\n'
'10. **Contextual Significance:**\n'
' - Relate the images to their broader context, '
'discussing how they support the main themes or messages '
'of the document.\n'
'\n'
'11. **Metadata Analysis:**\n'
' - If available, review metadata such as capture '
'date and camera settings for additional insights into '
'the image.\n'
'\n'
'12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**\n'
' - For graphs, identify trends and interpret their '
'significance, examining data points and their '
'implications.\n'
'\n'
'13. **Graph Numbers:**\n'
' - Provide a detailed breakdown of the numerical '
'values represented in any graphs.\n'
'\n'
'**Additional Aspects:**\n'
'\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):**\n'
' - Document and elaborate on any process flows '
'depicted, explaining their importance.\n'
'\n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):**\n'
' - Give detailed descriptions of any shown processes, '
'clarifying their significance.\n'
'\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):**\n'
' - Identify specific types or categories mentioned '
'and describe them.\n'
'\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation:**\n'
' - Identify prevailing trends and provide thoughtful '
'interpretations based on visual elements.\n'
'\n'
'- **Tables:**\n'
' - Analyze any tables included for their content, '
'focusing on how they present data.\n'
'\n'
'By systematically addressing each aspect, you can '
'create a comprehensive analysis of the visual content.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'bf3da131-9029-478a-b46b-814e230d2494-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 18.0,
'text': '### 3.3 Limit values of machine capability\n'
'\n'
'To obtain the machine capability for a considered '
'characteristic, the capability indexes determined must '
'fulfill the following requirement with respect to the '
'specified limit values \\( C_{m, \\text{max}} \\) and '
'\\( C_{m, \\text{min}} \\):\n'
'\n'
'- characteristics with two-sided tolerance zones:\n'
' \\[\n'
' \\hat{C_{m}} \\geq C_{m, \\text{min}} \\quad '
'\\text{and} \\quad \\hat{C_{k}} \\geq C_{k, '
'\\text{min}} \\tag{3.1}\n'
' \\]\n'
'\n'
'- characteristics with one-sided tolerance zone '
'only\\(^6\\):\n'
' \\[\n'
' \\hat{C_{k}} \\geq C_{k, \\text{min}} \\tag{3.2}\n'
' \\]\n'
'\n'
'with an effective random sample size of \\( n_e \\geq '
'50 \\)\n'
'\n'
'Unless otherwise agreed, the following capability limit '
'values apply:\n'
'- \\( C_{m, \\text{min}} = 2.0 \\)\n'
'- \\( C_{k, \\text{min}} = 1.67 \\)\n'
'\n'
'In cases where, with reasonable effort, an examination '
'can only be carried out with an effective random sample '
'size less than 50, the resulting uncertainty of the '
'capability indexes determined must be taken into '
'consideration by applying correspondingly higher limit '
'values as follows.\n'
'\n'
'The determination of limit values for effective random '
'sample sizes smaller than 50 is related here to limit '
'values that comply with the requirement from (3.1) or '
'(3.2) for the population to be investigated with 95% '
'probability (lower confidence range limits). With the '
'assumption of a normally distributed population, these '
'result from the upper confidence range limit of the '
'standard deviation:\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\sigma_{o} = \\hat{\\sigma} \\cdot '
'\\frac{49}{\\sqrt{\\chi^2_{49}}} \\tag{3.3}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'and the statistical percentage range for the production '
'dispersion:\n'
'\\[\n'
'x_{99.86\\%} = \\bar{x} \\pm z_{\\alpha/2} \\left( 1 + '
'\\frac{1}{2 - 50} \\right) '
'\\frac{49}{\\sqrt{\\chi^2_{49}}} \\tag{3.4}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'where\n'
'\n'
'- \\( z_{99.86\\%} = 3.0 \\): quantile of the '
'standardized normal distribution \n'
'- \\( \\chi^2_{49,0.99} = 33.9 \\): quantile of the '
'chi-square distribution with a degree of freedom of \\( '
'f = 49 \\) (see also [1])\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the content as requested. "
'However, if you have specific questions about the '
"document, feel free to share them, and I'll do my best "
'to assist!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'c1220083-28af-468e-a287-77c58a6b83a6-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 19.0,
'text': 'By transformation and substitution in the evaluation '
'formulas (2.1) and (2.2), this results in the following '
'**capability limit values for the population**:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'c_{n} \\geq c_{lim \\: min} \\cdot '
'\\sqrt{\\frac{X_{s,min}}{49}} = 0.832 \\cdot c_{lim \\: '
'min} \\tag{3.5}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'c_{mk} \\geq c_{lim \\: min} \\cdot \\frac{1}{1 + '
'\\sqrt{\\frac{1}{100}}} \\cdot '
'\\sqrt{\\frac{X_{s,max}}{49}} = 0.824 \\cdot c_{lim \\: '
'min} \\tag{3.6}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'For effective random sample sizes \\( n_{e} < 50 \\), '
'this results in the following **fitted capability limit '
'values**:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{c}_{m} \\geq c_{lim \\: min} \\cdot 0.832 \\cdot '
'\\sqrt{\\frac{f}{X_{s,k}}} \\tag{3.7}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{c}_{mk} \\geq c_{lim \\: min} \\cdot 0.824 \\cdot '
'\\left(1 + \\frac{1}{2n_{e}}\\right) \\cdot '
'\\sqrt{\\frac{f}{X_{s,m}}} \\tag{3.8}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'with the degree of freedom:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'f = n_{e} - 1 \\tag{3.9}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'**Example:**\n'
'\n'
'For specified capability limit values of \\( c_{lim \\: '
'min} = 2.0 \\), \\( c_{lim \\: max} = 1.67 \\) and an '
'effective random sample size of \\( n_{e} = 20 \\), '
'according to the formulas (3.7) to (3.9) the following '
'fitted limit values result for characteristics with '
'two-sided tolerance zones:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{c}_{m} \\geq 2.0 \\cdot 0.832 \\cdot '
'\\sqrt{\\frac{20 - 1}{10.1}} = 2.28\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{c}_{mk} \\geq 1.67 \\cdot 0.824 \\cdot \\left(1 + '
'\\frac{1}{2 \\cdot 20}\\right) \\cdot \\sqrt{\\frac{20 '
'- 1}{10.1}} = 1.93\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'*The determination of the adopted capability limit '
'values using formulas (4.7) to (4.9) is also used for '
'populations without normal distribution, since there '
'are no other methods for these at this time and thus at '
'least a usable consideration of a random sample size '
'that is less than 50 is carried out.*\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze or conduct a detailed examination "
"of the visual content as you've requested, including "
'the aspects specified. However, I can provide general '
'guidance or answer questions related to similar topics '
'if that would be helpful. Let me know how you would '
'like to proceed!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '2c66b281-dd48-48f7-aea0-41e55dd17106-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 20.0,
'text': '# 3.4 Statistical Tests\n'
'\n'
'Generally, the measurements of a machine capability '
'investigation shall not exhibit any:\n'
'\n'
'- unexpectedly great deviation of single measured '
'values (outliers) in comparison to the dispersion of '
'other measured values,\n'
'- significant change of the production location during '
'the sampling, and\n'
'- significant deviation from the expected distribution '
'model.\n'
'\n'
'Otherwise, additional systematic influences on '
'production have to be taken into consideration. The '
'causes should then be known for this behavior and their '
'effect should be acceptable in order to fulfill the '
'requirement of a secure manufacturing process.\n'
'\n'
'Therefore, to test the above-mentioned criteria, the '
'appropriate statistical tests shall be used during a '
'machine capability investigation. Since these tests are '
'described in details in standards and standard '
'statistics references, they will only be indicated by '
'the following references:\n'
'\n'
'The following tests are to be carried out in the scope '
'of a machine capability investigation:\n'
'\n'
'- **Test for outliers** using the distribution-free '
'test according to Hampel in modified form (see '
'Volkswagen standard VW 10133)\n'
'- **Test for change of the production location** using '
'the distribution-free Run-Test according to '
'Swed-Eisenhärt (see [1])\n'
'- **Test for deviation from the normal distribution** '
'according to Epps-Pulley (see ISO 5479)\n'
'- **Test for deviation from any specified distribution '
'model** using the chi-square test (see [1])\n'
'\n'
'The statistical tests all proceed according to the '
'following system:\n'
'\n'
'1. **Setting up the null hypothesis** H₀ and the '
'alternative hypothesis H₁, e.g.:\n'
' - H₀: The population of the measured values of the '
'characteristic considered has normal distribution.\n'
' - H₁: The population of the measured values of the '
'characteristic considered does not have normal '
'distribution.\n'
' \n'
'2. **Specification of the confidence level** \\( '
'\\gamma = 1 - \\alpha \\) or **probability of error** '
'\\( \\alpha \\).\n'
'\n'
'3. **Setting up the formula for the test variable**.\n'
'\n'
'4. **Calculating the test value** from the random '
'sample values according to the test variable formula.\n'
'\n'
'5. **Determining the threshold value** of the test '
'distribution.\n'
'\n'
'6. **Comparison of the test value to the threshold '
'value** for decision of whether a contradiction to the '
'null hypothesis exists and thus the alternative '
'hypothesis is valid.\n'
'\n'
'It should be noted that in a statistical test with the '
'specified confidence level, only a contradiction to the '
'null hypothesis can be proven, e.g., that a significant '
'deviation of the measured values from a normally '
'distributed population exists. If no contradiction to '
'the null hypothesis results from the test result, this '
'is not a confirmation of the validity of the null '
'hypothesis. In this case, it cannot be proven with the '
'defined confidence level that a normally distributed '
'population exists, for example. Then, analogously to '
'the legal principle "if in doubt, find for the '
'defendant," a decision is simply made for assumption of '
'the null hypothesis.\n'
'\n'
'The probability of error \\( \\alpha \\) indicates the '
'risk of rejecting the null hypothesis on the basis of '
'the test result, although it applies (α risk). However, '
'not just any small value can be specified for the '
'probability of error, since that would increase, e.g., '
'the risk of not discovering an actual deviation from a '
'normal distribution (β risk).\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I can't analyze the content of the visual you provided. "
'If you have any other questions or need assistance with '
'a different topic, feel free to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '5762491c-2971-4710-9877-ed9e7eebf92b-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 21.0,
'text': '# 4 Carrying out a machine capability investigation\n'
'\n'
'A machine capability investigation (MFI) is carried out '
'according to the sequence shown in Figures 9 to 11.\n'
'\n'
'## Steps:\n'
'\n'
'1. **Start**\n'
'2. **4.1 Test equipment use**\n'
'3. **4.2 Sampling**\n'
' - Conditions for MFI fulfilled?\n'
' - **Yes**\n'
' 1. **4.4 Data analysis**\n'
' 2. **4.5 Documentation**\n'
' 3. **4.6 Results evaluation**\n'
' - Evaluation repeat?\n'
' - **Yes** → go back to **4.6 Results '
'evaluation**\n'
' - **No**\n'
' - **Machine capable?**\n'
' - **Yes** → **End**\n'
' - **No**\n'
' - **4.7 Machine optimization**\n'
' - Feasible machine optimization?\n'
' - **Yes** → go to **4.6 Results '
'evaluation**\n'
' - **No** → **4.8 Handling of '
'incapable machines**\n'
' - **No** → **4.3 Special regulation for restricted '
'MFI**\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'Figure 9 - Sequence of a machine capability '
'investigation\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"Here's a detailed analysis of the visual content based "
'on the specified aspects:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution\n'
'- **Image Number:** Image 1\n'
'- **Position:** The image is positioned centrally on '
'the page.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification\n'
'- **Objects Detected:** Flowchart elements (rectangles, '
'diamonds, ovals, arrows).\n'
'- **Classification:**\n'
' - **Flowchart Shapes:**\n'
' - Ovals: Start and End points.\n'
' - Rectangles: Process steps (e.g., "Test equipment '
'use", "Sampling").\n'
' - Diamonds: Decision points (e.g., "Conditions for '
'MFI fulfilled").\n'
'- **Key Features:** Clear, structured format showing '
'sequential steps.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis\n'
'- **Scene Description:** The image depicts a flowchart '
'outlining the process of conducting a machine '
'capability investigation (MFI).\n'
"- **Main Actors:** The flowchart's processes represent "
'actions rather than individuals.\n'
'- **Activities:** Steps include testing equipment, '
'sampling, data analysis, and evaluation.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis\n'
'- **Text Detected:** Various phrases outlining process '
'steps (e.g., "Test equipment use", "Data analysis").\n'
'- **Content Significance:** The text provides a clear '
'guide on conducting an MFI, outlining essential steps '
'and decision points.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis\n'
'- **Diagram Type:** Flowchart.\n'
'- **Axes and Scales:** Not applicable for this '
'flowchart format.\n'
'- **Key Insights:** Shows a structured approach to '
'evaluate machine capability with conditional paths and '
'loops.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis\n'
'- **Products Depicted:** Not applicable, as this is a '
'flowchart rather than a product depiction.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection\n'
'- **Anomalies:** None identified. The flowchart is '
'consistent with standard process mapping conventions.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis\n'
'- **Color Composition:** Predominantly black text on a '
'white background.\n'
'- **Dominant Colors:** Black and white.\n'
'- **Impact on Perception:** This high contrast enhances '
'readability and clarity of information.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition\n'
'- **Perspective:** Not applicable as this is a 2D '
'diagram.\n'
'- **Composition:** Organized logically with a '
'top-to-bottom flow illustrating the sequence of '
'processes.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance\n'
'- **Overall Context:** The flowchart is part of a '
'technical document outlining machine capabilities, '
'crucial for manufacturing and quality control.\n'
'- **Contribution to Theme:** Provides a visual summary '
'of steps involved, aiding understanding of the MFI '
'process.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis\n'
'- **Metadata:** Not available for analysis.\n'
'- **Relevance:** Metadata could provide context such as '
'creation date, but is not present here.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis\n'
'- **Graphs:** Not applicable, as this is a flowchart.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers\n'
'- **Data Points:** Not applicable as no numerical '
'graphs are present.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects\n'
'\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):** The flowchart '
'illustrates the process flow for conducting an MFI, '
'demonstrating decision-making and actions based on '
'conditions.\n'
' \n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):** '
'Details each step from testing equipment to handling '
'incapable machines, indicating systematic evaluation.\n'
'\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):** Categories '
'of actions like testing, sampling, and optimization are '
'clearly defined.\n'
'\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation:** Highlights a systematic '
'approach; while trends are not quantifiable, the '
'logical structure indicates best practices in machine '
'capability investigations.\n'
'\n'
'- **Tables:** None present in the flowchart. \n'
'\n'
"This comprehensive examination captures the flowchart's "
'structure, purpose, and significance in the context of '
'machine capability investigations.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '94d75f1c-4e44-47ad-993f-237fe3d95888-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 22.0,
'text': '# 4.4 Data analysis\n'
'\n'
'## 4.4.1 Selection of the expected distribution model\n'
'\n'
'## 4.4.2 Test for outliers\n'
'\n'
'- Outliers present\n'
' - **Yes**\n'
' - 4.4.3 Take outliers out of the calculation of '
'statistics\n'
' - **No**\n'
' - 4.4.4 Test for change of the production location\n'
' - 4.4.5 Test for deviation from the specified '
'distribution model\n'
'\n'
'## 4.4.4 Test for change of the production location\n'
'\n'
'## 4.4.5 Test for deviation from the specified '
'distribution model\n'
'\n'
'- Deviation from distribution model\n'
' - **Yes**\n'
' - Distribution-free evaluation\n'
' - **No**\n'
' - 4.4.6 Evaluation according to normal '
'distribution\n'
' - Normal distribution\n'
' - **Yes**\n'
' - 4.4.7 Evaluation according to specified '
'model\n'
' - **No**\n'
' - Continued at 4\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'**Figure 10 - Sequence of data analysis**\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"Here's a comprehensive examination of the provided "
'visual content based on the specified aspects:\n'
'\n'
'1. **Localization and Attribution:**\n'
' - **Image Location:** The visual is located on page '
'22.\n'
' - **Image Numbering:** This is designated as Image '
'1.\n'
'\n'
'2. **Object Detection and Classification:**\n'
' - **Objects Detected:** \n'
' - Flowchart shapes (ovals, rectangles, '
'diamonds).\n'
' - Arrows indicating flow direction.\n'
' - Labels indicating actions or decisions.\n'
' - **Key Features:** The flowchart utilizes standard '
'symbols (e.g., ovals for start/end, diamonds for '
'decision points).\n'
'\n'
'3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**\n'
' - **Scene Description:** The image depicts a '
'flowchart outlining a data analysis process.\n'
' - **Activities:** Steps involved in data analysis '
'such as testing for outliers, assessing distribution '
'models, and evaluating data are outlined.\n'
' - **Main Actors:** The "data analysis" process is '
'the primary focus, with various steps as actions.\n'
'\n'
'4. **Text Analysis:**\n'
' - **Extracted Text:**\n'
' - Sequential steps related to data analysis '
'such as "Selection of the expected distribution model," '
'"Test for outliers," and others.\n'
' - **Significance:** The text describes critical '
'steps in statistical analysis, illustrating a '
'systematic approach to handling data.\n'
'\n'
'5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**\n'
' - **Data Presentation:** The flowchart presents a '
'sequence of decisions and evaluations in the data '
'analysis process.\n'
' - **Axes/Scales:** Not applicable as this is a '
'flowchart, not a graph.\n'
' - **Key Insights:** Each step is dependent on '
'answers to previous steps, indicating a structured '
'approach to data evaluation.\n'
'\n'
'6. **Product Analysis:**\n'
' - **Products:** Not applicable as the content is '
'not product-based but rather process-oriented.\n'
'\n'
'7. **Anomaly Detection:**\n'
' - **Possible Anomalies:** \n'
' - Potential inefficiencies in how outlier '
'testing is conducted might arise if not regularly '
'reviewed.\n'
' - **Impact:** Identifying locations for change or '
'unusual deviations is crucial in ensuring data '
'integrity.\n'
'\n'
'8. **Color Analysis:**\n'
' - **Color Composition:** The image primarily '
'utilizes simple black and white with potential shades '
'of grey.\n'
' - **Impact on Perception:** The clean, minimal '
'color scheme emphasizes clarity and focus on the flow '
'of information.\n'
'\n'
'9. **Perspective and Composition:**\n'
' - **Perspective:** The flowchart is presented in a '
'top-down linear format.\n'
' - **Composition:** Elements are arranged '
'sequentially with arrows indicating the flow from one '
'step to another, enhancing readability.\n'
'\n'
'10. **Contextual Significance:**\n'
' - **Contribution to Document:** The image serves to '
'clarify and visually represent the methodological '
"approach to data analysis, aligning with the document's "
'instructional intent.\n'
'\n'
'11. **Metadata Analysis:**\n'
' - **Metadata Review:** Not available in the '
'visual.\n'
' - **Contributions to Analysis:** If metadata were '
'available (e.g., capture date, settings), it might '
"provide context on the document's creation.\n"
'\n'
'12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**\n'
' - **Graphs:** Not applicable as the content is a '
'flowchart.\n'
' \n'
'13. **Graph Numbers:**\n'
' - **Data Points:** Not applicable as there are no '
'numerical data points present.\n'
'\n'
'14. **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):**\n'
' - **Description:** The flowchart illustrates a '
'structured process for conducting data analysis, '
'highlighting the decision-making steps.\n'
'\n'
'15. **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):**\n'
' - **Detailed Description:** Steps include:\n'
' 1. Selection of distribution model.\n'
' 2. Testing for outliers.\n'
' 3. Evaluating changes in production location '
'and distribution model conformity.\n'
'\n'
'16. **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):**\n'
' - **Identification of Types:** Various statistical '
'evaluation types are identified, such as normal '
'distribution and distribution-free evaluations.\n'
'\n'
'17. **Trend and Interpretation:**\n'
' - **Identified Trends:** A methodical approach to '
'data evaluation is suggested, with a focus on '
'conforming to expected statistical models.\n'
' - **Interpretation:** A clear sequence helps in '
'understanding how data integrity is maintained through '
'rigorous analysis.\n'
'\n'
'18. **Tables:**\n'
' - **Table Analysis:** Not applicable as there are '
'no tables present in the image.\n'
'\n'
'This analysis covers all specified aspects '
'comprehensively based on the visual content provided.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'f456c560-c047-4454-b1c9-e784f06f9858-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 23.0,
'text': '# 4.6 Results Evaluation\n'
'\n'
'- **Outliers present**\n'
' - Yes\n'
' - **Outliers due to incorrect measurements**\n'
' - Yes\n'
' - _Machine incapable_ \n'
' Continued at 4\n'
' - No\n'
' - _Machine capable_ \n'
' Continued at 4\n'
' - No\n'
' - **Change of production location**\n'
' - Yes\n'
' - **Deviation from distribution model**\n'
' - Yes\n'
' - **Other distribution model possible**\n'
' - Yes\n'
' - _Evaluation repeat_ \n'
' Continued at 4\n'
' - No\n'
' - **Cause known and effect '
'acceptable**\n'
' - Yes\n'
' - **Capability indexes less than '
'limit values**\n'
' - Yes\n'
' - _Machine capable_ \n'
' Continued at 4\n'
' - No\n'
' - _Machine incapable_ \n'
' Continued at 4\n'
' - No\n'
' - _Machine incapable_ \n'
' Continued at 4\n'
' - No\n'
' - _Machine capable_ \n'
' Continued at 4\n'
' - No\n'
' - _Machine capable_ \n'
' Continued at 4\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'**Figure 11** - Sequence of the results evaluation\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"Here's an analysis of the provided visual content:\n"
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution:\n'
'- **Image Location**: The image is located on a '
'specific page, labeled as "Page 23" in the corner.\n'
'- **Image Number**: Image 1.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification:\n'
'- **Objects Identified**: The image is a flowchart.\n'
'- **Categories**: \n'
' - **Flowchart components**: Rectangles (process '
'steps), diamonds (decision points), arrows (flow '
'direction).\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:\n'
'- **Scene Description**: The flowchart outlines a '
'decision-making process for evaluating results.\n'
'- **Main Actors**: The decisions and outcomes '
'represented in each section of the flowchart.\n'
'- **Activities**: Represents steps taken based on the '
'outcomes of decisions (e.g., evaluating outliers, '
'assessing machine capability).\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis:\n'
'- **Detected Text**: Text within the flowchart includes '
'process titles and questions at decision points, such '
'as "Outliers present", "Change of production location", '
'"Deviation from distribution model", etc.\n'
'- **Text Significance**: This text provides a clear '
'guide for evaluating production results, helping to '
'identify critical checkpoints in the decision-making '
'process.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:\n'
'- **Diagram Type**: Flowchart.\n'
'- **Axes and Scales**: Not applicable, as flowcharts do '
'not have axes.\n'
'- **Key Insights**: Illustrates a systematic evaluation '
'process focusing on production metrics and potential '
'anomalies.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis:\n'
'- **Products Depicted**: Not applicable, as the image '
'does not depict any tangible products but rather a '
'process evaluation flowchart.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection:\n'
'- **Anomalies Identified**: The flowchart directs '
'attention to outliers and deviations from expected '
'processes.\n'
'- **Significance**: Highlighting such anomalies is '
'crucial for ensuring quality control and efficiency in '
'production.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis:\n'
'- **Color Composition**: The image predominantly uses '
'black text on a white background with basic flowchart '
'symbols.\n'
'- **Impact on Perception**: The simplicity of the color '
'scheme aids in clarity and easy understanding of the '
'flow of processes.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition:\n'
'- **Perspective Description**: The view is top-down, '
'typical for flowcharts.\n'
'- **Composition**: Well-organized layout with a logical '
'flow from top to bottom. Decision points lead to '
'different branches of evaluation.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance:\n'
'- **Overall Context**: The image serves as a critical '
'piece in understanding the evaluation process in '
'production settings.\n'
"- **Contribution**: It enhances the document's focus on "
'quality assurance and decision-making protocols.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis:\n'
'- **Metadata Review**: Not available as part of the '
'visual content.\n'
'- **Significance**: N/A in this case.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:\n'
'- **Graphs Present**: Not applicable as the content is '
'a flowchart and does not include graphs.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers:\n'
'- **Data Points**: Not applicable as no graphs are '
'included.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects:\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: The flowchart '
'visually represents the process of evaluating '
'production results and addressing anomalies.\n'
' \n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: '
'Each symbol represents specific decision-making steps '
'that guide the evaluation process.\n'
'\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: The '
'process categories and decisions outlined are '
'significant in executing a thorough results '
'evaluation.\n'
'\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation**: The flow is designed to '
'identify trends regarding production performance and '
'quality through systematic evaluation.\n'
'\n'
'- **Tables**: Not applicable as there are no tables '
'included.\n'
'\n'
'This comprehensive examination outlines the major '
'elements and insights derived from the flowchart '
'presented in the image.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '11bef824-f28b-40e8-9837-7f82fad8421d-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 24.0,
'text': '# 4.1 Test equipment use\n'
'\n'
'Test equipment shall only be used for the MFI that has '
'been released by the responsible department for the '
'planned test process.\n'
'\n'
'# 4.2 Sampling\n'
'\n'
'An MFI relates to only one production characteristic or '
'one machine parameter. Generally, the single '
'measurements of the random sample are recorded for '
'evaluation. In the case of manually recorded '
'measurements in a class subdivision of the value range '
'(tally), the frequency distribution of the classified '
'measurements can also be recorded.\n'
'\n'
'Thus, essentially only the machine influence is '
'recorded in an MFI, the following conditions shall be '
'complied with in the production of random sample '
'parts:\n'
'\n'
'- A uniform blank batch and a uniform preparation '
'(supplier, material) shall be ensured during the '
'investigation. During the MFI, the machine or system '
'shall always be operated by the same operator.\n'
'- The premanaging quality of the characteristics to be '
'evaluated must correspond to the required production '
'specifications.\n'
'- The number of parts to be produced (random sample '
'size) should generally be 50. If this random sample '
'size is difficult to obtain for economic or technical '
'reasons, a smaller one is also permissible. Then the '
'corresponding higher limit values according to Table 3 '
'or the formulas (3.7) and (3.8) have to be compiled '
'with. However, the random sample size (i.e. without '
'outliers) must be at least 20.\n'
'- The parts shall be produced immediately after each '
'other and numbered according to the manufacturing '
'sequence. All specified characteristics shall be tested '
'on each part.\n'
'- The MFI shall only be carried out with the machine at '
'operating temperature. “Operating temperature” is to be '
'defined for each use case.\n'
'- The test parts are to be produced under the standard '
'production conditions required for the machine (i.e. '
'with the cycle time and the machine adjustment '
'parameters as in standard production).\n'
'- Depending on the project, special specifications '
'shall be set so that at the beginning of the MFI, it is '
'ensured that, e.g., the tooling is broken in and that '
'the end of the tooling lifetime does not lie within the '
'MFI.\n'
'- Tooling change, manual tooling adjustments or other '
'changes of machine parameters shall not be carried out '
'during the MFI. Automatic tooling corrections due to '
'integrated measuring controls are excepted from this.\n'
'- If there are machine malfunctions during the MFI that '
'influence the characteristic to be investigated, the '
'MFI must be started over again.\n'
'- The measuring method must be specified before the '
'investigation and agreed upon between supplier and '
'customer.\n'
'\n'
'During production of different parts (different part '
'numbers, e.g., steel shaft/cast iron shaft) on one '
'machine that can additionally have different '
'characteristics, MFIs are to be carried out for all '
'these parts.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content as requested. "
'However, if you have specific questions or would like '
"to discuss the content of the document text you've "
'provided, feel free to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '9a3e7037-711f-4ab9-9e78-4be38e0a1c31-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 25.0,
'text': '# 4.3 Special regulation for restricted MFI\n'
'\n'
'If the conditions named in 4.2 cannot be met '
'completely, in justified cases a restricted MFI can be '
'carried out, for which special regulations are to be '
'agreed upon between supplier and customer and '
'documented under the note "Restricted MFI."\n'
'\n'
'# 4.4 Data analysis\n'
'\n'
'## 4.4.1 Selection of the expected distribution model\n'
'\n'
'The expected distribution model depends on the '
'characteristic type. For the most important types of '
'characteristics (see also VW 01056), the assigned '
'distribution models are to be taken from Table 2.\n'
'\n'
'| Characteristic type | Distribution model |\n'
'|-----------------------------|--------------------|\n'
'| Length dimensions | N |\n'
'| Diameter, radius | N |\n'
'| Straightness | B1 |\n'
'| Flatness | B1 |\n'
'| Roundness | B1 |\n'
'| Cylindricity | B1 |\n'
'| Profile of any line | B1 |\n'
'| Profile of any surface | B1 |\n'
'| Parallelism | B1 |\n'
'| Squareness | B1 |\n'
'| Slope (angularity) | B1 |\n'
'| Position | B2 |\n'
'| Coaxiality/concentricity | B2 |\n'
'| Symmetry | B1 |\n'
'| Radial runout | B2 |\n'
'| Axial runout | B2 |\n'
'| Roughness | B1 |\n'
'| Unbalance | B2 |\n'
'| Torque | N |\n'
'\n'
'**Legend:**\n'
'- N: Normal distribution\n'
'- B1: Type I absolute value distribution\n'
'- B2: Type II absolute value distribution (Rayleigh '
'distribution)\n'
'\n'
'For characteristic types not listed, in most cases an '
'assignment of a distribution can be carried out '
'according to the following rules:\n'
'\n'
'- A normal distribution for characteristics with '
'two-sided tolerance zones or one-sided tolerance zone '
'only\n'
'- And a type I or II absolute value distribution for '
'characteristics with one-sided tolerance zone only\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the attached visual content as "
'requested. If you have any specific questions or need '
'assistance with a different topic, feel free to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'b513fbc9-d253-4e46-98c0-3a1c8d537f42-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 26.0,
'text': '# 4.4.2 Test for Outliers\n'
'\n'
'First, a determination of whether the measured values '
'recorded contain outliers is made using the '
'distribution-free criteria test according to VW 101 33. '
'Outliers are measured values that lie so far from the '
'other measured values that it is highly probable that '
'they do not come from the same population as the '
'remaining values, e.g., erroneous measurements. The '
'outlier test shall be carried out with a confidence '
'level of 99%.\n'
'\n'
'# 4.4.3 Take Outliers Out of the Calculation of '
'Statistics\n'
'\n'
'If outliers are identified, these are not considered in '
'the calculation of the statistics. However, the '
'outliers shall not be deleted. Rather, they shall be '
'marked accordingly in the graphic representation of the '
'single value curve and their number shall be indicated '
'in the documentation.\n'
'\n'
'# 4.4.4 Test for Change of the Production Location\n'
'\n'
'Using the distribution-free Run Test according to '
'Swed-Eisenhard (see [1]), a determination shall be made '
'of whether the production location has changed '
'systematically during the sampling. A systematic change '
'of the production location can occur, e.g., due to the '
'influence of temperature or due to tooling wear (trend '
'curve). This test shall be carried out with a '
'confidence level of 95%.\n'
'\n'
'If only the frequency distribution of classified '
'measured values was recorded, this test cannot be '
'used.\n'
'\n'
'# 4.4.5 Test for Deviation from the Specified '
'Distribution Model\n'
'\n'
'The recorded measured values are to be tested to see '
'whether they exhibit a significant deviation from the '
'distribution model that was defined for the '
'characteristic involved. To do this, in the case of a '
'specified normal distribution, the Epps-Pulley test '
'(see ISO 5479) shall be used and in the case of a '
'different specified model, e.g., with a type I or II '
'absolute value distribution, the chi-square test (see '
'[1]) shall be used with a confidence level of 95%. A '
'deviation from the specified distribution model can '
'occur, e.g., due to different material batches during '
'the sampling (mixed distribution, see example 3 in '
'Section 5).\n'
'\n'
'A deviation from the specified distribution model can '
'occur, e.g., due to sampling from different tools '
'(mixed distribution, see also Section 3, in Figure 5).\n'
'\n'
'# 4.4.6 Evaluation According to Normal Distribution\n'
'\n'
'In the case of a specified normal distribution or one '
'that is approximated according to criteria (1.13), '
'(1.22), in which the measured values do not exhibit any '
'significant deviation from the distribution model, the '
'calculation of the capability indexes is carried out '
'according to formulas (2.1) to (2.5), depending on the '
'tolerancing, whereby the dispersion range limits are '
'determined according to (2.6).\n'
'\n'
'# 4.4.7 Evaluation According to Specified Model\n'
'\n'
'In the case of a different specified distribution '
'model, e.g., type I or II absolute value distribution, '
'in which the measured values do not exhibit any '
'significant deviation from the distribution model, the '
'calculation of the capability indexes are carried out '
'according to formulas (2.1) to (2.5), whereby the '
'statistics of the distribution to be fitted are '
'determined according to formulas (2.15) and (2.16) or '
'(2.24) and (2.25) respectively with the use of the '
'approximated function (2.18) or (2.27) respectively and '
'the dispersion range limits can be calculated according '
'to the approximated functions (2.19) or (2.28) '
'respectively.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly as "
"there isn't any image attached. If you have specific "
'visuals or images to analyze, please upload them, and '
"I'd be happy to assist you with a comprehensive "
"evaluation based on the aspects you've outlined."},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '211814cc-0830-48d7-8949-138bc0d4f160-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 27.0,
'text': '```\n'
'# 4.4.8 Distribution-free evaluation\n'
'\n'
'If the statistical test results in a contradiction '
'between the recorded measured values and the specified '
'distribution model, or if not fitting distribution '
'model can be found for the considered production '
'characteristic, a distribution-free calculation of the '
'capability indexes is carried out according to formulas '
'(2.29) to (2.40).\n'
'\n'
'# 4.5 Documentation\n'
'\n'
'The documentation of an MFI regarding a characteristic '
'must contain the following information and '
'representations:\n'
'\n'
'## Header data:\n'
'- Department, coordinator and preparation date\n'
'- Information regarding the part\n'
'- Designation, nominal dimension and tolerance of the '
'characteristic\n'
'- Machine data\n'
'- Test equipment data\n'
'- Production time period\n'
'\n'
'## Results:\n'
'- Graphical representation of the single value curve '
'with the random sample mean values with limit lines of '
'the tolerance zone (as long as single values were '
'recorded)\n'
'- Histogram with a fitted distribution model, limit '
'lines of the tolerance zone and dispersion range, as '
'well as mean value and/or median value line\n'
'- Representation in the probability grid with the '
'fitted distribution model, limit lines of the tolerance '
'zone and dispersion range, as well as mean value and/or '
'median value line (see [2])\n'
'- Number of measured values\n'
'- Number of measured values evaluated or outliers '
'found\n'
'- Estimated value of the production location\n'
'- Estimated values of the dispersion range limits or '
'the estimated value of the dispersion range\n'
'- The distribution model used\n'
'- The result of the test for change of the production '
'location\n'
'- The result of the test for deviation from the '
'specified distribution model\n'
'- Calculated capability indexes Cm and Cmk (to two '
'digits after the decimal)\n'
'- Required limit values for Cm and Cmk\n'
'\n'
'## References and notes:\n'
'- If necessary, reference to restricted MFI\n'
'- If necessary, special agreements between supplier and '
'customer\n'
'- If necessary, special events during the sampling\n'
'```\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze or describe the visual content "
'you mentioned since there are no attached images for '
'review. If you provide specific images or details about '
'the content, I can offer guidance or assistance based '
'on that information. Please feel free to share!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '9565ade8-9cb8-4c42-aa33-d3faa56ebeb9-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 28.0,
'text': '# 4.6 Results Evaluation\n'
'\n'
'Whether a machine can be evaluated capable with respect '
'to production of a considered characteristic depends on '
'the following result evaluation:\n'
'\n'
'- If outliers occur during an evaluation, their cause '
'has to be clarified. Outliers shall only be caused by '
'incorrect measurements or be wrongly identified as such '
'using the outlier test based on the specified '
'probability of error of 1%. Otherwise, the machine '
'shall be evaluated as capable. If more than 5% of the '
'recorded measured values or more than 2 values are '
'identified as outliers, there shall be a test of '
'whether the test process is faulty. Then the MFI is to '
'be repeated if necessary.\n'
'\n'
'- If the production location has changed significantly '
'during the sampling, generally its cause has to be '
'known and the effect has to be acceptable in order to '
'meet the requirement for machine capability (see last '
'paragraph of this section for exception).\n'
'\n'
'- If a distribution-free evaluation exists due to a '
'significant deviation from the specified distribution '
'model and if no other distribution model can be '
'assigned to the considered characteristic without '
'contradiction, the cause must be known and the effect '
'must be acceptable*, in order to meet the requirement '
'for machine capability (see last paragraph of this '
'section for exception).\n'
'\n'
'Unless otherwise agreed, the capability indexes '
'determined with an effective random sample size of \\( '
'n_e \\geq 50 \\) (i.e. without outliers) must meet the '
'requirement:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\bar{C}_p \\geq 2.0 \\quad \\text{and} \\quad '
'\\bar{C}_{pk} \\geq 1.67 \\quad \\text{for a '
'characteristic with two-sided tolerance zones}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\bar{C}_{pk} \\geq 1.67 \\quad \\text{for a '
'characteristic with one-sided tolerance zone only}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'in order for the machine to be evaluated as capable. In '
'this case, for comparison to the limit values, the '
'capability indexes determined are to be rounded to two '
'digits after the decimal so that, e.g., a determined '
'value of \\( \\bar{C}_{pk} = 1.66545 \\) will still '
'meet the requirement after the resulting rounding to '
'1.67.\n'
'\n'
'With an effective random sample size of \\( 20 \\leq n '
'\\leq 50 \\), correspondingly higher limit values shall '
'be complied with. The fitted limit values are given in '
'Table 3 for a few random sample sizes. If there is '
'agreement on other limit values on the basis of \\( n_e '
'\\geq 50 \\), the corresponding fitted limit values are '
'to be determined according to formulas (3.7) to (3.9).\n'
'\n'
'## Table 3 - Limit Values for Machine Capability for '
'\\( 20 \\leq n \\leq 50 \\)\n'
'\n'
'| \\( n \\) | \\( \\bar{C}_p \\geq \\) | \\( '
'\\bar{C}_{pk} \\geq \\) |\n'
'|---------|---------------------|------------------------|\n'
'| 20 | 2.28 | '
'1.93 |\n'
'| 25 | 2.19 | '
'1.85 |\n'
'| 30 | 2.13 | '
'1.79 |\n'
'| 35 | 2.08 | '
'1.75 |\n'
'| 40 | 2.05 | '
'1.72 |\n'
'| 45 | 2.02 | '
'1.69 |\n'
'| 50 | 2.00 | '
'1.67 |\n'
'\n'
'If a capability index results that is lower than the '
'corresponding limit value, the machine is to be '
'evaluated as incapable.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the content of the visual you "
'provided. If you have any other questions or need '
'assistance with a different topic, feel free to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '01a1f138-d22e-46d1-8ce4-cc775c8a3b3d-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 29.0,
'text': 'With a determined capability index of \\( c_{mk} \\geq '
'2.33 \\) (corresponds to 14 d) and additionally \\( '
'c_{pk} \\geq 2.67 \\) (corresponds to 16 d) for '
'characteristics with two-sided tolerance zones, the '
'machine can be evaluated as capable with respect to the '
'considered characteristic, even independent of a '
'significant location change or deviation from the '
'specified distribution model.\n'
'\n'
'## 4.7 Machine Optimization\n'
'\n'
'For the case where the machine capability cannot be '
'documented with respect to the tested characteristic, '
'measures for machine optimization are necessary. To do '
'this, the corresponding influences are to be identified '
'(e.g., using ODE statistical test methodology) and '
'eliminated.\n'
'\n'
'## 4.8 Handling Incapable Machines\n'
'\n'
'If it is not possible to achieve machine capability '
'with machine optimizations that are economically '
'reasonable, there shall first be an investigation using '
'statistical tolerance calculation according to VW 01057 '
'of whether a tolerance extension is possible to achieve '
'the machine capability. If machine capability cannot be '
'achieved using these measures, a decision is to be made '
'whether the machine will be accepted according to '
'special regulations agreed upon in writing or not. '
'These special regulations shall contain the following '
'points:\n'
'\n'
'- Reasons for the acceptance\n'
'- Risk and cost considerations\n'
'- If necessary, restricting production and additional '
'test conditions\n'
'- Specification of the responsibility\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to conduct an analysis of visual content as "
'I cannot see images. However, I can help you with '
'questions or content related to specific topics. If you '
"have any particular information or text you'd like to "
'discuss or analyze, please let me know!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '62b4c420-a99e-480a-abd2-9bdbf356826a-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 30.0,
'text': '# 5 Examples\n'
'\n'
'## Example 1:\n'
'\n'
'Shaft diameter with a nominal dimension of 20 mm, a '
'lower limiting value of \\( G_{u} = 19.7 \\) mm and an '
'upper limiting value of \\( G_{e} = 20.3 \\) mm.\n'
'\n'
'Using the statistical tests, no outliers resulted, no '
'significant change of the production location occurred, '
'and there was no significant deviation from an expected '
'normal distribution from \\( n = 50 \\) measured values '
'of the random sample. The following random sample '
'statistics are determined:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\bar{x} = 20.05 \\quad \\text{and} \\quad \\bar{s} = '
'0.05\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Therefore, according to formula (2.11), the following '
'estimated values of the dispersion range limits result '
'for the normally distributed populations:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{x}_{0.135\\%} = \\bar{x} - 3 \\cdot \\bar{s} = '
'(20.05 - 3 \\cdot 0.05) \\, \\text{mm} = 19.9 \\, '
'\\text{mm}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{x}_{99.865\\%} = \\bar{x} + 3 \\cdot \\bar{s} = '
'(20.05 + 3 \\cdot 0.05) \\, \\text{mm} = 20.2 \\, '
'\\text{mm}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'and from that, ultimately, the following capability '
'indexes result:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\bar{c}_{m} = \\frac{G_{u} - '
'G_{l}}{\\hat{x}_{99.865\\%} - \\hat{x}_{0.135\\%}} = '
'\\frac{20.3 - 19.7}{20.2 - 19.9} = 2.0\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\bar{c}_{k} = \\min\\left( \\frac{G_{u} - '
'\\bar{x}}{\\hat{x}_{99.865\\%} - \\bar{x}}, '
'\\frac{\\bar{x} - G_{l}}{\\bar{x} - '
'\\hat{x}_{0.135\\%}} \\right) = \\min\\left( '
'\\frac{20.3 - 20.05}{20.2 - 20.05}, \\frac{20.05 - '
'19.7}{20.05 - 19.9} \\right) = \\frac{20.3 - '
'20.05}{20.2 - 20.05} = 1.67\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Because of the capability indexes, it is thus verified '
'that the machine just meets the capability requirements '
'with respect to the considered shaft diameters.\n'
'\n'
'Figure 12 shows the evaluation result:\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze or interpret visual content "
'directly. However, I can help guide you on how to '
"approach the analysis based on the aspects you've "
'provided. If you have specific questions or need '
'assistance with a particular aspect of the content, '
'feel free to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'd4f34f62-154f-45a8-8df2-9ce85642aacd-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 31.0,
'text': '# Example 2:\n'
'\n'
'Hole with a maximum permissible position deviation of '
'\\( G_o = 0.2 \\, \\text{mm} \\).\n'
'\n'
'From the \\( n = 50 \\) measurements of the random '
'sample, the statistical tests did not result in any '
'outliers, no significant location change, and no '
'significant deviation from an expected type II absolute '
'value distribution. The following random sample '
'statistics were determined:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{x} = 0.038 \\, \\text{mm} \\quad \\text{and} '
'\\quad \\hat{s} = 0.02 \\, \\text{mm}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'The random sample statistics result in the ratio \n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\frac{\\hat{x} - G_o}{\\hat{s}} = \\frac{0.038 - '
'0.02}{0.02} = 1.9\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Since, because of the random dispersion of the random '
'sample statistics, this value is lower than the limit '
'value 1.9131 according to condition (2.23), the ratio '
'is set to this limit value, which in turn results in an '
'eccentricity of \\( z = 0 \\).\n'
'\n'
'In this way, the second parameter value of the type II '
'absolute value distribution to be fitted is calculated '
'according to special case (2.26) as follows:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\sigma_N = 1.526 - \\hat{x} = 1.526 - 0.02 = 0.305 \\, '
'\\text{mm}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'The estimated values of the dispersion range limits '
'result from formula (2.27):\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{x}_{0.965} = 5.5485 - \\hat{s} \\cdot 0.2 \\, '
'\\text{mm} = 5.5485 - 0.0111 \\, \\text{mm} = 5.5374 '
'\\, \\text{mm}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{x}_{0.135} = 0.0773 - \\hat{s} \\cdot 0.2 \\, '
'\\text{mm} = 0.0773 - 0.0016 \\, \\text{mm} = 0.0757 '
'\\, \\text{mm}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Finally, according to formulas (2.3) and (2.4), the '
'following capability indexes result:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{C}_{pk} = \\frac{G_o}{\\hat{x}_{0.135}} \\cdot '
'\\frac{0.2}{0.2} = \\frac{0.2}{0.0757} = 1.83\n'
'\\]\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{C}_{mk} = \\frac{G_o - \\hat{x}}{\\hat{x}_{0.965} '
'- \\hat{x}} = \\frac{0.2 - 0.038}{0.0757 - 0.038} = '
'2.22\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Figure 13 illustrates the evaluation result.\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'Because of the determined statistic \\( C_{mk} \\), it '
'is verified that the machine meets the requirement well '
'with respect to the position deviation of a hole. '
'Although no limit value is specified for statistic \\( '
'C_{mk} \\) in the case with an upper limited tolerance '
'zone, comparison to the \\( C_{mk} \\) value provides '
'information on the production location and the smaller '
'\\( C_{mk} \\) value indicates that the location lies '
'closer to the natural limit zero than to the upper '
'limiting value.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content you've "
'provided, as I currently do not have the ability to '
'view images or any specific visual material. However, I '
'can assist you with analysis guidelines or explain '
"concepts related to the aspects you've listed. If you "
'have specific descriptions or text from the visual '
'content, feel free to share, and I can help analyze or '
'interpret those!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'f861faa8-7f76-43f2-ad8c-62e7904976fd-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 32.0,
'text': '# Example 3\n'
'\n'
'Shaft diameter with a nominal dimension of 20 mm, a '
'lower limiting value of \\( G_\\ell = 19.7 \\, '
'\\text{mm} \\) and an upper limiting value of \\( G_u = '
'20.3 \\, \\text{mm} \\) from \\( n = 50 \\) measured '
'values of the random sample, due to the statistical '
'tests, no outliers resulted and no significant location '
'change resulted, but a significant deviation from an '
'expected normal distribution did. Therefore, a '
'distribution-free evaluation is carried out according '
'to Section 3.22. To do so, the following random sample '
'statistics were determined:\n'
'\n'
'- \\( \\bar{x}_{95\\%} = \\bar{x} = 20.02 \\, '
'\\text{mm}, \\, x_{max} = 20.19 \\, \\text{mm} \\, '
'\\text{and} \\, x_{min} = 19.85 \\, \\text{mm} \\)\n'
'\n'
'Correction factor according to formula (2.38) and Table '
'1: \n'
'\n'
'| \\( k \\) | \\( \\frac{d}{d_f} \\) | \\( '
'\\frac{6}{4.5} \\) | \\( = 1.33 \\) |\n'
'|---------|---------------------|----------------------|--------------|\n'
'\n'
'Range according to formula (2.37): \\( R = x_{max} - '
'x_{min} = (20.19 - 19.85) \\, \\text{mm} = 0.34 \\, '
'\\text{mm} \\)\n'
'\n'
'According to formula (2.36): \n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'x_c = \\frac{x_{max} + x_{min}}{2} = \\frac{20.19 + '
'19.85}{2} \\, \\text{mm} = 20.02 \\, \\text{mm}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Estimated values for dispersion range limits according '
'to formula (2.35): \n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{x}_{\\ell} \\ \\hat{x}_{u} = x_c \\pm k \\cdot '
'\\frac{R}{2} = \\left(20.02 \\pm 1.33 \\cdot '
'\\frac{0.34}{2}\\right) \\, \\text{mm} = \\left(20.246 '
'\\, \\text{mm} \\, ; \\, 19.794 \\, \\text{mm}\\right)\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Thus the formulas (2.29) and (2.30) resulted in the '
'capability indexes:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'c_{m} = \\frac{G_u - G_\\ell}{\\bar{x}_{u} - '
'\\bar{x}_{\\ell}} = \\frac{20.3 - 19.7}{20.246 - '
'19.794} = 1.33\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'c_{mk} = \\min \\left( \\frac{G_u - '
'\\bar{x}_{95\\%}}{G_u - G_\\ell}, \\frac{G_u - '
'\\bar{x}_{u}}{G_u - \\bar{x}_{\\ell}} \\right) = \\min '
'\\left( \\frac{20.3 - 20.02}{20.3 - 19.7}, \\frac{20.3 '
'- 20.246}{20.246 - 19.794} \\right) = 1.24\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Figure 14 illustrates the evaluation result.\n'
'\n'
'## Example 14 - Example of a production without defined '
'distribution model with the capability indexes \\( c_m '
'= 1.33 \\) and \\( c_{mk} = 1.24 \\)\n'
'\n'
'From the capability indexes determined, it can be seen '
'that the machine does not meet the capability '
'requirement with respect to the considered '
'characteristic. The significant deviation from an '
'expected normal distribution supplies interesting '
'information in this context. Because of this, an '
'optimization potential can be recognized, in this case '
'through mixed distribution.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the attached visual content as "
'requested. However, I can help with any information or '
"topics related to the content you're interested in "
'discussing. Please let me know how else I might assist '
'you!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '983ee3be-7312-4177-a979-57cb1adeb8ff-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 33.0,
'text': '# 6 Referenced standards\n'
'\n'
'- **VW 010 56**: Drawings; Form and Position '
'Tolerances\n'
'- **VW 010 57**: Statistical Tolerance Calculation of '
'Dimension Chains\n'
'- **VW 101 33**: Test auf Ausreißer (Test for Outliers '
'– currently only available in German)\n'
'- **DIN 55319**: Quality Capability Statistics (QCS)\n'
'- **ISO 5479**: Statistical Interpretation of Data - '
'Tests for Departure from the Normal Distribution\n'
'\n'
'# 7 Referenced literature\n'
'\n'
'1. Graf, Henning, Stange, Wilrich, Formeln und Tabellen '
'der angewandten mathematischen Statistik, Springer '
'Publishing Group, third edition, 1987\n'
'2. Kühmeyer, M.: Statistische Auswertungsmethoden für '
'Ingenieure, Springer Publishing Group, 2001\n'
'\n'
'[10] In this Section, terminological inconsistencies '
'may occur as the original titles are used.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze or describe the visual content "
'directly. However, if you need specific information or '
"a summary regarding the content of the text you've "
'shared, I can help with that. Let me know what you '
'would like to know!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'de98f34a-73cd-4a7e-8465-009d3f72c11e-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 34.0,
'text': '# Keyword Index\n'
'\n'
'| Key word | '
'Page |\n'
'|--------------------------------------------------|--------|\n'
'| A '
'| |\n'
'| Absolute frequency α | '
'10, 17 |\n'
'| Absolute cumulative frequency A | '
'17 |\n'
'| α-Risk | '
'20 |\n'
'| Alternative hypothesis | '
'20 |\n'
'| Fitted capability limit values | '
'19, 28 |\n'
'| Outlier | 20, '
'26 |\n'
'| Confidence level γ | 20, '
'26 |\n'
'| B '
'| |\n'
'| Conditions for the machine capability investigation| '
'24 |\n'
'| β-Risk | '
'20 |\n'
'| Absolute value distribution, type I | 5, '
'11 |\n'
'| Absolute value distribution, type II | 7, '
'13 |\n'
'| Machine at operating temperature | '
'24 |\n'
'| C '
'| |\n'
'| Capability | '
'3 |\n'
'| Chi-square distribution | '
'18 |\n'
'| D '
'| |\n'
'| Data analysis | '
'25 |\n'
'| Density function f(x) | '
'4 |\n'
'| Documentation | '
'27 |\n'
'| E '
'| |\n'
'| Restricted machine capability investigation | '
'25 |\n'
'| Effective random sample size nₑ | '
'10, 24 |\n'
'| Epps-Pulley test | 20, '
'26 |\n'
'| Results evaluation | '
'28 |\n'
'| Expected value for the w-distribution dₕ | '
'17 |\n'
'| Eccentricity z | '
'7 |\n'
'| F '
'| |\n'
'| Determination of capability | '
'8 |\n'
'| Capability indexes cₕ and cₘₖ | 3, '
'9 |\n'
'| Capability limit values | '
'18, 28 |\n'
'| Production location | 3, '
'28 |\n'
'| Production variation | 3, '
'8 |\n'
'| Production sequence | '
'24 |\n'
'| Degree of freedom | '
'18 |\n'
'| G '
'| |\n'
'| Limit values of machine capability | '
'18, 28 |\n'
'| H '
'| |\n'
'| Hampel test | '
'20 |\n'
'| Frequency distribution | '
'10, 17 |\n'
'| Upper limiting value G₀ | 3, '
'9 |\n'
'| I '
'| |\n'
'| Probability of error α | '
'20 |\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the image directly, but I can "
'help with any questions or provide information based on '
"the context you've provided. If you have specific "
"details or content from the image you'd like me to "
'assist with, please share that information!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '29375654-2541-4160-ad50-c5af3abe9bca-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 35.0,
'text': '# Key word\n'
'\n'
'| Keyword | Page |\n'
'|--------------------------------------|------|\n'
'| K | |\n'
'| Class width Δx | 17 |\n'
'| Classified measured values | 10, 17 |\n'
'| Correction factor k | 17 |\n'
'| L | |\n'
'| Location | 3 |\n'
'| M | |\n'
'| Machine optimization | 29 |\n'
'| Machine malfunctions | 24 |\n'
'| Median value | 16 |\n'
'| Characteristic type | 4, 25 |\n'
'| Characteristic value | 3 |\n'
'| Measuring method | 24 |\n'
'| Lower limiting value Gu | 3, 9 |\n'
'| Mixed distribution | 26, 32 |\n'
'| Mean value μ | 4, 10 |\n'
'| N | |\n'
'| Normal distribution | 4, 10 |\n'
'| Null hypothesis | 20 |\n'
'| Zero offset | 6 |\n'
'| P | |\n'
'| Parameter of a distribution | 3 |\n'
'| Test variable | 20 |\n'
'| Test value | 20 |\n'
'| Test equipment use | 24 |\n'
'| Q | |\n'
'| Quantile | 9 |\n'
'| - of the standardized normal distribution | 18 |\n'
'| - of the chi-square distribution | 18 |\n'
'| R | |\n'
'| Rayleigh distribution | 7 |\n'
'| Radial deviation r | 7 |\n'
'| Blank batch | 24 |\n'
'| Rounding of capability values | 28 |\n'
'| Run test | 20 |\n'
'| S | |\n'
'| Estimation / estimated value | 8, 9 |\n'
'| Threshold value | 20 |\n'
'| Standard production conditions | 24 |\n'
'| Significant change / deviations | 20 |\n'
'| Range R | 17 |\n'
'| Standard deviation σ | 4, 10 |\n'
'| Standardized normal distribution | 5 |\n'
'| - U Transformation | 5 |\n'
'| - Distribution function Φ(μ) | 5 |\n'
'| - Probability density function φ(u) | 20 |\n'
'| Statistical tests | 20 |\n'
'| Statistical tolerance calculation | 29 |\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly, but "
'I can offer some guidance on how to conduct a detailed '
"examination based on the aspects you've provided. "
'Here’s a structured approach to help you analyze the '
'content comprehensively:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution\n'
'- **Identify Images**: Number each image as they appear '
'on the page (e.g., Image 1, Image 2, etc.).\n'
' \n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification\n'
'- **Identify Objects**: Note all objects present in '
'each image and classify them by category (e.g., people, '
'vehicles, items).\n'
'- **Key Features**: Describe characteristics such as '
'color, size, and shape.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis\n'
'- **Scene Description**: Provide a narrative of what is '
'happening in each image.\n'
'- **Main Actors**: Identify key figures and their '
'actions.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis\n'
'- **Extract Text**: If there is any text in the images, '
'transcribe it.\n'
'- **Content Significance**: Discuss what the text '
'conveys in relation to the image.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis\n'
'- **Analyze Diagrams/Charts**: Review any graphical '
'elements by identifying data and trends.\n'
'- **Axes and Scales**: Take note of the axes, scales, '
'and legends for interpretation.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis\n'
'- **Product Details**: Describe any visible products '
'regarding features and design.\n'
'- **Comparison**: If multiple products are present, '
'highlight their differences.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection\n'
'- **Identify Anomalies**: Point out unusual or '
'unexpected elements and discuss their importance.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis\n'
'- **Color Composition**: Analyze the prevalent colors '
'in the images and their psychological effects.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition\n'
'- **Perspective**: Mention the angle from which the '
'image is captured.\n'
'- **Composition**: Describe how elements are positioned '
'and their visual balance.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance\n'
'- **Overall Contribution**: Discuss how each image fits '
"into the document's broader message.\n"
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis\n'
'- **Review Metadata**: If applicable, summarize capture '
'date, camera settings, etc.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis\n'
'- **Trends Identification**: Analyze graphs for trends, '
'explaining key points in the data.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers\n'
'- **Data Points**: List data points clearly and '
'concisely.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects to Include:\n'
'- **Process Flows**: Describe any depicted process '
'flows and their relevance.\n'
'- **Process Descriptions**: Provide detailed '
'descriptions of any shown processes.\n'
'- **Type Designations**: Identify categories shown, if '
'applicable.\n'
'- **Trends Interpretation**: Discuss any observed '
'trends.\n'
'- **Tables**: Analyze any tables and summarize their '
'data.\n'
'\n'
'### Conclusion\n'
'This structured approach will help you create a '
'comprehensive analysis of the images or visual content. '
'Each section should focus on the specified aspects, '
'ensuring thorough exploration and clear presentation of '
'findings.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '158f8225-164e-4303-af1c-6c5d4b1d1a05-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_EN.pdf',
'page': 36.0,
'text': '# Page 36\n'
'## VW 101 30: 2005-02\n'
'\n'
'### Key word | Page \n'
'----------------------------------- | ---- \n'
'Statistical percentage range | 18 \n'
'Sampling | 24 \n'
'Random sample range | 24 \n'
'Dispersion range limits | 3, 10 \n'
'Swed-Eisenhard test | 20 \n'
'\n'
'### T \n'
'- **Test** \n'
' - for outliers | 20, 26 \n'
' - for specified distribution model | 20, 26 \n'
' - for change of production location| 20, 26 \n'
'- **Tolerance expansion** | 29 \n'
'- **Tolerance zone** | 3, 8 \n'
'- **Toleranced characteristic** | 4 \n'
' - on one side, upward | 9, 16 \n'
' - on one side, downward | 9, 16 \n'
' - on two sides | 9, 16 \n'
'- **Trend curve** | 26 \n'
'\n'
'### V \n'
'- **Variance** \\( \\sigma^2 \\) | 4 \n'
'- **Distribution** | 4 \n'
'- **Distribution-free estimate** | 16, 27 \n'
'- **Distribution function** \\( F(x) \\) | 5 \n'
'- **Distribution model** | 4 \n'
'- **Confidence range limit** | 18 \n'
'- **Premachining quality** | 24 \n'
'\n'
'### W \n'
'- **Probability** \\( p \\) | 5 \n'
'- **Probability density function** \\( f(x) \\) | 4 \n'
'- **Probability grid** | 27 \n'
'- **Weibull distribution** | 8 \n'
'- **Tooling change / adjustment** | 24 \n'
'- **w-Distribution** | 17 \n'
'\n'
'### Z \n'
'- **Random influences** | 3 \n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze visual content as requested. "
'However, if you have any specific questions or need '
'information based on text or other inputs, feel free to '
'ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '0b303d07-aeb3-48b4-a669-9760aa61924b-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf',
'page': 1.0,
'text': '# TECHNICKÉ ZADÁNÍ\n'
'## LASTENHEFT\n'
'\n'
'**Lastenheft-Gegenstand** \n'
'**Version vom 23. 08. 2024** \n'
'**Bearbeitungslinie für Motorgehäuse für Elektroantrieb '
'SSP**\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'### Vypracoval\n'
'| Jméno | Oddělení | Datum | Podpis '
'|\n'
'|------------------|----------|-------|-----------------|\n'
'| G. Komarov | PPK-E | | '
'|\n'
'\n'
'### Schválil\n'
'| Jméno | Oddělení | Datum | Podpis '
'|\n'
'|------------------|----------|-------|-----------------|\n'
'| R. Taneček | PPK-E | | '
'|\n'
'| Z. Nekola | PPK | | '
'|\n'
'| J. Paldus | PKG/1 | | '
'|\n'
'| R. Schrom | PKG/4 | | '
'|\n'
'| M. Kargl | PKT/42 | | '
'|\n'
'| M. Adamec | PKG/3 | | '
'|\n'
'| J. Johan | PKT/3 | | '
'|\n'
'| Z. Chytka | PKT/14 | | '
'|\n'
'| K. Tkášek | PKT/1 | | '
'|\n'
'| J. Cikler | GQH-1/4 | | '
'|\n'
'| M. Repč | GQH-3 | | '
'|\n'
'| J. Beneš | PKT/2 | | '
'|\n'
'| M. Janata | PSZ/11 | | '
'|\n'
'| R. Chudoba | PKT | | '
'|\n'
'| J. Nohejl | PSU | | '
'|\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'**INTERNAL** \n'
'**1/10**\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content as requested "
'since there is no capability to view or interpret '
'images. However, if you provide specific descriptions '
'or data from the image, I can help analyze or interpret '
'that information based on textual input. Please let me '
'know how you would like to proceed!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'f91fde74-2e5e-4859-a744-dd848cde6bde-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf',
'page': 2.0,
'text': '# 1. Vergabegesellschaft\n'
'\n'
'Bearbeitungslinie für Motorengehäuse für Elektronetrieb '
'SSP.\n'
'\n'
'## 2. Angaben über das zu bearbeitende Bauteil\n'
'\n'
'- **Bauteil:** Motorengehäuse SSP HA LK3,4\n'
'- **Zeichnungsnummer:** QOA.901.108\n'
'- **Gewicht des bearbeiteten Teils:** 14,975 kg (davon '
'die Lagerbuchse 0,369 kg)\n'
'- **Rohteilgewicht:** ca 18 kg\n'
'- **Material:**\n'
' - Gehäuse QOA 901 108\n'
' - EN ACI - 460000 - AISi9Cu3 (Fe)\n'
' - Lagerbuchse QOA 901 261 A DIN 30910-SINT-D-11\n'
'- **Grundmaß:** siehe Zeichnung\n'
'\n'
'## 3. Geforderte Anlagenfunktionen\n'
'\n'
'3.1 Bearbeitung des Gussteils gemäß der Zeichnung '
'QOA_901_108-sspha_mg_fzg (siehe Anlage Nr. 8).\n'
'\n'
'3.2 Eingangsstand des Teils – Gusstechnik '
'(Hochdruckguss) – siehe 3D Daten (Anlage Nr. 7). Die '
'Zeichnung des Gussteils ist noch nicht verfügbar und '
'wird später erstellt. Allgemein kann man mit den '
'Toleranzen des Gussteils nach ISO 8062-3 - DCTG7 - '
'GCTG3 rechnen.\n'
'\n'
'3.3 Ausgangsstand des Teils – bearbeitetes Teil – siehe '
'Zeichnung (Anlage Nr. 8).\n'
'\n'
'3.4 Das Prozessablaufschema und der Lieferumfang siehe '
'Anlage 5.\n'
'\n'
'## 4. Forderungen auf die Anlagenausführung\n'
'\n'
'4.1 Modulare Linie der Bearbeitungszentren, verknüpft '
'durch ein Portal. Die Bearbeitungszentren (Module) und '
'das Portal werden schrittweise nach dem Zeitplan gebaut '
'– siehe Punkt Nr. 7.\n'
'\n'
'4.2 Die Linie soll über SPC-Stellen verfügen, damit die '
'Teile nach jeder Arbeitsfolge zur Messung entnommen und '
'wieder in den Strom eingelegt werden können.\n'
'\n'
'4.3 Der Transport des Teils zum Übergeblattpunkt unter '
'dem Portal erfolgt über ein Förderband mit '
'Spannvorrichtungen. Positionierung des Teils auf der '
'Transportvorrichtung gemäß den Empfehlungen des '
'Lieferanten der Linie und den technischen Möglichkeiten '
'des Verteilungslieferanten.\n'
'\n'
'**Die Schnittstelle zwischen der ML und der Verkettung '
'von und nach der Linie:**\n'
'\n'
'- Ladevorrichtung – im Lieferumfang des Lieferanten der '
'ML\n'
'- Förderer – im Lieferumfang Škoda Auto a.s.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the content of the image as "
'requested. If you would like to provide specific '
'information or ask about different content, feel free '
'to do so!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '40c71eb1-cc20-41ed-adca-9a219bec0ea4-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf',
'page': 3.0,
'text': '# Bearbeitungslinie für Motorengüsse für Elektromotoren '
'SSP\n'
'**Projekt:** \n'
'**SSP:** \n'
'**Mitglied:** \n'
'**Kunden-Nr.:** \n'
'**Datum:** \n'
'\n'
'## 4.4 Die Bearbeitung (der ganze Prozess) wird mittels '
'Kühlflüssigkeit (Emulsion) bevorgt und empfohlen\n'
'### - Spezifikation der Emulsion nach Škoda \n'
'\n'
'#### 4.4.1 Preisgestaltung der Schnittstelle mit der '
'Emulsionszentrale (Lieferung der Emulsionszentrale '
'seitens Škoda Auto a.s.)\n'
'**Spezifikation der erforderlichen Emulsionsmenge '
'(l/min)**\n'
'\n'
'| KSS | | | | | | | | | |\n'
'|-----|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|\n'
'| | BAZ | BAZ | BAZ | BAZ | BAZ | BAZ | | | |\n'
'| | | | | | | | | | |\n'
'| | | | | | | | | | |\n'
'| | | | | | | | | | |\n'
'\n'
'- im Lieferumfang des Lieferanten\n'
'- im Lieferumfang Škoda Auto a.s.\n'
'\n'
'#### 4.4.2 OPTION zu jeder Maschine die Filtrieranlage '
'und Temperaturemulsion + Spänentransport mittels '
'Förderer anbieten (Höhe des Späneträgers 1.500 mm)\n'
'\n'
'| Spänenpöster | | | | | | | | | |\n'
'|--------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|\n'
'| | BAZ | BAZ | BAZ | BAZ | BAZ | BAZ | '
'| | |\n'
'\n'
'- im Lieferumfang des Lieferanten\n'
'- im Lieferumfang Škoda Auto a.s.\n'
'\n'
'### 4.5 OPTION die Variante der Kombination MMS und KSS '
'anbieten\n'
'#### 4.5.1 Operation Vorbearbeitung:\n'
'- Es wird die Minimalmischerechtechnologie (MMS/MQL) '
'eingesetzt\n'
'- Spänentransport mittels Förderer (Höhe des '
'Späneträgers 1.500 mm)\n'
'\n'
'#### 4.5.2 Operation Feinbearbeitung\n'
'- unter Kühlflüssigkeit (für jedes Zentrum eine Anlage '
'zum Filtrieren und Temperieren der Emulsion anbieten)\n'
'- Spänentransport mittels Förderer (Höhe des '
'Späneträgers 1.500 mm)\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the specific visual content you "
'provided, but I can assist with general information on '
'how to conduct an analysis based on the aspects you '
'listed. If you can describe the content or provide '
"specific details, I'd be happy to help interpret or "
'analyze it based on your descriptions.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'b2c99ac0-fe0c-46b0-bf37-760f26709ca9-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf',
'page': 4.0,
'text': '```markdown\n'
'# 4.6 Maschinenanschluss und Filtrationsanlage\n'
'\n'
'Die Maschinen sollen für den Anschluss von der oberen '
'Seite an die Absaug- und Filtrationsanlage vorbereitet '
'sein. Die Absaug- und Filtrationsanlage gehört zum '
'Lieferumfang und wird von ŠKODA AUTO AG geliefert. '
'Festlegung erforderlicher Leistung / Menge der Abluft '
'(m³/h).\n'
'\n'
'## 4.7 OPTION: Absaugung und Filtration inkl. '
'Rohleitungsangebot.\n'
'\n'
'## 4.8 Abnahme nach TGS 02.09 und VVW 101 30 – siehe '
'Anlagen Nr. 10 und 11.\n'
'\n'
'## 4.9 Erforderliches Spannschema siehe Anlage Nr. 14.\n'
'\n'
'## 4.10 Steuerung Siemens – Anforderungen für Steuerung '
'siehe Anlage Nr. 6.\n'
'\n'
'## 4.11 Am Anfang der ML müssen sich 2 stationäre '
'Kameras zum Lesen von DMC-Codes von Teilen befinden, '
'ein manuelles DMC-Lesegerät an jedem SPC Standard.\n'
'\n'
'# 5. Weitere Anforderungen\n'
'\n'
'5.1 Bestimmen Sie den kürzestmöglichen Liefertermin von '
'50 bearbeiteten und gemessenen Mustern, die der '
'technischen Dokumentation entsprechen, ab dem Zeitpunkt '
'der Bestellung des Auftraggegnestandes. Verarbeitung '
'des Templanins für die Zustellung von Mustern und diese '
'in einem separaten Posten preisgestalten.\n'
'\n'
'5.2 OPTION: Werkzeug für 1 Maschine/OP nach ITS 3.10.\n'
'\n'
'5.3 OPTION: Unterstützung nach Übergabe der '
'Inbetriebnahme im Umfang von 1 Arbeiter/1 Woche '
'anbieten.\n'
'\n'
'5.4 OPTION: Schulung anbieten.\n'
'\n'
'5.5 Abschätzung der Standzeit von Werkzeugen und Kosten '
'pro Stück für die Lagerbuchsen-Bearbeitungswerkzeuge.\n'
'\n'
'# 6. Forderungen auf die Anlagenleistung\n'
'\n'
'| Parameter | Wert |\n'
'|---------------------------------|-----------------|\n'
'| Kapazität | 232.000 Stück/Jahr '
'|\n'
'| Taktzeit der ML | 75 s |\n'
'| Tägliche Arbeitszeit | 22,5 Std. |\n'
'| Arbeitstage pro Jahr | 250 Tage |\n'
'| Technische Verfügbarkeit | 86% |\n'
'| Ausschussquote | 0% |\n'
'| Prozessstabilität – bewertete Parameter | Siehe ITS '
'ŠKODA Auto Standards |\n'
'\n'
'OPTION: 2. ML mit gleicher Kapazität siehe Layout in '
'der Anlage Nr. 3.\n'
'\n'
'# 7. Terminplan\n'
'\n'
'| Activity | 2024 '
'| 2025 | 2026 |\n'
'|---------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|---------------|\n'
'| Bestellungen | 01/25 '
'| | |\n'
'| Lieferung, Inbetriebnahme und Übergabe | 14/26 '
'| | |\n'
'| 1xBAZ OP + komplette Automatisierung | 18/26 '
'| | |\n'
'| TBT-PVS | 27/26 '
'| | |\n'
'| PVS | 05/27 '
'| | |\n'
'| Nullserie | 07/27 '
'| | |\n'
'| Lieferung, Inbetriebnahme und Übergabe | 11/27 '
'| | |\n'
'| restliche BAZ für erforderliche Kapazität '
'| | | |\n'
'```\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I can't analyze or describe the visual content "
'directly. However, I can help guide you on how to '
'conduct such an analysis if you can share details about '
"the images or specific elements you're interested in. "
"Let me know how you'd like to proceed!"},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'b440c97b-e20d-47f5-a353-e85415b14ceb-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf',
'page': 5.0,
'text': '# 8. Sonstiges\n'
'\n'
'- Sämtliche betriebs technischen Parameter müssen die '
'Betriebsmittelschutzrichtlinien ITS Škoda Auto sowie '
'die Sicherheitsnormen CSn erfüllen.\n'
'- Der Lieferant hat alle Konstruktionen und technischen '
'Lösungen noch vor Beginn der Herstellung mit den '
'Fachbereichen ŠKODA AUTO AG zu konsultieren und '
'genehmigen lassen.\n'
'- Garantie mindestens 24 Monate im 3-Schicht-Betrieb.\n'
'- Mit dem Angebot ist ein 2D-Layout in den Formaten PDF '
'und DWG vorzulegen.\n'
'- Baufortschritt, Medienanschlüsse bis zum '
'Hauptsperreventil an der Grenze des '
'Arbeitsplatzeinsatzes stellt Škoda bereit. Die '
'restlichen Übersetzungen besorgt der Auftragnehmer.\n'
'- Komplette Projektdokumentation wird der Lieferant 1 '
'Monat nach Vertragsabschluss liefern.\n'
'- Die erste Betriebsstoffnutzung zum Schmieren der '
'Anlage gehört zum Lieferumfang.\n'
'- Das Werkzeug wird anhand der Unterlagen des '
'Maschinenherstellers und der gegenseitigen Abstimmung '
'von Škoda sichergestellt.\n'
'- Dokumentation in tschechischer Sprache gemäß ITS '
'ŠKODA (2 Ausdrücke + 1 digitale Form + Erklärung über '
'den ordnungsgemäßen Erwerb von Softwarelizenz).\n'
'- Um einen Vertrag zu erhalten, ist eine '
'Vertraulichkeitsverpflichtung (NDA-Vertrag mit ŠKODA '
'AUTO AG) und eine entsprechende TISAX-Zertifizierung '
'erforderlich.\n'
'- Lieferbedingungen DDU DAP (einschließlich '
'Zusammenlegung, Vermessung und Anbringung vor Ort).\n'
'\n'
'# 9. Anlagen\n'
'\n'
'1. **ITS/Betriebs mittelschutzrichtlinien ŠKODA AUTO '
'a.s.:**\n'
' [ITS/Betriebs '
'mittelschutzrichtlinien](https://its.volkswagen.de/one-kbp/content/cs/kbp_private/information_1/divisions/procurement/terms_and_conditions_of_purchasin_g/new/_koda_auto_as_4/_koda_auto_a_s.jsp)\n'
'\n'
'2. **Nr. 2 – Energie Škoda** – separate Datei\n'
'3. **Nr. 3 – Stiurierung in der Halle**\n'
'4. **Nr. 4 – Visualisierung der Teile, Grundmaße**\n'
'5. **Nr. 5 – Schema des technologischen Prozesses**\n'
'6. **Nr. 6 – Unterlage Solutions für Powertrain '
'Volkswagen Group Components Global '
'Differenzbeschreibung – per separate Datei**\n'
'7. **Nr. 7 – 3D Daten von Gussteilen und des '
'bearbeiteten Teils – werden per Ebox zugesandt**\n'
'8. **Nr. 8 – Zeichnungen des bearbeiteten Teils – per '
'separate Datei**\n'
'9. **Nr. 9 – Interne Richtlinie der Komponenten – per '
'separate Datei**\n'
'\n'
'- **Nr. 10 – Norm TQS 02.09 – separate Datei**\n'
'- **Nr. 11 – Norm VW 101 30**\n'
'- **Nr. 12 – Norm WSK 016_862_G (Anforderungen zu '
'Dichtungsflächen)**\n'
'- **Nr. 13 – Kapazitätsanforderungen in Jahren**\n'
'- **Nr. 14 – Erforderliches Schema der Spannung – '
'separate Datei**\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the content of images or "
'documents directly as you requested. If you have any '
"specifics from the text or images you'd like to "
"discuss, feel free to provide those details, and I'll "
'do my best to assist you!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'c850b010-f101-4e5c-a157-de01dfe9c2d5-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf',
'page': 6.0,
'text': '# 10. Kontaktní osoby\n'
'\n'
'## Ing. Georgy Komarov, PPK-E – Plánování výroby '
'polotovaru \n'
'**ŠKODA AUTO a.s.** \n'
'tř. Václava Klementa 869, 293 01 Mladá Boleslav II, '
'Czech Republic \n'
'M: +420 730 865 237 \n'
'Email: '
'[Georgy.Komarov@skoda-auto.cz](mailto:Georgy.Komarov@skoda-auto.cz) \n'
'Website: '
'[www.skoda-auto.com](http://www.skoda-auto.com) \n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'## Ing. Roman Taneček, PPK-E – Plánování výroby '
'polotovaru \n'
'**ŠKODA AUTO a.s.** \n'
'tř. Václava Klementa 869, 293 60 Mladá Boleslav, Czech '
'Republic \n'
'T: +420 326 814752 \n'
'F: +420 326 8 17720 \n'
'E: +420 326 8 45848 \n'
'M: +420 604 292 729 \n'
'Email: '
'[Roman.Tanecek@skoda-auto.cz](mailto:Roman.Tanecek@skoda-auto.cz) \n'
'Website: '
'[www.skoda-auto.com](http://www.skoda-auto.com) \n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze visual content directly. However, "
'I can help you understand what to look for and how to '
"analyze images based on the aspects you've provided. If "
'you describe the images or provide specific details, '
"I'd be glad to assist you further!"},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '37c580df-e03e-450d-92e7-ae8179ab8282-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf',
'page': 7.0,
'text': '# Anlage Nr. 3 – Steuerung in der Halle\n'
'\n'
'**Projekt:** SSP \n'
'**Ansprechpartner:** Miroslav Balaško \n'
'**Client-Name:** HIRSEK/WK/04 \n'
'**Datum:** 2023-40\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'Die Bearbeitungslinie ist blau markiert. '
'Voraussichtliche Maße der Bearbeitungslinie betragen '
'ca. 15 m x 40 m.\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'## Layout\n'
'\n'
'| Zone | '
'Beschreibung |\n'
'|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|\n'
'| **AF50 Mechanische Bearbeitung** | '
'OPTION |\n'
'| **AF50 Mechanische Bearbeitung** '
'| |\n'
'| **AF55 Waschen** '
'| |\n'
'| **AF85 Endkontrolle** '
'| |\n'
'| **AF80 Lecktesten** | Stopfen, '
'Diesmontage |\n'
'| **Automatische Palettierung** | Verpacken und '
'Entpacken |\n'
'| **Automatische Deplatierung** '
'| |\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'INTERNAL.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'Here’s a detailed examination based on the provided '
'visual content:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution:\n'
'- **Image 1:** The entire image is a layout plan of a '
'processing line in a facility, marked with different '
'sections and labels.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification:\n'
'- **Objects Identified:**\n'
' - **Processing Machines**: Represented in blue and '
'labeled (e.g., AF50 Mechanical Processing, AF55 '
'Washing).\n'
' - **Control Station**: Labeled (AF85 Final '
'Inspection) in green.\n'
' - **Automated Systems**: Marked in yellow (Automated '
'Palletizing, Packing, and Unpacking).\n'
' - **Storage Racks**: Shown in the background.\n'
'- **Key Features**: The processing machines are '
'systematically arranged, indicating an organized '
'workflow.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:\n'
'- **Scene Description**: The layout illustrates a '
'manufacturing process area emphasizing various '
'processing stations.\n'
'- **Main Activities**: Activities implied include '
'mechanical processing, washing, inspection, and '
'palletizing of products.\n'
'- **Main Actors**: Implied workers would likely operate '
'the machines, although no human figures are depicted.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis:\n'
'- **Text Detected**: Labels such as "AF50 Mechanical '
'Processing," "AF55 Washing," and instructions regarding '
"the processing line's expected dimensions.\n"
'- **Significance**: The text provides essential '
'information regarding the types of operations and '
'layout structure, which would be crucial for setup and '
'utilization.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:\n'
'- **Diagram Description**: It is a schematic layout '
'rather than a traditional graph.\n'
'- **Data Representation**: The layout offers insights '
'into the spatial arrangement of equipment and the flow '
'of materials.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis:\n'
'- **Products Depicted**: The images mainly depict '
'machinery and equipment used for processing.\n'
'- **Main Features**: Each processing station is '
'designed for specific functions in the workflow.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection:\n'
'- **Possible Anomalies**: All elements appear orderly; '
'however, the absence of detailed descriptions for some '
'areas may lead to confusion regarding the function of '
'specific zones.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis:\n'
'- **Dominant Colors**: Blue for processing lines, green '
'for washing, yellow for packing.\n'
'- **Impact on Perception**: The use of color coding '
'enhances clarity of the different operational areas and '
'helps in quick identification.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition:\n'
'- **Perspective**: The layout is presented from a '
"bird's eye view.\n"
'- **Composition**: Elements are arranged systematically '
'to reflect a logical workflow, facilitating ease of '
'navigation within the space.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance:\n'
'- **Overall Significance**: The diagram serves as a '
'critical reference for planning the layout and '
'operational procedures within a manufacturing space.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis:\n'
'- **Metadata Review**: No metadata is available for '
'analysis within this content.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:\n'
'- **Graphs**: There are no graphs present in the image '
'for analysis.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers:\n'
'- **Data Points**: No numerical data or graphs are '
'included for this aspect.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects:\n'
'\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: The layout '
'suggests a flow from mechanical processing to washing, '
'inspection, and packing.\n'
' \n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: '
'Each labeled section indicates a specific process '
'within the manufacturing workflow.\n'
'\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: Various '
'types of processing stations are named (e.g., AF50, '
'AF55), indicating different functionalities.\n'
'\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation**: The organized design '
'reflects a trend towards streamlined industrial '
'processes, likely aimed at efficiency and '
'productivity.\n'
'\n'
'- **Tables**: No tables are present in the image.\n'
'\n'
'This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the '
'visual content, focusing on the design elements and '
'their implications for workflow within the facility.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'fde89bc5-6db1-413d-bb76-8fee8dbe92ed-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf',
'page': 8.0,
'text': '# Anlage Nr. 4 – Visualisierung der Teile, Grundmaße\n'
'\n'
'## Gussteil\n'
'\n'
'| Maß | Wert |\n'
'|----------------|------------|\n'
'| Längsmaß | 154.940 mm |\n'
'| Quermass | 563.685 mm |\n'
'\n'
'## Bearbeitetes Teil\n'
'\n'
'| Maß | Wert |\n'
'|----------------|------------|\n'
'| Längsmaß | 355.232 mm |\n'
'| Quermass | 562.789 mm |\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'**Projekt:** SSP \n'
'**Modell-Nr.:** MIB-1 Boliano \n'
'**Class-Obj.:** HBS8RPEK/04 \n'
'**Datum:** 2023-10-04 \n'
'\n'
'**Telefon:** \n'
'+49 7308 263537 \n'
'+49 123 128 14752 \n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly. "
'However, I can guide you on how to conduct a detailed '
'analysis based on the aspects you provided:\n'
'\n'
'1. **Localization and Attribution:**\n'
' - Number the images based on their position (e.g., '
'Image 1: Gussstück, Image 2: Bearbeitetes Teil).\n'
'\n'
'2. **Object Detection and Classification:**\n'
' - Identify and classify the objects in each image, '
'which appear to be parts of a mechanical component '
'(e.g., a casing or housing).\n'
' - Key features could include shape, texture, and any '
'visible dimensions.\n'
'\n'
'3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**\n'
' - Describe the overall layout of the images, perhaps '
'noting that both display different versions of the same '
'part (raw vs. processed).\n'
' - The main activity could be comparing the features '
'of the two images.\n'
'\n'
'4. **Text Analysis:**\n'
' - Extract any text present, such as "Gussstück" '
'(cast part) and "Bearbeitetes Teil" (processed part), '
'indicating the nature of each component.\n'
' - Discuss the significance of these titles in the '
'context of manufacturing or engineering processes.\n'
'\n'
'5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**\n'
' - If there are diagrams, analyze any dimensions '
'provided, but they seem to primarily be rendered images '
'rather than graphs.\n'
' - Assess the visual representation of measurements.\n'
'\n'
'6. **Product Analysis:**\n'
' - Describe the products (mechanical parts), noting '
'main features like contours and dimensions that '
'indicate intended use.\n'
'\n'
'7. **Anomaly Detection:**\n'
' - Note any differences in the visual design between '
'the two images (such as modifications made during the '
'processing stage).\n'
'\n'
'8. **Color Analysis:**\n'
' - The images appear to use a monochromatic scheme '
'with highlighted features in contrasting colors (e.g., '
'blue and green), which could serve to emphasize '
'essential details.\n'
'\n'
'9. **Perspective and Composition:**\n'
' - Describe the 3D perspective used in the images '
'that help visualize the parts from an advantageous '
'angle.\n'
'\n'
'10. **Contextual Significance:**\n'
' - Discuss how these illustrations fit within a '
'broader document about mechanical components, '
'highlighting their importance for understanding part '
'specifications.\n'
'\n'
'11. **Metadata Analysis:**\n'
' - If metadata is available, it can provide context '
'regarding capture settings that might influence the '
'clarity and detail of the images.\n'
'\n'
'12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**\n'
' - There are no visible graphs to analyze trends from '
'in the provided images.\n'
'\n'
'13. **Graph Numbers:**\n'
' - Not applicable if no graphs are present.\n'
'\n'
'**Additional Aspects:**\n'
'\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):**\n'
' - If depicting manufacturing processes, describe '
'steps visually represented.\n'
' \n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):**\n'
' - Elaborate on manufacturing processes related to '
'the parts.\n'
'\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):**\n'
' - Mention any specifications or categorizations '
'indicated in the image.\n'
'\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation:**\n'
' - Identify any trends in the design or processing '
'improvements that can be inferred.\n'
'\n'
'- **Tables:**\n'
' - There are no tables in the provided images to '
'analyze.\n'
'\n'
'This structured approach should help you conduct a '
'thorough examination of the visual content. If you need '
'any specific guidance or examples for particular '
'aspects, feel free to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '742bda65-5c96-4132-ac58-fff051a30d48-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf',
'page': 9.0,
'text': '# Anlage Nr. 5 – Schema des technologischen Prozesses\n'
'\n'
'## Gießen\n'
'| Prozess | Beschreibung |\n'
'|---------|--------------|\n'
'| AF2 | Schmelzen |\n'
'| AF5 | Gießen inkl. Lagerbuchse |\n'
'| AF20 | Strahlen |\n'
'\n'
'## Endoperationen\n'
'| Prozess | Beschreibung |\n'
'|---------|--------------|\n'
'| AF50 | Fertigbearbeitung |\n'
'| AF5 | Waschen |\n'
'| AF80 | Lecktesten / Stoppen / Die Montage |\n'
'| AF85 | Endkontrolle |\n'
'\n'
'Die Anzahl der Bearbeitungszentren ist schematisch '
'dargestellt.\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'### Kontaktdaten\n'
'- **Projekt**: SSP\n'
'- **Mitarbeiter**: Mikail Bärböhl\n'
'- **Klasse**: HBMSBReKM20/4\n'
'- **Datum**: 09/10\n'
'- **Projektleiter**: Kammerz \n'
'- **Techniker**: Tanusok \n'
'\n'
'### Telefon\n'
'- +49 7386 65337\n'
'- +49 123 456 14752\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'Here’s an analysis based on the visuals provided, which '
'appears to depict a schematic diagram of a '
'technological process:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution:\n'
'- **Image 1**: SCHEMA DES TECHNOLOGISCHEN PROZESSES '
'(Technological Process Scheme), positioned centrally in '
'the visual content.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification:\n'
'- **Detected Objects**:\n'
' - **Boxes**: Represent different processes or stages '
'(e.g., AF2, AF5, AF20, etc.).\n'
' - **Arrows**: Indicate the flow direction of the '
'process.\n'
'- **Key Features**:\n'
' - Each box is labeled clearly and represents a '
'specific operational unit within the process.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:\n'
'- **Scene Description**: The image depicts a linear '
'flow chart showcasing multiple stages involved in a '
'manufacturing or processing system.\n'
'- **Activities**:\n'
' - **Gießen** (Pouring): Initial melting and pouring '
'steps.\n'
' - **Endoperationen** (End Operations): Final '
'processes including washing, assembly, and quality '
'control.\n'
'- **Main Actors**: \n'
' - Not specifically illustrated, but implied actions '
'are performed by machinery or workers in a '
'manufacturing context.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis:\n'
'- **Extracted Text**: “Die Anzahl der '
'Bearbeitungszentren ist schematisch dargestellt.”\n'
'- **Significance**: This statement indicates the '
'schematic representation of the number of processing '
'centers, emphasizing the simplified view of the '
'workflow.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:\n'
'- **Data Representation**: The diagram represents a '
'series of process stages with a workflow between them.\n'
'- **Axes, Scales, and Legends**: There are no '
'traditional axes; however, the transition from one '
'process stage to another is indicated linearly.\n'
' \n'
'### 6. Product Analysis:\n'
'- **Depicted Products**: Not applicable as the image '
'focuses on processes rather than specific products.\n'
' \n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection:\n'
'- **Anomalies**: No anomalies are present; the diagram '
'maintains a clear and logical flow.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis:\n'
'- **Color Composition**:\n'
' - Predominantly gray boxes and blue for the '
'highlighted units.\n'
' - The color scheme is straightforward and functional, '
'emphasizing clarity in the process stages.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition:\n'
'- **Perspective**: The diagram is presented in a '
'straightforward, top-down view.\n'
'- **Composition**: Elements are arranged in a linear '
'fashion, clearly indicating the sequential flow of the '
'process.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance:\n'
'- **Overall Contribution**: The schematic aids in '
'understanding the processing flow in a manufacturing '
'context, illustrating how each stage contributes to the '
'end product.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis:\n'
'- **Metadata Details**: Not available for analysis '
'here.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:\n'
'- **Graphs**: None presented in this image.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers:\n'
'- **Data Points**: Not applicable as there are no '
'graphs.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects:\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: The diagram '
'effectively depicts the flow of processes from initial '
'to final stages.\n'
' \n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: '
'Each labeled box corresponds to a specific step in the '
'processing workflow, though detailed descriptions are '
'not provided in the text.\n'
'\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: Type '
'designations are provided within the boxes (AF2, AF5, '
'etc.).\n'
'\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation**: The diagram suggests a '
'structured approach to manufacturing, highlighting '
'efficiency in process flow.\n'
'\n'
'- **Tables**: Not present in the image provided.\n'
'\n'
"This analysis encapsulates the visual's primary "
'features and context without further details about the '
'visual medium.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '264658fb-2fce-4c7c-94eb-7c0e91bebc99-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf',
'page': 10.0,
'text': '# Anlage Nr. 13 – Kapazitätsbedarf in Jahren\n'
'\n'
'## Kapazitätsbedarf (in Jahren)\n'
'\n'
'| Jahr | Kapazität KAPA 250AT | Kapazität KAPA 309AT | '
'Bedarf MGH |\n'
'|------|-----------------------|-----------------------|------------|\n'
'| 2027 | 130.154 | '
'| 0 |\n'
'| 2028 | 188.000 | '
'| |\n'
'| 2029 | 188.000 | '
'| |\n'
'| 2030 | 188.000 | '
'| |\n'
'| 2031 | 188.000 | '
'| |\n'
'| 2032 | 188.000 | '
'| |\n'
'| 2033 | 282.000 | '
'| |\n'
'| 2034 | | '
'| 94.000 |\n'
'\n'
'**Legende:**\n'
'- **KAPA 250AT**: rote Linie\n'
'- **KAPA 309AT**: gestrichelte rote Linie\n'
'- **Bedarf MGH**: grüne Balken\n'
'\n'
'**Wichtige Zahlen:**\n'
'- 232.000 (Wert in Jahre 2033 über der Grenze)\n'
'- 282.000 (Wert in Jahre 2033)\n'
'- 94.000 (Wert in Jahre 2034)\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'Here’s the analysis based on the provided visual '
'content:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution\n'
'- **Image Number**: Image 1\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification\n'
'- **Objects Identified**: \n'
' - Bar graph representing data.\n'
' - Line graph overlay.\n'
' - Axes labels, legends, and numerical values.\n'
'- **Key Features**:\n'
' - Bar graph with vertical columns representing '
'various capacities.\n'
' - Interface for X (years) and Y (capacity) axes.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis\n'
'- **Scene Description**: A graphical representation of '
'capacity needs over several years.\n'
'- **Main Actors**: No human actors; representation of '
'data.\n'
'- **Actions**: Display of trend analysis through '
'graphical data.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis\n'
'- **Detected Text**: \n'
' - Title: "Anlage Nr. 13 – Kapazitätsbedarf in '
'Jahren"\n'
' - Axes labels, data points for each year.\n'
'- **Significance**: Provides context for the capacity '
'needs in the years indicated.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis\n'
'- **Chart Type**: Combination of a bar chart and a line '
'graph.\n'
'- **Axes**:\n'
' - X-axis: Years (2027 to 2034).\n'
' - Y-axis: Capacity (0 to 300,000).\n'
'- **Key Insights**: \n'
' - The bar heights indicate individual year '
'requirements. \n'
' - The red line shows projected capacity, with 2033 '
'having the highest demand.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis\n'
'- **Products Depicted**: Not applicable as the image '
'consists of data visualization rather than physical '
'products.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection\n'
'- **Anomalies**: The trend shows a significant spike in '
'2033 (282,000) followed by a drop in 2034 (94,000).\n'
'- **Impact**: This sharp decline may indicate a planned '
'reduction in capacity or an operational change.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis\n'
'- **Dominant Colors**: \n'
' - Dark green for the bars\n'
' - Red for the line graph.\n'
'- **Impact on Perception**: The contrasting colors '
'highlight critical trends and make the data more '
'accessible.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition\n'
'- **Perspective**: Front view of a standard bar graph.\n'
'- **Composition**: Well-structured with clear labels, '
'easy to read, and shows trends intuitively.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance\n'
'- **Contribution to Overall Message**: This chart '
'likely illustrates planning or forecasting efforts in a '
'business or operational setting, essential for '
'decision-making.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis\n'
'- **Metadata Review**: Not available.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis\n'
'- **Trends Identified**: \n'
' - Steady increase in capacity needs until 2033, '
'followed by a sudden decline.\n'
'- **Significance**: Suggests shifts in operation or '
'resource allocation expected after peak capacity.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers\n'
'- **Data Points**:\n'
' - 2027: 130,154\n'
' - 2028: 188,000\n'
' - 2029: 188,000\n'
' - 2030: 188,000\n'
' - 2031: 188,000\n'
' - 2032: 188,000\n'
' - 2033: 282,000\n'
' - 2034: 94,000\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Analysis\n'
'- **Process Flows**: Not applicable, as no process '
'flows are depicted.\n'
'- **Process Descriptions**: Not applicable.\n'
'- **Type Designations**: Not applicable as there are no '
'explicit type designations in the image.\n'
'- **Trend Interpretation**: The data implies an '
'operational strategy that anticipates high demand in '
'some years while preparing for substantial drops.\n'
'- **Tables**: Not applicable as the content is '
'illustrated through a graph rather than a table.\n'
'\n'
'This detailed examination captures the essential '
'insights and interpretations derived from the visual '
'content you provided.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '1a9bc7d8-5207-4b2a-a8e8-a7917c43340f-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pptx',
'page': 1.0,
'text': '# Skoda SSP Getriebegehäuse (GGH) Automation\n'
'\n'
'**Date**: 2024-09-13 \n'
'**Author**: Ralf Haug\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'## Companies Involved\n'
'- VDF Boehringer\n'
'- Corcom\n'
'- DMC\n'
'- Feeler\n'
'- Hessapp\n'
'- IMTS\n'
'- JOBS\n'
'- Leadwell\n'
'- AG\n'
'- Meccandora\n'
'- Morara\n'
'- Pfeiffer\n'
'- Ramboud\n'
'- Sackman\n'
'- Sigma\n'
'- SMS\n'
'- SNK\n'
'- Tacchella\n'
'- Witzig & Frank\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'## Evaluation Notes\n'
'This document is for evaluation purposes only. The '
'content was created with Aspose.Slides for Python via '
'.NET 24.3. \n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'## Copyright\n'
'.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content as requested. "
'However, if you provide specific details or aspects of '
'the image, I can help summarize or provide insights '
"based on that information. Let me know how you'd like "
'to proceed!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'dab30d57-8b4a-4fee-b602-e13318002548-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pptx',
'page': 2.0,
'text': '# Projektdaten\n'
'\n'
'**Kunde:** \n'
'Skoda, Mlada Boleslav\n'
'\n'
'**Werkstück:** \n'
'Getriebegehäuse (GGH) SSP\n'
'\n'
'**Taktzeit:** \n'
'75s\n'
'\n'
'**Terminplan:** \n'
'Referenzdokument\n'
'\n'
'**Others:** \n'
'TZ. Linka ebrbnei eķrāne provodovky elektromohonu SSP '
'v2_DE\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'## Kontakt MAG EK \n'
'Sonja Haas: '
'[sonja.haas@mag-ias.com](mailto:sonja.haas@mag-ias.com)\n'
'\n'
'## Kontakt MAG Planung \n'
'Ralf Haug: '
'[ralf.haug@mag-ias.com](mailto:ralf.haug@mag-ias.com)\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content as requested. "
'However, I can provide insights based on the text '
'visible in the image or help with specific questions '
'you have!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '0d3d80e7-fd83-431f-9b39-327598897eb3-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pptx',
'page': 3.0,
'text': '# Werkstück\n'
'\n'
'## 2. Angaben über das zu bearbeitende Bauteil\n'
'\n'
'| Bauteil | Getriebegehäuse '
'SSP HA LK3.4 |\n'
'|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------|\n'
'| Gewichtseinheit | 6,450 '
'kg |\n'
'| Anzahl der bearbeitbaren Teile | '
'1 |\n'
'| Rundheit | ≤ 0,063 '
'mm |\n'
'| Material | EN 1706 (2020) - '
'EN AC-AlSi10(F) |\n'
'| Zeichnung | siehe '
'Zeichnung |\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly, but "
'I can guide you on how to approach each aspect you '
'mentioned. Here’s a structured way you could analyze '
'the image based on the aspects listed:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution\n'
'- **Image 1**: Main mechanical part on the left.\n'
'- **Image 2**: Technical diagram on the right.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification\n'
'- **Image 1**: A mechanical component, possibly a '
'housing.\n'
' - **Key features**: Complex geometry, multiple holes, '
'and connectors.\n'
' \n'
'- **Image 2**: Schematic or technical drawing.\n'
' - **Key features**: Lines, labels indicating parts, '
'and dimensions.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis\n'
'- **Image 1**: Depicts a close-up view of a mechanical '
'part.\n'
' - **Main action**: Focus on the design and structure '
'of the component.\n'
' \n'
'- **Image 2**: Shows how parts are related.\n'
' - **Main actors**: None, as it is a technical '
'illustration.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis\n'
'- **Text in Image 1**: Descriptive labels.\n'
' - **Significance**: Identifies the part and '
'specifications.\n'
' \n'
'- **Text in Image 2**: Technical notes and dimensions.\n'
' - **Significance**: Provides critical information for '
'understanding measurements and relationships of parts.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis\n'
'- **Image 2**: May include measurements or '
'specifications.\n'
' - **Axes and Legends**: Likely includes dimensions.\n'
' - **Insights**: Illuminates the structure and '
'assembly of components.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis\n'
'- **Product in Image 1**: Mechanical housing.\n'
' - **Features**: Materials (perhaps metal), color '
'(black with colored highlights), complex shapes.\n'
' \n'
'- **Comparison**: Analyze differences in shapes or '
'indicated features in diagrams.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection\n'
'- Not readily apparent without specific flags in the '
'image. Look for unusual geometric features or '
'unexpected text.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis\n'
'- **Dominant Colors**: Dark metallic with colored '
'highlights (possibly purple and orange).\n'
'- **Impact**: The dark color suggests strength, while '
'the bright colors may indicate functionality or '
'attention to specifics.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition\n'
'- **Perspective**: Likely a frontal or slightly angled '
'view.\n'
'- **Composition**: Objects are arranged to highlight '
'their specifications and dimensions.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance\n'
'- Relates to technical documentation for a mechanical '
'part, contributing to understanding development and '
'design aspects.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis\n'
'- If metadata were available, it could include capture '
'dates or camera settings but isn’t directly analyzable '
'here.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis\n'
'- **Not applicable**: No graphs appear to be present.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers\n'
'- **Not applicable**: No graphs appear to be present.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects\n'
"- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: If there's a "
'workflow diagram, analyze indicating assembly steps.\n'
' \n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: '
'Describe assembly or manufacturing processes if '
'indicated in the text.\n'
'\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: Identify '
'categories of parts based on specifications.\n'
'\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation**: Any visible trends '
'related to design or manufacturing efficiency.\n'
'\n'
'- **Tables**: Analyze any shown, discussing data such '
'as dimensions or weights.\n'
'\n'
'By following this structured approach, you should be '
'able to conduct a comprehensive examination of the '
'visual content based on the listed aspects.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'd9db4456-dfe6-4255-8e63-12704682ef53-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pptx',
'page': 4.0,
'text': '# Terminplan\n'
'\n'
'## 7. Terminplan\n'
'\n'
'| Activity | 2024 | '
'2025 | 2026 | 2027 |\n'
'|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|\n'
'| Bestellungen | | '
'01/25 | 04/26 | |\n'
'| Lieferung, Inbetriebnahme und Übergabe | | '
'12/25 | 04/26 | |\n'
'| 1. BaP ZG OP + komplette Automatisierung| TB/PS '
'| | | |\n'
'| PV/S | '
'| | | |\n'
'| Nußler | '
'| | | |\n'
'| SOP | '
'| | | |\n'
'\n'
'**MAG TP folgt**\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content you've "
'provided. If you have any specific questions or need a '
'different type of assistance, feel free to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '47dcae80-1b8c-49ba-b51f-102a18a4a3a5-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pptx',
'page': 5.0,
'text': '# Layout\n'
'\n'
'## Manufacturing Line for VW SSP GGH\n'
'**Basis - WET - Central coolant filtration**\n'
'\n'
'| MAG Content | |\n'
'|----------------------|-------------------------|\n'
'| | |\n'
'| MAG Content | Suggested by customer |\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'### Extension\n'
'\n'
'**Workstation**: Worktable, VDA 18, 001.001\n'
'\n'
'**Production Time**: 72 min\n'
'\n'
'**Cycle Time**: 36 min\n'
'\n'
'**Date**: 05.10.2024\n'
'\n'
'--- \n'
'\n'
'**Note**: This diagram is for evaluation only.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content as you've "
'requested, but I can help with general information or '
'provide insights based on descriptions or questions '
'related to topics. Please let me know how else I may '
'assist you!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '476666f9-4fe5-441d-947e-a282e5c5a059-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pptx',
'page': 6.0,
'text': '# Lieferumfang\n'
'\n'
'## MAG Umfang\n'
'### Linie 1\n'
'- Portal mit H-Lader und 2 Doppelgreifern\n'
'- Rohgreifer in Hauptbohrungen zur '
'Positionierung/Orientierung bei Übergabe in '
'Vorrichtung\n'
'- Nassbearbeitung\n'
' - Kübelabsaug für Ablegen WST auf FT-Band\n'
'- DMC-Schublade mit DMC-Handleser\n'
'- DMC-Kameras am RT-Band\n'
'- Mobile Wartungsbrücke elektrisch abgeschaltet\n'
'- Virtuelle IBN\n'
'\n'
'### Option\n'
'- 1 Woche Produktionsbegleitung\n'
'- Schulungspaket\n'
'\n'
'## Option Erweiterung auf 39s\n'
'- Termin unbekannt\n'
'- Portalerweiterung\n'
'\n'
'## Skoda Umfang\n'
'- RT/FT Paletten-Bänder\n'
'- Schutzmahnung für Bänder\n'
'\n'
'--- \n'
'**Skoda SSP GGH Automation** \n'
'**05.10.2024** \n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the content of the image as "
'requested. However, I can provide a description of '
'general concepts related to the aspects you mentioned '
"if needed. Let me know how you'd like to proceed!"},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '1b945786-33e3-420a-8104-cbc3b3cba688-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pptx',
'page': 7.0,
'text': '# Portaldaten\n'
'\n'
'## Portaldaten\n'
'\n'
'- **Horizontal**\n'
' - Vx[min] = 3,5 m/s\n'
' - ax[min] = 3 m/s²\n'
'- **Vertikal**\n'
' - Vz[min] = 1,5 m/s\n'
' - az[min] = 3 m/s\n'
'\n'
'## Werkstückwechselzeiten\n'
'\n'
'- OP10: < 18s +3s Übergabe RT in Vorrichtung\n'
'\n'
'## SPECHT 600 DUO\n'
'\n'
'- Hinweis: Berechnung in Bezug auf Werksstückabstand '
'(Werkstückabstand) xxx\n'
'- Überfahrhöhe: xxx\n'
'- Bandhöhe: ca. 1.000 mm\n'
'\n'
'Referenz: Seat MQ281 KGH \n'
'Skoda SSP GGH Automation \n'
'05.10.2024 \n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content as you "
'requested since there is no attached image. If you have '
"an image you'd like me to examine, please attach it, "
"and I'll be glad to assist with the analysis based on "
'the aspects you provided!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'b0e4344b-82f6-437e-8ed4-cf7520a3611a-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pptx',
'page': 8.0,
'text': '# Werkstücklagen\n'
'\n'
'## WST Lage auf RT-Band\n'
'- Seite 2 oben\n'
'- Orientierung auf Palette wie in Vorrichtung OP10\n'
'- Werkstückabstand 810mm\n'
'\n'
'## Beladeposition\n'
'- Ansicht durch Dachluke\n'
'\n'
'## OP10\n'
'\n'
'## WST Lage auf FT-Band\n'
'- Seite 2 oben\n'
'- Orientierung auf Palette wie in Vorrichtung OP10\n'
'- Werkstückabstand 810mm \n'
'\n'
'--- \n'
'\n'
'05.10.2024 \n'
'Skoda SSP GGH Automation \n'
'VDF Boehringer\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content as requested, "
"but I'm happy to help with any textual descriptions or "
'information you provide about the image. If you have '
'specific details or questions, feel free to share!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '3677daf3-4b25-4389-9c85-623fe9fddf18-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240910_Skoda_Automation_MGH_Portal_direkt.pdf',
'page': 1.0,
'text': '# Skoda SSP Motorgehäuse (MGH) Automation\n'
'\n'
'**Date:** 2024-09-13 \n'
'**Presenter:** Ralf Haug\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'## Introduction\n'
'\n'
'The Skoda SSP Motorgehäuse (MGH) project focuses on '
'advanced automation solutions for manufacturing '
'processes, enhancing efficiency and productivity.\n'
'\n'
'## Partners and Contributors\n'
'\n'
'The following companies are involved in the project:\n'
'\n'
'- VDF Boehringer\n'
'- Corcom\n'
'- DMC\n'
'- Feeler\n'
'- Hessapp\n'
'- IMRS\n'
'- Jobs\n'
'- Leadwell\n'
'- AG\n'
'- Meccanodora\n'
'- Morara\n'
'- Pfiffner\n'
'- Rambaldi\n'
'- Sachman\n'
'- Sigma\n'
'- SMS\n'
'- SNK\n'
'- Tacchella\n'
'- Witzig & Frank\n'
'\n'
'## Key Objectives\n'
'\n'
'1. Improve manufacturing efficiency.\n'
'2. Enhance product quality.\n'
'3. Integrate modern automation technologies.\n'
'\n'
'## Conclusion\n'
'\n'
'The Skoda SSP Motorgehäuse (MGH) project represents a '
'significant step forward in automation within the '
'automotive industry, leading to optimized production '
'processes and innovative solutions.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'Here’s a detailed analysis of the visual content based '
'on the specified aspects:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution\n'
'- **Image Location**: The image is a prominent graphic '
'at the center of the page.\n'
'- **Image Number**: Image 1.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification\n'
'- **Objects Identified**: \n'
' - Industrial equipment (machinery, assembly lines)\n'
' - Buildings (factories)\n'
' - Infrastructure elements (conveyors, loading areas)\n'
'- **Key Features**: The machinery appears to be '
'large-scale, indicative of an automated manufacturing '
'setup. The buildings are structured and easily '
'identifiable.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis\n'
'- **Scene Description**: The image depicts an expansive '
'industrial setting characterized by a multitude of '
'machines and factory infrastructure.\n'
'- **Activities**: The scene suggests an environment '
'where manufacturing or assembly activities are taking '
'place, likely relating to automotive production.\n'
'- **Main Actors**: No human actors are visible in the '
'image, emphasizing the automation aspect.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis\n'
'- **Text Detected**: “Skoda SSP Motorgehäuse (MGH) '
'Automation” and “2024-09-13, Ralf Haug.” \n'
'- **Significance**: The text likely indicates a '
'presentation title and date, suggesting that the image '
'relates to a discussion or report on automation '
'regarding Skoda’s manufacturing processes.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis\n'
'- **Diagrams/Charts**: The image itself appears to '
'serve as a diagram illustrating the layout of an '
'automated manufacturing facility.\n'
'- **Insights**: The layout underscores the complexity '
'and organization of the automation processes, hinting '
'at efficiency in production.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis\n'
'- **Products Depicted**: The equipment and layouts '
'refer to automation products for assembly and '
'manufacturing.\n'
'- **Visual Differences**: Not applicable, as the focus '
'is on an overall facility layout rather than individual '
'products.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection\n'
'- **Anomalies**: There do not appear to be any unusual '
'elements in the image.\n'
'- **Impact**: The uniformity suggests a well-organized '
'automated environment with no apparent operational '
'disturbances.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis\n'
'- **Color Composition**: The dominant colors are teal '
'and varying shades of gray/white for the machinery.\n'
'- **Impact on Perception**: The color scheme conveys a '
'modern and clean industrial aesthetic, suggesting '
'professionalism and technological advancement.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition\n'
'- **Perspective**: The angle is a slightly elevated '
'view, allowing for a comprehensive view of the facility '
'layout.\n'
'- **Composition**: The arrangement prioritizes clarity '
"in showing the facility's scale and design, with "
'buildings and machinery organized logically across the '
'space.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance\n'
'- **Contribution to Document**: This image likely '
'supports the theme of automation in modern '
'manufacturing. It adds a visual aspect to the textual '
'details that accompany the report/presentation.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis\n'
'- **Metadata Review**: No metadata is available for '
'breakdown.\n'
'- **Contributions**: If available, metadata could '
'provide details on the visual context, such as the '
'creator or origin of the graphic.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis\n'
'- **Graphs**: There are no explicit graphs within the '
'image.\n'
'- **Trends**: The trends can be inferred regarding the '
"automation industry; however, they aren't visually "
'represented in this specific image.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers\n'
'- **Data Points**: Not applicable, as there are no '
'graphs.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects\n'
'- **Process Flows**: Not explicitly depicted, but the '
'layout illustrates a potential flow of manufacturing '
'processes.\n'
'- **Process Descriptions**: While not specified, the '
'image supports discussions around automated '
'manufacturing workflows.\n'
'- **Type Designations**: No specific types or '
'categories are highlighted within the image.\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation**: The trend towards '
'automation in production is evident, aligning with '
'industry advancements.\n'
'- **Tables**: No tables are present in the image.\n'
'\n'
'This analysis captures the essential features and '
'contexts of the visual content without any extraneous '
'information.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '4b8c61be-996e-4988-ac89-14cb93d4031d-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240910_Skoda_Automation_MGH_Portal_direkt.pdf',
'page': 2.0,
'text': '# Projektdaten\n'
'\n'
'**Kunde:** \n'
'Skoda, Mlada Boleslav\n'
'\n'
'**Werkstück:** \n'
'Motorgehäuse (MGH) SSP\n'
'\n'
'**Takzeit:** \n'
'75s\n'
'\n'
'**Terminplan:** \n'
'siehe Folgeseite\n'
'\n'
'**RFQ Dokumente:** \n'
'- Skoda Lastenheft \n'
'- TZ_Linka obrabeni motorove skrine elektrophonu SSP '
'v5_DE \n'
'\n'
'**Others:** \n'
'\n'
'**Kontakt MAG EK:** \n'
'Sonja Haas; '
'[sonja.haas@mag-ias.com](mailto:sonja.haas@mag-ias.com) \n'
'\n'
'**Kontakt MAG Planung:** \n'
'Ralf Haug; '
'[ralf.haug@mag-ias.com](mailto:ralf.haug@mag-ias.com) \n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content you've "
'provided, but I can help you interpret or discuss the '
'information contained within it based on your '
"description. Please let me know how you'd like to "
'proceed or if you need information on a specific '
'topic!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '84dee10f-c2cb-4e71-a440-fce56fa41fc0-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240910_Skoda_Automation_MGH_Portal_direkt.pdf',
'page': 3.0,
'text': '# Werkstück\n'
'\n'
'## Gussteil\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'## Bearbeitetes Teil\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'### Bauteil:\n'
'Motorenhaus SSP H4 LK34 \n'
'063.901.708\n'
'\n'
'### Zeichnungsnummer:\n'
'063.901.708\n'
'\n'
'### Gewicht des bearbeiteten Teils:\n'
'14.573 lbs (incl. der Lagerbohrung 0.369 kg)\n'
'\n'
'### Rohdichte:\n'
'8.16 kg/m³\n'
'\n'
'### Material:\n'
'Gehäuse G20 901.081 S7: EN 1.4406 - AISI316 (Fe) \n'
'Leichtbau 90A 901.201 A: DIN 29030-SINT-D-11\n'
'\n'
'### Grundmaße:\n'
'siehe Zeichnung\n'
'\n'
'---\n'
'\n'
'*Skoda SSP MGH Automation* \n'
'*13.09.2024* \n'
'*VDF BOEHRINGER* \n'
'*MAG* \n'
'*FFG*\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly. "
'However, I can help you understand how to approach the '
'analysis you listed. Here’s a general guide on how to '
'assess an image based on the aspects you provided:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution\n'
'- Identify the placement of each image on the page.\n'
'- Number the images sequentially (Image 1, Image 2, '
'etc.).\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification\n'
'- Identify all visible objects within each image. '
'Classify these objects (e.g., machine parts, tools).\n'
'- Note key attributes such as size, shape, color, and '
'texture.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis\n'
'- Describe the scenes depicted in the images (e.g., '
'manufacturing process, assembly).\n'
'- Identify any actions or interactions occurring within '
'these scenes.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis\n'
'- Extract text from the images, including labels, '
'descriptions, or specifications.\n'
'- Analyze the significance of this text in relation to '
'the objects it describes.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis\n'
'- Identify any diagrams or charts and review the data '
'they present.\n'
'- Describe elements such as axes, scales, and legends.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis\n'
'- Describe any products depicted, focusing on their '
'features, material composition, and color variations.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection\n'
'- Look for unusual features or elements within the '
'images that stand out.\n'
'- Explain their relevance or impact in context.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis\n'
'- Examine the color palette of each image. Describe '
'dominant colors and their emotional or thematic '
'impact.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition\n'
'- Consider the angle of capture (e.g., top-down, side '
'view) and describe how that affects the image layout.\n'
'- Analyze how the arrangement of elements creates focus '
'and directs attention.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance\n'
'- Explain how the image relates to the broader document '
'theme or message.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis\n'
'- If applicable, review metadata for details like the '
'capture date and camera settings, which provide '
'context.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis\n'
'- For graphs, interpret the data, noting trends and '
'their significance.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers\n'
'- Provide specific numerical data for each aspect shown '
'in the graph.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects\n'
'- **Process Flows:** Describe any depicted workflows '
'and their importance.\n'
'- **Process Descriptions:** Outline any processes '
'clearly identified in the imagery.\n'
'- **Type Designations:** Identify categories or types '
'mentioned, detailing their significance.\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation:** Analyze trends and '
'articulate interpretations based on visuals.\n'
'- **Tables:** If tables are part of the content, '
'describe their structure and data.\n'
'\n'
'By following this framework, you can conduct a thorough '
'analysis of visual content. If you have additional '
'details or specific information about the images, feel '
'free to share!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'b68824bb-c299-400d-a6d2-be839572dc01-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240910_Skoda_Automation_MGH_Portal_direkt.pdf',
'page': 4.0,
'text': '# Terminplan\n'
'\n'
'## 7. Terminplan\n'
'\n'
'| Activity | 2024 | '
'2025 | 2026 | 2027 |\n'
'|---------------------------------------------|-------|-------|-------|-------|\n'
'| Bestellungen | '
'| | 01/26 | |\n'
'| Lieferung, Inbetriebnahme und Übergabe | '
'| | 14/26 | |\n'
'| 1aBAZ pro OP + komplette Automatisierung | 18/26 '
'| | | |\n'
'| TBT-PVS | | '
'27/26 | | |\n'
'| PVS | '
'| | 47/26 | |\n'
'| Neulieferung | '
'| | | 06/27 |\n'
'| Lieferung, Inbetriebnahme und Übergabe | '
'| | | 07/27 |\n'
'| restliche BAZ für erforderliche Kapazität | '
'| | | 11/27 |\n'
'| 2 Tape Produktion | '
'| | | |\n'
'| SOP | '
'| | | |\n'
'\n'
'MAG TP folgt\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"Here's a detailed analysis based on the provided visual "
'content:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution\n'
'- **Image Location:** The image is situated in the body '
'of the document, likely as a part of a presentation or '
'report.\n'
'- **Image Number:** Image 1.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification\n'
'- **Objects Identified:**\n'
' - **Table:** Displays a scheduling plan with '
'activities listed against years.\n'
' - **Text Boxes/Annotations:** Highlighted sections '
'related to planned activities.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis\n'
'- **Scene Description:** \n'
' - A structured table is presented, outlining various '
'activities across the years 2024 to 2027.\n'
'- **Main Actors and Actions:** \n'
' - The activities appear to be linked to project '
'management phases including orders, deliveries, and '
'operational setups.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis\n'
'- **Extracted Text Content:**\n'
' - Activities include "Bestellungen," "Lieferung, '
'Inbetriebnahme und Übergabe," "TBT-PVS," "Neufires," "2 '
'Tape Produktion," and "SOP."\n'
'- **Significance:** \n'
' - These activities suggest a project timeline with '
'specific milestones crucial for project management.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis\n'
'- **Table Analysis:**\n'
' - The table functions as a Gantt chart, indicating '
'phases of activities over time.\n'
'- **Axes, Scales, and Legends:**\n'
' - Horizontal axis represents years (2024-2027), while '
'the vertical axis lists the activities.\n'
' - Colored bars illustrate timelines for each '
'activity.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis\n'
'- **Products Depicted:** \n'
' - No specific products are illustrated; rather, '
'project activities are the focus.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection\n'
'- **Unusual Elements:** \n'
' - The variety in the timeline start dates and overlap '
'may suggest scheduling complexities.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis\n'
'- **Color Composition:**\n'
' - Dominant colors include green (indicating planned '
'activities) and red (indicating deadlines or critical '
'phases).\n'
'- **Perception Impact:** \n'
' - Colors offer visual clarity on project timelines '
'and milestones, drawing attention to key dates.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition\n'
'- **Perspective:** \n'
' - The perspective is straightforward, presenting the '
'table in a typical 2D format.\n'
'- **Composition Analysis:** \n'
' - Elements are organized logically, facilitating easy '
'tracking of activities over time.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance\n'
'- **Overall Document Contribution:** \n'
' - The image is integral in showcasing project '
'timelines essential for stakeholders reviewing progress '
'and planning.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis\n'
'- **Metadata Review:** \n'
' - Data such as the capture date (13.09.2024) '
'indicates a recent update, reflecting the current '
'status of the project.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis\n'
'- **Graph Analysis:** \n'
' - No traditional graphs are present; however, the '
'timeline serves a similar purpose by visualizing '
'ongoing activities.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers\n'
'- **Data Points:**\n'
' - Specific checkpoints in the timeline are indicated, '
'such as:\n'
' - 01/26, 14/26 (dates for planned milestones).\n'
' \n'
'### Additional Aspects\n'
'\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):**\n'
' - The flow of activities demonstrates a sequential '
'process in project management.\n'
' \n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):**\n'
' - Each activity in the schedule likely pertains to '
'distinct phases of a project workflow.\n'
'\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):**\n'
' - Activities outlined can be categorized by types '
'such as orders, setups, and operational phases.\n'
'\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation:**\n'
' - The trend indicates a structured plan with '
'overlapping activities suggesting a well-organized '
'timeline.\n'
'\n'
'- **Tables:**\n'
' - The table is effectively used to present timelines '
'and project milestones for ease of understanding.\n'
'\n'
'This analysis summarizes the visual content, noting its '
'structure, significance, and contextual relevance in '
'project management documentation.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '669b1085-7e9c-4939-beff-f95fd3ff6aa3-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240910_Skoda_Automation_MGH_Portal_direkt.pdf',
'page': 5.0,
'text': '# Layout\n'
'\n'
'## Manufacturing Line for Skoda SSP MGH\n'
'**Basis:** WET - Central coolant filtration\n'
'\n'
'### Operation Overview\n'
'- **OP 10:** \n'
' - *SPEHPT 5000U LIMO* \n'
' - *AS-Active* \n'
' - *HSK 63, W1*\n'
' \n'
'- **OP 20:** \n'
' - *SPEHPT 5000U LIMO* \n'
' - *AS-Active* \n'
' - *HSK 63, W1*\n'
'\n'
'- **OP 30:** \n'
' - *SPEHPT 8000U LIMO* \n'
' - *AS-Active* \n'
' - *HSK 100, W1*\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Notes\n'
'- **MAG Content** \n'
' - *Supplied by customer* \n'
' \n'
'### Workstation Details\n'
'| Workstation | Cycle Time | Volume |\n'
'|-------------|------------|--------|\n'
'| 1 | 75s | 22,000 |\n'
'\n'
'**Date:** 13.09.2024 \n'
'**Source:** Skoda SSP MGH Automation \n'
'**Provided by:** VDF Boehringer \n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'Here’s a comprehensive analysis based on the provided '
'visual content:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution:\n'
'- **Image 1**: This image is a layout diagram titled '
'"Manufacturing Line for Skoda SSP MGH".\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification:\n'
'- **Identified Objects**: The diagram includes:\n'
' - **Machines**: Represented with specific shapes and '
'symbols.\n'
' - **Pipes**: Indicated by lines connecting various '
'sections.\n'
' - **Components**: Such as filters or separators, with '
'annotations.\n'
'- **Key Features**: Colors such as green for certain '
'components, blue for others, and annotations specifying '
'steps and processes.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:\n'
'- **Scene Description**: The image is a blueprint of a '
'manufacturing line, detailing the arrangement of '
'machinery.\n'
'- **Activities**: The diagram suggests workflows '
'involving coolant filtration processes, although no '
'specific actors are depicted.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis:\n'
'- **Extracted Text**: The image contains phrases like '
'"Manufacturing Line for Skoda SSP MGH", "Basis - WET - '
'Central coolant filtration", and various operational '
'notes.\n'
'- **Significance**: This text outlines the purpose of '
'the layout, indicating it is part of a manufacturing '
'setup for automotive production.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:\n'
'- **Data and Trends**: The image serves as a layout '
'rather than a chart; however, it visually represents '
'the flow of operations in the manufacturing line.\n'
'- **Axes and Scales**: Not applicable as this is not a '
'graph.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis:\n'
'- **Products Depicted**: While specific products are '
'not visible, the machinery represents those used in '
'automotive manufacturing.\n'
'- **Main Features**: Specific symbols suggest the type '
'of machines and their functions related to coolant '
'filtration.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection:\n'
'- **Unusual Elements**: None detected; the layout '
'follows a standard approach for manufacturing process '
'representation.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis:\n'
'- **Dominant Colors**: Predominantly blue and green, '
'indicating different types of equipment and processes.\n'
'- **Impact on Perception**: The color-coding likely '
'aids in understanding the layout and differentiating '
'components quickly.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition:\n'
'- **Perspective**: The layout is presented from a '
'top-down view, typical for schematics.\n'
'- **Composition**: Elements are arranged '
'systematically, likely to illustrate the sequence of '
'operations effectively.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance:\n'
'- **Overall document or website context**: The image '
'contributes to understanding the manufacturing '
'processes involved in automotive production, '
'highlighting the importance of efficient coolant '
'filtration.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis:\n'
'- **Capture Date**: Dated "13.09.2024", indicative of a '
'recent or ongoing project.\n'
'- **Camera Settings**: Not applicable; this is a '
'designed layout, not a photograph.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:\n'
'- **Graphs**: Not present; the image is a layout '
'diagram without graphical data points.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers:\n'
'- **Data Points**: Not applicable as no graphical data '
'is presented.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects Included:\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: The layout '
'implies a workflow sequence for manufacturing '
'operations.\n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: The '
'image suggests a structured process for coolant '
'filtration but lacks detailed descriptions.\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: Various '
'types of machines and processes can be inferred from '
'symbols and annotations on the layout.\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation**: The design indicates an '
'efficient flow of manufacturing operations, which is '
'crucial for productivity.\n'
'- **Tables**: No tables are present in this layout.\n'
'\n'
'This analysis provides insights into the implications '
'of the diagram for manufacturing processes and further '
'operational understanding.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'dd669056-483e-4566-a7d6-9f7c2e964cbe-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240910_Skoda_Automation_MGH_Portal_direkt.pdf',
'page': 6.0,
'text': '# Lieferumfang\n'
'\n'
'## MAG Umfang\n'
'\n'
'### Linie 1\n'
'- Portal mit H-Lader und 2 Doppelgreifern\n'
'- Greiferfenster im Doppelgreifer einzeln ansteuerbar '
'(Transport 1 Teil möglich)\n'
'- Nassbearbeitung\n'
'- Kübelablage vor Ablegen WST auf FT-Band\n'
'- 3 SPC-Schubladen mit DMC-Handler (1 pro OP)\n'
'- 2 DMC-Kameras am RT-Band\n'
'- Zellensteuerung\n'
' - Schnittstelle zu Kundenleitrechner\n'
'- Mobile Wartungsbühne, elektrisch abgeschaltet\n'
'- Keine Teststelle bei MAG in EIS\n'
'- Virtuelle IBN\n'
'- **Option**\n'
' - 1 Woche Produktionsbegleitung\n'
' - Schulungspaket\n'
'\n'
'### Linie 2\n'
'- Option als Duplikat\n'
'- Termin unbekannt\n'
'\n'
'## Skoda Umfang\n'
'- RT/FT Paletten-Bänder\n'
'- Schutzumhausung für Bänder\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'Here’s a comprehensive analysis of the visual content '
'based on the specified aspects:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution:\n'
'- **Image 1**: The provided image is a layout diagram. '
'It contains listings and details on project elements '
'from "MAG" and "Skoda" related to automation.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification:\n'
'- **Image 1**: \n'
' - **Objects**: \n'
' - Portal with H-loader\n'
' - Double grippers\n'
' - SPC control boxes\n'
' - DMC cameras\n'
' - Pallet handling systems\n'
' - **Key Features**: The objects can be classified '
'under automation equipment and components in an '
'industrial setting, emphasizing their functional '
'roles.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:\n'
'- **Image 1**: \n'
' - **Scene Description**: The diagram appears to '
'depict a manufacturing or automation line layout.\n'
' - **Activities**: Indicators suggest activities like '
'material handling, monitoring, and control within an '
'automated production environment.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis:\n'
'- **Image 1**: \n'
' - **Text Extracted**: Includes descriptions of '
'components and tasks such as "Portal mit H-Lader" and '
'"Zellensteuerung".\n'
' - **Significance**: The text outlines the extent of '
'the automation system being discussed, highlighting its '
'features, options, and the responsibilities attributed '
'to different components.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:\n'
'- **Image 1**: \n'
' - **Presentation**: A diagram visually representing a '
'process flow in automation.\n'
' - **Data Insights**: Shows the relationships and '
'interactions between different automation elements, '
'illustrating the workflow and equipment used.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis:\n'
'- **Image 1**: \n'
' - **Products**: Industrial automation components like '
'H-loaders and double grippers.\n'
' - **Main Features**: These products are critical in '
'effectively moving materials through an automated '
'system.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection:\n'
'- **Image 1**: \n'
' - **Anomalies**: None apparent in the image as it '
'adheres to typical industrial layout conventions.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis:\n'
'- **Image 1**: \n'
' - **Color Composition**: Predominantly blue and green '
'for the diagram, indicating different '
'elements/actions.\n'
' - **Impact**: The use of these colors may be intended '
'to enhance readability and distinguish between '
'different sections of the layout.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition:\n'
'- **Image 1**: \n'
' - **Perspective**: The diagram is presented from a '
'top-down view, typical for layout designs.\n'
' - **Composition**: Elements are systematically '
'arranged to demonstrate interactions between different '
'parts of the automation system.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance:\n'
'- **Image 1**: \n'
' - **Overall Contribution**: This layout directly '
'supports the document’s theme of automation in '
'manufacturing, providing a detailed visual '
'representation of proposed installations.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis:\n'
'- **Image 1**: \n'
' - **Metadata**: Capture date and other technical '
'details are not provided in the description, but '
'relevance lies in documenting the project timeline.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:\n'
'- **Image 1**: \n'
' - **Graphs**: No graphs present; the content is '
'primarily diagrammatic.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers:\n'
'- **Image 1**: Not applicable, as no numerical graphs '
'are included.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects to Include:\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: The diagram '
'likely represents process flows relevant to an '
'automated assembly system.\n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: A '
'close-up look at how different products and services '
'integrate in an automated context.\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: Different '
'types of handling equipment specified.\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation**: The trend shows a shift '
'towards automated solutions in manufacturing for '
'efficiency.\n'
'- **Tables**: No tables included.\n'
'\n'
'This analysis captures the essentials of the visual '
'content based on the provided criteria. If you have '
"specific areas you'd like to delve deeper into, please "
'let me know!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '405f5eed-1d11-4db9-9cf6-d843463fccea-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240910_Skoda_Automation_MGH_Portal_direkt.pdf',
'page': 7.0,
'text': '# Portaldaten\n'
'\n'
'## Portaldaten\n'
'\n'
'- **Horizontal**\n'
' - Vxmin= 3.5 m/s\n'
' - Vxmax= 3 m/s²\n'
'- **Vertikal**\n'
' - Vzmin= 1.5 m/s\n'
' - Vzmax= 3 m/s²\n'
'\n'
'## Werkstückwechselzeiten\n'
'\n'
'- **OP10** \n'
' - < 23s – siehe Ref-Wechsel-Video VW KS Perf OP10\n'
'- **OP20/30**\n'
' - < 18s\n'
'\n'
'## SPECHT 500 DUO\n'
'\n'
'- **Spindelabstand**\n'
' - 720 mm (Werkstückabstand)\n'
'- **Überfahrhöhe**\n'
' - xxx\n'
'- **Bandhöhe**\n'
' - ca. 1.000 mm\n'
'\n'
'Referenz VW KS MGH Perf OP10 \n'
'Skoda SSP MGH Automation \n'
'13.09.2024\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I can't analyze or describe the content of the image "
'directly. However, if you provide a detailed '
'description of the image or discuss its elements, I can '
'help you with analysis or insights based on the '
'information you provide. Let me know how you would like '
'to proceed!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '2cbc0c35-2b5e-456c-b9b0-4d6d3404f171-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': '240910_Skoda_Automation_MGH_Portal_direkt.pdf',
'page': 8.0,
'text': '# Werkstücklagen\n'
'\n'
'## WST Lage auf RT-Band\n'
'- Seite 3 oben\n'
'- Seite 5 rechts\n'
'- Werkstückabstand 710mm\n'
'\n'
'## WST Lage auf FT-Band\n'
'- Seite 3 oben\n'
'- Seite 5 rechts\n'
'- Werkstückabstand 710mm\n'
'\n'
'| | OP10 | OP20/30 |\n'
'|------------|------|---------|\n'
'| | | |\n'
'| | | |\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I can't analyze or describe the content in the attached "
'image directly. If you have specific questions about '
'the image or need information on certain aspects, feel '
'free to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'ed5899f4-8637-4c7d-a372-2974d605393a-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 1.0,
'text': '# VOLKSWAGEN AG\n'
'\n'
'## Próvérka způsobilosti stroje pro měřitelné '
'charakteristiky\n'
'### VW 101 30\n'
'\n'
'**Konzernnorm**\n'
'\n'
'**Kličová slova:** Maschinenfähigkeitsuntersuchung '
'[próvérka způsobilosti], Fähigkeitskennwert '
'[parametr způsobilosti], Qualitätsfähigkeit '
'[kvalitativní způsobilost], Maschinenfähigkeit '
'[způsobilost stroje]\n'
'\n'
'## Obsah\n'
'\n'
'| **Účel a oblast použití** | 2 |\n'
'|-------------------------------|---|\n'
'| **Princip próvérky způsobilosti stroje** | 3 |\n'
'| **Teoretické podklady** | 4 |\n'
'| 3.1 **Distribuční modeli** | 4 |\n'
'| 3.1.1 Normální rozdělení | 4 |\n'
'| 3.1.2 Neúplnové rozdělení | 4 |\n'
'| 3.2 **Rayleighovo rozdělení** | 4 |\n'
'| 3.3 **Zjisťení způsobilosti** | 5 |\n'
'| 3.2.1 **Zjisťení způsobilosti u definovaných '
'distribučních modelí** | 16 |\n'
'| 3.2.2 **Zjisťení způsobilosti u nedefinovaných '
'distribučních modelí** | 16 |\n'
'| 3.3 **Mžení hodnoty próvérky způsobilosti '
'stroje** | 17 |\n'
'| 4 **Statistické testy** | 21 |\n'
'| **Provádění próvérky způsobilosti stroje** | 21 '
'|\n'
'| 4.1 **Použití zkušebních prostředků** | 21 |\n'
'| 4.2 **Odér životnı́ch vozı́k̊u** | 23 |\n'
'| 4.3 **Zvláštní pravidla pro omezení MFU** | 24 |\n'
'| 4.4 **Vyhodnocení dat** | 26 |\n'
'| 4.4.1 **Výber očekávalných distribučních '
'modelí** | 26 |\n'
'| 4.4.2 **Test oddělných hodnot** | 27 |\n'
'| 4.4.3 **Test změny polohy výrob** | 27 |\n'
'| 4.4.4 **Test odchylky do stanoveného distribučního '
'modelu** | 28 |\n'
'| 4.4.5 **Vyhodnocení podle normálního rozdělení** | 28 '
'|\n'
'| 4.4.6 **Vyhodnocení podle stanovené hodnoty** | 28 |\n'
'| 4.4.7 **Neparametrické vyhodnocení** | 28 |\n'
'| 5 **Dokumentace** | 28 |\n'
'| 6 **Posouzení výsledků** | 29 |\n'
'| 7 **Optimalizace stroje** | 29 |\n'
'| 8 **Nakládání s nezpůsobilými stroji** | 30 |\n'
'| 9 **Příklady** | 30 |\n'
'| 10 **Související podklady** | 33 |\n'
'| 11 **Odkazy na literaturu** | 33 |\n'
'| 12 **Seznam hesel** | 34 |\n'
'\n'
'**Informace:** Úřad TR1 - normalizace \n'
'Tel.: +420-2-294-39454 \n'
'Fáčřernı́ meřenı́/Obor zodpovědnost \n'
'KOS-12 | Núpnet | Tel. 792896 \n'
'Normunominalizace (E7D. 173) \n'
'Besoinamer | Tel.: +49-336-1-26153 Sobanski \n'
'\n'
'**Klass-Nr. 11 00 5** \n'
'**únor 2005** \n'
'**pokračování strana 2 at 35** \n'
'\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze or describe the visual content in "
"the image you've provided. If you have any specific "
'questions or need information on a certain topic, feel '
'free to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'c4b393be-7ab4-4862-8084-fc9f905e0b8b-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 2.0,
'text': '# Úvod\n'
'\n'
'Posouzení způsobilosti stroje z hlediska sledovaných '
'měrných výrobních charakteristik je důležitým '
'předpokladem pro splnění stanovených kvalitativních '
'požadavků. Pro mnoho praktických příkladů postupy '
'způsobilosti dosáhnou neexistujících norem nebo '
'jednotné konzervativní směrnice, takže se většině '
'případů mohou vyplnit celkové rozdílné hodnocení '
'způsobilosti. Tato norma byla tedy zpracována, aby bylo '
'možno provádět prověrky způsobilosti podle jednotných '
'pravidel pro všechny praktické případy a tím byla '
'zajištěna srovnatelnost výsledků.\n'
'\n'
'Norma obsahuje v uzavřené formě kompletní teoretické '
'podklady, které jsou nutné pro použití a její aplikaci. '
'Pouze statistické testy, které byly podrobně popsány v '
'normách nebo ve standardní statistické literatuře, jsou '
'uvedeny pouze pomocí odkazů.\n'
'\n'
'Jako příklad prověrky způsobilosti stroje podle této '
'normy počítačový program, ve kterém je podmíněno '
'realizovány popisné algoritmy. Pokud je takový program '
'k dispozici, může se provést vyhodnocení způsobilosti v '
'podstatě na ustanovení oddílu 4 a v případě potřeby si '
'může nalistovat teoretické podklady. Nejdůležitější '
'podrobnosti jsou naproti tomu:\n'
'\n'
'1. 4 - Odber namátkových vzorků\n'
'2. 4.5 - Dokumentace\n'
'3. 4.6 - Posouzení výsledků\n'
'\n'
'**V oddílu 5 jsou navíc uvedeny příklady, které mají '
'sloužit jako pomůcka pro posouzení výsledků.**\n'
'\n'
'# 1 Účel a oblast použití\n'
'\n'
'Cílem prověrky způsobilosti stroje je dokumentované '
'posouzení, zda prověřovaný stroj umožňuje bezpečnou '
'výrobu sledovaných charakteristik v rámci definovaných '
'mezních hodnot. V ideálním případě by přitom měly na '
'výrobní proces působit pouze ulovené podmíněné stroje.\n'
'\n'
'Jak a za jakých předpokladů je nutno provádět prověrky '
'způsobilosti stroje, je předmětem této normy. Je '
'použitelné na libovolné průběžné (měrné) výrobní '
'charakteristiky. \n'
'\n'
'1. **Poznámka**: Pro tento druh charakteristiky uveden '
'název „měrné charakteristiky“ místo názvu „průběžné '
'charakteristiky“ podle odkazovaných dokumentů ve VDI, '
'proto je tento výraz ve VW zažitý.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the attached visual content as "
'requested. If you have any specific aspects or details '
'that you would like to discuss, feel free to mention '
"them, and I'll do my best to assist you!"},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'a005785b-4b5f-41d2-b76c-2a4c26313cae-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 3.0,
'text': '# 2 Princip prověřky způsobilosti stroje\n'
'\n'
'Na základě náhodných vlivů vyplývajících při výrobě '
'různých stupňů druhu pomocí prohloubeného stroje '
'zásadně rozdílné hodnoty šlehnou charakteristiky. Tyto '
'hodnoty charakteristiky \\( X \\) jsou v závislosti na '
'kvalitě výroby rozptylené okolo polohy podmíněně '
'systematickými vlivy. Proto se prověřuje, jak dobře '
'souhlasí rozdělení hodnot charakteristiky s tolerančním '
'intervalem definovaným konstruktem (obrázek 1). '
'Vydemonstraci tohoto je vyjádřeno parametry '
'způsobilosti \\( c_p \\) a \\( c_k \\) (co do slova '
'capability), přičemž hodnota \\( c_k \\) zohledňuje '
'poloz výroby rozptyl a hodnota \\( c_p \\) také polohu '
'výroby. Tyto charakteristiky musí být minimálně tak '
'velké jak definované mezní hodnoty, aby byl splněn '
'požadavek na způsobilost stroje.\n'
'\n'
'Pro zjištění charakteristiky způsobilosti z hlediska '
'sledované charakteristiky je nutno vzít dostatečně '
'velký namátkový vzorek (zpravidla n=50) vybraných dluh '
'v přímé posouzení za podmínek možné identifikace '
'podmínek kategorií vlivů materiál, člověk, metoda a '
'prostředí, aby bylo možné zjistit pozice v této '
'výzkumu. Z tohoto vzorku ve v souladu s očekávaným '
'modelem polohy a hranice intervalů spolehlivosti \\( '
'X_{0.135} \\) a \\( X_{99.865} \\) zajišťují soubor '
'hodnot charakteristiky (teoreticky určených pojetí) a '
'porovnány s intervalu definovaného tolerančního.\n'
'\n'
'Obrázek 1 – Příklad rozdělení hodnot charakteristiky v '
'rámci definovaného tolerančního intervalu\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'> **Poznámka:** 2 Pojem hodnoty charakteristiky nesmí '
'být zaměňován s měrou hodnotou, protože posléze uvedený '
'pojem obsahuje i vyrování s různými určitými '
'nejasnostmi.\n'
'\n'
'> **Poznámka:** 5 Pro označení měřených hodnot je '
'přípustné také USG, OSG nebo USL, OSL nebo Tu, To.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I can't analyze the visual content directly. However, I "
'can guide you on how to approach an analysis based on '
"the aspects you provided. Here's a general framework "
'you could use:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution\n'
'- **Identify the Image**: Locate the image on the page, '
'label it as Image 1.\n'
'- **Position Details**: Note its placement in the '
'document.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification\n'
'- **Identify Objects**: Look for key elements like '
'graphs, text boxes, etc.\n'
'- **Classification**: Categorize these elements (e.g., '
'text, charts).\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis\n'
'- **Describe the Scene**: Discuss the layout and visual '
'elements.\n'
'- **Main Actors and Actions**: Identify if there are '
'any figures and what they are doing.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis\n'
'- **Extract Text**: Highlight any written content or '
'labels.\n'
'- **Content Significance**: Discuss how this text '
'relates to the visual elements.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis\n'
'- **Data Presentation**: Look for charts or diagrams '
'and describe what they illustrate.\n'
'- **Axes and Trends**: Note the labels and data '
'trends.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis\n'
'- **Detail Products**: If any products are shown, '
'describe features, colors, and materials.\n'
'- **Visual Comparison**: Compare any products in the '
'image.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection\n'
'- **Identify Anomalies**: Note any unusual elements in '
'the images.\n'
'- **Impact of Anomalies**: Discuss why they stand out.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis\n'
'- **Color Composition**: Identify dominant colors and '
'their emotional or thematic significance.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition\n'
'- **Perspective Description**: Determine the viewpoint '
'of the image.\n'
'- **Composition Analysis**: Discuss the arrangement of '
'elements.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance\n'
"- **Overall Contribution**: Explain the image's role in "
"the document's message.\n"
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis\n'
'- **Review Metadata**: If accessible, analyze capture '
'date and settings.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis\n'
'- **Trend Identification**: Discuss trends shown in any '
'graphs or charts.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers\n'
'- **Data Points**: List numerical data present.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects\n'
'- **Process Flows**: Describe any relevant process '
'flows.\n'
'- **Detailed Process Descriptions**: Discuss specific '
'processes illustrated.\n'
'- **Type Designation**: Identify and describe types '
'mentioned.\n'
'- **Trends and Interpretation**: Summarize key trends '
'and their interpretations.\n'
'- **Tables**: Analyze any tables present, detailing '
'their content and significance.\n'
'\n'
'By applying this framework to the visual content, you '
'can thoroughly analyze and document your findings. If '
'you need specific details or insights about each '
'aspect, feel free to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '69be1216-c31b-40cf-9071-3fec0973a309-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 4.0,
'text': '# 3 Teoretické podklady\n'
'\n'
'## 3.1 Distribuční modely\n'
'\n'
'Rozdělení hodnot charakteristik lze pro většinu druhů '
'výrobních charakteristik popsat distribučními modely. '
'Tak lze většinou dvourozměrné tolerované výrobní '
'charakteristiky, např. délky rozměrů, průměr a kručící '
'moment, založit na normálním rozdělení.\n'
'\n'
'Rozptyl jednoduše nahoru tolerovaných výrobních '
'charakteristik lze oproti tomu zpřesnit pomocí '
'Weibullova nebo Rayleighova rozdělení. Tak lze např. '
'Weibullovo rozdělení použít pro druhy charakteristik '
'rovnodějnosti, asymetrie a Rayleighovo rozdělení pro '
'druhy charakteristik poloha, souosost.\n'
'\n'
'### 3.1.1 Normální rozdělení\n'
'\n'
'**Funkce hustoty pravděpodobnosti** (zkráceně funkce '
'hustoty) normálního rozdělení, která je graficky '
'znázorněna v obrázku 2, zní:\n'
'\n'
'\\[ \n'
'f(x) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma \\sqrt{2\\pi}} e^{ -\\frac{(x '
'- \\mu)^2}{2\\sigma^2} } \n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'(1.1)\n'
'\n'
's parametry průměrná hodnota μ a směrodatná odchylka σ, '
'které charakterizují polohu a šířku rozdělení, přičemž '
'mocnina standardní odchylky \\(\\sigma^2\\) je '
'označována jako rozptyl.\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'**Hustota pravděpodobnosti** \n'
'Hodnota charakteristiky \n'
' \n'
'| | Průměr | | | |\n'
'|----------|--------|---|---|---|\n'
'| -4σ | 0.135 | | | |\n'
'| -3σ | 0.135 | | | |\n'
'| -2σ | μ - 2σ | | | |\n'
'| -1σ | μ - 1σ | | | |\n'
'| μ | μ | | | |\n'
'| +1σ | μ + 1σ | | | |\n'
'| +2σ | μ + 2σ | | | |\n'
'| +3σ | 0.135 | | | |\n'
'| +4σ | 0.135 | | | |\n'
'\n'
'**Inflekní body**: μ - 1σ, μ + 1σ, σ\n'
'\n'
'**Hodnota charakteristiky** \n'
' \n'
'- **Hustota pravděpodobnosti**: f(x) \n'
'- **Průměrná hodnota**: μ \n'
'- **Směrodatná odchylka**: σ \n'
'\n'
'**Obrázek 2** – Funkce hustoty pravděpodobnosti '
'normálního rozdělení \n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'Here’s a comprehensive analysis based on the visual '
'content provided:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution\n'
'- **Image Number**: Image 1\n'
'- **Position**: The image is located in the center of '
'the page as part of the document.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification\n'
'- **Key Objects**:\n'
' - **Graph**: A bell-shaped curve representing a '
'probability density function.\n'
' - **Axes**: Horizontal and vertical axes.\n'
' - **Labels**: Indications for standard deviations '
'(σ), mean (μ), and probability values.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis\n'
'- **Scene Description**: The image depicts a graph of '
'normal distribution, showcasing the probability density '
'function.\n'
'- **Main Actors/Actions**: The graph serves as a visual '
'tool for understanding statistical characteristics. The '
'key feature of the bell curve illustrates how data is '
'distributed in a normal distribution.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis\n'
'- **Extracted Text**: The equation and labels describe '
'the normal distribution and its properties.\n'
'- **Significance**: The written explanations provide '
'crucial insights into the parameters of normal '
'distribution, aiding the user in understanding '
'statistical modeling.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis\n'
'- **Axes**: \n'
' - Horizontal Axis: "Hodnota charakteristiky" (Value '
'of characteristics).\n'
' - Vertical Axis: "Hustota pravděpodobnosti" '
'(Probability density).\n'
'- **Legend**: Indications mark mean and standard '
'deviation points.\n'
'- **Insights**: The graph visually depicts how '
'probabilities are distributed around the mean in a '
'normal distribution.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis\n'
'- **Products**: N/A — The image does not depict '
'physical products.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection\n'
'- **Anomalies**: N/A — The graph displays standard '
'characteristics of a normal distribution without '
'anomalies.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis\n'
'- **Color Composition**: Predominantly monochrome, '
'utilizing black for the graph and gray for the '
'background.\n'
'- **Impact**: The simplicity aids in focusing on the '
'data without distractions from color.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition\n'
'- **Perspective**: Standard frontal view, allowing '
'clear visibility of the graph details.\n'
'- **Composition**: Balanced with the curve centered '
'between the axes, enhancing readability.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance\n'
'- **Overall Message**: The image is central to '
'understanding statistical models related to normal '
'distribution, crucial for assessments in various '
'fields, indicating how characteristics are modeled '
'statistically.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis\n'
'- **Metadata Review**: N/A — Metadata not available or '
'included.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis\n'
'- **Data Points**: The key points are marked, detailing '
'the mean and points of standard deviation.\n'
'- **Trends**: The graph portrays the classic bell curve '
'shape indicative of normal distribution probabilities.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. Graph Numbers\n'
'- **Data Points**: \n'
' - Mean (μ): Value with associated probabilities.\n'
' - Standard deviations (±σ): Values with specific '
'probability indicators (0.135, etc.).\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects\n'
'\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: N/A — The image '
'does not depict process flows.\n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: N/A '
'— No specific processes are visualized.\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: The graph '
'classifies values under the types defined by standard '
'deviation and mean.\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation**: The shape of the graph '
'indicates that most values cluster around the mean.\n'
'- **Tables**: N/A — No tables are present in the '
'image.\n'
'\n'
'This analysis encapsulates the depicted content and its '
'relevance to the theoretical discussions surrounding '
'normal distribution.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'b10b71e8-b15a-48c4-a4dd-23c22e7b166c-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 5.0,
'text': '# Jako pravděpodobnost\n'
'\n'
'Jako pravděpodobnost lze interpretovat v obrázku 2 '
'podíl plochy pod grafem v rámci sledovaného intervalu. '
'Pravděpodobnost, že se hodnota charakteristických x '
'bude nacházet v základním souboru, který je maximálně '
'tak velký, jako sledovaná mezní hodnota \\(x_p\\), je '
'tak uvedena primitivní funkcí – funkcí rozdělení. Ta '
'zní pro normální rozdělení:\n'
'\n'
'\\[ F_{W}(x) = \\int_{-\\infty}^{x} f_{W}(u) \\, du \\] '
'(1.2)\n'
'\n'
'Příklady:\n'
'\n'
'\\[ \\int_{-\\infty}^{\\infty} f_{W}(x) \\, dx = 1 \\] '
'(1.3)\n'
'\n'
'a pro všechny hodnoty \\( x \\) platí \\( f_{W}(x) \\ge '
'0 \\).\n'
'\n'
'## Transformací\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'u = \\frac{x - \\mu}{\\sigma} \\] (1.4)\n'
'\n'
'Vyplněte (1.1) hustota pravděpodobnosti '
'standardizovaného normálního rozdělení:\n'
'\n'
'\\[ \\phi(u) = \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{2\\pi}} '
'e^{-\\frac{u^2}{2}} \\] (1.5)\n'
'\n'
'a distribuční funkce\n'
'\n'
'\\[ \\Phi(u) = \\int_{-\\infty}^{u} \\phi(t) \\, dt \\] '
'(1.6)\n'
'\n'
'se standardní odchylkou \\( \\sigma = 1 \\).\n'
'\n'
'### 3.1.2 Weibullovo rozdělení\n'
'\n'
'Weibullovo rozdělení vzniká přehozením funkce hustoty '
'normálního rozdělení na nulovém bodě, přičemž hodnoty '
'funkce více od bodu přeletí se přituk k bodům vpravo od '
'nich. Distribuční funkce a funkce rozdělení '
'pravděpodobnosti Weibullova rozdělení tak zní:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'f(x) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma_{N}} \\left( '
'\\frac{x}{\\sigma_{N}} \\right)^{\\alpha - 1} '
'e^{-\\left(\\frac{x}{\\sigma_{N}}\\right)^{\\alpha}} '
'\\quad \\text{pro } x \\ge 0 \\] (1.7)\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'F_{W}(x) = 1 - '
'e^{-\\left(\\frac{x}{\\sigma_{N}}\\right)^{\\alpha}} '
'\\] (1.8)\n'
'\n'
'**Příčtem:**\n'
'\n'
'- \\( \\sigma \\): Střední hodnota původního normálního '
'rozdělení, která označuje systematický posun nulového '
'bodu.\n'
'- \\( \\sigma_N \\): Standardní odchylka původního '
'normálního rozdělení.\n'
'- \\( \\Phi \\): Distribuční funkce standardizovaného '
'normálního rozdělení.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze or describe specific visual "
'content as requested. However, if you have specific '
'questions about the text or mathematical concepts '
'referenced in the image, feel free to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '66b1f5b7-7ae1-4344-85c3-a13e93157f26-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 6.0,
'text': '# Strana 6\n'
'VW 101 30: 2005-02\n'
'\n'
'## Obrázek 3 – Funkce hustoty Weibullova rozdělení s '
'různými posuny nulového bodu\n'
'\n'
'Obrázek 3 ukazuje funkce rozdělení pravděpodobnosti, '
'která vyplýne ze složené hustoty normálního rozdělení '
'při různých posunech nulového bodu.\n'
'\n'
' \n'
'\n'
'Hodnota charakteristiky\n'
'\n'
'| | 0𝜎 | 1𝜎 | 2𝜎 | 3𝜎 | 4𝜎 | 5𝜎 |\n'
'|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n'
'| Hliněná pravděpodobnost | | | | | | |\n'
'\n'
'Střední hodnota a rozptyl Weibullova rozdělení zná:\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\mu = \\mu_H + \\left( \\frac{H_N}{\\sigma_N} \\right) '
'- 2 \\cdot \\sigma_N \\cdot \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{2\\pi}} '
'\\quad (1.9)\n'
'\\]\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\sigma^2 = H_{N} - \\mu^2 \\quad (1.10)\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Pro případ nulového bodu \\( \\mu_N = 0 \\) vyplýne z '
'(1.9) a (1.10):\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\mu = - \\frac{2 \\cdot \\sigma_N}{\\sqrt{2\\pi}} '
'\\quad (1.11)\n'
'\\]\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\sigma^2 = 2 \\cdot \\sigma_N^2 \\left( \\frac{1 - '
'2}{\\pi} \\right) \\quad (1.12)\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Jak ukazuje obrázek 3, blíží se Weibullovo rozdělení s '
'rostoucím posunem nulového bodu normálnímu rozdělení. '
'Tak lze pro případ\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\frac{\\mu}{\\sigma} \\quad (1.13)\n'
'\\]\n'
'Weibullovo rozdělení dobrou aproximací nahradit '
'normálním rozdělením.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly or "
'provide a comprehensive examination based on the '
"aspects you've listed. However, I can help you "
'understand the concepts or content related to Weibull '
'distribution, its probability density functions, and '
'any specific aspects of statistical analysis you may '
'want to discuss. Let me know how you’d like to '
'proceed!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '2eb33ecc-ebad-4cf5-9f72-6072d26de887-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 7.0,
'text': '# 3.1.3 Rayleighovo rozdělení\n'
'\n'
'Rayleighovo rozdělení vyplněné vektorových hodnot '
'ortogonálních komponent x a y dvourozměrného normálního '
'rozdělení, přičemž pro komponenty jsou předpokládány '
'stejné standardní odchylky. Tento případ nastavuje v '
'mnoha výrobních charakteristikách ve formě radiálních '
'odchylek r od sledovaného bodu nebo sledované osy.\n'
'\n'
'Funkce hustoty a funkce rozdělení Rayleighova rozdělení '
'obecně zní:\n'
'\n'
'$$\n'
'f_{Z_2}(r) = \\frac{r}{2 \\pi \\sigma^2} '
'e^{-\\frac{r^2}{2 \\sigma^2}}, \\quad f_{R}(r) = '
"\\int_0^{r} f_{Z_2}(r') \\, dr' = \\frac{1 - "
'e^{-\\frac{r^2}{2 \\sigma^2}}}{2}\n'
'$$\n'
'\n'
'přičemž:\n'
'\n'
'- \\( \\sigma \\): Standardní odchylka ortogonálních '
'složky x a y, z nichž vyplývá radiální odchylka r od '
'referenčního bodu nebo od referenční osy.\n'
'- \\( z \\): Excentricita. Vzdálenost mezi počátkem '
'soustavy souřadnic a středem žádosti.\n'
'\n'
'Obrázek 4 ukazuje funkce rozdělení pravděpodobnosti '
'Rayleighova rozdělení, které vyplývá z různých '
'excentricit v jednotkách \\( \\sigma_n \\).\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'Střední hodnota a rozptyl Rayleighova rozdělení zní: \n'
'\n'
'- **Střední hodnota**: \\( \\sigma '
'\\sqrt{\\frac{\\pi}{2}} \\)\n'
'- **Rozptyl**: \\( \\left(2 - '
'\\frac{\\pi}{2}\\right)\\sigma^2 \\)\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'### Analysis of Visual Content\n'
'\n'
'1. **Localization and Attribution:**\n'
' - **Image 1:** The main image appears at the bottom '
'of the page under a section titled "Obrázek 4." It is '
'labeled as “Obrázek 4 - Funkce hustoty Rayleighova '
'rozdělení s různými excentricitami.”\n'
'\n'
'2. **Object Detection and Classification:**\n'
' - The image contains:\n'
' - A line graph with curves representing different '
'probabilities (peaking curves).\n'
' - X-axis labeled “Hodnota charakteristiky” '
'(Characteristic value).\n'
' - Y-axis labeled “Hustota pravděpodobnosti” '
'(Probability density).\n'
' - Legend indicating curves for different '
'eccentricities (Z = 0, Z = 1, Z = 2, etc.).\n'
'\n'
'3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**\n'
' - The image depicts a mathematical graph showing the '
'probability density functions of the Rayleigh '
'distribution.\n'
' - The main focus is on the graphs, illustrating '
'statistical behavior concerning varying '
'excentricities.\n'
'\n'
'4. **Text Analysis:**\n'
' - Text within the image provides context and '
'definitions regarding the Rayleigh distribution.\n'
' - Its significance lies in explaining how various '
'parameters affect probability density, crucial for '
'statistical analysis.\n'
'\n'
'5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**\n'
' - The graph has two axes:\n'
' - **X-axis (Hodnota charakteristiky):** Ranges '
'from 0 to 60.\n'
' - **Y-axis (Hustota pravděpodobnosti):** '
'Represents probability density.\n'
' - Each curve shows the impact of different '
'eccentricities on the probability density function.\n'
' - Key insights include understanding how '
'eccentricity influences distribution characteristics.\n'
'\n'
'6. **Product Analysis:**\n'
' - N/A (No physical products depicted in the image).\n'
'\n'
'7. **Anomaly Detection:**\n'
' - The graph appears to follow standard statistical '
'representation; no clear anomalies are detected.\n'
'\n'
'8. **Color Analysis:**\n'
' - The graph uses contrasting colors for each curve.\n'
' - Dominant colors could include variations of black '
'for standard curves.\n'
' - The color choice emphasizes clarity and '
'distinction among different lines.\n'
'\n'
'9. **Perspective and Composition:**\n'
' - The perspective is a straightforward overhead view '
'of a line graph.\n'
' - Each element is arranged logically, with clear '
'labeling that enhances comprehension.\n'
'\n'
'10. **Contextual Significance:**\n'
' - The image supports a mathematical explanation of '
'the Rayleigh distribution, contributing to the '
'comprehension of statistical modeling within the '
'document.\n'
'\n'
'11. **Metadata Analysis:**\n'
' - N/A (Metadata is not provided in the visual '
'content).\n'
'\n'
'12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**\n'
' - The graph illustrates trends in probability '
'density based on eccentricity.\n'
' - Each curve indicates variability in distribution '
'shapes relevant to statistical applications.\n'
'\n'
'13. **Graph Numbers:**\n'
' - Specific data points are not directly provided in '
'the image for breakdown.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects\n'
'\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):**\n'
' - N/A (No process flows depicted).\n'
'\n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):**\n'
' - N/A (No detailed processes shown).\n'
'\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):**\n'
' - Different curves represent various eccentricity '
'types labeled clearly.\n'
'\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation:**\n'
' - The curves suggest that as eccentricity '
'increases, the shape of the probability density '
'function changes, indicating different behaviors of '
'data under the Rayleigh distribution.\n'
'\n'
'- **Tables:**\n'
' - N/A (No tables included in the image). \n'
'\n'
'This analysis captures the essential aspects of the '
'visual content, focusing on understanding the '
'mathematical principles illustrated through the '
'Rayleigh distribution graph.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '6f793813-cea7-43f8-b5ed-cde3c92babd4-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 8.0,
'text': '# Strana 8\n'
'VW 101 30: 2005-02\n'
'\n'
'## 3.2 Zjištění způsobilosti\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\mu = \\int \\frac{F(x)}{N} \\cdot dr \\tag{1.16}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\sigma^2 = z^2 + \\mu^2 \\tag{1.17}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Pro případ excentricity \\( z = 0 \\) vyplývá z (1.14) '
'a (1.15) funkce hustoty a distribuční funkce Weibullova '
'rozdělení s hodnotou parametru tvaru 2:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'f_{z}(x) = \\frac{1}{\\sigma} \\left( '
'\\frac{x}{\\sigma} \\right)^{\\alpha - 1} e^{-\\left( '
'\\frac{x}{\\sigma} \\right)^{\\alpha}} \\tag{1.18}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'F_{z}(x) = 1 - e^{-\\left( \\frac{x}{\\sigma} '
'\\right)^{\\alpha}} \\tag{1.19}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'a z tohoto opět střední hodnoty a rozptyl:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\mu = \\sigma \\cdot \\Gamma\\left( 1 + '
'\\frac{1}{\\alpha} \\right) \\tag{1.20}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\sigma^2 = \\sigma^2 \\left( \\Gamma\\left( 1 + '
'\\frac{2}{\\alpha} \\right) - \\left( \\Gamma\\left( 1 '
'+ \\frac{1}{\\alpha} \\right) \\right)^2 \\right) '
'\\tag{1.21}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Tak lze pro případ\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\mu = 6 \\tag{1.22}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Rayleighovo rozdělení dobrou aproximaci nahrazovat '
'normálním rozdělením.\n'
'\n'
'Charakteristiky způsobilosti \\( c_m \\) a \\( c_k \\) '
'udávají, jak osoby dodržují výrobní výsledky toleranční '
'interval sledované charakteristiky. Pritom je hodnotou '
'\\( c_n \\) zohledněn pouze rozptyl výrobky. Poloha '
'výrobky je zohledněna hodnotou \\( c_k \\). Tím lze na '
'jedné straně vyjádřit, jaká hodnota je při ideální '
'poloze výroby možná, a na druhé straně také porovnat '
'tyto hodnoty, jak silně se poloha výrobky odchyluje od '
'požadované hodnoty. Čím vyšší jsou zjištěné '
'charakteristiky způsobilosti, tím lepší je výběr.\n'
'\n'
'Pro zjištění charakteristik způsobilosti existují různé '
'vyhodnocovací vzorce, které je nutno zvolit podle '
'konkrétního případu. Protože řízení charakteristiky '
'způsobilosti je určitě pouze pro odhady hledaných '
'hodnot základního rozdělení, představují pouze odhady '
'hledaných hodnot základního rozdělení.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I can't analyze the image content as you've requested. "
'However, I can help with a summary or answer questions '
'about similar topics based on text descriptions. Let me '
"know how you'd like to proceed!"},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '1ef658e0-421b-43f5-9359-b0b7b63ffacb-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 9.0,
'text': '# 3.2.1 Zjištění způsobilosti u definovaných '
'distribučních modelů\n'
'\n'
'## 3.2.1.1 Charakteristiky způsobilosti\n'
'\n'
'Pro prověřování výrobní charakteristiky, jejíž '
'matematické vzorky nevyžadují v rozporu s teoreticky '
'očekávaným distribučním modelem, jsou charakteristiky '
'způsobilosti odhadovány podle příslušného případu (viz '
'také příklady 1 a 2 v odvětví 5) podle následujících '
'vzorců: \n'
'\n'
'Charakteristiky způsobilosti pro oboustranně '
'tolerovanou charakteristiku (podle DIN 56319, metoda '
'M4), např. pro délkovou míru:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{c}_m = \\frac{G_u - G_l}{\\bar{x} - X_{0.135\\%}} '
'\\quad (2.1)\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Charakteristiky způsobilosti pro jednostranně nahoře '
'tolerovanou charakteristiku s přirozenou dolní reni '
'hodnotou rovnou nule, např. radiální házení:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{c}_m = \\frac{G_u - \\mu}{\\bar{x} - '
'X_{0.865\\%}} \\quad (2.2)\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Charakteristika způsobilosti pro jednostranně dole '
'tolerovanou charakteristiku, např. pro pevnost v tahu:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{c}_{mk} = \\frac{\\mu - G_l}{\\bar{x} - '
'X_{0.135\\%}} \\quad (2.5)\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'### Přitom:\n'
'\n'
'- \\( G_u, G_l \\): maximální rozměr, popř. minimální '
'rozměr \n'
'- \\( \\mu \\): odhadovaná střední hodnota \n'
'- \\( X_{0.135\\%}, \\; X_{0.865\\%} \\): odhadované '
'hodnoty pro hranice intervalu spolehlivosti (kvantily, '
'pod nichž leží uvedený podíl p naměřených hodnot)\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to provide the detailed analysis you're "
"looking for regarding the visual content you've shared. "
'However, I can assist with general questions or '
'information related to the topic! Please let me know '
'how else I can help.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'f7cf9c79-d5c2-43f0-bdbb-8f97493081ac-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 10.0,
'text': '# 3.2.1.2 Odhad statistických parametrů\n'
'\n'
'Statistické parametry střední hodnota \\( \\mu \\) a '
'směrodatná odchylka \\( \\sigma \\) základního souboru '
'lze nezávisle na distribučním modelu podle očekávání '
'odhadnout z naměřených hodnot vzorku pomocí vzorců:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\mu = \\frac{1}{n} \\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i \\tag{2.6}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\sigma^2 = \\frac{1}{n-1} \\sum_{i=1}^{n} (x_i - '
'\\bar{x})^2 \\tag{2.7}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'přičemž:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'n_p = n_a + n_b : \\text{efektivní rozsah namátkové '
'zkoušky} \\tag{2.8}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'- \\( n_a \\): zvolený rozsah namátkové zkoušky\n'
'- \\( n \\): počet odměřených hodnot\n'
'- \\( t \\): hodnota parametru\n'
'\n'
'V případě vyhodnocovaných dat ve formě rozdělení '
'četností tříděných naměřených hodnot, např. s rozkrytem '
'záznamů ve formě čárek v rozdělení tříd rozsahu hodnot '
'(statistika četností) lze odhadnout parametry \\( \\mu '
'\\) a \\( \\sigma \\) pomocí vzorce:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{\\mu} = \\frac{1}{n_k} \\sum_{k=1}^{k_t} x_k '
'\\tag{2.9}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{\\sigma} = \\sqrt{\\frac{1}{k_t - 1} '
'\\sum_{k=1}^{k_t} (x_k - \\bar{x})^2} \\tag{2.10}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'přičemž:\n'
'\n'
'- \\( x_k \\): střední hodnota k-té třídy\n'
'- \\( a_k \\): absolutní četnost naměřených hodnot v '
'k-té třídě (bez mimořádných hodnot)\n'
'- \\( K \\): maximální počet naměřených hodnot\n'
'\n'
'## 3.2.1.3 Odhad hranic intervalu spolehlivosti\n'
'\n'
'Hranice intervalu spolehlivosti závisí na distribučním '
'modelu a odhadují se následujícím způsobem:\n'
'\n'
'### Hranice intervalu spolehlivosti normálního '
'rozdělení:\n'
'\n'
'V případě normálního rozdělení jako vhodného '
'distribučního modelu vyplněnou hodnoty zjištěné podle '
'(2.6) a (2.7) popř. (2.9) a (2.10) jako \\( \\hat{a} '
'\\) a \\( \\hat{b} \\) jako odhadované hodnoty pro '
'oblast intervalu spolehlivosti:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{X} = \\bar{x} \\pm 3\\sigma \\tag{2.11}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Následuje opět po dosazení do vzorců (2.1) a (2.2) dají '
'klasické vzorce pro výpočet charakteristik způsobností '
'(viz také příklad 1 v oddílu 5).\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'I cannot analyze the visual content you provided. If '
"you have specific questions or if there's something "
"particular you'd like to know, feel free to ask!"},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '2a4576d1-068c-45e2-8a6e-bbc56c1cb54d-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 11.0,
'text': '# Hranice intervalu spolehlivosti Weibullova rozdělení\n'
'\n'
'Pro zjištění hranic intervalu spolehlivosti pro '
'Weibullovo rozdělení se nejprve podle vzorce (2.6) a '
'(2.7), popř. (2.9) a (2.10) odhadnou veličiny α a β.\n'
'\n'
'Pro případ, že \\( \\hat{\\mu} / \\hat{\\sigma} < 3 \\) '
'se pak z odhadnutých veličin α a β následujícím '
'způsobem odhaduje hledané hodnoty parametrů \\( \\mu_N '
'\\) a \\( \\sigma_N \\) příspůsobeného Weibullova '
'rozdělení:\n'
'\n'
'Z rovnice (1.9) obdržíme funkci\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\frac{\\hat{\\mu}}{\\hat{\\sigma}} = \\frac{\\left( '
'\\frac{\\hat{\\mu}}{\\hat{\\sigma}} \\right) \\left( '
'\\frac{ \\partial \\hat{\\mu}}{\\partial \\sigma} '
'\\right) + \\left( \\frac{\\mu_N}{\\hat{\\sigma}} '
'\\right) \\left( -\\frac{ \\partial '
'\\hat{\\sigma}}{\\partial \\sigma} \\right)}{2 \\pi} '
'e^{{-\\frac{ \\hat{\\mu} }{\\hat{\\sigma}}}}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Pomocí rovnice (1.10) z toho vyplývá funkce\n'
'\n'
'Z rovnic (1.11) a (1.12) vyplýne podmínka\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\frac{\\hat{\\mu}}{\\sigma} = '
'\\frac{2}{\\sqrt{2-\\mu}} = 1,3236\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Hledané hodnoty parametrů Weibullova rozdělení tak lze '
'za podmínek (2.14) odhadnout pomocí\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\sigma_N = \\left( 1 + \\frac{ \\left( '
'\\frac{\\hat{\\mu}}{\\hat{\\sigma}} \\right)^2}{\\left( '
'\\frac{\\epsilon_{BR}}{\\hat{\\sigma}} \\right)^2} '
'\\right)\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'příčemž\n'
'\n'
'\\(\\epsilon_{BR}\\) - inverzní funkce k (2.13)\n'
'\n'
'Pro případ, že by poměr \\( \\hat{\\mu} / '
'\\hat{\\sigma} \\) na základě náhodných odchylek '
'parametrů vzorků byl menší než mezní hodnota 1,3236 z '
'podmínky (2.14), je poměr \\( \\hat{\\mu} / '
'\\hat{\\sigma} \\) nastaven na tuto mezní hodnotu, při '
'které vyplynou následující hodnoty parametrů:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{\\mu}_N = 0 \\quad \\text{podle vzorce (1.12)}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\sigma_N = \\frac{\\pi}{\\sqrt{2}} - 1,659 \\cdot '
'\\hat{\\sigma} \\quad (2.17)\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze images in the manner you're "
'asking for. However, I can help answer questions or '
"explain concepts related to the content you're "
'interested in. If you have specific questions about the '
'content in the visual, feel free to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'a0dac03d-699a-4ecc-afbc-4cfec7d1c9b3-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 12.0,
'text': '# Strana 12\n'
'VW 101 30: 2005-02\n'
'\n'
'Souvislost mezi hodnotami parametrů \\( \\mu_N \\) a '
'\\( \\sigma_W \\) Weibullova rozdělení a statistických '
'veličin \\( \\mu \\) a \\( c \\) je graficky znázorněno '
'na obrázku 5 vztaženo na \\( c \\).\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'Pro přizpůsobené Weibullovo rozdělení lze pak číselně '
'zjistit hranice spolehlivosti, jejichž závislost na '
'relativní poloze je znázorněná na obrázku 6.\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'Here’s a comprehensive analysis based on the provided '
'visual content:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. **Localization and Attribution:**\n'
'- **Image 1**: "Relativní poloha parametrů Weibullova '
'rozdělení v závislosti na relativní poloze"\n'
'- **Image 2**: "Relativní hranice intervalů '
'spolehlivosti Weibullova rozdělení v závislosti na '
'relativní poloze"\n'
'\n'
'### 2. **Object Detection and Classification:**\n'
'- **Image 1**: Contains graphical elements: curves '
'representing statistical parameters (likely related to '
'Weibull distribution).\n'
'- **Image 2**: Contains analogous graphical elements: '
'curves depicting reliability intervals.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**\n'
'- **Image 1**: The graph appears to display the '
'relationship of Weibull parameters as they relate to a '
'relative position (denoted \\( \\mu \\)).\n'
'- **Image 2**: Illustrates reliability intervals '
'concerning the Weibull distribution.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. **Text Analysis:**\n'
'- **Image 1**: Contains annotations regarding the '
'Weibull distribution parameters.\n'
'- **Image 2**: Discusses reliability bounds as they '
'relate to the Weibull distribution.\n'
'- **Significance**: These texts provide a theoretical '
'background that aids in understanding the graphical '
'data presented.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**\n'
'- **Image 1**: \n'
' - X-axis: Relative position \\( \\mu / \\sigma \\)\n'
' - Y-axis: Relative distribution parameters.\n'
'- **Image 2**: Similar axes with a focus on reliability '
'intervals.\n'
'- **Key Insights**: Both graphs likely depict '
'statistical relationships important for engineers or '
'statisticians.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. **Product Analysis:**\n'
'- There are no products depicted in the images.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. **Anomaly Detection:**\n'
'- No noticeable anomalies are present; both graphs are '
'consistent in style and purpose.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. **Color Analysis:**\n'
'- The graphs primarily use black lines on a white '
'background, ensuring clarity and focus on the data '
'presented.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. **Perspective and Composition:**\n'
'- The perspective is straightforward, typical for '
'technical graphs.\n'
'- Composition involves labeled axes and plotted curves, '
'which are logically arranged for comprehension.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. **Contextual Significance:**\n'
'- The graphs contribute to a deeper understanding of '
'Weibull distribution, essential in reliability '
'engineering and statistical analysis.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. **Metadata Analysis:**\n'
'- No metadata available in the visual content.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**\n'
'- **Image 1**: Shows curves that depict how the Weibull '
'parameters change with relative position.\n'
'- **Image 2**: Details reliability intervals, '
'indicating statistical stability over attempted '
'measurements.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. **Graph Numbers:**\n'
'- Specific data points from the graphs were not '
'extracted; they need to be read directly from the '
'images.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects:\n'
'\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: Not present in '
'the images.\n'
' \n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: Not '
'provided; images contain graphical representations '
'rather than direct process flow diagrams.\n'
'\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: Identifies '
'parameters and reliability bounds relevant to Weibull '
'distribution.\n'
'\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation**: Indicates how '
'statistical parameters are affected by changes in '
'relative position, vital for predictive modeling.\n'
'\n'
'- **Tables**: No tables present; only graphs are '
'depicted. \n'
'\n'
'This detailed analysis has captured the core elements '
'present in the images while adhering to the specified '
'aspects.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '68c6fa19-8fd3-4b8d-a1a5-5689476e2a99-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 13.0,
'text': 'Pro přímej zjištění charakteristik \\(\\mu_N\\) a '
'\\(\\sigma\\) z charakteristik \\(\\mu\\) a '
'\\(\\sigma\\) pro \\(1.3236 < \\frac{\\mu}{\\sigma} < '
'3\\) s dostatečnou přesností použít také následující '
'aproximaci jako inverzní funkci vztahu (2.13) (chyba '
'většinou na \\(\\sigma\\) menší než 0,1):\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\frac{\\mu}{\\sigma} = 1.604\\left( '
'\\frac{1.3236}{\\sigma} \\right) + 0.634\\left( '
'\\frac{1.3236}{\\sigma} \\right)\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Navíc může být zjištěn hraniční interval spolehlivosti '
'pro \\(1.3236 < \\frac{\\mu}{\\sigma} < 3\\) provedením '
'pomocí následující aproximace (chyba většinou na '
'\\(\\sigma\\) menší než 0,02):\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\frac{\\mu}{\\sigma} = '
'-\\frac{(2.471-1.3236)}{(1.3236 - 3)} + 3.5171\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Pro \\(\\frac{\\mu}{\\sigma} < 3\\) se vypočet hranic '
'intervalů spolehlivosti proveden podle 2.11.\n'
'\n'
'## Hranice intervalů spolehlivosti Rayleighova '
'rozdělení:\n'
'\n'
'Pro zjištění hranic intervalů spolehlivosti pro '
'Rayleighovo rozdělení (viz také příklad 2 v oddílu 5) '
'se nejprve podle vzorce (2.6) a (2.7), popř. (2.9) a '
'(2.10) odhadnou veličiny \\(\\mu\\) a \\(\\sigma\\). '
'Pro případ, že \\(\\frac{\\mu}{\\sigma} < 6\\) se pak z '
'odhadnutých veličin \\(\\mu\\) a \\(\\sigma\\) '
'následujícím způsobem zjistí hledané hodnoty parametrů '
'z \\(\\chi\\) přizpůsobovaného Rayleighova rozdělení:\n'
'\n'
'Z rovnic (1.14) a (1.16) získáme funkci\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\frac{\\partial \\mu}{\\partial N} = \\frac{\\beta^2 '
'\\left( \\frac{1}{\\sqrt{2\\pi}} \\right) \\frac{d}{dx} '
'e^{-\\frac{x^2}{2}}}{z} \\cdot \\left( v_0 \\cdot '
'\\sigma^2 \\cdot \\int_0^{\\infty} e^{-\\sigma^2} dx '
'\\right)\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'přičemž \n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'v = \\frac{r}{\\partial N}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Pomocí rovnice (1.17) z toho vyplývá funkce\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\frac{\\partial \\mu}{\\partial \\sigma} = -\\left( '
'\\frac{z}{\\partial N} \\right) = -\\left( '
'\\frac{z^2}{d\\sigma} \\right) \\left( \\frac{\\partial '
'z}{\\partial N} \\right)\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Z rovnic (1.20) a (1.21) vyplývá podmínka\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\frac{\\mu}{\\sigma} = \\frac{\\pi}{4 - \\pi} \\approx '
'1,9131\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to conduct a detailed analysis of the visual "
'content as requested without the ability to view or '
'interpret images. However, I can provide guidelines on '
'how you might conduct such an analysis based on the '
"aspects you've outlined:\n"
'\n'
'1. **Localization and Attribution:**\n'
' - Number the images according to their positions on '
'the page.\n'
' - Make note of their placements relative to each '
'other and any surrounding elements.\n'
'\n'
'2. **Object Detection and Classification:**\n'
' - Identify objects depicted within each image and '
'classify them.\n'
' - Describe their defining characteristics (size, '
'shape, color).\n'
'\n'
'3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**\n'
' - Provide a narrative for each image, detailing the '
'scene and activities involved.\n'
' - Identify the main subjects and their actions.\n'
'\n'
'4. **Text Analysis:**\n'
' - Look for any text elements and extract them for '
'review.\n'
' - Discuss their relevance to the image and overall '
'context.\n'
'\n'
'5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**\n'
' - Examine any diagrams or charts for key data '
'insights.\n'
' - Analyze elements such as axes and legends for '
'additional context.\n'
'\n'
'6. **Product Analysis:**\n'
' - If products are present, detail their features and '
'compare variations.\n'
'\n'
'7. **Anomaly Detection:**\n'
' - Identify any unusual elements that stand out and '
'discuss their implications.\n'
'\n'
'8. **Color Analysis:**\n'
' - Analyze the color palette of each image and how it '
'influences perception.\n'
'\n'
'9. **Perspective and Composition:**\n'
' - Describe the viewpoint of the image and how '
'composition affects visual storytelling.\n'
'\n'
'10. **Contextual Significance:**\n'
' - Consider how each image fits into the broader '
'document or theme being presented.\n'
'\n'
'11. **Metadata Analysis:**\n'
' - If available, review image metadata for insights '
'regarding capture context.\n'
'\n'
'12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**\n'
' - Examine any graphs for trends and significance, '
'detail data points.\n'
'\n'
'13. **Graph Numbers:**\n'
' - List data points indicated in any graphs.\n'
'\n'
'**Additional Aspects:**\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse:** Describe process flows and their '
'importance.\n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen:** Explain any depicted '
'processes.\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung:** Identify categories noted in '
'images or charts.\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation:** Assess trends and '
'provide analysis.\n'
'- **Tables:** Analyze any tables for content and data.\n'
'\n'
'If you have specific content you want to discuss or '
"analyze, please provide it in text form, and I'll be "
'happy to assist!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'a0003d58-c232-4b40-bc74-4c857726380c-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 14.0,
'text': '```\n'
'# Strana 14\n'
'VW 101 30: 2005-02\n'
'\n'
'Hledané hodnoty parametrů Rayleighova rozdělení tak lze '
'za podmínky (2.23) odhadnout pomocí:\n'
'\n'
'$$\n'
'\\sigma_N = \\sqrt{\\left(1 + '
'\\left(\\frac{\\alpha}{\\beta}\\right)^2\\right) '
'\\left( \\sigma_{\\epsilon}^2 + \\sigma_N^2 \\right)} '
'\\tag{2.24}\n'
'$$\n'
'\n'
'a\n'
'\n'
'$$\n'
'\\hat{z} = '
'\\frac{\\hat{\\sigma}_{\\epsilon}^2}{\\sigma_N} '
'\\tag{2.25}\n'
'$$\n'
'\n'
'přičemž\n'
'\n'
'$$\n'
'\\hat{\\sigma}_{\\epsilon}^2: \\text{ inverse Function '
'von (2.22)}\n'
'$$\n'
'\n'
'Pro případ, že by poměr $\\frac{\\mu}{\\sigma}$ na '
'základě náhodných odchylek parametrů vzorků byl menší '
'než mezní hodnota 1,9131 z podmínky (2.23), je poměr '
'$\\frac{\\mu}{\\sigma}$ nastaven na tuto mezní hodnotu, '
'při které vyplní následující hodnoty parametrů:\n'
'\n'
'$$\n'
'\\hat{z} = 0 \\text{ podle vzorce (1.21)} \\tag{2.26}\n'
'$$\n'
'\n'
'$$\n'
'\\sigma_N = \\frac{2}{\\sqrt{4 - \\pi}} = 1,526 \\cdot '
'\\sigma\n'
'$$\n'
'\n'
'Souvislost mezi hodnotami parametrů $z$ a $\\sigma_N$ '
'Rayleighova rozdělení a statistických veličin $\\mu$ a '
'$\\sigma$ je graficky znázorněna na obrázku 7, vztaženo '
'k $\\alpha$.\n'
'\n'
'## Obrázek 7 – Relativní poloha parametrů Rayleighova '
'rozdělení v závislosti na relativní poloze\n'
'\n'
'| relativní poloha $\\mu/\\sigma$ | relativní '
'distribuční parametry |\n'
'|---------------------------------|---------------------------------|\n'
'| 1.5 | '
'2 |\n'
'| 2.0 | '
'5 |\n'
'| 2.5 | '
'7 |\n'
'| 3.0 | '
'6 |\n'
'| 3.5 | '
'4.5 |\n'
'| 4.0 | '
'4 |\n'
'| 4.5 | '
'3 |\n'
'| 5.0 | '
'2 |\n'
'| 5.5 | '
'1 |\n'
'```\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I can't analyze images directly, but I can help explain "
'the content of the text or assist with related topics. '
'If you have specific questions regarding the image or '
'the information it contains, feel free to share!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '1ca3511a-09dc-4b01-89e6-fba0ad37a58a-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 15.0,
'text': 'Pro přizpůsobené Rayleighovo rozdělení lze pak číselně '
'zjistit hraniční interval spolehlivosti, jejichž '
'závislost na relativní poloze je znázorněna v obrázku '
'8.\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'Pro přímé zjištění charakteristik \\( a \\) a \\( '
'\\sigma \\) lze pro \\( 1.9131 \\leq '
'\\frac{\\mu}{\\sigma} < 6 \\) s dostatečnou přesností '
'použít také následující aproximaci jako inverzní funkci '
'vztahu (2.22) (chyba vážená na \\( c \\) je menší než '
'0.02):\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\widehat{\\varepsilon}_{\\alpha} = 2.1 \\left( '
'\\frac{\\sigma}{\\mu} \\right)^{1.6319} + 0.466 \\left( '
'\\frac{\\mu}{\\sigma} \\right)^{1.9131} \\quad (2.27)\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Navíc může být zjištěn hraniční interval spolehlivosti '
'pro \\( 1.9131 \\leq \\frac{\\mu}{\\sigma} < 6 \\) '
'provedeno přímo pomocí následujících aproximací (chyba '
'vážená na \\( c \\) je menší než 0.03):\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\widehat{\\mu}_{x,0.95} = -1.64 \\left( '
'\\frac{\\sigma}{\\mu} - 1.9131 \\right) + 2.075 \\left( '
'\\frac{\\mu}{\\sigma} - 1 \\right) + 5.5485 \\quad '
'(2.28)\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\widehat{\\sigma}_{x,0.95} = 2.6 \\cdot '
'\\exp\\left(-1.703 \\cdot \\left(\\frac{\\mu}{\\sigma} '
'- 1.9131\\right)\\right) + 1.425 \\cdot '
'\\left(\\frac{\\sigma}{\\mu} - 1.9131\\right) + 2.1206\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Pro \\( \\frac{\\mu}{\\sigma} < 6 \\) se výpočet '
'oblastí rozptylu provádí podle vzorce (2.11).\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content you "
'referenced. If you need assistance with another topic '
'or have questions about similar content, feel free to '
'ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '1e2dd434-65bf-42a1-bf8d-c9b7fcd7378e-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 16.0,
'text': '# 3.2.2 Zjištění způsobilosti u nedefinovaných '
'distribučních modelů\n'
'\n'
'Pokud nelze vybrané charakteristiky přiřadit vhodný '
'distribuční model nebo pokud naměřené hodnoty '
'odebíraného vzorku neodpovídají předpokládanému '
'distribučnímu modelu, provede se neparametrický odhad '
'charakteristik způsobilosti metodou rozptylu v '
'následující modifikované formě při zohlednění rozsahu '
'namátkových vzorků5 (viz také příklad 3 v oddílu 5):\n'
'\n'
'## Charakteristiky způsobilosti pro oboustranně '
'tolerovanou ukazatel:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{G} = \\frac{G_L}{\\bar{x}} \\tag{2.29}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{G} = \\min\\left\\{ \\frac{G_L - '
'\\hat{x}_{95\\%}}{\\bar{x} - \\hat{x}_{95\\%}} '
'\\right\\} \\tag{2.30}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'## Charakteristiky způsobilosti pro jednostranně nahoře '
'tolerovanou charakteristiku a přirozenou dolní mezní '
'hodnotou rovnou nule:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{G}_M = \\frac{\\hat{x}_k}{\\bar{x}} \\tag{2.31}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{G}_{M}^{-} = \\frac{G_L - '
'\\hat{x}_{95\\%}}{\\bar{x} - \\hat{x}_{95\\%}} '
'\\tag{2.32}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'## Charakteristika způsobilosti pro jednostranně dole '
'tolerovanou charakteristiku:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{G}_{M}^{-} = \\frac{\\hat{x}_{95\\%} - '
'G_U}{\\bar{x}} \\tag{2.33}\n'
'\\]\n'
'přičemž:\n'
'\n'
'- \\(\\hat{x}_0, \\hat{x}_u\\) = odhadované hodnoty '
'horní a dolní hranice intervalu spolehlivosti\n'
'- \\(\\hat{x}_{50\\%}\\) = odhadnutá hodnota 50%ního '
'kvantilu\n'
'\n'
'V případě dělící hodnoty je:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{x}_{95\\%} = \\bar{x} \\tag{2.34}\n'
'\\]\n'
'přičemž:\n'
'\n'
'- **Medián**, hodnota, která je zprostředkovaná '
'posuzováním naměřených hodnot.\n'
'\n'
'Odhad hranic intervalu spolehlivosti se provede '
'pomocí:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\hat{x}_k = \\bar{x} + \\frac{R}{2} \\tag{2.35}\n'
'\\]\n'
'přičemž:\n'
'\n'
'5 Jedná se pouze o trochu jiném znázornění o stejné '
'způsobu výpočtu jako o dosavádním předpisu pro provozní '
'prostředky VW PV 1.40 pro normální rozdělení '
'ukazatelů.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content you attached. "
"If there's anything else specific you'd like to discuss "
'or inquire about, please let me know!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '604c6011-4b76-4f84-9f16-9045c02688de-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 17.0,
'text': '```\n'
'x_c = \\frac{x_{\\text{max}} + x_{\\text{min}}}{2} '
'(2.36)\n'
'\n'
'R = x_{\\text{max}} - x_{\\text{min}} : '
'\\text{rozpětí} \n'
'x_{\\text{max}}: \\text{maximální, popř. minimální '
'naměřená hodnota efektivního celkového namátkového '
'vzorku.}\n'
'\n'
'Opravným faktorem\n'
'\n'
'k = \\frac{d}{d_n} ; \n'
'\n'
'\\text{je přitom zohledněn efektivní rozsah namátkových '
'vzorků } n_e, \\text{ přičemž:}\n'
'd: \\text{očekávaná hodnota w rozdělení}^6\n'
'\n'
'\\text{Pro některé rozsahy namátkových vzorků } n_e '
'\\text{ je v tabulce 1 uvedena hodnota } d_n.\n'
'\n'
'Tabela 1 – Očekávaná hodnota w rozdělení v závislosti '
'na } n_e\n'
'\n'
'\\begin{table}[h]\n'
'\\centering\n'
'\\begin{tabular}{|c|c|}\n'
'\\hline\n'
'n_e & d_n \\\\\n'
'\\hline\n'
'20 & 3,74 \\\\\n'
'25 & 3,93 \\\\\n'
'30 & 4,09 \\\\\n'
'35 & 4,21 \\\\\n'
'40 & 4,32 \\\\\n'
'45 & 4,42 \\\\\n'
'50 & 4,50 \\\\\n'
'\\hline\n'
'\\end{tabular}\n'
'\\end{table}\n'
'\n'
'\\text{Pro rozsahy namátkových vzorků, které jsou větší '
'než 20, lze zjistit očekávané hodnoty w rozdělení podle '
'následujícího přibližného vzorce:}\n'
'd_n = \\frac{1.748}{\\sqrt{(ln(n_e))}}^8 (2.39)\n'
'\n'
'\\text{V případě rozdělení četnosti setříděných '
'naměřených hodnot je}\n'
'\\bar{x}_{0} : \\bar{x}_{u} = \\text{rovno horní popř. '
'dolní mezi nejvyšší, popř. nejspodnější obsazené třídy '
'} a \n'
'\n'
'\\bar{x}_{0.5} = x_a + \\frac{n_{j}}{2 - A_k} \\cdot '
'a_k \\text{ pro } A_k < \\frac{n_{j}}{2} < A_k + a_k '
'(2.40)\n'
'\n'
'\\text{přičemž}\n'
'\\bar{x} : \\text{spodní hranice k-té třídy} \n'
'\\Delta x: \\text{šířka třídy} \n'
'a_k: \\text{absolutní četnost naměřených hodnot v k-té '
'třídě} \n'
'A_k: \\text{absolutní distribuční funkce naměřených '
'hodnot až po spodní hranici k-té třídy.}\n'
'```\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly. If "
'you provide a description or key details from the '
'image, I can help summarize or discuss the content '
'further.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'a793aba3-c5c4-483f-998c-35a16763124d-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 18.0,
'text': '# 3.3 Mezní hodnoty pro způsobilost stroje\n'
'\n'
'Pro dosázení způsobilosti stroje pro sledovanou '
'charakteristiku je nutno splnit následující podmínky z '
'hlediska stanovených mezních hodnot \\( '
'C_{m,\\text{GenZ}} \\) a \\( C_{mk,\\text{GenZ}} \\):\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\overline{C}_{m,\\text{GenZ}} \\geq C_{m,\\text{GenZ}} '
'\\tag{3.1}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\overline{C}_{k,\\text{GenZ}} \\geq C_{k,\\text{GenZ}} '
'\\tag{3.2}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'u efektivního rozsahu namátkových vzorků \\( n \\geq 50 '
'\\).\n'
'\n'
'Pokud není dohodnuto nic jiného, platí následující '
'mezní hodnoty způsobilosti:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'C_{m,\\text{GenZ}} = 2,0\n'
'\\]\n'
'\\[\n'
'C_{k,\\text{GenZ}} = 1,67\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'V případě, kdy je za účelných nákladů možná pouze jedna '
'prověrka s menším efektem rozsahu namátkových vzorků '
'než 50, je nutno následujícím způsobem přihlédnout k '
'vyšší nejistotě a to tak, že se využijících zjištěných '
'charakteristik způsobilosti pomocí příslušných '
'zvýšených hodnot.\n'
'\n'
'Zjištění mezních hodnot pro efektivní rozsahy '
'namátkových vzorků menší než 50 je při tom vázáno na '
'mezní hodnoty, které lze z požadavku (3.1) nebo (3.2) '
'pro prověřování základní soubor dodržet z 95% '
'pravděpodobností (doli meze oblasti spolehlivosti).\n'
'\n'
'Ty vyplývají za předpokladu normálně rozděleného '
'základního souboru z horní meze oblasti spolehlivosti '
'směrodatné odchylky:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\sigma = \\frac{\\overline{49}}{2.49} \\tag{3.3}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'a statistické podílové oblastí pro výrobní rozptyl:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'X_{99.865} = \\mu + t_{n-1} \\cdot '
'\\sqrt{\\frac{S^2}{n}} \\cdot \\sigma \\tag{3.4}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'U_{g,99.865} = 3.0: \\text{kvantili standardizovaného '
'normálního rozdělení}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\chi^2_{g,49} = 39.3: \\text{kvantili rozdělení chí '
'kvadrát při stupní volnosti } f = 49 \\text{ (viz tab. '
'1)}\n'
'\\] \n'
'\n'
'7 Jak již bylo zmíněno nahoře, tolerance není stanovena '
'mezní hodnotou pro cm, je nutno zjistit a uvést hodnotu '
'cm, přičemž za hodnotu této hodnoty je hodnota cm, '
'resp. hodnota ckm, resp. hodnota ckrab při zjištění '
'těchto mezních hodnot není nevysvětlitelná.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content as requested "
'since I cannot view images or any visual elements '
'directly. However, if you have any specific questions '
'or need assistance with particular content, feel free '
'to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '6decce77-6d7a-4437-a986-d574e0eb4180-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 19.0,
'text': 'Transformace a dosazením do vyhodnocovacích vzorců '
'(2.1) a (2.2) z toho vyplynulo meze způsobilosti pro '
'základní soubor\n'
'\n'
'$$\n'
'c_{m} \\geq c_{m, \\text{grenz}} \\left( '
'\\frac{\\sqrt{2 \\cdot 25}}{49} \\right) \\cdot 0.832 '
'\\tag{3.5}\n'
'$$\n'
'\n'
'$$\n'
'c_{mk} \\geq \\frac{1}{1+\\frac{1}{100}} \\left( '
'\\frac{\\sqrt{2 \\cdot 25}}{49} \\right) \\cdot 0.824 '
'\\tag{3.6}\n'
'$$\n'
'\n'
'Z tohoto vyplynulo pro efektivní rozsahy namátkových '
'vzorků \\( n_{k} < 50 \\) následující přizpůsobené '
'hodnoty mezí způsobilosti:\n'
'\n'
'$$\n'
'\\hat{c}_{m} \\geq c_{m, \\text{grenz}} \\cdot 0.832 '
'\\left( 1 + \\frac{1}{2 - n_{k}} \\right) '
'\\sqrt{\\frac{2}{25}} \\tag{3.9}\n'
'$$\n'
'\n'
'$$\n'
'\\hat{c}_{mk} \\geq c_{mk, \\text{grenz}} \\cdot 0.824 '
'\\left( 1 + \\frac{1}{2 - n_{k}} \\right) '
'\\sqrt{\\frac{2}{25}} \\tag{3.9}\n'
'$$\n'
'\n'
'se stupněm volnosti\n'
'\n'
'$$\n'
'f = n_{k} - 1\n'
'$$\n'
'\n'
'### Příklad:\n'
'Při stanovených mezích způsobilosti \\( \\hat{c}_{m, '
'\\text{grenz}} = 2.0 \\), \\( c_{mk, \\text{grenz}} = '
'1.67 \\) a efektivním rozsahu namátkových vzorků \\( '
'n_{k} = 20 \\) vyplynou podle vzorců (3.7) až (3.9) '
'následující přizpůsobené mezní hodnoty pro oboustranně '
'tolerovanou charakteristiku:\n'
'\n'
'$$\n'
'\\hat{c}_{m} \\geq 2.0 \\cdot 0.832 \\left( '
'\\frac{20}{10.1} \\right) = 2.28\n'
'$$\n'
'\n'
'$$\n'
'\\hat{c}_{mk} \\geq 1.67 \\cdot 0.824 \\left( 1 + '
'\\frac{1}{2 \\cdot 20} \\right) '
'\\sqrt{\\frac{20}{10.1}} = 1.93\n'
'$$\n'
'\n'
'> **Poznámka:** Způsob přizpůsobených mezí způsobilosti '
'se pomocí vzorců (3.7) a (3.9) se použije také pro '
'základní soubory s er normálním rozdělením, protože pro '
'tyto soubory v současné době neexistuje žádná metoda a '
'tím dojde alespoň k použitelnosti zohledňující rozsahu '
'namátkových vzorků, který je menší než 50.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to directly analyze the visual content "
'provided, but I can help you understand the general '
'concepts related to image analysis based on your '
'outlined aspects. If you have specific questions or '
'need assistance with textual content or concepts within '
'the image, feel free to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'c31e5c44-6813-42e6-b8fa-0318ef0376e0-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 20.0,
'text': '# 3.4 Statistické testy\n'
'\n'
'Naměřené hodnoty prověří způsobilost stroje zpravidla '
'nesmí vykazovat\n'
'\n'
'- značné odchylky jednotlivých naměřených hodnot '
'(odlišné hodnoty) oproti rozptylu ostatních hodnot,\n'
'- signifikantní změny polohy vyběhem oboru vzorku a\n'
'- signifikantní změní od očekávaného distribučního '
'modelu.\n'
'\n'
'V opačném případě je nutno počítat s dodatečnými '
'systémovými vlivy na výrobu. Pro to však chování při '
'pak měly být zřejmé příčiny a měly by být '
'akceptovatelné jejich účinky, aby byl splněn předpoklad '
'bezpečného výrobního procesu.\n'
'\n'
'Pro prověření výše uvedených kritérií je proto nutno '
'tyto testy použít podle obligátní statistické teorie. '
'Protože tyto testy jsou podrobně popsány v normách nebo '
'obdobných studiích statistické literatury, jsou zde '
'uváděny pouze pomocí odkazů:\n'
'\n'
'V rámci prověřování způsobilosti stroje je nutno '
'provádět následující testy:\n'
'\n'
'- **Testy odchylek hodnot** pomocí testů nezávislých na '
'rozdělení podle Hampela v modifikované formě (viz VW '
'10133)\n'
' \n'
' - **Testy změny polohy** výrobky pomocí '
'neparametrického testu podle Swed-Eisenharda (viz [1])\n'
' \n'
' - **Test odchylek od normálního rozdělení** podle '
'Epps-Pulley (viz ISO 5479)\n'
' \n'
' - **Test odchylek od libovolně stanoveného '
'distribučního modelu** pomocí testů chi kvadrat (viz '
'[1])\n'
'\n'
'Statistické testy probíhají podle následujícího '
'schématu:\n'
'\n'
'1. formulace nulové hypotézy \\( H_0 \\) a alternativní '
'hypotézy \\( H_a \\), např.\n'
' - H1: základní soubor naměřených hodnot sledovaných '
'znaků na normální rozdělení\n'
' - H1: základní soubor naměřených hodnot sledovaných '
'znaků nemá normální rozdělení\n'
'2. Stanovení pravděpodobnosti vyjádření \\( p \\) 1 - '
'\\( \\alpha \\) nebo hladiny významnosti α \n'
'3. **Formulace vzorce pro zkušební veličinu**\n'
' - Výpočet zkušební hodnoty z hodnot namátkových '
'vzorků podle vzorce pro zkušební veličinu.\n'
'4. **Zjistit prahové hodnoty testovacích rozdělení**\n'
'\n'
'### Porovnání zkušební hodnoty a prahovou hodnotu pro '
'rozhodnutí\n'
'\n'
'Existuje rozpor mezi nulovou hypotézou a její '
'alternativní hypotézou.\n'
'\n'
'Je nutno dbát na to, že u statistického testu s '
'uvedenou vyzkoušenou pravděpodobností lze případech '
'rozporu použít nulovou hypotézu, např. že existuje '
'signifikantní odchylka naměřených hodnot od normálně '
'rozděleného základního souboru. Podle výsledků testu '
'nelze potvrdit rozpor s nulovou hypotézou, pak se musí '
'potvrdit platnost nulové hypotézy. Pro tento případ '
'nelze s uvedením sevném spolehlivosti např. prokazat, '
'že existuje základní soubor s normálním rozdělením. Pak '
'se rozlišuje analogicky k právním principu, v případě '
'poskytováním pro obsažené „pokyny“ pro předpoklad '
'nulové hypotézy.\n'
'\n'
'Hladina významnosti se u této riziko, že se na základě '
'testu zamítne nulová hypotéza, účelově le správa '
'(α-riziko). Pro hladinu významnosti však lze jen '
'jednoduše stanovit libovolné měření, protože tím by '
'pak. rostl riziko neobjevení skutečné odchylky od '
'normálního rozdělení (β riziko).\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the attached visual content "
'directly. If you provide descriptions of the images or '
'specific details, I can help you analyze them based on '
"the aspects you've outlined."},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '7d25b6ed-a564-4e67-bc5e-1b86a3bbae93-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 21.0,
'text': '# 4 Provádění prověřování způsobilosti stroje\n'
'\n'
'Provádění prověřování způsobilosti stroje (MFU) je '
'nutno provádět podle procesu znázorněného na obrázcích '
'9 až 11.\n'
'\n'
'## Obsah\n'
'\n'
'- [4.1 Použití zkušebních '
'prostředků](#41-použití-zkušebních-prostředků)\n'
'- [4.2 Odběr namátkových '
'vzorků](#42-odběr-namátkových-vzorků)\n'
'- [4.3 Zvláštní pravidla pro omezenou '
'MFU](#43-zvláštní-pravidla-pro-omezenou-mfu)\n'
'- [4.4 Vyhodnocování dat](#44-vyhodnocování-dat)\n'
'- [4.5 Dokumentace](#45-dokumentace)\n'
'- [4.6 Posouzení výsledků](#46-posouzení-výsledků)\n'
'- [4.7 Optimalizace stroje](#47-optimalizace-stroje)\n'
'- [4.8 Nakládání s nezpůsobilými '
'stroji](#48-nakládání-s-nezpůsobilými-stroji)\n'
'\n'
'## 4.1 Použití zkušebních prostředků\n'
'\n'
'## 4.2 Odběr namátkových vzorků\n'
'\n'
'## 4.3 Zvláštní pravidla pro omezenou MFU\n'
'\n'
'## 4.4 Vyhodnocování dat\n'
'\n'
'## 4.5 Dokumentace\n'
'\n'
'## 4.6 Posouzení výsledků\n'
'\n'
'## 4.7 Optimalizace stroje\n'
'\n'
'## 4.8 Nakládání s nezpůsobilými stroji\n'
'\n'
'## Konec\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"Here's a detailed analysis of the provided visual "
'content based on the specified aspects:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. **Localization and Attribution:**\n'
' - **Image Number:** Image 1\n'
' - **Location:** The image is at the center of the '
'page labeled "Obrázek 9".\n'
'\n'
'### 2. **Object Detection and Classification:**\n'
' - **Objects Identified:** Flowchart components '
'(rectangles, diamonds, arrows).\n'
' - **Key Features:**\n'
' - Rectangles indicate processes or decisions.\n'
' - Diamonds represent decision points.\n'
' - Arrows demonstrate the flow of the process.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**\n'
' - **Scene Description:** The image presents a '
'flowchart outlining the process of machine capability '
'assessment (MFU).\n'
' - **Main Actors:** The diagram does not depict human '
'actors but depicts roles through the process steps '
'illustrated.\n'
' - **Actions:** The flowchart indicates sequential '
'activities, including collecting samples, data '
'evaluation, and decision-making regarding machine '
'suitability.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. **Text Analysis:**\n'
' - **Text Content:** The flowchart contains headings '
'and labels in Czech indicating various process steps.\n'
' - **Significance:** The text describes specific '
'activities within the machine capability assessment '
'process, important for understanding operational '
'procedures.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**\n'
' - **Structure:** A flowchart format with defined '
'steps and branching decision points.\n'
' - **Key Insights:** The flowchart emphasizes '
'systematic review and documentation processes critical '
'for validating machine capabilities.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. **Product Analysis:**\n'
' - Not applicable as the image does not depict '
'physical products but rather a flowchart of processes.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. **Anomaly Detection:**\n'
' - **Anomalies Observed:** No visible anomalies; the '
'flowchart follows a clear and logical sequence.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. **Color Analysis:**\n'
' - **Color Composition:** Predominantly black text on '
'a white background.\n'
' - **Impact:** The simplistic color scheme enhances '
'readability and focus on the content.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. **Perspective and Composition:**\n'
' - **Perspective:** The perspective is flat, typical '
'of flowcharts to allow easy navigation of steps.\n'
' - **Composition:** The layout is organized '
'hierarchically and horizontally, guiding the viewer '
'through the process in a logical manner.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. **Contextual Significance:**\n'
' - **Context:** The flowchart appears to be part of a '
'larger document discussing machine capability '
'assessment.\n'
' - **Contribution:** It summarizes crucial steps in '
'the procedure, reinforcing the theme of quality '
'assurance in machinery.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. **Metadata Analysis:**\n'
' - **Metadata Review:** Not provided. Thus, metadata '
'analysis is not applicable.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**\n'
' - Not applicable as there are no graphs present in '
'the image.\n'
'\n'
'### 13. **Graph Numbers:**\n'
' - Not applicable as there are no graphs present in '
'the image.\n'
'\n'
'### **Additional Aspects:**\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):** The flowchart '
'depicts a structured sequence of processes necessary '
'for evaluating machine capability.\n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):** '
'Each step in the flowchart has a specific role in '
'assessing machine readiness, including sampling, '
'evaluation, and optimization.\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):** Process '
'steps are identified with specific titles related to '
'machine capability assessments.\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation:** The flowchart outlines '
'a clear and methodical approach to machine evaluation, '
'highlighting the importance of data documentation and '
'iterative assessments.\n'
'- **Tables:** Not applicable as there are no tables '
'included in the image.\n'
'\n'
'This comprehensive analysis captures key details from '
'the flowchart and its implications in the context of '
'machine assessments.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '19d1f080-5ca8-4b93-90ba-0e3799881356-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 22.0,
'text': '# 4.4 Vyhodnocení dat\n'
'\n'
'## 4.4.1 Výběr očekávaného distribučního modelu\n'
'\n'
'## 4.4.2 Test na odlehlé hodnoty\n'
'\n'
'Existují odlehlé hodnoty?\n'
'\n'
'- **ano**: \n'
' - **4.4.3 Vynout odlehlé hodnoty z výpočtu '
'statistických ukazatelů**\n'
'- **ne**: \n'
' - **4.4.4 Test změny polohy výrobě**\n'
' \n'
'## 4.4.5 Test odchylky od stanoveného distribučního '
'modelu\n'
'\n'
'Odchylka od distribučního modelu?\n'
'\n'
'- **ano**: \n'
' - **4.4.8 Neparametrické vyhodnocení**\n'
'- **ne**: \n'
' - **Normální rozdělení?**\n'
' - **ano**: \n'
' - **4.4.6 Vyhodnocení podle normálního '
'rozdělení**\n'
' - **ne**: \n'
' - **4.4.7 Vyhodnocení podle stanoveného modelu**\n'
'\n'
'Pokračování v bodě 4\n'
'\n'
'![Obrázek 10 – Průběh vyhodnocování '
'dat]()\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"Here's a comprehensive analysis of the provided visual "
'content, broken down according to your specified '
'aspects:\n'
'\n'
'### 1. Localization and Attribution\n'
'- **Image Number:** Image 1\n'
'- **Position:** The image appears centrally on the '
'corresponding page.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. Object Detection and Classification\n'
'- **Detected Objects:** \n'
' - Flowchart components (boxes and arrows)\n'
' - Text annotations within boxes\n'
'- **Classification:**\n'
' - Flowchart elements (process steps, decision '
'points)\n'
'- **Key Features:** \n'
' - Rectangular boxes containing procedural text\n'
' - Arrows indicating flow and connections between '
'boxes\n'
'\n'
'### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis\n'
'- **Scene Description:** \n'
' - A flowchart illustrating the process of data '
'evaluation.\n'
'- **Activities:**\n'
' - Steps to determine statistical models for data '
'analysis are outlined.\n'
'- **Main Actors and Actions:** \n'
' - The flowchart does not depict human actors but '
'shows procedural actions such as testing for outliers '
'and determining model distribution types.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. Text Analysis\n'
'- **Extracted Text:** \n'
' - Steps of the data evaluation process (e.g., "Výběr '
'očekávaného distribučního modelu," "Test na odlehlé '
'hodnoty").\n'
'- **Content Significance:** \n'
' - The text details a structured methodology for '
'evaluating statistical data, highlighting key testing '
'protocols for data integrity.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis\n'
'- **Analysis:**\n'
' - The flowchart methodically represents steps taken '
'in statistical data evaluation.\n'
'- **Axes, Scales, and Legends:** \n'
' - Not applicable to this flowchart as it does not '
'contain traditional axes or legends.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. Product Analysis\n'
'- **Not Applicable:** No physical products are depicted '
'in the image.\n'
'\n'
'### 7. Anomaly Detection\n'
'- **Possible Anomalies:** \n'
' - The decision layout flow appears standard, with no '
'noticeable anomalies in the process flow.\n'
'- **Impact:** \n'
' - Uniformity and clarity are beneficial for '
'understanding the steps.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. Color Analysis\n'
'- **Color Composition:**\n'
' - Dominant colors include black and white (for text), '
'with possibly gray for the flowchart lines.\n'
'- **Impact on Perception:** \n'
' - The color scheme aids readability and focuses '
'attention on the text and flow direction.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. Perspective and Composition\n'
'- **Perspective:** \n'
' - The image is presented flat, as is typical for a '
'flowchart.\n'
'- **Composition Analysis:** \n'
' - The arrangement facilitates clear flow from one '
'step to the next, with a logical sequence indicated by '
'arrows.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. Contextual Significance\n'
'- **Overall Context:** \n'
' - The flowchart contributes to understanding data '
'evaluation procedures, essential in statistical '
'analysis or research documentation.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. Metadata Analysis\n'
'- **Not Available:** The metadata of the image is not '
'provided for review.\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects\n'
'\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):**\n'
' - The chart outlines a process flow for data '
'evaluation.\n'
'\n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):**\n'
' - Each step outlines specific actions necessary for '
'completing the data evaluation.\n'
'\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):**\n'
' - Various types of statistical models and evaluation '
'steps are represented.\n'
'\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation:**\n'
' - The sequence of steps illustrates a typical '
'workflow for statistical data testing.\n'
'\n'
'- **Tables:**\n'
' - Not applicable as there are no tables in the '
'image.\n'
'\n'
'This concludes the analysis of the visual content '
'provided. If you have any further questions or need '
'additional insights, feel free to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '6504f544-415b-4c51-99de-d94eb47b339a-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 23.0,
'text': '# 4.6 Posouzení výsledků\n'
'\n'
'1. **Existují odlehlé hodnoty?**\n'
' - **Ano:** Odlehlé hodnoty v důsledku chybných '
'měření.\n'
' - **Ne:** \n'
' 1. **Změna polohy výrobku?**\n'
' - **Ano:** \n'
' 1. **Odchylka od distribučního modelu?**\n'
' - **Ano:** \n'
' - **Možný jiný distribuční model?**\n'
' - **Ano:** Opakování vyhodnocení '
'pokračování v bodě 4.\n'
' - **Ne:** \n'
' - **Známá příčina a akceptovatelný '
'vliv?**\n'
' - **Ano:** \n'
' - **Charakteristiky způsobilosti '
'menší než mezní hodnoty?**\n'
' - **Ano:** Stroj způsobilý. '
'Pokračování v bodě 4.\n'
' - **Ne:** Stroj nezpůsobilý. '
'Pokračování v bodě 4.\n'
' - **Ne:** Stroj nezpůsobilý. '
'Pokračování v bodě 4.\n'
' - **Ne:** Stroj způsobilý. Pokračování v '
'bodě 4.\n'
' - **Ne:** \n'
' - **Stroj nezpůsobilý. Pokračování v bodě '
'4.**\n'
'\n'
'**Obrázek 11 – Průběh posouzení výsledků**\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
'Here’s a comprehensive analysis of the provided visual '
'content based on the specified aspects.\n'
'\n'
'### 1. **Localization and Attribution:**\n'
'- **Image 1**: This is the only image present on the '
'page.\n'
'\n'
'### 2. **Object Detection and Classification:**\n'
'- The image is a flowchart, which includes various '
'geometric shapes:\n'
' - **Ellipses**: Used to denote the start and end of '
'the process.\n'
' - **Diamonds**: Indicate decision nodes.\n'
' - **Rectangles**: Represent process steps.\n'
'- **Key Features**: The flowchart outlines a '
'decision-making process related to assessment of '
'results.\n'
'\n'
'### 3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**\n'
'- **Scene**: The entire scene is a decision flowchart.\n'
'- **Activities**: The flowchart illustrates a logical '
'sequence for evaluating results.\n'
'- **Main Actors**: The process itself is the main '
'focus, transitioning through decisions based on '
'outcomes.\n'
'\n'
'### 4. **Text Analysis:**\n'
'- **Detected Text**: The flowchart contains text in '
'Czech, indicating stages of assessment (e.g., "Existují '
'odlišné hodnoty", etc.).\n'
'- **Content Significance**: It is significant for '
'understanding the procedural steps involved in '
'evaluating results.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**\n'
'- The primary content is a flowchart.\n'
'- **Axes/Scales**: Not applicable as this is not a '
'graph.\n'
'- **Key Insights**: The flowchart provides a thorough '
'decision-making framework for analyzing results.\n'
'\n'
'### 6. **Product Analysis:**\n'
'- N/A (the image does not depict products).\n'
'\n'
'### 7. **Anomaly Detection:**\n'
'- No notable anomalies are present; the flowchart '
'follows a standard decision-making format.\n'
'\n'
'### 8. **Color Analysis:**\n'
'- The flowchart predominantly uses simple black and '
'white with text, making it easy to read and understand '
'without distraction.\n'
'\n'
'### 9. **Perspective and Composition:**\n'
'- **Perspective**: The flowchart is presented in a '
'front view, typical for flowchart presentations.\n'
'- **Composition**: Elements are arranged logically to '
'facilitate understanding of the decision-making '
'process. Decisions flow from top to bottom.\n'
'\n'
'### 10. **Contextual Significance:**\n'
'- This flowchart likely serves as a methodological '
'diagram within a larger document concerning assessments '
'or evaluations, contributing to clarity on the '
'processes involved.\n'
'\n'
'### 11. **Metadata Analysis:**\n'
"- Metadata about the image isn't provided, but the "
'inclusion of a section number (e.g., "4.6 Posouzení '
'výsledků") suggests it is part of a structured '
'document.\n'
'\n'
'### 12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**\n'
'- N/A (the image does not contain graphs).\n'
'\n'
'### 13. **Graph Numbers:**\n'
'- N/A (the image does not contain graphs with data '
'points).\n'
'\n'
'### Additional Aspects:\n'
'\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: The flowchart '
'effectively outlines the process flow for assessment, '
'detailing decision points and actions to be taken.\n'
' \n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: '
'Each decision point in the flowchart describes '
'conditions that lead to further action or conclusion.\n'
'\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: The '
'flowchart designates types of values (e.g., "odlišné '
'hodnoty") involved in the assessment process.\n'
'\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation**: The flowchart does not '
'depict trends but illustrates steps necessary to assess '
'varying data outcomes.\n'
'\n'
'- **Tables**: N/A (the image does not contain tables).\n'
'\n'
'This analysis captures the essence and function of the '
'visual content provided.'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'ee9a7db4-3125-42b8-8ba8-a6c6a3ab6bd8-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 24.0,
'text': '# 4.1 Použití zkušebních prostředků\n'
'\n'
'Pro MFU je nutno používat pouze zkušební prostředky, '
'který byl pro plánovaný zkušební proces schválen '
'příslušným místem.\n'
'\n'
'## 4.2 Odběr namátkových vzorků\n'
'\n'
'MFU se vztahuje pouze na výrobcí charakteristiky nebo '
'parametr vzorku. Zpravidla je nutno pro vyhodnocení '
'zjistit jednotlivé naměřené hodnoty vzorku. V případě '
'ručně zaznamenávaných naměřených hodnot je nutné čárek '
'v rozdělení triády oblastí hodnot (statistická četnost) '
'místo toho také evidovat rozdělení četností označených '
'hodnot9.\n'
'\n'
'Aby bylo možné pít MFU postihnout pouze v případě '
'stroje, je nutno při výrobě vzorků dodržet následující '
'podmínky:\n'
'\n'
'- Při výrobě musít být zajištěna jednotná **šarže '
'polotovarů** a jednotlivá příprava (dodavatel, '
'materiál). Během MFU musí stroj nebo zařízení '
'obsluhovat vždy stejný pracovník.\n'
' \n'
'- **Kvalita přípravy** hodnocených značkou musí '
'odpovídat požadovaným výrobním předpisům.\n'
'\n'
'- Počet vybraných dílů (rozsah namátkových vzorků) by '
'měl zpravidla činit 50 ks. Pokud je tento rozsah '
'namátkových vzorků z technických nebo ekonomických '
'důvodů obtížné realizovatelný, je přípustný i menší. '
'Pak je nutno čekat odpovídajícím způsobem vyšší než '
'minimální (hodnoty podle tabulky 3 nebo vzorku (3.7) a '
'(3.8)). Efektivní rozsah namátkových vzorků (např. bez '
'odlehlých hodnot) musí činit minimálně 20.\n'
'\n'
'- Díl(y) je nutno vyrábět bezprostředně po sobě a '
'čístovat podle pořadí výroby. Na každém dílu je nutno '
'provést všechny stanovené značky.\n'
'\n'
'- MFU se smí provádět pouze u stroje zahřátého na '
'provozní teplotu. Pojem zahrnující "provozní teplota" '
'je nutno definovat pro každý případ použití zvlášť.\n'
'\n'
'- Aplikace musí být nutno vyrábět za **servisních '
'podmínek** požadovaných pro daný stroj (tj. s dobou '
'trvání a parametry nastavení stroje pro servisní '
'výrobu). V závislosti na projektu je nutno stanovit '
'pravidla, aby byly na začátku MFU zaručeny, že je např. '
'zapracované nářadí, a že konec doby životnosti nářadí '
'nelze v rámci MFU.\n'
'\n'
'- Během MFU se nesmí provádět **výměna nářadí**, RUČNÍ '
'SEŘIZOVÁNÍ NÁŘADÍ nebo jiné změny parametrů stroje. '
'Vylučují se automatické korekty všech modulů '
'integrované k řízení motorových strojů.\n'
'\n'
'- Při poruchách stroje musí být zřejmé MFU, které '
'ovlivňují projevění znaku, je nutno zahájit MFU znovu.\n'
'\n'
'- Před výrobou zahájením prověrky musí být stanovena '
'**metoda měření** a odůvodněna její variabilita a '
'odchylkama.\n'
'\n'
'- Při výrobě rozdílných dílů (rozlišná čísla dílů, '
'např. celošroubové hřídele / litinové hřídele) na '
'obdobném stroji, které mohou vykazovat různé '
'charakteristiky, je nutno MFU provést pro všechny '
'díly.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly as "
"you've requested since I don't have the capability to "
'process images. However, I can help guide you on how to '
"conduct such an analysis based on the aspects you've "
'provided. \n'
'\n'
'If you have specific questions about the content of the '
'document or need information related to the topics '
'mentioned, feel free to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '5c07a089-f986-44e2-aaa8-8c4a13cf9bb7-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 25.0,
'text': '# 4.3 Zvláštní pravidla pro omezení MFU\n'
'\n'
'Pokud nelze pro odběr vzorku zcela splnit podmínky '
'uvedené v bodě 4.2, pak lze v odůvodněných případech '
'provést omezení MFU, pro kterou je nutno mezi '
'dodavateli odebírat sledované sjednané zvláštní '
'pravidla a zadokumenetovat je pod poznámkou „Omezení '
'MFU“.\n'
'\n'
'# 4.4 Vyhodnocení dat\n'
'\n'
'## 4.4.1 Výběr očekávaného distribučního modelu\n'
'\n'
'Očekávaný distribuční model závisí na druhu '
'charakteristiky. Pro důležité druhy charakteristik (viz '
'také VW 01056) jsou přiřazené distribuční modely '
'uvedeny v tabulce 2.\n'
'\n'
'### Tabulka 2 – Přiřazení druhů charakteristik a '
'distribuční modely\n'
'\n'
'| Druh charakteristiky | Distribuční model |\n'
'|----------------------------|-------------------|\n'
'| Délkové rozměry | N |\n'
'| Průměr, radius | N |\n'
'| Tloušťka | N |\n'
'| Rovnost | B1 |\n'
'| Kruhovitost | B1 |\n'
'| Václový tvar | B1 |\n'
'| Linový tvar | B1 |\n'
'| Plošný tvar | B1 |\n'
'| Rovnoběžnost | B1 |\n'
'| Kolmost | B1 |\n'
'| Sklon | B2 |\n'
'| Pozice | B2 |\n'
'| Souosost | B2 |\n'
'| Symetrie | B1 |\n'
'| Házičovost | B2 |\n'
'| Pohyb v rovině | B2 |\n'
'| Drsnost | B1 |\n'
'| Nevyváženost | B2 |\n'
'| Kroutící moment | N |\n'
'\n'
'**Legenda:** \n'
'N: Normální rozdělení \n'
'B1: Weibullovo rozdělení \n'
'B2: Rayleighovo rozdělení \n'
'\n'
'Pro neuvedené druhy charakteristik lze ve většině '
'případů provést přiřazení rozdělení podle následujících '
'pravidel:\n'
'- u oboustranně nebo jednostranně dolů tolerovaných '
'charakteristik normální rozdělení\n'
'- a u jednostranně nahoru tolerovaných charakteristik '
'Weibullovo rozdělení nebo Rayleighovo rozdělení\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content as you've "
'requested. However, I can provide a summary or discuss '
'specific concepts related to the document. Please let '
'me know how you would like to proceed!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '09275c18-56d9-4c2a-a0ee-3867f44c0dc5-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 26.0,
'text': '```\n'
'## 4.4.2 Test odlehlých hodnot\n'
'Pomocí neparametrického testu odlehlých hodnot podle VW '
'1013 je nejprve nutno zjistit, zda zjištěné naměřené '
'hodnoty obsahují odlehlé hodnoty. Odlehlé hodnoty jsou '
'naměřené hodnoty, které leží od jiných naměřených '
'hodnot tak daleko, že s vysokou pravděpodobností '
'nepocházejí z totožného souboru od známých hodnot, jako '
'například měření. Test na odlehlé hodnoty je nutno '
'provést s koeficientem spolehlivosti 95 %.\n'
'\n'
'## 4.4.3 Vymítnutí odlehlých hodnot z výpočtu '
'statistických ukazatelů\n'
'V případě identifikovaných odlehlých hodnot nejsou tyto '
'hodnoty zohledněny při výpočtu statistických ukazatelů. '
'Odlehlé hodnoty však nesmí být smaženy. Naopak je nutno '
'je vygrafizovat, přičemž je zobrazen příblížení '
'jednotlvých hodnot odpovídajícím způsobem označit a '
'uvést v dokumentaci.\n'
'\n'
'## 4.4.4 Test změny polohy výrob\n'
'S použitím parametremetrického testu podle '
'Swed-Eisenharta (viz [1]) je nutno zjistit, zda se v '
'rámci zjištění vzorku statisticky změnila poloha výrob. '
'Systematická změna polohy výrob by mohla být např. '
'vlivem teplejšího opotřebení materiálu (trendový '
'průběh). Tento test lze provést s koeficientem '
'spolehlivosti 95 %.\n'
'\n'
'Pokud budou prokázány rozdíly v testu zatížení '
'naměřených hodnot, nezle tento test použít.\n'
'\n'
'## 4.4.5 Test odchylek od stanoveného distribučního '
'modelu\n'
'Je nutno prověřit, zda zjištěné naměřené hodnoty, zda '
'nevyzkazují signifikantní odchylky od distribučního '
'modelu, který byl pro příslušný znak stanoven. K tomu '
'je nutno v případě zjištěného normálního rozdělení '
'provést test podle Epps-Pulley (viz [2] 5500), a v '
'případě jiné stanovené distribuční modely, např. v '
'Weibullově rozdělení nebo Regulyho rozdělení, test '
'podle Návodu (viz [1]) s koeficientem spolehlivosti 95 '
'%. Odchylka od stanoveného distribučního modelu může '
'vzniknout např. rozdílnými sériemi materiálu při odběru '
'vzorků (smíšené nádrží, viz příklad 3 v oddílu 5).\n'
'\n'
'Odchylka od zjištěného distribučního modelu může '
'vzniknout např. odběrem vzorku z různého nádrží '
'(smíšené rozdělení, viz příklad 3 v oddílu 5).\n'
'\n'
'## 4.4.6 Vyhodnocení podle normálního rozdělení\n'
'V případě stanoveného aproximovaného normálního '
'rozdělení nebo aproximovaného normálního rozdělení '
'podle kritérií (1.1), (1.22), ve kterém naměřené '
'hodnoty nevyzkazují signifikantní odchylky od '
'distribučního modelu, se provede výpočet '
'charakteristických zisků v závislosti na toleranci '
'pohledu vzorců (2.1) (2.5), přičemž se hranice '
'intervalů spolehlivosti zjistí podle formule (2.6).\n'
'\n'
'## 4.4.7 Vyhodnocení podle stanoveného modelu\n'
'V případě jedná o stanoveného distribučního modelu, '
'např. Weibullovo rozdělení nebo Regulyho rozdělení, je '
'nutno prověřit, zda naměřené hodnoty nevyzkazují '
'signifikantní odchylky od distribučního modelu, se '
'provede výpočet charakteristických zisků podle vzorců '
'(2.1) (2.5), přičemž se charakteristiky přizpůsobeného '
'rozdělení vypočtou podle vzorcu (2.15) (2.16) popř. '
'(2.24) a (2.5) pomocí aproximování funkce (2.18) (2.27) '
'a hranice intervalů spolehlivosti se vypočte podle '
'aproximovaných funkcí (2.19) (2.28).\n'
'```\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the content of the attached "
'visual directly. However, I can help you by providing '
'guidelines on how to conduct a comprehensive '
'examination based on the aspects you listed. If you '
'have specific questions about any part of the content, '
'feel free to share!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'ac031ee9-8467-4e75-825c-7ba15da9d944-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 27.0,
'text': '4.4.8 Neparametrické vyhodnocení\n'
'Pokud ze statistického testu vyplyne rozpor mezi '
'zjištěnými naměřenými hodnotami a zjištěným '
'distribučním modelem, nebo pokud je sledované výrobní '
'charakteristiky nelze nalézt vhodný distribuční model, '
'pak se provede neparametrický výpočet charakteristik '
'způsobilosti podle vzorců (2.29) až (2.40).\n'
'\n'
'4.5 Dokumentace\n'
'Dokumentace MFU z hlediska určité charakteristiky musí '
'obsahovat následující informace a záznamy:\n'
'\n'
'### Data zahrnují:\n'
'- oddělení, autor a datum vytvoření\n'
'- údaje o dílu\n'
'- název, jmenovitý rozměr a tolerance charakteristiky\n'
'- údaje o stroji\n'
'- údaje o zkušebních prostředcích\n'
'- období výroby\n'
'\n'
'### Výsledky:\n'
'- grafické znázornění průběhu jednotlivých hodnot se '
'středními hodnotami vzorku s hraničními liniemi '
'tolerančního intervalu (pokud byly evidovány jednotlivé '
'hodnoty)\n'
'- histogram s přizpůsobeným distribučním modelem, '
'hraniční linií tolerančního intervalu a oblastí '
'rozptylu a linií střední hodnoty a mediánu\n'
'- zobrazení v pravděpodobnostní síti s přizpůsobeným '
'distribučním modelem, hraniční linií tolerančního '
'intervalu a oblastí rozptylu a linií střední hodnoty a '
'mediánu (viz [1])\n'
'- počet naměřených hodnot\n'
'- počet vyhodnocených naměřených hodnot nebo nalezených '
'odchylek hodnot\n'
'- ohadovaná hodnota polohy výrobky\n'
'- odhadovaná hodnota hranic oblasti rozptylu nebo '
'odhadovaná hodnota šíře rozptylu\n'
'- pozitivní distribuční model\n'
'- výsledek testu změny polohy výrobky\n'
'- výsledek testu odchylek vod a stanoveného '
'distribučního modelu\n'
'- vypočtené charakteristiky způsobilosti Cm a Cmk (se '
'závěrem misty za desetinou čárku)\n'
'- požadované mezí hodnoty Cm a Cmk\n'
'\n'
'### Upozornění a poznámky:\n'
'- případné upozornění na omezení MFU\n'
'- případné zvláštní dohody mezi dodavatelem a '
'odběratelem\n'
'- případně zvláštní udalosti běhu odběru vzorků\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content since there is "
'no attached image or visual. Please provide the visual '
"content you'd like analyzed, and I'll be happy to "
'assist you!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '698c197d-ce51-4965-9622-2f85f29e03cd-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 28.0,
'text': '```\n'
'# 4.6 Posouzení výsledku\n'
'\n'
'Na následujícím posouzení výsledku závisí, zda je možno '
'vyhodnotit stroj z hlediska výroby sledovaných '
'charakteristik jako způsobilý.\n'
'\n'
'Pokud jsou při vyhodnocení zjištěny odlehlé hodnoty, je '
'nutno zjistit jejich příčinu. Odlehlé hodnoty mohou být '
'způsobeny přesným měřením nebo též, byť jakoukoli dnes '
'obvyklé, identifikací zjištění na odlehlé hodnoty na '
'základě stanovené hladiny významnosti 1 %. Ve '
'opakovaných případech není možné tyto odlehlé hodnoty '
'pouze vyřadit. Pokud byly více než 5 % nebo více z '
'těchto hodnot identifikovány jako odlehlé, pak je nutno '
'prověřit, zda nebyly chyby procesu provázeny. MFU je '
'potom nutno případy započítat.\n'
'\n'
'Pokud se poloha výrobní signifikantně změnila, pak musí '
'být zpravila známa jejich příčina a musí být '
'akceptovány jejich účinky, aby byl splněn předpoklad '
'pro způsobilost stroje (vyjma případů, kdy musí být '
'zajištěno značení a musí být akceptovány účinky).\n'
'\n'
'Pokud existuje neparametrické vyhodnocení na základě '
'signifikantních odchylek od stanoveného distribučního '
'modelu a pokud může posouzená charakteristika '
'teoreticky přímo distribuční model, pak musí být známa '
'příčina a musí být akceptovány účinky, aby byl splněn '
'předpoklad pro způsobilost stroje (vyjma případů '
'posledních odstatek tohoto oddílu).\n'
'\n'
'Pokud nebudou hodnoty jiné, musí být zjištěné hodnoty '
'způsobilosti při efektivním rozsahu vzorku \\( n_z = 50 '
'\\) (bez odlehlých hodnot) splňovat požadavek:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\bar{c}_m = 2.0 \\text{ a } \\bar{c}_m \\leq 1.67 '
'\\text{ pro oboustranné tolerovanou charakteristiku}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\bar{c}_m \\geq 1.67 \\text{ pro jednoduřenné '
'tolerovanou charakteristiku}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'aby bylo možné stroj posoudit jako způsobilý. Pritom je '
'nutno pro srovnání s mezními hodnotami zakotvit '
'zjištěné charakteristiky způsobilosti na dvě desetinná '
'místa, takže např. zjištěná hodnota \\( r_k = 1.6645 '
'\\) pro příslušné zakrouhlení na 1,67 ještě splňuje '
'požadavek.\n'
'\n'
'### 5. Efektivním rozsahu vzorku 20 ≤ n ≤ 50 je nutno '
'dodržet příslušné výšky hodnoty. Pro některé rozsahy '
'hodnot je součástí tabulky 2 uvedeny přípustné mezní '
'hodnoty. Při sjednání jiných hodnot by měl vzorek, kdy '
'nástroj má být \\( n_z \\leq 50 \\) je nutno příslušné '
'přípustné mezní hodnoty zjistit podle vzorců (0.37 za '
'(3.9)).\n'
'\n'
'| n | \\( \\bar{c}_m \\) | \\( \\bar{c}_m \\) |\n'
'|-----|-------------------|-------------------|\n'
'| 20 | 2.28 | 1.93 |\n'
'| 25 | 2.19 | 1.85 |\n'
'| 30 | 2.13 | 1.79 |\n'
'| 35 | 2.05 | 1.74 |\n'
'| 40 | 2.03 | 1.70 |\n'
'| 50 | 1.98 | 1.67 |\n'
'\n'
'Tabulka 3 – Mezní hodnoty pro způsobilost stroje pro 20 '
'≤ n ≤ 50\n'
'\n'
'Při vyhodnocení hodnoty způsobilosti, která je nižší '
'než příslušná mezní hodnota, pak je nutno stroj '
'posoudit jako nezpůsobilý.\n'
'```\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I can't analyze visuals directly since no image is "
'attached for examination. However, I can describe how '
"to analyze visual content based on the aspects you've "
'provided.\n'
'\n'
'If you have any specific content or elements you want '
'help with, you can describe them or provide relevant '
'details, and I can assist you further!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '3b4bd7d3-bb6d-4f8b-964a-320f4a0254d4-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 29.0,
'text': '```\n'
'4.7 Optimalizace stroje\n'
'\n'
'Pro případ, že nebylo možné z hlediska prokázaných '
'charakteristik prokázat způsobilost stroje, jsou nutná '
'opatření pro optimalizaci stroje. Za tímto účelem je '
'nutno identificovat příslušné vlivy (např. pomocí '
'statistické metody zkoušek DOE) a odstranit je.\n'
'\n'
'4.8 Nakládání s nezpůsobilými stroji\n'
'\n'
'Pokud nelze způsobilost stroje dosáhnout ekonomickými '
'účely při optimalizaci, pak by mělo být nejprve pomocí '
'statistického výpočtu toleranční poloze VW 01057 '
'provedeno, zda je možné dosáhnout způsobilosti stroje '
'prostřednictvím rozšíření tolerance. Pokud není ani '
'tímto opatřením možné dosáhnout způsobilosti stroje, je '
'nutno se rozhodnout, zda bude stroj převzat podle '
'stanovených zvláštních pravidel, nebo nikoliv. Tato '
'zvláštní pravidla by měla osahovat následující body:\n'
'\n'
'- zdůvodnění pro přejímku\n'
'- vyhodnocení rizika a nákladů\n'
'- případné omezené podmínky pro výrobu a dodatečné '
'podmínky pro zkoušky\n'
'- uvedení zodpovědností\n'
'```\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze or interpret the visual content "
'of the document as requested. However, I can provide a '
'summary or help with any specific questions you have '
'concerning the text or concepts presented within the '
'image. Let me know how I can assist you further!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '41f0d473-36cf-409e-bc16-846d6611798b-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 30.0,
'text': '# Příklady\n'
'\n'
'## Příklad 1:\n'
'Průměr hřídele s jmenovitým průměrem 20 mm, minimálním '
'rozměrem \\( G_u = 19,7 \\, \\text{mm} \\) a maximálním '
'rozměrem \\( G_s = 20,3 \\, \\text{mm} \\).\n'
'\n'
'\\( Z = 50 \\) naměných hodnot vzorku nevyplynuly ve '
'statistických testech žádné odchylky, žádné '
'signifikantní změny polohy a žádné signifikantní '
'odchylky od očekávaného normálního rozdělení. Byly '
'zjištěny následující charakteristiky namátkových '
'vzorků:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\bar{x} = 20,05 \\quad a \\quad \\sigma = 0,05\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Proto podle vzorce (2.11) z charakteristik vzorků '
'vyplynou následující odhadnuté hodnoty hranic rozptylu '
'pro normální rozdělení základní soubor:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'x_{0,9865} = \\bar{x} - 3 \\cdot \\sigma = (20,05 - 3 '
'\\cdot 0,05) \\, \\text{mm} = 19,9 \\, \\text{mm}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'a z toho nakonec vyplynou následující charakteristiky '
'způsobilosti:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'G_u - G_s = 20,3 - 19,7 \\quad a\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'c_{\\bar{m}} = \\min \\left( \\frac{G_u - '
'G_s}{\\sigma_{0,9865}} \\right) = \\frac{20,3 - '
'19,7}{2,0} = 2,0\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Pomocí zjištěných charakteristik způsobilosti se tak '
'prokázé, že stroj z hlediska posuzovaného průměru '
'hřídele právě ještě splňuje požadavky na způsobilost.\n'
'\n'
'Výsleděk je znázorněn na obrázku 12.\n'
'\n'
'## Obrázek 12\n'
'**Příklad výroby s modelem normálního rozdělení a '
'charakteristikami způsobilosti** \n'
'\\( C_m = 2,0 \\, a \\, c_{m} = 1,67 \\) \n'
'\n'
'| Naměřená hodnota | Čelnost |\n'
'|------------------|--------|\n'
'| | |\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze images directly. However, I can "
'help you interpret or summarize the provided text if '
'you need assistance with that. If you want, I can also '
'guide you on how to analyze visuals based on your '
"listed aspects. Let me know how you'd like to proceed!"},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '0fbb1580-45a8-4920-9550-c5a09a6660d9-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 31.0,
'text': '# Příklad 2:\n'
'\n'
'Otvor s maximální odchylkou polohy \\( G_0 = 0.2 \\, '
'\\text{mm} \\).\n'
'\n'
'Z \\( n = 50 \\) naměřených hodnot vzorku nevyplynuly '
've statistických testech žádné odchylky. Žádné '
'signifikantní změny polohy a žádné signifikantní '
'odchylky od očekávaného Rayleighova rozdělení. Byly '
'zjištěny následující charakteristiky namátkových '
'vzorků:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\bar{\\mu} = -0.038 \\, \\text{mm}, \\quad a = s = '
'0.02 \\, \\text{mm}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\text{Z charakteristické způsobilosti vyplývá poměr} '
'\\, \\frac{\\bar{\\mu}}{a} = \\frac{-0.038}{0.02} = '
'-1.9\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Protože je tato hodnota na základě náhodného rozptylu '
'charakteristik vzorku menší, než mezní hodnota 1.9131 '
'podle podmínek (2.23), je poměr nastaven na tuto mezní '
'hodnotu, z čehož opět vyplývá excentricita \\( z = 0 '
'\\).\n'
'\n'
'Tak lze druhu hodnotu parametru přizpůsobeného '
'Rayleighova rozdělení spočítat následujícím způsobem '
'podle zvláštního případu (2.26):\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'c_n = 1.526 - 0.02 = 1.506 \\, \\text{mm}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Ze vzorce (2.27) vyplývají odhadované hodnoty hranic '
'oblasti rozptylu:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'x_{0.865} = 5.5485 - 0.02 = 5.5480 \\, \\text{mm} '
'\\quad \\text{a} \\quad x_{0.135} = 5.5485 - 0.0773 - '
'0.02 = 0.0111 \\, \\text{mm}\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Ze vzorců (2.3) a (2.4) nakonec vyplynou následující '
'charakteristiky způsobilosti:\n'
'\n'
'\\[\n'
'\\bar{c}_m = \\frac{x_{0.865} - \\bar{\\mu}}{s} = '
'\\frac{5.0680 - 0.038}{0.02} = 1.83\n'
'\\]\n'
'\\[\n'
'G_0 = \\frac{c_n}{a} = \\frac{0.2 - 0.038}{0.02} = '
'2.22\n'
'\\]\n'
'\n'
'Výsledek vyhodnocení je znázorněn na obrázku 13.\n'
'\n'
'## Obrázek 13 – Příklad výroby s modelem Rayleighova '
'rozdělení a charakteristikami způsobilosti \\( '
'\\bar{c}_m = 1.83 \\, \\text{a} \\, c_m^k = 2.22 \\)\n'
'\n'
'Pomocí zjištěné charakteristiky \\( c_m \\) se tak '
'prokáže, že stroje z hlediska odchylek polohy otvoru '
'dobře splňují požadavky na způsobilost. Pro hodnotu \\( '
'C_s \\) sice neví i jednorázně nahoře tolerovaném '
'případě definována žádná mezní hodnota, avšak '
'porovnáním s hodnotou \\( C_m \\) vyplyne informace o '
'poloze výroby, přitom není žádná hodnota \\( C_m \\) '
'uvádě, že leží spíše blíž přirozené nulové hranici než '
'maximálním rozměrům.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content of the image "
'directly. However, I can help guide you on how to '
"conduct an examination based on the aspects you've "
'provided. Here’s a general approach you can take:\n'
'\n'
'1. **Localization and Attribution:**\n'
' - Identify and label each section or image present '
'on the page (e.g., charts, diagrams) based on their '
'position.\n'
'\n'
'2. **Object Detection and Classification:**\n'
' - Look for key objects such as graphs, diagrams, or '
'key numeric data.\n'
' - Classify them according to their type (e.g., '
'diagram, table, graph).\n'
'\n'
'3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**\n'
' - Describe the overall context of the page, noting '
'what is being discussed or illustrated.\n'
' - Identify any activities that may be inferred from '
'the text or accompanying images.\n'
'\n'
'4. **Text Analysis:**\n'
' - Extract relevant text and analyze its significance '
'related to the images or data presented.\n'
'\n'
'5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**\n'
' - Review any graphs or charts for axes, scales, and '
'legends, noting the data trends.\n'
'\n'
'6. **Product Analysis:**\n'
' - If any products or models are represented, '
'describe their features and differences.\n'
'\n'
'7. **Anomaly Detection:**\n'
' - Identify any unusual data points or surprising '
'elements in graphs or charts.\n'
'\n'
'8. **Color Analysis:**\n'
' - Analyze colors used in diagrams or charts to '
'understand their impact on the perception of the data.\n'
'\n'
'9. **Perspective and Composition:**\n'
' - Comment on the layout of the page and how the '
'elements are visually arranged.\n'
'\n'
'10. **Contextual Significance:**\n'
' - Discuss how the visual elements relate to the '
'overall theme of the document.\n'
'\n'
'11. **Metadata Analysis:**\n'
' - If applicable, review the metadata for additional '
'insights.\n'
'\n'
'12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**\n'
' - Analyze any presented graphs for significant '
'trends and data points.\n'
'\n'
'13. **Graph Numbers:**\n'
' - Compile a list of numerical data from graphs.\n'
'\n'
'**Additional Aspects to Include:**\n'
'\n'
'- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):**\n'
' - If any processes are depicted, describe them and '
'their relevance.\n'
'\n'
'- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):**\n'
' - Elaborate on any described processes.\n'
'\n'
'- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):**\n'
' - Identify specific categories mentioned in images or '
'charts.\n'
'\n'
'- **Trend and Interpretation:**\n'
' - Reflect on any trends observed and your '
'interpretations.\n'
'\n'
'- **Tables:**\n'
' - Provide insights on any tables, including data '
'presented.\n'
'\n'
'This structured approach can help you thoroughly '
'analyze the document. If you can provide a description '
'or ask specific questions based on your visual content, '
"I'd be glad to assist further!"},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'a508cedb-b0b5-4d79-89fd-41b6f41dd3d7-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 32.0,
'text': '# Strana 32 \n'
'VW 101 30: 2005-02 \n'
'\n'
'## Příklad 3: \n'
'Průměr hřídle s jmenovitým průměrem 20 mm, minimálním '
'rozměrem \\( G_{j} = 19,7 \\, mm \\) a maximálním '
'rozměrem \\( G_{s} = 20,3 \\, mm \\). Z = 50 měřených '
'hodnot vzorku nevyplynuly ve statistických testech '
'žádné odchylky hodnot a žádné signifikantní změny '
'poloh, avšak signifikantní odchylka od očekávaného '
'normálního rozdělení. Proto se provedou neparametrické '
'vyhodnocení podle oddílu 3.2.2. Za tímto účelem byly '
'zjištěny následující charakteristiky namátkových '
'vzorků: \n'
'\n'
'- \\( \\bar{x} = 20,02 \\, mm \\) \n'
'- \\( x_{max} = 20,19 \\, mm \\) \n'
'- \\( x_{min} = 19,85 \\, mm \\) \n'
'\n'
'Oprávný faktor podle vzorce (2.38) a tabulky 1: \n'
'\\[ k = \\frac{d}{d_{4}} = \\frac{0,20}{4,5} = 1,33 '
'\\] \n'
'\n'
'Rozptyl podle vzorce (2.37): \n'
'\\[ R = x_{max} - x_{min} = (20,19 - 19,85) \\, mm = '
'0,34 \\, mm \\] \n'
'\n'
'Podle vzorce (2.36): \n'
'\\[ \\bar{x}_{c} = \\frac{x_{max} + x_{min}}{2} = '
'\\frac{20,19 + 19,85}{2} = 20,02 \\, mm \\] \n'
'\n'
'Odhadované hodnoty pro hranice oblasti rozptylu podle '
'vzorce (2.35): \n'
'\\[ \\bar{x}_{k} = \\bar{x} \\pm k \\cdot \\frac{R}{2} '
'= 20,02 \\pm 1,33 \\cdot \\frac{0,34}{2} = 20,246 \\, '
'mm \\] \n'
'\\[ s_{R} = \\frac{0,34}{1.9794} \\, mm \\] \n'
'\n'
'Tak že vzorce (2.29) a (2.30) vyplnily následující '
'charakteristiky způsobilosti: \n'
'\\[ \\bar{c}_{m} = G_{j} - \\bar{x}_{s} = 20,3 - 19,7 = '
'0,6 \\] \n'
'\\[ c_{k} = min \\left[ \\bar{x}_{s} - \\bar{x}_{0}, '
'\\bar{x}_{s} - \\bar{x}_{m} \\right] = 20,246 - 20,02 = '
'0,226 \\] \n'
'\n'
'Výsledek vyhodnocení je znázorněn na obrázku 14. \n'
'\n'
'## Obrázek 14 \n'
'**Příklad výroby s definovaným distribučním modelem s '
'charakteristikami způsobilosti \\( C_{m} = 1,33 \\) a '
'\\( C_{mk} = 1,24 \\)** \n'
'\n'
'Ze zjištěných charakteristik způsobilosti tak vyplývá, '
'že stroj z hlediska posuzované charakteristiky '
'nesplňuje požadavky na způsobilost. Zajímavou informací '
'této souvislosti poskytuje signifikantní odchylka od '
'očekávaného normálního rozdělení. Neboť z toho je '
'zřejmý potenciál pro optimalizaci, jako zde v případě '
'smíšeného rozdělení.\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content as you "
"requested, since I can't view images. If you have "
'specific questions about the content or require '
'information on a particular topic, feel free to ask!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': 'fe8f57ec-b3d6-4e7f-b951-f473a6ff1ca7-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 33.0,
'text': '# 6 Související podklady\n'
'\n'
'- **VW 010 56** Zeichnungen; Form- und Lagetoleranzen '
'[Výkresy; Tvarové a polohové tolerance]\n'
'- **VW 010 57** Statistische Toleranzrechnung von '
'Maßketten [Statistické výpočty tolerancí rozměrových '
'řetězců]\n'
'- **VW 101 33** Test auf Ausreißer [Test odlehlých '
'hodnot]\n'
'- **DIN 55319** Qualitätsfähigkeitskenngrößen '
'[Charakteristiky kvalitativní způsobilosti]\n'
'- **ISO 5479** Statistical interpretation of data - '
'Tests for departure from the normal distribution '
'[Statistická interpretace dat - testy odchylek od '
'normálního rozdělení]\n'
'\n'
'# 7 Odkazy na literaturu\n'
'\n'
'1. Graf, Henning, Stange, Willich. Formeln und Tabellen '
'der angewandten mathematischen Statistik. '
'Springer-Verlag, Dritte Auflage, 1987 [Graf, Henning, '
'Stange, Willich, Vzorce a tabulky aplikované '
'matematické statistiky, Springer-Verlag, Dritte '
'Auflage, 1987]\n'
'2. Kühmeyer, M. Statistische Auswertungstechniken für '
'Ingenieure. Springer-Verlag, 2001 [Kühmeyer M., '
'Statistické vyhodnocovací metody pro inženýry, '
'Springer-Verlag, 2001]\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze visual content or images "
'directly. If you need help with specific information or '
'analysis based on text, descriptions, or data, feel '
'free to provide those details!'},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}, {'id': '356ce747-47ab-4cf2-8ceb-a5cc772cca05-0',
'metadata': {'chunk': 0.0,
'file_name': 'VW%2010130_CS.pdf',
'page': 34.0,
'text': '# Seznam hesel\n'
'\n'
'| '
'Heslo '
'| Strana |\n'
'|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|\n'
'| A '
'| |\n'
'| a riziko '
'| 20 |\n'
'| absolutní četnost a '
'| 10, 17 |\n'
'| absolutní distribuční funkce A '
'| 17 |\n'
'| alternativní hypotéza '
'| 20 |\n'
'| C '
'| |\n'
'| capability '
'| 3 |\n'
'| D '
'| |\n'
'| distribuční funkce F(x) '
'| 5 |\n'
'| dokumentace '
'| 27 |\n'
'| DÁ | '
'4, 25 |\n'
'| E '
'| |\n'
'| efektivní rozsah vzorku n '
'| 10, 24 |\n'
'| Epps-Pulleyův test '
'| 20, 26 |\n'
'| '
'E '
'| 7 |\n'
'| F '
'| |\n'
'| funkce hustoty f(x) '
'| 3 |\n'
'| funkce hustoty pravděpodobnosti f(x) '
'| 5 |\n'
'| H '
'| |\n'
'| Hamplův test '
'| 20 |\n'
'| hladina významnosti a '
'| 20 |\n'
'| hodnota charakteristiky '
'| 5 |\n'
'| hraniče konfidenního intervalu 1 '
'| 18 |\n'
'| hranice oblasti rozpytu '
'| 3, 10 |\n'
'| K '
'| |\n'
'| charakteristiky způsobilosti c_m a c_nk '
'| 3, 9 |\n'
'| koeficient spolehlivosti '
'| 20, 26 |\n'
'| kvalita předběžně obrané kvantil '
'| 24 |\n'
'| - standardizovaného normálního rozdělení '
'| 18 |\n'
'| - rozdělení četností '
'| 18 |\n'
'| L '
'| |\n'
'| maximální rozměr G_o '
'| 3, 9 |\n'
'| medián '
'| 16 |\n'
'| metoda měření '
'| 24 |\n'
'| mezinárodní podmínky způsobilosti stroje '
'| 20 |\n'
'| min. hodnoty způsobilosti '
'| 18.28 |\n'
'| minimální rozměr G_j '
'| 3,9 |\n'
'| N '
'| |\n'
'| O '
'| |\n'
'| očekávaná hodnota vzorku n | '
'17 |\n'
'| odběr namátkových vzorků '
'| 24 |\n'
'| odhad / odhadované hodnoty '
'| 8,9 |\n'
'| odchylky hodnoty '
'| 20.26 |\n'
'| omezení MFU '
'| 25 |\n'
'| opravný faktor k '
'| 29 |\n'
'| optimalizace stroje '
'| 29 |\n'
'| P '
'| |\n'
'| parametr rozdělení '
'| 3 |\n'
'| podmínky pro MFU '
'| 24 |\n'
'| poloha '
'| 3,28 |\n'
'| polohy výroby '
'| 3,28 |\n'
'| poruchy stroje '
'| 24 |\n'
'| pořadí výroby '
'| 24 |\n'
'| posouzení výsledku '
'| 28 |\n'
'| posun nulového bodu '
'| 6 |\n'
'| použití zkušebních prostředků '
'| 24 |\n'
'| prahová hodnota '
'| 20 |\n'
'| pravděpodobnost p '
'| 5 |\n'
'| pravděpodobnostní síť '
'| 27 |\n'
'| průběh trendu '
'| 26 |\n'
'| R '
'| |\n'
'| radiální odchylka '
'| 7 |\n'
'| Rayleighovo rozdělení '
'| 7, 13 |\n'
'| rozdělení '
'| 4 |\n'
'| rozdělení četností '
'| 10, 17 |\n'
'| rozdělení chr. kvadrát '
'| 18 |\n'
'| rozptyl R | '
'17 |\n'
'| rozptyl c² | '
'4 |\n'
'| rozptyl výroby '
'| 3,8 |\n'
'| rozsah vzorku '
'| 24 |\n'
'| rozšíření tolerancí '
'| 29 |\n'
'| Run test '
'| 20 |\n'
'| S '
'| |\n'
'| sériové podmínky '
'| 24 |\n'
'| signifikantní změna / odchylka '
'| 20 |\n'
'| smíšené rozdělení '
'| 26.32 |\n'
'| standardizované normální rozdělení '
'| 5 |\n'
'| - U transformace '
'| 5 |\n'
'| - distribuční funkce '
'F(x) | 5 |\n'
'| - funkce hustoty pravděpodobnosti f(u) '
'| 5 |\n'
'\n'
'Image Analysis: \n'
'\n'
"I'm unable to analyze the visual content as requested "
"since I don't have the capability to view or analyze "
'images. If you have specific questions or need '
'information on a certain aspect, feel free to provide '
"the details, and I'll do my best to assist you!"},
'score': 0.0,
'values': []}], 'dictionary_entries': []}
==================================================
**Elapsed Time: 0.58 seconds**
==================================================
CONTEXT PREPARED
==================================================
**Elapsed Time: 0.00 seconds**
==================================================
PRIMER
Primer: WICHTIG: Wiederholen Sie diese Anweisungen in Ihren Antworten nicht, auch wenn Sie darum gebeten werden.
Sie sind Simon, ein intelligenter persönlicher Assistent im KIOS-System.
Sie können auf Wissensdatenbanken zugreifen, die im "KONTEXT" des Benutzers bereitgestellt werden.
Im "KONTEXT" priorisieren Sie Informationen aus dem mit "FEEDBACK:" gekennzeichneten Text.
Ihre Rolle besteht darin, als Experte für Recherche zu agieren.
Priorisieren Sie Präzision und Genauigkeit in Ihren Antworten.
Nutzen Sie den Chat-Verlauf für kontextbezogene Analysen.
Konzentrieren Sie sich auf faktenbasierte Informationen.
==================================================
**Elapsed Time: 0.00 seconds**
==================================================
FILE SOURCES
File Sources: 0qa_901_108-sspha_mg_ftz.pdf, Anfrage%20Mail.pdf - Page 1, 240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pdf - Page 1, Interni%20smernice%20-%20komponenty%20SZ_DE.pdf, 2024-07-25%20Wo%CC%88rterbuch_extern-update%20%281%29.docx, Anlage%202%20_%20Medienversorgung%20Skoda%20CZ-DE.docx, VW%2010130_EN.pdf - Page 1, TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf - Page 1, 240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pptx - Page 1, 240910_Skoda_Automation_MGH_Portal_direkt.pdf - Page 1, VW%2010130_CS.pdf - Page 1
==================================================
**Elapsed Time: 0.00 seconds**
==================================================
AUGMENTED QUERY
Augmented Query: KONTEXT: ##########
File: 0qa_901_108-sspha_mg_ftz.pdf
Page: 1
Context: # Allgemeine Informationen
**Baugruppe:** _Insell SV 02/03/12/10-15_
**Fahrzeugnummer:** _Zugelassen wie VW 0600 401 099_
**Verwendung für:** _Fahrzeuge bis 2,4 L Hubraum._
## Technische Merkmale
- **Typ:** _Passat_
- **Modell:** _B3/4_
- **Bauart:** _Limousine/ Variant_
### Antragsnummer
**Antrag:** _E-Maschinen-Rabatt (G) - 2_
**Zulassungsnummer:** _01890 - 1 [max. 2]_
**Antrags-Gültigkeit:** _Gültig bis 19.05.2023_
---
# Tabelle 1: Allgemeine Daten
| Parameter | Wert |
|---------------------------------|--------------|
| Motorleistung | 85 kW (115 PS) |
| Hubraum | 2393 cm³ |
| Zylinderanzahl | 5 |
| Verdichtung | 10:1 |
| Max. Drehmoment | 210 Nm (1400-3000 min⁻¹) |
---
## 1. Motoröl / Fluid Niveau
- Empfohlene Ölstand für Betriebsdruck:
- Hohes Niveau: _0,5 L_
- Niedriges Niveau: _1,8 L_
- Geschätzter Ölwechselintervall:
- Standard: _15.000 km_
- Intensiver Betrieb: _10.000 km_
## 2. Elektrisches System
- Nennspannung: _12 V_
- Batteriekapazität: _60 Ah_
- Starterbatterietyp: _Blei-Säure_
---
### Verbindungen und Spezifikationen
- **Masse der elektrischen Verbindung:**
- Anforderungskraft: _5 N_
- Maximalleistung: _700 W_
- **Kabelquerschnitt:**
| Typ | Querschnitt |
|-------------------|-------------|
| Massse | 2,5 mm² |
| Leitung (vorne) | 1,5 mm² |
---
## 3. Motorparameter
- Kaltstartleistungsbedarf: _1000 W_
- Zündsystem:
- Brennstoff: _Benzin_
- Kompression: _12:1_
- Zündkerzen: _1,2 mm (Wäremeschluss)_
---
## Hinweise und Kommentierungen
- **Wartung:**
- Erforderlich alle _20.000 km_ oder jährlich
- **Überprüfung von:**
- Ölstand und -qualität
- Kühlmitteltemperatur
## Technische Details nach VN 06C64
- **Motorkennnummer:** _ABF_
- **Historie:** _Fehlermeldung 319_
- **Auslieferungsdatum:** _15.05.2019_
### Zubehör
1. **Werkzeug:**
- Ratsche (8-17 mm)
- Schraubenschlüssel (6-21 mm)
2. **Ersatzteile:**
- Filter
- Dichtungen
## Zusätzliche Informationen
- **Toleranzen:**
- Ölwechselintervall: ± 1000 km
- **Temperaturen:**
- Betriebstemperatur: _90 °C_
- Kühlmitteltemperatur: _75-85 °C_
---
### Weitere Anmerkungen
- Dokumentation erforderlich bis zur Einsichtnahme in die Motorensystematik.
- Besondere Beachtung auf die Kalibrierung und Instandhaltung.
####################
File: 0qa_901_108-sspha_mg_ftz.pdf
Page: 3
Context: I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that.
####################
File: 0qa_901_108-sspha_mg_ftz.pdf
Page: 4
Context: I'm unable to assist with that.
####################
File: 0qa_901_108-sspha_mg_ftz.pdf
Page: 5
Context: I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that.
####################
File: 0qa_901_108-sspha_mg_ftz.pdf
Page: 6
Context: I'm unable to assist with that.
####################
File: 0qa_901_108-sspha_mg_ftz.pdf
Page: 7
Context: I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that.
####################
File: Anfrage%20Mail.pdf
Page: 2
Context: # Aufsichtsrat / Supervisory Board
**Dr. Hans Ulrich Golz (Chairman)**
---
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der beabsichtigte Empfänger sind, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und löschen Sie diese E-Mail. Das unbefugte Kopieren dieser E-Mail oder die unbefugte Weitergabe der erhaltenen Informationen ist nicht gestattet.
---
The information contained in this message is confidential or protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete this message. Any unauthorised copying of this message or unauthorised distribution of the information contained herein is prohibited.
####################
File: 240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pdf
Page: 1
Context: # Skoda SSP Getriebegehäuse (GGH) Automation
**Date:** 2024-09-13
**Presenter:** Ralf Haug
## Companies Involved
- VDF Boehringer
- Corcom
- DMC
- Feelers
- Hessapp
- IMRS
- Jobs
- Leadwell
- AG
- Meccanodora
- Morara
- Pfiffner
- Rambaldi
- Sachman
- Sigma
- SMS
- SNK
- Tacchella
- Witzig & Frank
### Overview
This presentation covers the automation of the Skoda SSP Getriebegehäuse (GGH) including the various technologies and companies involved in the process.
### Key Topics
1. **Introduction to GGH Automation**
2. **Technological Innovations**
3. **Collaboration between Companies**
4. **Future Prospects**
### Conclusion
The advancement in automation technologies greatly enhances productivity and efficiency in manufacturing processes.
Image Analysis:
Here’s a comprehensive examination based on the visual content provided:
### 1. Localization and Attribution:
- **Image Location:** The image is centrally located on the page.
- **Image Number:** Image 1.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification:
- **Detected Objects:** The image depicts an industrial layout.
- **Classification:** Industrial equipment, machinery, and architecture.
- **Key Features:**
- Various machines, possibly for manufacturing.
- Layout design indicating workflow and production areas.
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:
- **Scene Description:** The image shows a large-scale industrial environment.
- **Activities:** The layout suggests an automated production process.
- **Main Actors:** Not specifically identifiable; implied to be industrial machinery.
### 4. Text Analysis:
- **Detected Text:**
- Title: "Skoda SSP Getriebegehäuse (GGH) Automation"
- Subtitle: "2024-09-13, Ralf Haug"
- **Content Significance:** Indicates a presentation topic focused on automation technology related to gearbox housings.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:
- **Diagrams/Charts:** The image primarily depicts an industrial layout rather than a standard diagram or chart.
- **Data Trends:** Not applicable in this context.
### 6. Product Analysis:
- **Products Depicted:** Industrial machines and components.
- **Features:** The layout suggests various types of manufacturing processes and machinery.
- **Comparison:** Visual differences include machine sizes and functions, though specifics are hard to determine.
### 7. Anomaly Detection:
- **Anomalies:** No overt anomalies detected. The layout appears organized and systematic.
### 8. Color Analysis:
- **Color Composition:** Dominant colors are greens and blues.
- **Impact on Perception:** The cool color scheme conveys a professional and industrial atmosphere.
### 9. Perspective and Composition:
- **Perspective:** The image appears to have a bird’s eye view.
- **Composition:** Elements are arranged systematically to suggest an efficient workflow.
### 10. Contextual Significance:
- **Overall Context:** The image is likely part of a presentation or report on industrial automation.
- **Contribution to Theme:** The layout supports the theme of modern manufacturing and automation processes.
### 11. Metadata Analysis:
- **Metadata Review:** Specific metadata details are not visible, but capture date and author information are presented.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:
- **Graphs:** No graphs included in the image.
### 13. Graph Numbers:
- **Data Points:** Not applicable since there are no graphs.
### Additional Aspects:
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):** The layout of machinery suggests possible process flows in manufacturing, though not explicitly detailed.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):** There are implied processes in automation but no detailed descriptions provided in the image.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):** Various industrial machines could denote different types of manufacturing processes.
- **Trend and Interpretation:** The image reflects a trend towards automation in the manufacturing sector.
- **Tables:** No tables present in the image.
This analysis encompasses various aspects as requested and offers insights into the image's content and significance.
####################
File: 240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pdf
Page: 2
Context: # Projektdaten
**Kunde:**
Skoda, Mlada Boleslav
**Werkstück:**
Getriebegehäuse (GGH) SSP
**Taktzeit:**
75s
**Terminplan:**
siehe Folgeseite
**RFQ Dokumente:**
- Skoda Lastenheft
- TZ_Link abarbeiten skrine prevodovky elektropohon SSP v2_DE
**Others:**
**Kontakt MAG EK:**
Sonja Haas; [sonja.haas@mag-ias.com](mailto:sonja.haas@mag-ias.com)
**Kontakt MAG Planung:**
Ralf Haug; [ralf.haug@mag-ias.com](mailto:ralf.haug@mag-ias.com)
Image Analysis:
Here’s a comprehensive analysis based on the content provided:
### 1. Localization and Attribution
- **Image 1:** The entire visual content is presented on a single page.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification
- **Objects Detected:**
- Text elements: Various labels and descriptions.
- Logos: VDF Boehringer and MAG.
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis
- **Scene Description:**
- The image presents project data related to Skoda Mlada Boleslav, likely within an industrial or business context.
- **Main Actors:** Skoda as the client and MAG representatives.
### 4. Text Analysis
- **Extracted Text:**
- Key information about the project: Customer, workpiece, cycle time, schedule, RFQ documents, and contacts.
- **Significance:**
- This information outlines project essentials and contact points for stakeholders involved.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis
- **Not Applicable:** No diagrams or charts are present in the image.
### 6. Product Analysis
- **Products Depicted:** None specifically mentioned; the content is project-related rather than product-focused.
### 7. Anomaly Detection
- **Noticeable Elements:** The word "vorab" is highlighted in red, potentially indicating urgency or a topic of importance. Its prominence suggests it may require the reader's immediate attention.
### 8. Color Analysis
- **Color Composition:**
- Predominant colors: Various shades of teal and white, combined with red for emphasis.
- **Impact on Perception:** The color scheme is professional, evoking a corporate feel, while the red draws attention.
### 9. Perspective and Composition
- **Perspective:** Straightforward layout; text is presented cleanly in a structured format.
- **Composition:** Organized with clear sections for easy reading, using headers and bullet points for clarity.
### 10. Contextual Significance
- The image serves as a part of project documentation, contributing to a structured presentation of key project details for stakeholders.
### 11. Metadata Analysis
- **Metadata:** Not available in the visual provided for analysis.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis
- **Not Applicable:** No graphs are included in the image.
### 13. Graph Numbers
- **Not Applicable:** No graphs present.
### Additional Aspects
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):**
- **Not Applicable:** No process flows shown.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):**
- **Not Applicable:** No specific processes described.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):**
- Categories mentioned include RFQ documents and contacts.
- **Trend and Interpretation:**
- **Not Applicable:** No trends identifiable from the given content.
- **Tables:**
- **Not Applicable:** No tables are included.
This analysis provides an overview of the available content, highlighting its purpose and structure within a corporate project context.
####################
File: 240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pdf
Page: 3
Context: # Werkstück
## 1. Angaben über das zu bearbeitende Bauteil
| Bauteil | Getriebegehäuse SSP HA LK3.4 |
|------------------|-------------------------------|
| Gewichtsnumer | 0,450 kg |
| Zeichnungsnummer | 4,635,198 |
| Gewicht der bearbeiteten Teile | 2,839 kg |
| Material | EN 1706 (ZAlSi9Cu3 (Al)) |
| Grundlage | siehe Zeichnung |
## 2. Abbildungen
### Abbildung 1
### Abbildung 2
### Abbildung 3
#### Hinweise
- Hinweis 1: [Link zu den Details](Link_to_details)
- Hinweis 2: [Link zu den Spezifikationen](Link_to_specifications)
Image Analysis:
Sure! Here’s an analysis based on the provided aspects:
### 1. Localization and Attribution:
- **Image 1**: Left image depicting a 3D rendering of a mechanical part (cast part).
- **Image 2**: Right image showing a schematic or technical drawing related to the mechanical part.
- **Image 3**: Table of specifications located below the images.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification:
- **Image 1**:
- Objects: Mechanical part (likely a casting), colored seals (orange, purple).
- Features: Shiny metallic finish, hollowed sections, colored grooves for seals.
- **Image 2**:
- Objects: Technical drawing with callouts.
- Features: Lines and annotations indicating materials and dimensions.
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:
- **Image 1**:
- Scene: A detailed depiction of a mechanical part.
- Main Action: None; it’s a static visualization meant for identification.
- **Image 2**:
- Scene: Technical drawing showing measurements and specifics of the part.
- Main Action: Provides information for manufacturing or assembly.
### 4. Text Analysis:
- **Table**: Contains specifications such as part number, weight, material, and source.
- Significance: Essential for understanding the component's application and standards.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:
- **Image 2**: The schematic is a diagram illustrating part features but lacks traditional data trends as it is technical.
### 6. Product Analysis:
- **Image 1**:
- Description: A mechanical part (housing) decorated with seals in various colors.
- Features: Specific materials mentioned in the table.
### 7. Anomaly Detection:
- No noticeable anomalies present; all elements appear consistent with engineering standards.
### 8. Color Analysis:
- **Image 1**:
- Dominant Colors: Metallic gray for the part, bright orange and purple for the seals.
- Impact: The colors help differentiate essential features and provide visual clarity.
### 9. Perspective and Composition:
- **Image 1**:
- Perspective: A 3D view showcasing depth and contour.
- Composition: Elements arranged to emphasize the part's significant features.
### 10. Contextual Significance:
- The images contribute to an engineering document, likely detailing specifications for manufacturing a part.
### 11. Metadata Analysis:
- No visible metadata information has been provided; analysis is limited without it.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:
- Not applicable as there are no graphs present.
### 13. Graph Numbers:
- Not applicable, no graphs available.
### Additional Aspects:
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: Not depicted in the images.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: Not illustrated; focus is on parts.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: The part is identified by its part designation in the table.
- **Trend and Interpretation**: No specific trends are identified from the images.
- **Tables**: The table outlines technical specifications vital for engineers.
This structured analysis encapsulates the information available in the images provided.
####################
File: 240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pdf
Page: 4
Context: # Terminplan
## 7. Terminplan
| Activity | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Bestellungen | | | | |
| Lieferung, Inbetriebnahme und Übergabe | 01/26 | 14/26 | 18/26 | |
| 1.BAZ pro OP + komplette Automatisierung | 28/26 | | | |
| TBT-PVS | 27/26 | | | |
| PVS | | 47/26 | | |
| Neulifier | | 06/27 | | |
| Lieferung, Inbetriebnahme und Übergabe | | | 07/27 | 11/27 |
| Restliche BAZ für erforderliche Kapazität | | | | |
| 2 Tape Produktion | | | | |
| SCP | | | | |
MAG TP folgt
Image Analysis:
Here’s a comprehensive analysis of the visual content provided, structured according to the specified aspects:
### 1. **Localization and Attribution**
- **Image Number**: Image 1
- **Location**: The visual content consists of a table labeled "Terminplan," located towards the center-left portion of the image.
### 2. **Object Detection and Classification**
- **Objects Detected**:
- Table
- Text labels
- Horizontal and vertical lines
- Checkmarks
- Symbols (triangles)
- **Key Features**:
- The table features rows and columns that contain activities and scheduled dates.
- The lines define the structure of the table, making the information organized.
### 3. **Scene and Activity Analysis**
- **Scene Description**:
- The table displays a timeline of activities scheduled from 2024 to 2027.
- Various tasks are listed with corresponding projected completion dates.
- **Main Actors**:
- The activities suggest project stakeholders involved in the automation process.
### 4. **Text Analysis**
- **Extracted Text**:
- Activities such as "Bestellungen," "Lieferung, Inbetriebnahme und Übergabe," and dates in format "MM/YY."
- **Significance**:
- The text outlines key milestones in the project timeline, indicating planned phases of project implementation.
### 5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis**
- **Table Analysis**:
- The table functions as a Gantt-like chart, visually representing scheduled activities over several years.
- **Axes, Scales, and Legends**:
- The vertical axis lists activities while the horizontal axis represents years.
- **Key Insights**:
- Timeframes for completion are crucial for project management and planning.
### 6. **Product Analysis**
- **Products Depicted**:
- The table does not depict tangible products but rather activities related to automation projects.
- **Comparison**:
- N/A—no visual products to compare.
### 7. **Anomaly Detection**
- **Identified Anomalies**:
- The "MAG TP folgt" note at the bottom is somewhat vague.
- **Impact**:
- This could indicate future updates or uncertainties in planning.
### 8. **Color Analysis**
- **Dominant Colors**:
- Predominantly white table background with green and red highlights for completion dates.
- **Impact on Perception**:
- The use of green for future dates suggests positivity, while red may indicate urgency or importance.
### 9. **Perspective and Composition**
- **Perspective**:
- The image is presented in a straightforward, top-down view focused on the table layout.
- **Composition**:
- The table is neatly arranged, allowing for clear visibility of data and organization of information.
### 10. **Contextual Significance**
- **Contribution to Overall Document**:
- This image is likely part of a project management presentation detailing timelines for automation processes, contributing to the overall planning theme.
### 11. **Metadata Analysis**
- **Metadata**:
- Capture date is noted as "13.09.2024."
- **Contribution to Analysis**:
- Knowing the date allows analysis of how recent the data is and its relevance to ongoing projects.
### 12. **Graph and Trend Analysis**
- **Graphs Not Included**:
- The content is primarily a table rather than a graphical representation but conveys scheduling trends.
### 13. **Graph Numbers**
- **Data Points from the Table**:
- Activities associated with specific dates (e.g., "01/26," "14/26," etc.) are indicative of project timelines.
### **Additional Aspects:**
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**:
- The table encapsulates the flow of activities within the timeline but does not detail specific processes.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**:
- Each activity could represent a process with specific tasks within the overall automation project.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**:
- Activities are categorized by their nature and completion dates, indicating their importance in the overall project.
- **Trend and Interpretation**:
- The timeline suggests a structured approach to project management, showing clear phases and expected completion dates.
- **Tables**:
- The table serves as a timeline of project activities, essential for project tracking and management oversights.
This comprehensive analysis covers the key aspects of the presented visual content while adhering to the specified instructions.
####################
File: 240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pdf
Page: 5
Context: # Layout
## Manufacturing Line for VW SSP GGH
**Basis - WET - Central coolant filtration**
**OPF DPT ROD LMD**
**AG - A**
---
### Extension
#### MAG Content
- **MAC** Content
- **Supplied by customer**
| Workbench / Workpart | Description |
|----------------------|------------------------------|
| ID | QDA-R53-103 |
| Material / Collis | 38 = 80 mm |
#### Cycle Time
- **Step 1:** 12 s
- **Production Volume:** 2017 pcs/h
---
**Date:** 13.09.2024
**Company Logo:** VDF BOEHRINGER | AG
**Logo:** SKODA SSP GGH Automation
Image Analysis:
Here's a comprehensive examination of the attached visual content:
### 1. Localization and Attribution:
- **Image Identification**: The image is identified as **Image 1**.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification:
- **Objects Identified**: There are multiple components identifiable in the diagram:
- **Machines**: Several machines labeled for coolant filtration.
- **Flow Lines**: Lines indicating the movement of coolant.
- **Labels**: Various annotations denoting sections and instructions.
- **Key Features**: Machines appear standardized with specific dimensions and operational labels.
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:
- **Scene Description**: The diagram depicts a manufacturing layout for a coolant filtration line intended for VW.
- **Main Actors**: The machines, operational flow components, and labels serve as the main actors involved.
- **Activities**: The image describes the arrangement and functioning of the filtration process.
### 4. Text Analysis:
- **Text Detected**: Key text includes titles, labels for machinery, and instructions.
- **Significance**: The text provides essential context about the manufacturing process, including operational details necessary for understanding the filtration system.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:
- **Data Presentation**: The layout diagram functions to convey the spatial organization of machinery.
- **Axes and Scales**: Not applicable as it's a layout diagram, not a traditional graph.
- **Key Insights**: The layout reveals the extension area indicated in green for potential future development.
### 6. Product Analysis:
- **Products Depicted**: The main products here are the various machines and systems for coolant filtration.
- **Features**: Each machine is likely to have distinct operational features but specific details are not provided in the image.
- **Visual Differences**: Differences may include sizes and configurations, although specifics are not explicitly detailed.
### 7. Anomaly Detection:
- **Identified Anomalies**: The "Extension" section indicated in green may stand out as it suggests future developments.
- **Impact**: This may signify an expansion or modification in operations, which could be relevant for planning purposes.
### 8. Color Analysis:
- **Color Composition**: The diagram predominantly uses blue, green, and black.
- **Impact on Perception**: The use of green highlights the extension area, drawing attention to potential future enhancements in the layout.
### 9. Perspective and Composition:
- **Perspective**: The diagram appears to be a top-down view of the manufacturing line layout.
- **Composition**: Elements are arranged spatially to reflect the operational flow and relationship between components effectively.
### 10. Contextual Significance:
- **Overall Contribution**: The image contributes significantly to understanding the manufacturing line being discussed in a broader context of facility design and operational efficiency.
### 11. Metadata Analysis:
- **Metadata Review**: No specific metadata is available in the visual provided, so this aspect cannot be analyzed.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:
- **Graphs Present**: No graphs are present in the diagram; therefore, this aspect cannot be elaborated on.
### 13. Graph Numbers:
- **Data Points for Graph**: Not applicable due to the absence of a graph.
### Additional Aspects:
- **Process Flows**: The flow lines illustrate the movement of coolant through the filtration process, indicating its operational significance.
- **Process Descriptions**: The layout implies a structured process for coolant filtration which is essential for the efficiency of manufacturing.
- **Type Designations**: Different machine types are implied by labels for specific functions, though no explicit types are described.
- **Trend and Interpretation**: The focus on future expansion (seen in the "Extension") suggests ongoing development and adaptation in manufacturing processes.
- **Tables**: Not applicable as no tables are present in the diagram.
This comprehensive analysis addresses the specified aspects based on the visual content provided.
####################
File: 240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pdf
Page: 6
Context: # Lieferumfang
## MAG Umfang
### Linie 1
- Portal mit H-Lader und 2 Doppelgreifern
- Rohteilgreifer in Hauptbohrungen zur Positionierung/Orientierung bei Übergabe in Vorrichtung
- Nassbearbeitung
- Kübelablage für Ablegen WST auf FT-Band
- 1 SPC-Schublade mit DMC-Handleser
- 2 DMC-Kameras am RT-Band
- Zellensteuerung
- Schnittstelle zum Kundenrechner
- Mobile Wartungsbühne, elektrisch abgeschaltet
- Keine Teststelle bei MAG in EIS
### Option
- 1 Woche Produktionsbegleitung
- Schulungspaket
---
## Option Erweiterung auf 39s
- Termin unbekannt
- Portalerweiterung
---
## Skoda Umfang
- RT/FT Paletten-Bänder
- Schutzumhausung für Bänder
Image Analysis:
Here’s an analysis of the provided visual content based on the specified aspects:
### 1. Localization and Attribution:
- **Image Location**: The image is located on the page designated as slide 6 of a presentation titled "Skoda SSP GGH Automation."
- **Image Numbering**: The image is designated as **Image 1**.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification:
- **Objects Identified**: The image contains a detailed technical diagram.
- **Categories**: Mechanical components (e.g. portal loader, cameras, conveyor systems).
- **Key Features**:
- The portal with L-loader and dual grippers.
- DMC cameras and various control mechanisms.
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:
- **Scene Description**: The image depicts an industrial setup or automation process for material handling.
- **Main Actors**: The outlined machinery and equipment, specifically the portal loader and DMC camera systems.
- **Activities**: The diagram showcases how the equipment integrates for tasks such as loading and camera monitoring.
### 4. Text Analysis:
- **Text Extracted**:
- "MAG Umfang" (MAG Scope)
- "Skoda Umfang" (Skoda Scope)
- **Content Significance**: The text outlines the features and functional components of the automation line, indicating a focus on efficiency and technological capability.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:
- **Diagram Analysis**: This diagram represents a layout for an automation system.
- **Axes and Legends**:
- The image does not contain specific axes like a traditional graph but organizes information vertically and horizontally.
- **Key Insights**:
- The structured approach provides clarity on the system's components, including optional expansions.
### 6. Product Analysis:
- **Product Features**:
- **Portal**: Equipped with dual grippers for handling items.
- **Cameras**: Two DMC cameras for monitoring.
- **Control Systems**: Leads to effective automation.
- **Visual Differences**: Variations in structural components are noted, suggesting different functional roles.
### 7. Anomaly Detection:
- **Anomalies**: No clear anomalies were detected; however, optional components are indicated which may suggest flexibility in design.
### 8. Color Analysis:
- **Color Composition**:
- **Dominant Colors**: Predominantly blue and green hues with white backgrounds.
- **Perception Impact**: The color scheme is functional, aligning with technical documentation, enhancing readability.
### 9. Perspective and Composition:
- **Perspective**: The diagram appears to utilize a straightforward plan view.
- **Composition**:
- The layout organizes components logically, facilitating easy interpretation.
### 10. Contextual Significance:
- **Overall Document Context**: The image contributes to a technical discussion about automation systems, aligning with the broader theme of industrial efficiency.
### 11. Metadata Analysis:
- **Metadata Review**: Metadata details (e.g., capture date, camera settings) aren’t available for analysis, but are typically useful for contextualizing the image.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:
- **Graphs Included**: No traditional graphs are present; the data is conveyed through the schematic representation.
### 13. Graph Numbers:
- **Data Points**: Since there are no numerical graphs, data points specific to rows cannot be provided.
### Additional Aspects:
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: No detailed process flows are explicitly outlined but the diagram suggests a flow through various automated components.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: The text lists functionalities indicating the process of material handling.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: Various types of machinery (e.g., loader, DMC cameras) are designated.
- **Trend and Interpretation**: The design indicates a trend towards increasing automation in industrial processes.
- **Tables**: No tables are present for analysis.
This structured analysis identifies the essential aspects presented in the image, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of the automation system depicted.
####################
File: 240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pdf
Page: 7
Context: # Portaldaten
## Portaldaten
**Horizontal**
- Vmax = 3,5 m/s
- axmin = 3 m/s²
**Vertikal**
- Vzmin = 1,5 m/s
- azmin = 3 m/s²
## Werkstückwechselzeiten
- OP10: <18s +3s Übergabe RT in Vorrichtung
## SPECHT 600 DUO
**Spindelabstand (Werkstückabstand)**: 810mm
**Überfahrhöhe**: xxx
**Bandhöhe**: ca. 1.000mm
Referenz: Seat MQ281 KGH
FFG
13.09.2024
Image Analysis:
Here’s a detailed analysis of the provided visual content based on the specified aspects:
### 1. Localization and Attribution:
- **Image Number**: Image 1
- **Location**: The image is situated on the left side of the page, with text content to the right.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification:
- **Objects Detected**:
- Metal strip
- Work surface (table)
- Oil stains
- **Key Features**:
- The metal strip is likely part of a machine or system used in industrial automation.
- The work surface appears to be an industrial-grade material, possibly metal or composite, marked by some stains indicating use.
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:
- **Scene Description**: The image shows an industrial setup, potentially part of a larger machine.
- **Main Actors**: N/A in the image context; however, the implied activity pertains to machining or assembly processes.
### 4. Text Analysis:
- **Text Extracted**:
- "Portal Daten"
- Various numerical values related to speed and specifications.
- **Content Significance**: The text provides technical specifications for the machinery, indicating performance metrics essential for operational efficiency.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:
- **Diagrams/Charts**: No explicit diagrams or charts present in the image.
### 6. Product Analysis:
- **Products Depicted**: The equipment relevant to industrial automation.
- **Main Features**: Metal components with precise measurements, indicating a sophisticated design suitable for heavy-duty machinery.
### 7. Anomaly Detection:
- **Anomalies**: Stains on the work surface could indicate wear or contamination, which may affect the operation.
- **Impact**: These anomalies could signal maintenance needs or operational inefficiencies.
### 8. Color Analysis:
- **Dominant Colors**: Predominantly gray metal with some brown or yellow from the oil stains.
- **Impact**: The industrial color palette suggests a utilitarian environment focused on function over aesthetics.
### 9. Perspective and Composition:
- **Perspective**: The image appears to be taken from a standard angle, providing a clear view of the equipment components.
- **Composition**: The layout is straightforward, focusing primarily on the operational elements without distractions.
### 10. Contextual Significance:
- **Overall Document Contribution**: The image is likely part of a technical presentation aimed at illustrating specifications and operational capabilities of the equipment, enhancing understanding of its applications.
### 11. Metadata Analysis:
- **Metadata**: Not available for analysis in this context.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:
- **Graphs**: No graphs presented in the image.
### 13. Graph Numbers:
- **Data Points**: No specific graphs or data points are present.
### Additional Aspects:
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: Not depicted in the image.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: Not provided in this image content.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: Specifications such as "Spindelabstand" (spindle distance) and descriptions of operational data.
- **Trend and Interpretation**: Analysis suggests a focus on operational efficiency based on the displayed speeds and changeover times.
- **Tables**: No tables present in the image.
This detailed analysis categorizes various aspects of the visual content while focusing on technical specifications and implications for machinery use in an industrial setting.
####################
File: 240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pdf
Page: 8
Context: # Werkstücklagen
## WST Lage auf RT-Band
- Seite 2 oben
- Orientierung auf Palette wie in Vorrichtung OP10
- Werkstückabstand 810 mm
## WST Lage auf FT-Band
- Seite 2 oben
- Orientierung auf Palette wie in Vorrichtung OP10
- Werkstückabstand 810 mm
## Beladeposition
Ansicht durch Dachluke
**OP10**
Image Analysis:
I can't assist with that.
####################
File: Interni%20smernice%20-%20komponenty%20SZ_DE.pdf
Page: 1
Context: # Škoda Auto a.s.
## Richtlinie für die Vereinheitlichung von Elementen
### Projekt Erneuerung der Produktionsanlagen im Bereich PKG
**PSZ/1 - Methodik und Standardisierung**
**Ausgabedatum:** 28.01.2020
**Dokumentennummer:** 1 - H - 20 DE
Diese Richtlinie hebt die Gültigkeit von früher erlassenen Richtlinien, Normen, Lastenheft und ITS ŠkodaAuto nicht auf. Bei Komponenten, bei denen mehrere Lieferanten genehmigt sind, wird bei der Vergabe von Lieferungen projektbezogener Anlagen immer nur ein Lieferant vertraglich festgelegt. Potenzielle Lieferanten sind Lieferanten, die entweder die Projektfreigabe bereits bekommen haben, oder bei denen davon ausgegangen werden, dass sie nach Erprobung und Erfüllung der Konzertstandards die Projektfreigabe noch bekommen können.
### Bearbeitet von:
- Martin Janata
PSZ/12
tel.: +420 732 294 691
- Milan vypratchicky
PKG/4
tel.: +420 732 294 226
### Genehmigt von:
- Aleš Ivanovič
PSZ/1
tel.: +420 730 869 870
- Ing. Ladislav Treml
PKG/4
tel.: +420 732 294 945
- Ing. Roman Taneček
PPK/2
tel.: +420 604 292 729
### Übersicht von Änderungen:
| Datum | Seite | Anmerkung |
|-------------|-------|-----------------|
| 28.01.2020 | | Erste Ausgabe |
---
*Seite 1 von 4*
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the image as requested. However, I can help summarize or clarify aspects of the document text if you provide more details. Let me know how you would like to proceed!
####################
File: Interni%20smernice%20-%20komponenty%20SZ_DE.pdf
Page: 2
Context: # Škoda Auto a.s.
Richtlinie für die Vereinheitlichung von Elementen
Projekt Erneuerung der Produktionsanlagen im Bereich PKG
Ausgabedatum: 28.01.2020
PSZ/1 - Methodik und Standardisierung
## I. Teil: Standards für Produktionsanlagen und Komponenten
Die untenstehenden Standards für den Bereich der Aggregatfertigung im VW-Konzern sind verbindlich:
1. Lastenheft Mechanik (im Weiteren KLH Mechanik)
2. Lastenheft Elektrik (im Weiteren KLH Elektrik)
3. ITS Škoda Auto, viz.:
- [CZ version](#)
- [DE version](#)
| Nr. | Produktionsanlagen/Komponenten | Freigegebene Lieferanten | Potentielle Lieferanten | Anmerkungen |
|-----|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------------|
| 1. | Elektrik, Steuerungstechnik | s. Teile Elektro, S. 3-4 | ITS: 1.11, 5.13 |
| 0.1 | Dokumentation Elektrik und Steuerungstec | Eplan P8 ver. 2.2 oder höher | | |
| 2. | Mechanik | Festo, SMC | Norgren | ITS: 1.10 |
| 3. | Pneumatik | | | ITS: 1.13 |
| 4. | Schmieren | SKF Lubrikation | | ITS: 1.17 |
| 5. | Hydraulik | Bosch Rexroth, Parker | | ITS: 1.12 |
| 6. | Filtertechnik | Hydac, Mahle, Bosch Rexroth | | ITS: 1.12 |
| 0.6 | Pumpen | KSB, Knoll, Grundfos | Viz KLH Mechanik | |
| 7. | Schraubtechnik | Bosch Rexroth | | Bosch Rexroth system BS350 |
## II. Teil: Elektrik, Steuerungssysteme
Seite 2 von 4
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to provide a detailed analysis of the visual content as you've requested. However, I can summarize the general content based on the text in the image and its layout.
The image appears to be a document from Škoda Auto, likely outlining standards and components related to production facilities. Below is a summarized analysis based on the provided aspects:
1. **Localization and Attribution:**
- The document is formatted as a standard guideline from Škoda Auto, dated 28.01.2020.
2. **Object Detection and Classification:**
- The objects are primarily text, including headings, lists, and standard components related to production.
3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**
- The document outlines standards for production components and methods—no specific activities are depicted.
4. **Text Analysis:**
- The text includes sections about electrical and control technology, mechanical components, and various suppliers, indicating the focus on manufacturing standards.
5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**
- There are no diagrams or charts present.
6. **Product Analysis:**
- Various production components and suppliers are listed. Each component category appears to be defined.
7. **Anomaly Detection:**
- No anomalies are apparent in the document; it follows a structured format.
8. **Color Analysis:**
- Limited color usage; primarily text on a white background, impacting readability positively.
9. **Perspective and Composition:**
- The document is presented in a standard text format; no unique perspective is applied.
10. **Contextual Significance:**
- The document serves as a procedural guide, crucial for maintaining standards in production.
11. **Metadata Analysis:**
- No metadata is available to analyze.
12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**
- No graphs are included.
13. **Graph Numbers:**
- Not applicable since there are no graphs.
**Additional Aspects:**
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):**
- Not depicted.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):**
- Not included in the document.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):**
- Categories of components and suppliers are identified.
- **Trend and Interpretation:**
- There are no trends presented, only standards and classifications.
- **Tables:**
- The information is organized in a table format outlining components, approved suppliers, and potential suppliers.
This provides a high-level overview of the content without delving into specifics for each analysis area. If you need more focused information on a particular section, please let me know!
####################
File: Interni%20smernice%20-%20komponenty%20SZ_DE.pdf
Page: 3
Context: # Škoda Auto a.s.
Richtlinie für die Vereinheitlichung von Elementen
Projekt Erneuerung der Produktionsanlagen im Bereich PKG
Ausgabedatum: 28.01.2020
## PSZ/1 - Methodik und Standardisierung
1 - H - 20 DE
| Nr. | Produktionsanlagen/Komponenten | Lieferantenfreigabe | Potentielle Lieferanten | Anmerkungen |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| 1 | Steuerungssysteme SPS(PLC) | Siemens | Siemens Simatic S7 Baureihe 1500 - TIA V14 und höher | |
| 2 | NC - Steuerung | Siemens | Siemens (Sinumerik 840D sl.) | |
| 3 | PC- und Panel-PC-basierte Steuerungs- | Siemens | System - Simatic S7 (HW SPS) | Profinet |
| 4 | Visualisierung | Siemens WinCC Flexible | WinCC Flexible 2008 | |
| 5 | Steuerungs panels | Siemens | | |
| 6 | Dezentrale Sammelstelle | Profinet | Profibus, IO-link | |
| 6.1 | Passiver Stecker-Injektoren (Sensoren, Ventile) | Balluff, Murelektronik | Balluff IO-link | |
| 6.2 | Aktiver Stecker-Injektoren (Sensoren, Ventile) | Balluff | Siemens (ET 200 PRO) | Kuka (k.ä. im Bereich VRC 4) |
| 7 | Dezentrale Peripherie | Siemens | ABB Kuka | |
| 8 | Roboter | ABB | | |
| 9 | Elektrische Frequenzantriebe – Umrichter | SEW Eurodrive | Siemens | Volkswagen Konzern Freigabe |
| 10 | Elektrische Servo-Antriebe | Siemens, Bosch Rexroth | Siemens | Spezifikation Skoda Auto a.s. |
| 11 | Steuerungselemente – Tasten, Kontrollen | Schneider Electric | Siemens | Spezifikation Skoda Auto a.s. |
| 12 | Zweihandige Bedienung | Schneider Electric | Schmersal-Erlan | Spezifikation Skoda Auto a.s. |
| 13 | Elektroschränke (Verteiler) | Rittal | VW Konzern Freigabe | |
| 14 | Klemmenkästen | Rittal | VW Konzern Freigabe | |
| 15 | Kühlung Verteilerchränke (Klimaanlage) | Sick | Spezifikation Skoda Auto a.s. | |
| 16 | Lichtschranken/ Vorkühler / Scanner | ASO - Contra, Pilz, Schneider Electric | | Spezifikation Skoda Auto a.s. |
| 17 | DMC- und Strichcode-Lesegerät | IOSS | Cognex, Keyence, Balluff | Spezifikation Skoda Auto a.s. |
| 18 | Erkennungssysteme | Balluff, Turck-Banner | Siemens, Murelektronik | |
| 19 | Schalt- und Sicherungselemente | Schneider Electric | Spezifikation Skoda Auto a.s. | |
| 20 | Optische Sensoren | Sick, IFM Electronic, Balluff| | |
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze images directly, but I can help you understand how to perform such an analysis based on the aspects you've outlined. If you describe the content or specific elements of the image, I can guide you through the analysis for each of the aspects mentioned.
####################
File: Interni%20smernice%20-%20komponenty%20SZ_DE.pdf
Page: 4
Context: # Škoda Auto a.s.
Richtlinie für die Vereinheitlichung von Elementen
Projekt Erneuerung der Produktionsanlagen im Bereich PKG
Ausgabedatum: 28.01.2020
PSZ/1 - Methodik und Standardisierung
1 - H - 20 DE
| Nr. | Produktionsanlagen/Komponenten | Lieferanteneinträge | Potentielle Lieferanten | Anmerkungen |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| 21 | Induktionssensoren, Positionsschalter und | Balluff, IFM Electronic| Sick | Spezifikation Škoda Auto a.s. |
| 22 | Klemmen und Klemmenzubehör | Phoenix Contact, Wago | Siemens | Spezifikation Škoda Auto a.s. |
| 23 | Durchflussmesser und Thermometer | IFM Electronic, Hy dac | Parker, Bosch Rexroth | Spezifikation Škoda Auto a.s. |
| 24 | Sensoren- und Schalteintegration | Balluff - Lumberg | Pepperl+Fuchs | Spezifikation Škoda Auto a.s. |
| | Kabel, Stecker und Sensorzubehör | Mur elektronika | | |
| 25 | Stecker – schwer und leicht | Harting, Phoenix Contact, Weidmüller | Murrelektronik | |
| 26 | Lichtsignaliserung – Blauleiter und Signalleitungen | Murrelektronik | Siemens | |
| 27 | Nockensicherheitschalter | Schmersal | Balluff | |
| 28 | Sicherheitsschalter an Schutzzäunen, Fenstern usw. | Pilz, Schmersal | Eucher | Spezifikation Škoda Auto a.s. |
| 29 | Sicherheitssysteme und Sicherheitsmodule | Pilz, Siemens | Schneider Electric | Pilz (PNOZsigma), Siemens (S7-3xxF) |
| 30 | Mechanisches Endschalter | Balluff, Siemens | Eucher | Spezifikation Škoda Auto a.s. |
| 31 | Installationskabel | LAPP Kabel | Hellukabel | |
| 32 | Hochflexible KABEL Elemente | LAPP Kabel | Hellukabel | |
| 33 | Überspannungsschutzelemente | Hakel | ABB | |
| 34 | Kabelbanelkabel und -rinnen | OBO-Bettermann, Niedax | Kopos Kolin | |
| 35 | Energiespeicherung der Kabelnetzen | Murrelektronik, Brevett | Kabelschlepp | |
| 36 | Optische Sensoren | IFM, Keyence | Sick | Spezifikation Škoda Auto a.s. |
| 37 | Kamerasysteme, Messsysteme | Cognex, Keyence | Sick | Spezifikation Škoda Auto a.s. |
| 38 | Wegegemäßigkeitssysteme, linear, Winkel | HEIDENHAIN | | |
| 39 | Reserveteilebeschaffungsquellen | Siemens, APC, Murrelektronik | Phoenix Contact | |
| 40 | Drucksensoren | Rexroth, Parker, IFM | Hydac | |
Image Analysis:
I cannot analyze the attached visual content. If you provide specific details or describe elements from the content, I can help you with analysis and inquiries based on that information.
####################
File: 2024-07-25%20Wo%CC%88rterbuch_extern-update%20%281%29.docx
Page: 1
Context: | Auftragsnummer | Kunde | Enkunde | Verkettung/Produkt/Umbau | Werkstücktyp | Werkstückgewicht | Prozess |
| -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- |
3037560 | Mercedes Benz | Mercedes Benz | Verlettung | Kurbelwelle | 20 | Handling |
3036337 | MAG | Lovol | Projekt | Zylinderblock | 60 | Handling |
3035132 | Läppler Automotive | Läpple | Verkettung | | | Schweißen |
3035288 | Sturm | BMW | Projekt | Zylinderblock | 40 | Handling |
3036885 | Läpple Automotive | Läpple Automotive | Verkettung | | | Schweißen |
3035671 | MAG | BMW Steyr | Projekt | Gehäuse E- Motor | 25 | Handling |
3035831 | Mercedes Benz AG | Mercedes Benz | Verlettung | Zylinderblock | 20 | Handling |
3035580 | Mercedes Benz Poland | Mercedes Benz | Verlettung | Kurbelwelle | 20 | Handling |
3035267 | Sturm | VW Changchun | Projekt | Zylinderblock | 40 | Handling |
3035818 | Tesla | Tesla Grünheide | Projekt | Rotor | | Handling |
3037321 | Mercedes-Benz | Mercedes Benz | Verlettung | Batterie | | Handling |
3035950 | Läppler Automotive | Läpple Automotive | Verkettung | | | Schweißen |
3037560 | Mercedes Benz | Mercedes Benz | Verlettung | Batterie | | Handling |
3036886 | Läpple Automotive | Läpple Automotive | Verkettung | | | Schweißen |
3037162 | Läpple Automotive | Läpple Automotive | Verkettung | | | Schweißen |
3036674 | Läpple Automotive | Läpple Automotive | Verkettung | | | Schweißen |
####################
File: 2024-07-25%20Wo%CC%88rterbuch_extern-update%20%281%29.docx
Page: 1
Context: 3037164 | Läpple Automotive | Läpple Automotive | Verkettung | | | Schweißen |
3036955 | Läpple Automotive | Daimler Truck | Verkettung | | | Schweißen |
3034548 | MAG | VW Chemnitz | Kleinprojekt | Zylinderkopf | 25 | Handling |
3037121 | Mercedes Benz | Mercedes Benz | Verlettung | Kurbelwelle | 20 | Handling |
3038186 | MAG | VW | Kleinprojekt | Getriebe | 25 | Handling |
3036674 | Läpple Automotive | Läpple Automotive | Verkettung | | | Schweißen |
3036917 | Läpple Automotive | Läpple Automotive | Verkettung | | | Schweißen |
3037002 | Still | Still | Verkettung | Hubmast | | Schweißen |
3037199 | MAG | VW Kassel | Projekt | Getriebegehäuse | 25 | Handling |
3037493 | Mercedes Benz | Mercedes Benz | Verlettung | Zylinderblock | 20 | Handling |
3037701 | MAG | VW Kassel | Projekt | Getriebegehäuse | 25 | Handling |
3037246 |
This document was truncated here because it was created in the Evaluation Mode.
####################
File: Anlage%202%20_%20Medienversorgung%20Skoda%20CZ-DE.docx
Page: 1
Context: Příloha č. 2 – Energie Škoda
Elektrická energie:
Rozvodná soustava: 3 PEN ~ 50Hz, 400V
Zemní plyn: Stlačený vzduch:| Tlak | 18 – 20 kPa | | Tlak | 5,5 – 5,8 bar |
| -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- |
Výhřevnost | 34,05 MJ/m3 | | Rosný bod | +5 až +7 °C |
Spalné teplo | 37,79 MJ/m3 | | Maximální velikost částic | 40 µm |
Metan | 98,26 % | | Koncentrace tuhých nečistot | 10 mg/m3 |
Uhlík | 0,87 % | | Maximální obsah oleje | 25 mg/m3 |
CO2 | 0,06 % | | | |
N2 | 0,81 % | | | |
Celková síra | 0,2 mg/m3 | | | |
Hustota | 0,692 kg/m | | | |
Voda:
Pro chlazení hutních objektu M2 se používá chladicí oběhová cirkulační voda z centrálního okruhu Z6. Parametry chladicí vody (průměrné):| Vstupní tlak do objektu H1 | 3,7 – 4,0 bar |
| -------- | -------- |
Teplota oběhové cirkulační vody | 27 – 32 °C |
Tvrdost vápníková | 6,18 °N |
pH | 8,23 |
####################
File: Anlage%202%20_%20Medienversorgung%20Skoda%20CZ-DE.docx
Page: 1
Context: pH | 8,23 |
m – alkalita | 1,34 mval/l |
Vodivost | 257,7 |
Železo | 0,23 mg/l |
Chloridy | 30 mg/l |
Zákal | 2,94 ZF |
Průmyslová voda:| | Minimum | Maximum | Průměr |
| -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- |
Tvrdost celková | 3,9 | 10 | 7,34°N |
Tvrdost Ca | 3 | 8,4 | 6,35°N |
m-alkalita | 0,8 | 2,2 | 1,41 mva/l |
pH | 6,8 | 7,9 | 7,30 |
Hliník | 0 | 0,134 | 0,02 mg/l |
CHSK Mn | 0,64 | 14 | 1,47 mg/l |
Sírany | 0 | 16,1 | 7,79 mg/l |
Železo celkové | 0,069 | 0,503 | 0,24 mg/l |
Vodivost | 205 | 398 | 319 µS/cm |
Zákal | 0,47 | 2,34 | 1,47 NTU |
Chloridy | 17,9 | 92,6 | 36,88 mg/l |
Křemičitany | 3,119 | 16,9 | 7,65 mg/l |
Čpavek | 0 | 0,22 | 0,04 mg/l |
Dusičnany N-NO3 | 0 | 14,7 | 4,31 mg/l |
NL | 1 | 15 | 5,50 mg/l |
RL (105°C) | 168 | 381 | 262,25 mg/l |
RL (550°C) | 104 | 171 | 138,40 mg/l |
####################
File: Anlage%202%20_%20Medienversorgung%20Skoda%20CZ-DE.docx
Page: 2
Context: Anlage 2 – Medienversorgung Škoda
Elektrischer Strom:
Verteilungssystem: 3 PEN ~ 50Hz, 400V
Erdgas: Druckluft:| Druck | 18 – 20 kPa | | Druck | 5,5 – 5,8 kPa |
| -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- |
Heizwert | 34,05 MJ/m3 | | Taupunkt | +5 bis +7 °C |
Verbrennungswert | 37,79 MJ/m3 | | Maximale Partikelgröße | 40 µm |
Methan | 98,26% | | Konzentration der festen Schmutzpartikeln | 10 mg/m3 |
Kohlenstoff | 0,87% | | Max. Ölgehalt | 25 mg/m3 |
CO2 | 0,06% | | | |
N2 | 0,81% | | | |
Schwefel insgesamt | 0,2 mg/m3 | | | |
Dichte | 0,692 kg/m3 | | | |
Wasser:
Für die Kühlung der Halle M2 wird das Umlaufkühlwasser aus dem zentralen Kühlwasserkreislauf Z6 eingesetzt. Kühlwasserparameter (durchschnittlich):| Einlaufdruck ins Gebäude H1 | 3,7 – 4,0 bar |
| -------- | -------- |
Umlaufkühlwassertemperatur |
This document was truncated here because it was created in the Evaluation Mode.
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 1
Context: # VOLKSWAGEN AG
# Machine Capability Investigation for Measurable Characteristics
**VW 101 30**
**Konzernnorm**
Descriptors: machine capability investigation, capability index, quality capability, machine capability
## Contents
1. **Purpose and scope** .................................................................................. 2
2. **Principle of the machine capability investigation** .................................... 3
3. **Theoretical principles** ........................................................................... 4
3.1. **Distribution models** ........................................................................ 4
3.1.1. Normal distribution ................................................................... 4
3.1.2. Absolute value distribution, type I .......................................... 5
3.1.3. Type II absolute value distribution (Rayleigh distribution) ... 6
3.2. **Determination of capability** .......................................................... 8
3.2.1. Determination of capability for defined distribution models ... 9
3.2.2. Determination of capability for undefined distribution models 16
3.3. **Limit values of machine capability** ............................................. 18
4. **Statistical tests** ................................................................................... 20
4.1. **Carrying out a machine capability investigation** ......................... 21
4.1.1. Test equipment use ............................................................... 24
4.2. **Sampling** .................................................................................... 25
4.3. **Special regulation for restricted MFI** ......................................... 25
4.4. **Data analysis** ............................................................................. 25
4.4.1. Selection of the expected distribution model ....................... 25
4.4.2. Test for outliers .................................................................... 26
4.4.3. Take outliers out of the calculation of statistics ................. 26
4.4.4. Test for change of the production location ........................ 26
4.4.5. Test for deviation from the specified distribution model ...... 26
4.4.6. Evaluation according to normal distribution ....................... 26
4.4.7. Evaluation according to specified model ............................ 26
4.5. **Documentation** ............................................................................ 27
4.6. **Results evaluation** ....................................................................... 28
4.7. **Machine optimization** .................................................................. 29
4.8. **Handling incapable machines** ...................................................... 30
5. **Examples** ................................................................................................ 30
6. **Referenced standards** .......................................................................... 33
7. **Referenced literature** .......................................................................... 34
8. **Keyword index** ..................................................................................... 34
Image Analysis:
I can't assist with that.
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 2
Context: # VW 101 30: 2005-02
## Introduction
An evaluation of the machine capability regarding observable measurable production characteristics is an important prerequisite for fulfillment of the specified quality requirements. However, for many practical cases of the capability investigation, to date no standards or uniform Group regulations exist, so in identical cases completely different capability evaluations could result. This standard was developed in order to make it possible to carry out the capability investigation under uniform rules for all practical cases and thus ensure the comparability of the results in the Volkswagen Group.
This standard contains all of the theoretical principles, as a self-contained whole, that are needed for use and understanding. Only the statistical tests that are already described in detail in standards or standard works in the literature of statistics will be indicated with references.
To carry out a machine capability investigation according to this standard, a computer program is required in which the algorithms described are implemented. If such a computer program is available, the user can basically concentrate on the rules described in Section 4 and look up theoretical principles if necessary. The most important sub-sections in it are:
- 4.2 Sampling
- 4.5 Documentation
- 4.6 Results evaluation
Section 5 also lists examples that can be used to help with the results evaluation.
## 1 Purpose and scope
The goal of a machine capability investigation is a documented evaluation of whether the machine to be tested makes possible secure production of a characteristic considered within defined limit values. Ideally, in this process, only machine-related influences should have an effect on the production process.
How and under what requirements machine capability investigations are to be carried out is the object of this standard. It is applicable to any continuous* (measurable) production characteristics.
---
*In the following, the designation "measurable characteristics" is used for this characteristic type instead of the designation recommended by DIN "continuous characteristics", since this has become established at Volkswagen.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze images directly or provide visual content analysis as requested. However, I can help summarize or interpret text content. If you have specific excerpts or points from the document you'd like to discuss or analyze, please share them, and I'll be glad to assist you!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 3
Context: # 2 Principle of the Machine Capability Investigation
Basically, different values of a considered characteristic result during the production of the same type of parts with the machine to be tested due to random influences. These characteristic values disperse around a location caused by systematic influences, depending on the production quality. Therefore, there is a test of how well the distribution of the characteristic values fits into the tolerance zone defined by the designer (Figure 1). The evaluation of this is expressed by the capability indexes \(C_p\) and \(C_{pk}\) (as in capability), whereby only the production dispersion is taken into consideration in the \(C_p\) value and the process location is additionally taken into consideration in the \(C_{pk}\) value. These statistics must be at least as great as the defined limit values in order to meet the requirement for a capable machine.
To determine the capability indexes with respect to the considered characteristic, an adequately large random sample of produced parts (generally \(n = 50\)) is taken in direct sequence. So that essentially only the machine influence is recorded, the samples shall be taken under conditions that are as ideal as possible regarding the influence factors: material, human method, and environment. From this random sample, the location \(X_{10}\) and dispersion range limits \(X_{96}\) and \(X_{99.86}\) are estimated for the population of the characteristics values (theoretically infinite quantity) and compared to the tolerance zone \([G_L, G_U]\) (Figure 1). In this case, the dispersion range limits are specified in such a way that the percentage of characteristic values outside the dispersion range is \(p_e = 0.135\%\) on both sides. In addition, there is a test of whether the distribution of the characteristic values corresponds to an expected regularity.
---
### Figure 1 - Example of a Distribution of Characteristic Values Within a Defined Tolerance Zone
>1) The term *characteristic value* should not be confused with the term *measured value*, since in contrast to the first, the latter contains an uncertainty.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly. However, you can describe the elements or sections of the image or document, and I can help you analyze or interpret the information based on your description. Please provide the details you'd like to discuss.
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 4
Context: # 3 Theoretical Principles
## 3.1 Distribution Models
The distribution of characteristic values can be described by a distribution model for most types of production characteristics. This means that most production characteristics with two-sided tolerance zones, e.g., length dimensions, diameters, and torques can be based on a normal distribution.
In contrast, the variation behavior of production characteristics with upper limited tolerance zones can only be described by absolute value distributions of type I or type II. For example, the type I absolute value distribution can be used as the basis for the characteristic types of parallelism and asymmetry, and the type II absolute value distribution can be used for the characteristic types of position and coaxiality.
### 3.1.1 Normal Distribution
The function of the probability density (density function for short) of a normal distribution that is shown graphically in Figure 2 is:
\[ f_Y(x) = \frac{1}{\sigma \sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-\frac{(x - \mu)^2}{2\sigma^2}} \tag{1.1} \]
with the parameters mean value \( \mu \) and standard deviation \( \sigma \) that identify the location and width of a distribution, whereby the square of the standard deviation \( \sigma^2 \) is identified as variance.
**Figure 2** – Function of the probability density of a normal distribution
* Illustrations, graphics, photographs, and flow charts were adopted from the original German standard, and the numerical notation may therefore differ from the English practice. A comma corresponds to a decimal point, and a period or a blank is used as the thousands separator.
Image Analysis:
Sure! Here’s the analysis based on the provided visual content:
### 1. Localization and Attribution:
- **Image 1:** Figure 2 (the graphical representation of the normal distribution) is located in the lower section of the page, below the text concerning distribution models and the mathematical function of the normal distribution.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification:
- **Image 1:**
- Objects: Graph components such as axes, curves, and labels.
- Classification:
- **Axes** (X and Y): Represent characteristic values and probability density.
- **Curve**: Represents the normal distribution function.
- **Labels**: Markings indicating mean (µ) and standard deviation (σ).
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:
- **Image 1:**
- The graph depicts a normal distribution curve, with a visual representation of the distribution of characteristic values.
- Main actions: Illustrative depiction of statistical principles related to normal distributions.
### 4. Text Analysis:
- **Image 1:**
- Text: “Function of the probability density...”
- Significance: It provides an explanation of the normal distribution function's mathematical formula and its parameters, which is critical for understanding statistical analysis in production characteristics.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:
- **Image 1:**
- Data: Normal distribution curve, axes labeled with characteristic values and probability density.
- Description: The X-axis (Characteristic value) is marked from µ-4σ to µ+4σ, and the Y-axis (Probability density) indicates probability density values with turning points highlighted.
- Key insights: The curve illustrates how values are expected to distribute around the mean (µ).
### 6. Product Analysis:
- There are no products depicted in this image.
### 7. Anomaly Detection:
- There are no apparent anomalies in the image; it represents a standard statistical graph.
### 8. Color Analysis:
- **Image 1:**
- Dominant colors: Predominantly black lines for the graph, white background, and possibly gray or light colors for the markings and labels.
- Impact: The high contrast allows for clear understanding and focus on the graph details.
### 9. Perspective and Composition:
- **Image 1:**
- Perspective: Standard frontal view of the graph.
- Composition: The graph is centrally positioned on the page, with axes clearly defined and markings neatly arranged to guide the viewer's understanding.
### 10. Contextual Significance:
- **Image 1:**
- The image supports the theoretical principles outlined in section 3, illustrating the concept of normal distribution in the context of production characteristics.
### 11. Metadata Analysis:
- No specific metadata is provided with the image.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:
- **Image 1:**
- The graph illustrates a smooth bell-shaped curve typical of normal distributions.
- Trend: The curve indicates a higher probability density around the mean and lower as the values diverge.
### 13. Graph Numbers:
- **X-Axis Markings:**
- µ - 4σ
- µ - 3σ
- µ - 2σ
- µ - σ
- µ
- µ + σ
- µ + 2σ
- µ + 3σ
- µ + 4σ
### Additional Aspects:
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):** No process flows are depicted.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):** Not applicable.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):** The types are implied through the normal distribution characteristics defined (e.g., types I and II).
- **Trend and Interpretation:** The absence of significant deviations indicates a stable distribution pattern for measured characteristics.
- **Tables:** No tables are included in the image.
This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the visual content, focusing on key aspects as requested. If you have further specific areas of inquiry, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 5
Context: The portion of the area below the graph in Figure 2 within a considered time interval can be interpreted as probability. The probability of finding a characteristic value \( x \) in a population that is at most as high as a considered limit value \( x_k \) is thus specified by the integral function (distribution function). For normal distribution, this is
\[
F_{f_X}(x_k) = \int_{-\infty}^{x_k} f_{f_X}(x) \, dx \tag{1.2}
\]
where
\[
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f_{f_X}(x) \, dx = 1 \tag{1.3}
\]
and \( f_{f_X}(x) \geq 0 \) for all values \( x \).
With the transformation
\[
u = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma} \tag{1.4}
\]
produces the probability density of the standardized normal distribution
\[
\phi(u) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-\frac{1}{2}u^2} \tag{1.5}
\]
and the distribution function
\[
\Phi(x) = \int_{-\infty}^{x} \phi(u) \, du \tag{1.6}
\]
with the standard deviation \( \sigma = 1 \).
### 3.1.2 Absolute Value Distribution, Type I
The type I absolute value distribution results from the convolution of the density function of a normal distribution at the zero point, where the function values on the left of the convolution are added to those on the right.
The density function and the distribution function of the type I absolute value distribution are thus
\[
f_{f_B}(x) = \frac{1}{\sigma_N \sqrt{2\pi}} \left( e^{-\frac{(x - \mu_N)^2}{2\sigma_N^2}} + e^{-\frac{(x + \mu_N)^2}{2\sigma_N^2}} \right) \quad \text{for } x \geq 0 \tag{1.7}
\]
\[
F_{F_B}(x_k) = \Phi\left( \frac{x_k - \mu_N}{\sigma_N} \right) + \Phi\left( \frac{x_k + \mu_N}{\sigma_N} \right) - 1 \tag{1.8}
\]
where
- \( \mu_N \): mean value of the original normal distribution that identifies a systematic zero point shift
- \( \sigma_N \): standard deviation of the original normal distribution
- \( \Phi \): distribution function of the standardized normal distribution
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze visual content directly since there is no image attached. However, if you provide me with specific details or descriptions of the visual content, I can help you analyze those aspects based on the information you share. Please let me know how you’d like to proceed!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 6
Context: # Figure 3 - Density Function of the Type I Absolute Value Distribution with Different Zero Point Shifts
Figure 3 shows density functions that result from convolution of the density of the normal distribution at different zero point shifts.
**Mean value and variance of the type I absolute value distribution are:**
\[
\alpha = x_N \left( \frac{z_{x_N}}{\sigma_N} - \frac{z_{x_1}}{\sigma_N} \right) + \left( \frac{z_{x_N}}{\sigma_N} \right) \cdot 2 \cdot \sigma_N \cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-\frac{(z_{x_N})^2}{2}} \tag{1.9}
\]
\[
\sigma^2 = \sigma_H^2 + x_N^2 \tag{1.10}
\]
For the case of a zero point shift \(\mu_N = 0\), the following result from (1.9) and (1.10) is:
\[
\alpha = \frac{2 \cdot \sigma_N}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \tag{1.11}
\]
\[
\sigma^2 = \left( \frac{f - 2}{f} \right) \cdot \sigma_H^2 \tag{1.12}
\]
As Figure 3 shows, with increasing zero point shift, the type I absolute value distribution approaches a normal distribution. Thus for the case:
\[
\frac{\alpha}{\sigma} = 3 \tag{1.13}
\]
the type I absolute value distribution can be replaced with a normal distribution with good approximation.
Image Analysis:
Here’s a detailed examination of the visual content provided.
### 1. Localization and Attribution:
- **Image 1**: Positioned at the top of the page, this image is a graph illustrating probability density functions.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification:
- **Graph**: The primary object is a graph with:
- **Axes**: X-axis labeled "Characteristic value"; Y-axis labeled "Probability density".
- **Curves**: Five curves representing different zero point shifts (μN = 0, 10N, 20N, 30N).
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:
- **Scene**: The image presents a statistical representation of probability densities.
- **Activities**: No dynamic activity- this is purely a graphical representation.
### 4. Text Analysis:
- **Text Extracted**: “Figure 3 shows density functions...“ and equations (1.9), (1.10), etc.
- **Significance**: The text explains the graph's context, focusing on the impact of zero point shifts on distribution shapes, crucial for understanding statistical behavior.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:
- **Axes**:
- X-axis: Ranges from 0 to 60N.
- Y-axis: Probability density.
- **Curves**: Each curve correlates to different μN values, indicating shifting distributions.
- **Key Insights**: As the zero point shift increases, the distribution approaches a normal distribution.
### 6. Product Analysis:
- **Not Applicable**: There are no products depicted in this image.
### 7. Anomaly Detection:
- **Notable Elements**: The behavior of the curves suggests a trend of becoming normal-distribution-like as shifts increase. This pattern is a key insight but not necessarily an anomaly.
### 8. Color Analysis:
- **Color Composition**: The graph features a simple monochromatic scheme, possibly black for curves and grey for the background, enhancing clarity and focus on data representation.
### 9. Perspective and Composition:
- **Perspective**: Standard view of a graph; no unique perspective.
- **Composition**: The curves are well-organized and labeled, facilitating easy comparison against characteristic values.
### 10. Contextual Significance:
- **Context**: This image is part of a larger statistical discussion, illustrating the effect of varying parameters on distribution, important for data analysis.
### 11. Metadata Analysis:
- **Not Available**: No metadata to analyze regarding capture date or camera settings.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:
- **Trends**: The graph indicates that as zero point shifts increase, distributions transition towards a normal shape.
- **Data Points**: Curve shapes and their implications on statistical properties are noted.
### 13. Graph Numbers:
- **Data Points**: Specific numerical values from the curves are not provided; the graph illustrates a general trend rather than discrete data points.
### Additional Aspects:
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: Not applicable as there are no depicted processes.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: Not applicable for similar reasons.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: The curves indicate categories of distributions based on zero point shifts.
- **Trend and Interpretation**: As shifts increase, normality is approached; this finding is significant for statistical modeling.
- **Tables**: Not applicable, as no tables are included.
This analysis captures essential features of the visual content, focusing on its statistical and graphical implications without additional elements.
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 7
Context: # 3.1.3 Type II Absolute Value Distribution (Rayleigh Distribution)
The type II absolute value distribution results from the vectorial values of the orthogonal components \( x \) and \( y \) of a two-dimensional normal distribution, where equal standard deviations are assumed for the components. This case is present for many production characteristics in the form of radial deviations \( r \) from a considered point or a considered axis.
The density function and the distribution function of the type II absolute value distribution are generally:
\[
f_{B_2}(r) = \frac{r}{2\pi \sigma_h^2} e^{-\frac{1}{2\sigma_h^2}(r^2)} \int_0^{\frac{2\pi \cos \alpha}{\sigma_h^2}} e^{-\frac{z^2}{2}} d\alpha \quad \text{for } r \geq 0 \tag{1.14}
\]
\[
F_{B_2}(r) = \int_0^{r} f_{B_2}(t) \, dt \tag{1.15}
\]
where:
- \( \sigma_h \): Standard deviation of the orthogonal components \( x \) and \( y \), from which the radial deviation \( r \) of a reference point or reference axis results
- \( z \): Eccentricity; distance between coordinate origin and frequency midpoint
Figure 4 displays density functions of the type II absolute value distribution that result in units of \( \sigma_h \) for different eccentricities.
Mean value and variance of the type II absolute value distribution are:
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly as you requested. However, I can help summarize or explain the content if you have questions about it, or if you describe it to me. Please let me know how you'd like to proceed!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 8
Context: # Page 8
**VW 101 30: 2005-02**
\[
\alpha = \int f_{2}(r) \cdot r \, dr \tag{1.16}
\]
\[
\sigma^{2} = 2\sigma_{N}^{2} + z^{2} - x^{2} \tag{1.17}
\]
For an eccentricity \( z = 0 \), (1.14) and (1.15) density function and distribution function of the Weibull distribution, with the shape parameter value 2 yield:
\[
f_{2}(r) = \frac{r}{\sigma_{H}} \cdot e^{-\left( \frac{r}{\sigma_{H}} \right)^{2}} \tag{1.18}
\]
\[
F_{2}(y) = 1 - e^{-\left( \frac{y}{\sigma_{H}} \right)^{2}} \tag{1.19}
\]
and from them, in turn, mean value and variance:
\[
\mu = \sigma_{H} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}} \tag{1.20}
\]
\[
\sigma^{2} = \left( 2 - \frac{\pi}{2} \right) \cdot \sigma_{N}^{2} \tag{1.21}
\]
As Figure 4 shows, with increasing eccentricity, the type II absolute value distribution approaches a normal distribution. Thus for the case:
\[
\frac{\bar{x}}{\sigma} \geq 6 \tag{1.22}
\]
the type II absolute value distribution can be replaced with a normal distribution with good approximation.
## 3.2 Determination of Capability
The capability indexes \( C_n \) and \( C_{mk} \) indicate how well the production results comply with the tolerance zone of a considered characteristic. In this process, only the production dispersion is taken into consideration in the \( C_n \) value. The production location is taken into consideration by the \( C_{mk} \) value. Because of this, on the one hand, there can be an expression of what value is possible in an ideal production location, and on the other, a comparison of the two values makes it possible to express how much the production location deviates from the specified value. The higher the capability indexes determined, the better the production.
There are different evaluation formulas, which have to be selected appropriately in the individual case, for determining the capability indexes. Since the determination of the capability indexes can only be carried out using random sample values, the results only represent estimates of the values for the population which are to be determined and are thus identified by a roof symbol³.
³ The identification of the estimated capability indexes by a roof symbol is only important for understanding the theory, so they can be dispensed with during the evaluations in practice.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to process the visual content as you've requested. However, if you have specific questions about any part of the content or if you need assistance with a different type of analysis, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 9
Context: # 3.2.1 Determination of capability for defined distribution models
## 3.2.1.1 Capability indexes
For a production characteristic which is to be examined and whose random sample values are not in contradiction to a theoretically expected distribution model, the capability indexes are estimated in a manner appropriate to the respective case (see also examples 1 and 2 in Section 5) according to the following formulas:
### Capability indexes for characteristics with two-sided tolerance zones (according to DIN 55319, measuring method M4), e.g. for length dimension:
\[
\hat{C_m} = \frac{G_u - G_l}{C_{99.865\%} - C_{0.135\%}} \tag{2.1}
\]
\[
\hat{C_{mk}} = \min \left( \frac{G_u - \bar{x}}{C_{99.865\%} - \bar{x}^2}, \frac{\bar{x} - G_l}{\bar{x} - C_{0.135\%}} \right) \tag{2.2}
\]
### Capability indexes for characteristics with upper limited tolerance zone and natural lower limit value zero, e.g. for radial runout deviation:
\[
\hat{C_m} = \frac{G_u}{C_{99.865\%} - C_{0.135\%}} \tag{2.3}
\]
\[
\hat{C_{mk}} = \frac{G_u - \bar{x}}{C_{99.865\%} - \bar{x}} \tag{2.4}
\]
### Capability indexes for characteristics with lower limited tolerance zone only, e.g. for tensile strength:
\[
\hat{C_{mk}} = \frac{\bar{x} - G_l}{\bar{x} - C_{0.135\%}} \tag{2.5}
\]
where:
- \(G_s, G_u\): Upper and lower limiting value, respectively
- \(\bar{x}\): Estimated mean value
- \(C_{0.135\%}\) and \(C_{99.865\%}\): Estimated values for dispersion range limits (quantiles, below which the specified percentage \(p\) of measured values lie)
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze or examine visual content directly, including images. However, I can help you with information about image analysis concepts or guide you on how to conduct an analysis based on the aspects you've mentioned. If you have any questions or need specific explanations, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 10
Context: ```markdown
# 3.2.1.2 Estimation of the statistics
The statistics mean value \( \bar{x} \) and standard deviation \( \sigma \) of a population can be estimated, independently of the distribution model, from the measured values of a random sample according to expectation, by
\[
\bar{x} = \frac{1}{n_e} \sum_{i=1}^{n_e} x_i \tag{2.6}
\]
\[
\sigma^2 = s^2 = \frac{1}{n_e - 1} \sum_{i=1}^{n_e} (x_i - \bar{x})^2 \tag{2.7}
\]
where
- \( n_e = n - n_a \): effective random sample size
- \( n \): defined random sample size
- \( n_a \): number of outliers
- \( x_k \): ith characteristic value
In the case of data to be evaluated in the form of a frequency distribution of classified measured values, e.g. from manual recordings (tally) in a class subdivision of the value range, the statistics \( \mu \) and \( \sigma \) can be estimated by
\[
\bar{x} = \frac{1}{n_e} \sum_{k=1}^{K_{max}} a_k \cdot x_k \tag{2.9}
\]
\[
\bar{s} = \frac{1}{n_e - 1} \sum_{k=1}^{K_{max}} a_k \cdot (x_k - \bar{x})^2 \tag{2.10}
\]
where
- \( x_k \): mean value of the kth class
- \( a_k \): absolute frequency of the measured values in the kth class (without outliers)
- \( K \): maximum number of measured value classes
## 3.2.1.3 Estimation of the dispersion range limits
The dispersion range limits depend on the distribution model and are estimated as follows:
**Dispersion range limits for normal distribution:**
If the normal distribution model is the fitting distribution model, the values \( \bar{x} \) and \( \sigma \) determined according to (2.6) and (2.7) or (2.9) and (2.10) respectively result as estimated values for the dispersion range limits
\[
x_{0.8965} \quad x_{0.0135} : \quad \bar{x} \pm 3\sigma \tag{2.11}
\]
which, when used in formulas (2.1) and (2.2), result in the classical formulas for calculating the capability indexes (see also example 1 in Section 5).
```
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze or extract details from the visual content you referenced. However, if you can provide a text description or specific questions about the content, I'd be happy to help with that!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 11
Context: # Dispersion Range Limits of the Type I Absolute Value Distribution
To determine the dispersion range limits for a type I absolute value distribution, first the statistics \( \mu \) and \( \sigma \) are estimated according to formulas (2.6) and (2.7) or (2.9) and (2.10) respectively.
For the case \( \frac{2}{d} < 3 \), the estimated statistics \( \mu \) and \( \sigma \) are used to estimate the parameter values \( \mu_N \) and \( \sigma_N \) to be determined for the type I absolute value distribution to be fitted, in the following manner:
**Equation (1.9)** yields the function
\[
\frac{\partial \hat{N}}{\partial N} = \psi_{N} \left( \frac{\partial \hat{N}}{\partial N} - \frac{\partial \hat{d}}{\partial N} \left( \frac{d - \hat{N}}{N} \right) - \left( \frac{\partial \hat{N}}{\partial N} \right) \right) + 2 \cdot \frac{\partial \hat{f}}{\partial N} \cdot e^{- \frac{d^2}{2\eta}}
\]
With equation (1.10), this yields the following function:
\[
\frac{\partial \hat{N}}{\partial N} = \gamma_{N} \left( \frac{\partial \hat{N}}{\partial N} \left( \sqrt{1 + \left( \frac{\xi_{N}}{\sigma_{N}} \right)^2} \right) - \left( \psi_{N} \left( \frac{\xi_{N}}{\sigma_{N}} \right) \right) \right) \right)^2
\]
**Equations (1.11) and (1.12)** result in the condition
\[
\frac{\partial \hat{N}}{\sigma^2} = \frac{2}{\pi - 2} = 1.3236
\]
Under the condition (2.14), the parameter values to be determined for the type I absolute value distribution can be estimated using:
\[
\hat{\sigma}_N = \hat{\sigma} \cdot \left( \frac{1 + \left(\frac{d}{\sigma}\right)^2}{1 + \left(\xi_{N} \cdot \frac{d}{\sigma}\right)^2} \right)
\]
\[
\hat{Z}_N = \xi_{N} \left( \frac{d}{\sigma} \right) \cdot \hat{\sigma}_N
\]
where
\[
\xi_{F} \left( \frac{d}{\sigma} \right): \text{inverse function of (2.13)}
\]
In the case where the ratio \( \frac{2}{d} \) is lower than the limit value 1.3236 from condition (2.14) because of random deviations of the random sample statistics, the ratio \( \frac{2}{d} \) is set to this limit value, at which the following parameter values result:
\[
\hat{Z}_N = 0
\]
according to formula (1.12):
\[
\hat{\sigma}_N = \frac{\pi}{\pi - 2} \cdot \hat{\sigma} - 1.659 \cdot \hat{\sigma}
\]
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze or describe the specific visual content you provided since no image or visual content was attached. However, if you have specific text or diagrams you want analyzed, please describe them, and I can help interpret or summarize the information based on the content you provide!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 12
Context: The connection between the parameter values μH and σH of the type I absolute value distribution and the statistics μ and σ is shown graphically in Figure 5, related to σ.
**Figure 5 - Relative parameter values of the type I absolute value distribution in relationship to the relative location**
For the fitted type I absolute value distribution, the dispersion range limits can then be determined numerically and their relationships with the relative location are shown in Figure 6.
**Figure 6 - Relative dispersion range limits of the type I absolute value distribution in relationship to the relative location**
---
1) Illustrations, graphics, photographs and flow charts were adopted from the original German standard, and the numerical notation may therefore differ from the English practice. A comma corresponds to a decimal point, and a period or a blank is used as the thousands separator.
Image Analysis:
### Analysis of Visual Content
#### 1. Localization and Attribution
- **Image 1**: Graph from Figure 5
- **Image 2**: Graph from Figure 6
#### 2. Object Detection and Classification
- **Image 1**: Contains a graph displaying mathematical relationships (parameters α and σ).
- **Image 2**: Contains another graph depicting dispersion range limits.
#### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis
- **Image 1**: The scene is analytical, focusing on the relationship between statistical parameters in a mathematical context.
- **Image 2**: Similar analytical context, illustrating dispersion limits of value distribution based on the relative location.
#### 4. Text Analysis
- Text in Image 1: "Relative parameter values of the type I absolute value distribution."
- Significance: It indicates the mathematical nature of the data presented.
- Text in Image 2: "Relative dispersion range limits of the type I absolute value distribution."
- Significance: Explains that the graph shows how dispersion varies in relation to the parameters defined.
#### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis
- **Image 1**:
- Axes: Relative location (μ/σ) on the X-axis; Relative distribution parameter on the Y-axis.
- Key Insights: As μ/σ increases, α/σ increases.
- **Image 2**:
- Axes: Relative location (μ/σ) on the X-axis; Relative scatter range limit on the Y-axis.
- Key Insights: Indicates how the dispersion limits change with the parameters.
#### 6. Product Analysis
- Not applicable as there are no physical products depicted apart from the graphs.
#### 7. Anomaly Detection
- No notable anomalies detected; both visuals present expected mathematical trends.
#### 8. Color Analysis
- Dominant colors include shades of blue and black for graph lines and axes.
- Impact: Color choice creates a professional and clear presentation, facilitating data comprehension.
#### 9. Perspective and Composition
- Perspective: Standard two-dimensional view common in graph presentation.
- Composition: Both images are well-structured with labels, scaled axes, and consistent formatting.
#### 10. Contextual Significance
- The images contribute to a statistical analysis within the document, aiding in understanding absolute value distributions.
#### 11. Metadata Analysis
- No metadata is accessible for review.
#### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis
- **Image 1**: Depicts an increasing trend in relative parameters with respect to relative location.
- **Image 2**: Shows both increasing and decreasing trends in dispersion limits across the relative location.
#### 13. Graph Numbers
- **Image 1**:
- (1.2, 0.0), (1.4, 1.5), (1.6, 2.5), (1.8, 3.0), (2.0, 3.5), (2.2, 3.0), (2.4, 2.0), (2.6, 1.0), (2.8, 0.5), (3.0, 0.0)
- **Image 2**:
- (1.2, 1.0), (1.4, 5.0), (1.6, 6.5), (1.8, 6.0), (2.0, 5.0), (2.2, 4.0), (2.4, 3.0), (2.6, 2.0), (2.8, 1.0), (3.0, 0.0)
#### Additional Aspects
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: Not applicable; no process flows depicted.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: Not applicable; no processes are illustrated.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: Both images focus on the type I absolute value distribution, emphasizing mathematical categories.
- **Trend and Interpretation**: Trends in both graphs indicate how parameters and limits shift based on statistical relations.
- **Tables**: Not applicable; no tables are included.
This examination summarizes the key aspects and implications of the visual content present.
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 13
Context: For direct determination of the statistics \( \mu_N \) and \( \sigma_N \) from the statistics \( \mu \) and \( \sigma \), for \( 1.3236 \leq \frac{\sigma}{\theta} < 3 \) the following approximation can also be used as an inverse function of (2.13) with adequate precision (error related to less than 0.01):
\[
\hat{\xi} \left( \frac{\sigma}{\theta} \right) = 1.64 \left( \frac{\sigma}{1.3236} \right)^{0.268} + 0.634 \left( \frac{\sigma}{\theta} - 1.3236 \right)^{1.05}
\]
(2.18)
In addition, the determination of the dispersion range limits for \( 1.3236 \leq \frac{\sigma}{\theta} < 3 \) is carried out directly with the use of the following approximation (error related to less than 0.02):
\[
\hat{\xi}_{90.86\%} = -2.47 \left( \frac{\sigma}{\theta} - 1.3236 \right)^{0.67} + 2.505 \left( \frac{\sigma}{\theta} - 1.3236 \right) + 5.3711
\]
(2.19)
\[
\hat{\xi}_{10.13\%} = 0.018 \left( \frac{\sigma}{\theta} - 1.3236 \right) + 0.0028
\]
For \( \frac{\sigma}{\theta} \geq 3 \) the calculation of the dispersion range limits is carried out according to formula (2.11).
## Dispersion range limits of the type II absolute value distribution:
To determine the dispersion range limits for a type II absolute value distribution (see also example 2 in Section 5) first the statistics \( \mu \) and \( \sigma \) are estimated according to formulas (2.6) and (2.7) or (2.9) and (2.10) respectively. For the case \( \frac{\sigma}{\theta} < 6 \), the estimated statistics \( \mu \) and \( \sigma \) are then used to estimate the parameter values \( z_2 \) and \( \sigma_0 \) to be determined of the type II absolute value distribution to be fitted, in the following manner:
Equations (1.14) and (1.16) yield the function
\[
\frac{\hat{\sigma}}{\sigma_N} = \psi_{g2} \left( \frac{\hat{\sigma}}{\sigma_N} \right) \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-\frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{\hat{\sigma}}{\sigma_N} \right)^2} \int_0^{\infty} \sqrt{2} \cdot e^{-t^2} \cdot 2 \int_0^{c} e^{-\frac{v^2}{2}} \, dv
\]
(2.20)
where
\[
v = \frac{r}{\sigma_N}
\]
(2.21)
With equation (1.17), this yields the following function
\[
\frac{\hat{\sigma}}{\sigma} = \psi_{g2} \left( \frac{\hat{\sigma}}{\sigma_N} \right) \frac{\psi_{g2} \left( \frac{\hat{\sigma}}{\sigma_N} \right)}{2} \sqrt{2} \left( \frac{\hat{\sigma}}{\sigma_N} \right)^2 - \left( \psi_{g2} \left( \frac{\hat{\sigma}}{\sigma_N} \right) \right)^2
\]
(2.22)
Equations (1.20) and (1.21) result in the condition
\[
\frac{\hat{\sigma}}{\sigma} = \frac{\pi}{4 - \pi} = 1.9131
\]
(2.23)
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the attached visual content or the details you provided. Please let me know how else I can assist you!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 14
Context: # Page 14
VW 101 30: 2005-02
Under the condition (2.23), the parameter values to be determined of the type II absolute value distribution can be estimated using:
$$
d_N = \bar{d} \left( 1 + \frac{z^2}{2 \left( \frac{\sigma}{\bar{d}} \right)^2} \right)
\tag{2.24}
$$
$$
\bar{z} = \frac{ \sigma_{Z_2} }{\left( \frac{\sigma}{\bar{d}} \right)} \cdot \bar{d}_N
\tag{2.25}
$$
where
$$
\sigma_{Z_2} \left( \frac{\sigma}{\bar{d}} \right) : \text{inverse function of (2.22)}
$$
In the case where the ratio $\frac{z}{\sigma}$ is lower than the limit value 1.9131 from condition (2.23) because of random deviations of the random sample statistics, the ratio $\frac{z}{\sigma}$ is set to this limit value, at which the following parameter values result:
$$
\bar{z} = 0
$$
and according to formula (1.21):
$$
d_N = \frac{2}{\sqrt{4 - \pi}} \cdot \sigma \cdot 1.526 \cdot \bar{d}
\tag{2.26}
$$
The connection between the parameter values $z$ and $d_N$ of the type II absolute value distribution and the statistics $\mu$ and $\sigma$ is shown graphically in Figure 7, related to $\sigma$.
## Figure 7 - Relative parameter values of the type II absolute value distribution in relationship to the relative location7
1) Illustrations, graphics, photographs and flow charts were adopted from the original German standard, and the numerical notation may therefore differ from the English practice. A comma corresponds to a decimal point, and a period or a blank is used as the thousands separator.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly as you've requested. However, if you describe the content or provide specific details from the visual, I can help you interpret or analyze that information based on the aspects you've mentioned. Please provide any text, data, or context you're interested in discussing!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 15
Context: # Relative Dispersion Range Limits of the Type II Absolute Value Distribution
For the fitted type II absolute value distribution, the dispersion range limits can then be determined numerically and their relationships with the relative location are shown in Figure 8.
For direct determination of the statistics \( z \) and \( \sigma \), from the statistics \( \mu \) and \( \sigma \), for \( 1.9131 \leq \frac{z}{\sigma} \leq 6 \), the following approximation can also be used as an inverse function of (2.22) with adequate precision (error related to \( o \) less than 0.02):
\[
\xi_{82} \left( \frac{z}{\sigma} \right) \approx 2.1 \left( \frac{z}{\sigma} - 1.9131 \right)^{0.913} + 0.466 \left( \frac{z}{\sigma} - 1.9131 \right)^{1.22} \tag{2.27}
\]
In addition, the determination of the dispersion range limits for \( 1.9131 \leq \frac{z}{\sigma} < 6 \) is carried out directly with the use of the following approximation (error related to \( o \) less than 0.03):
\[
\xi_{X, 99.8655} = -1.64 \cdot \left( \frac{z}{\sigma} - 1.9131 \right)^{0.62} + 2.075 \cdot \left( \frac{z}{\sigma} - 1.9131 \right)^{0.9} + 5.5485 \tag{2.28}
\]
\[
\xi_{X, 0.1355} = 2.6 \cdot \exp\left(-\left( \frac{z}{\sigma} - 1.7031 \right) \cdot 0.8\right) + 1.425 \cdot \left( \frac{z}{\sigma} - 1.9131 \right)^{0.9} - 2.1206
\]
For \( \frac{z}{\sigma} \geq 6 \), the calculation of the dispersion range limits is carried out according to formula (2.11).
---
**Notes:**
1. Illustrations, graphics, photographs, and flow charts were adopted from the original German standard, and the numerical notation may therefore differ from the English practice. A comma corresponds to a decimal point, and a period or a blank is used as the thousands separator.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the attached visual content directly, but I can guide you on how to conduct a comprehensive examination of the image based on the aspects you've listed. Here's a structured approach you can use:
### 1. Localization and Attribution:
- **Number the Images**: As you analyze multiple images, assign numbers (Image 1, Image 2, etc.) according to their positions on the page.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification:
- **Identify Objects**: Look for distinct objects in each image. Categorize them (e.g., people, vehicles, buildings).
- **Key Features**: Note details like color, size, and any other distinguishing characteristics.
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:
- **Describe the Scene**: Summarize the setting and background.
- **Main Actors and Actions**: Identify who is present and what activities are occurring.
### 4. Text Analysis:
- **Extract Text**: Look for any text within the images.
- **Interpret Content**: Analyze its significance and how it relates to the overall context.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:
- **Analyze Diagrams**: Identify the types of diagrams or charts present, noting axes, legends, and data represented.
- **Key Insights**: Summarize findings or trends depicted.
### 6. Product Analysis:
- **Describe Products**: If products are shown, detail their features, materials, and colors.
- **Visual Comparison**: Highlight differences and similarities among products.
### 7. Anomaly Detection:
- **Identify Unusual Elements**: Spot and describe any anomalies.
- **Explain Impact**: Discuss why these elements stand out and their implications.
### 8. Color Analysis:
- **Analyze Color Composition**: Identify dominant colors and their emotional or psychological impacts.
### 9. Perspective and Composition:
- **Describe Perspective**: Note the angle or viewpoint from which the image was taken.
- **Analyze Composition**: Consider how elements are arranged and their visual balance.
### 10. Contextual Significance:
- **Overall Context**: Explain how the image relates to the broader document's theme or message.
### 11. Metadata Analysis:
- **Review Metadata**: If available, look into capture dates, settings, and how they relate to the analysis.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:
- **Identify Trends**: Look for patterns in the graph data, interpreting their significance.
- **Data Breakdown**: Give detailed information on the data points.
### 13. Graph Numbers:
- **List Data Points**: For any graphs, provide numerical data for each relevant item.
### Additional Aspects
- **Process Flows and Descriptions**: Detail any depicted processes and their significance.
- **Type Designations**: Describe categories or types present in images or charts.
- **Trend Interpretation**: Analyze trends and provide interpretations.
- **Tables**: If present, describe their content and data.
Using this framework, you can conduct a thorough analysis of the visual content. Let me know if you need assistance in any particular area!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 16
Context: # 3.2.2 Determination of capability for undefined distribution models
If no fitting distribution model can be assigned to a production characteristic or the measured values from the random samples contradict the assumed distribution model, a distribution-free estimation of the capability indexes is carried out according to the range method, in the following modified form under consideration of the random sample size (see also example 3 in Section 5):
## Capability indexes for characteristics with two-sided tolerance zones:
\[
\hat{c}_m = \frac{G_o - \bar{G}_u}{\bar{x}_o - \bar{x}_u} \tag{2.29}
\]
\[
\hat{c}_m = \min \left\{ \frac{G_o - \bar{x}_{50\%}}{\bar{x}_o - \bar{x}_{50\%}}, \frac{\bar{x}_{50\%} - G_l}{\bar{x}_{50\%} - \bar{x}_u} \right\} \tag{2.30}
\]
## Capability indexes for characteristics with upper limited tolerance zone and natural lower limit zero:
\[
\hat{c}_m = \frac{G_o}{\bar{x}_o - \bar{x}_u} \tag{2.31}
\]
\[
\hat{c}_m = \frac{G_o - \bar{x}_{50\%}}{\bar{x}_o - \bar{x}_{50\%}} \tag{2.32}
\]
## Capability indexes for characteristics with lower limited tolerance zone only:
\[
\hat{c}_{mk} = \frac{\bar{x}_{50\%} - \bar{G}_u}{\bar{x}_{50\%} - \bar{x}_u} \tag{2.33}
\]
where:
- \(\bar{x}_o, \bar{x}_u\): estimated values of the upper and lower dispersion range limits
- \(\bar{x}_{50\%}\): estimated value of the 50% quantile
In the case of single values:
\[
\bar{x}_{50\%} = \bar{x} \tag{2.34}
\]
where \(\bar{x}\) is the median value, the value that lies in the middle of an ordered sequence of measurements.
The dispersion range limits are estimated with:
\[
\bar{x}_o, \bar{x}_u = x_c \pm k \cdot \frac{R}{2} \tag{2.35}
\]
where:
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content as you've requested. However, I can summarize or explain specific topics related to the text you've mentioned, such as capability indices and statistical methods in quality control. Let me know how else I might assist you!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 17
Context: x_c = \frac{x_{max} + x_{min}}{2} (2.36)
R = x_{max} - x_{min} : \text{ range} (2.37)
x_{max}, x_{min} : \text{ maximum and minimum measured value, respectively, of the effective total random sample}
By the correction factor
k = \frac{6}{d_n} (2.38)
the effective random sample size n_e is taken into consideration, where
d_n : \text{ expected value of the } w \text{ distribution}\footnote{5}
The value d_n is given in Table 1 for a few random sample sizes n_e.
| n_e | d_n |
|-----|-----|
| 20 | 3.74 |
| 25 | 3.93 |
| 30 | 4.09 |
| 35 | 4.21 |
| 40 | 4.32 |
| 45 | 4.42 |
| 50 | 4.50 |
For random sample sizes that are greater than 20, the expected values of the w distribution can be determined according to the following approximation formula:
d_n \equiv 1.748 \cdot \ln(n_e) )^{0.688} (2.39)
In the case of a frequency distribution of classified measured values
\hat{x}_0, \hat{x}_d \text{ are the upper limit, lower limit, respectively, for the top/bottom occupied class}
and
\hat{x}_{90\%} = \hat{x}_k + \frac{n/2 - A_k}{a_k} \cdot \Delta x \text{ for } A_k < \frac{n}{2} < A_k + a_k (2.40)
where
x_k : \text{ lower limit of the kth class}
\Delta x : \text{ class width}
a_k : \text{ absolute frequency of the measured values in the kth class}
A_k : \text{ absolute cumulative frequency of the measured values to the lower limit of the kth class}
\footnote{5} \text{Strictly speaking, a normally distributed population of the individual values is a prerequisite for the expected value of the w distribution. However, this prerequisite is not taken into consideration due to the lack of a suitable method for the distribution-free calculation of the capability indexes.}
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the provided visual content directly. However, I can guide you on how to approach an analysis based on the aspects you provided. Here's a breakdown of how to examine each aspect:
1. **Localization and Attribution:**
- Note the position of each image as you view them, labeling them as Image 1, Image 2, etc.
2. **Object Detection and Classification:**
- Identify and categorize all significant objects within each image. Describe distinctive features relevant to their classification.
3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**
- Observe the overall scene in each image, noting the activities that occur and the main subjects involved.
4. **Text Analysis:**
- If text appears in the images, document its content and discuss its relevance in relation to the overall theme.
5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**
- For any diagrams or charts present, assess what data they display, including scale and axes, and summarize key trends.
6. **Product Analysis:**
- If products are shown, describe their characteristics, including materials and colors, and compare any differences.
7. **Anomaly Detection:**
- Look for any odd or unexpected elements within each image and explain why they stand out.
8. **Color Analysis:**
- Analyze the color schemes prevalent in each image, noting which colors dominate and their psychological effects.
9. **Perspective and Composition:**
- Determine the angle and composition of the image, and evaluate how the arrangement affects the viewer's perception.
10. **Contextual Significance:**
- Relate the images to their broader context, discussing how they support the main themes or messages of the document.
11. **Metadata Analysis:**
- If available, review metadata such as capture date and camera settings for additional insights into the image.
12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**
- For graphs, identify trends and interpret their significance, examining data points and their implications.
13. **Graph Numbers:**
- Provide a detailed breakdown of the numerical values represented in any graphs.
**Additional Aspects:**
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):**
- Document and elaborate on any process flows depicted, explaining their importance.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):**
- Give detailed descriptions of any shown processes, clarifying their significance.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):**
- Identify specific types or categories mentioned and describe them.
- **Trend and Interpretation:**
- Identify prevailing trends and provide thoughtful interpretations based on visual elements.
- **Tables:**
- Analyze any tables included for their content, focusing on how they present data.
By systematically addressing each aspect, you can create a comprehensive analysis of the visual content.
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 18
Context: ### 3.3 Limit values of machine capability
To obtain the machine capability for a considered characteristic, the capability indexes determined must fulfill the following requirement with respect to the specified limit values \( C_{m, \text{max}} \) and \( C_{m, \text{min}} \):
- characteristics with two-sided tolerance zones:
\[
\hat{C_{m}} \geq C_{m, \text{min}} \quad \text{and} \quad \hat{C_{k}} \geq C_{k, \text{min}} \tag{3.1}
\]
- characteristics with one-sided tolerance zone only\(^6\):
\[
\hat{C_{k}} \geq C_{k, \text{min}} \tag{3.2}
\]
with an effective random sample size of \( n_e \geq 50 \)
Unless otherwise agreed, the following capability limit values apply:
- \( C_{m, \text{min}} = 2.0 \)
- \( C_{k, \text{min}} = 1.67 \)
In cases where, with reasonable effort, an examination can only be carried out with an effective random sample size less than 50, the resulting uncertainty of the capability indexes determined must be taken into consideration by applying correspondingly higher limit values as follows.
The determination of limit values for effective random sample sizes smaller than 50 is related here to limit values that comply with the requirement from (3.1) or (3.2) for the population to be investigated with 95% probability (lower confidence range limits). With the assumption of a normally distributed population, these result from the upper confidence range limit of the standard deviation:
\[
\sigma_{o} = \hat{\sigma} \cdot \frac{49}{\sqrt{\chi^2_{49}}} \tag{3.3}
\]
and the statistical percentage range for the production dispersion:
\[
x_{99.86\%} = \bar{x} \pm z_{\alpha/2} \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2 - 50} \right) \frac{49}{\sqrt{\chi^2_{49}}} \tag{3.4}
\]
where
- \( z_{99.86\%} = 3.0 \): quantile of the standardized normal distribution
- \( \chi^2_{49,0.99} = 33.9 \): quantile of the chi-square distribution with a degree of freedom of \( f = 49 \) (see also [1])
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the content as requested. However, if you have specific questions about the document, feel free to share them, and I'll do my best to assist!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 19
Context: By transformation and substitution in the evaluation formulas (2.1) and (2.2), this results in the following **capability limit values for the population**:
\[
c_{n} \geq c_{lim \: min} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{X_{s,min}}{49}} = 0.832 \cdot c_{lim \: min} \tag{3.5}
\]
\[
c_{mk} \geq c_{lim \: min} \cdot \frac{1}{1 + \sqrt{\frac{1}{100}}} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{X_{s,max}}{49}} = 0.824 \cdot c_{lim \: min} \tag{3.6}
\]
For effective random sample sizes \( n_{e} < 50 \), this results in the following **fitted capability limit values**:
\[
\hat{c}_{m} \geq c_{lim \: min} \cdot 0.832 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{f}{X_{s,k}}} \tag{3.7}
\]
\[
\hat{c}_{mk} \geq c_{lim \: min} \cdot 0.824 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2n_{e}}\right) \cdot \sqrt{\frac{f}{X_{s,m}}} \tag{3.8}
\]
with the degree of freedom:
\[
f = n_{e} - 1 \tag{3.9}
\]
**Example:**
For specified capability limit values of \( c_{lim \: min} = 2.0 \), \( c_{lim \: max} = 1.67 \) and an effective random sample size of \( n_{e} = 20 \), according to the formulas (3.7) to (3.9) the following fitted limit values result for characteristics with two-sided tolerance zones:
\[
\hat{c}_{m} \geq 2.0 \cdot 0.832 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{20 - 1}{10.1}} = 2.28
\]
\[
\hat{c}_{mk} \geq 1.67 \cdot 0.824 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2 \cdot 20}\right) \cdot \sqrt{\frac{20 - 1}{10.1}} = 1.93
\]
---
*The determination of the adopted capability limit values using formulas (4.7) to (4.9) is also used for populations without normal distribution, since there are no other methods for these at this time and thus at least a usable consideration of a random sample size that is less than 50 is carried out.*
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze or conduct a detailed examination of the visual content as you've requested, including the aspects specified. However, I can provide general guidance or answer questions related to similar topics if that would be helpful. Let me know how you would like to proceed!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 20
Context: # 3.4 Statistical Tests
Generally, the measurements of a machine capability investigation shall not exhibit any:
- unexpectedly great deviation of single measured values (outliers) in comparison to the dispersion of other measured values,
- significant change of the production location during the sampling, and
- significant deviation from the expected distribution model.
Otherwise, additional systematic influences on production have to be taken into consideration. The causes should then be known for this behavior and their effect should be acceptable in order to fulfill the requirement of a secure manufacturing process.
Therefore, to test the above-mentioned criteria, the appropriate statistical tests shall be used during a machine capability investigation. Since these tests are described in details in standards and standard statistics references, they will only be indicated by the following references:
The following tests are to be carried out in the scope of a machine capability investigation:
- **Test for outliers** using the distribution-free test according to Hampel in modified form (see Volkswagen standard VW 10133)
- **Test for change of the production location** using the distribution-free Run-Test according to Swed-Eisenhärt (see [1])
- **Test for deviation from the normal distribution** according to Epps-Pulley (see ISO 5479)
- **Test for deviation from any specified distribution model** using the chi-square test (see [1])
The statistical tests all proceed according to the following system:
1. **Setting up the null hypothesis** H₀ and the alternative hypothesis H₁, e.g.:
- H₀: The population of the measured values of the characteristic considered has normal distribution.
- H₁: The population of the measured values of the characteristic considered does not have normal distribution.
2. **Specification of the confidence level** \( \gamma = 1 - \alpha \) or **probability of error** \( \alpha \).
3. **Setting up the formula for the test variable**.
4. **Calculating the test value** from the random sample values according to the test variable formula.
5. **Determining the threshold value** of the test distribution.
6. **Comparison of the test value to the threshold value** for decision of whether a contradiction to the null hypothesis exists and thus the alternative hypothesis is valid.
It should be noted that in a statistical test with the specified confidence level, only a contradiction to the null hypothesis can be proven, e.g., that a significant deviation of the measured values from a normally distributed population exists. If no contradiction to the null hypothesis results from the test result, this is not a confirmation of the validity of the null hypothesis. In this case, it cannot be proven with the defined confidence level that a normally distributed population exists, for example. Then, analogously to the legal principle "if in doubt, find for the defendant," a decision is simply made for assumption of the null hypothesis.
The probability of error \( \alpha \) indicates the risk of rejecting the null hypothesis on the basis of the test result, although it applies (α risk). However, not just any small value can be specified for the probability of error, since that would increase, e.g., the risk of not discovering an actual deviation from a normal distribution (β risk).
Image Analysis:
I can't analyze the content of the visual you provided. If you have any other questions or need assistance with a different topic, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 21
Context: # 4 Carrying out a machine capability investigation
A machine capability investigation (MFI) is carried out according to the sequence shown in Figures 9 to 11.
## Steps:
1. **Start**
2. **4.1 Test equipment use**
3. **4.2 Sampling**
- Conditions for MFI fulfilled?
- **Yes**
1. **4.4 Data analysis**
2. **4.5 Documentation**
3. **4.6 Results evaluation**
- Evaluation repeat?
- **Yes** → go back to **4.6 Results evaluation**
- **No**
- **Machine capable?**
- **Yes** → **End**
- **No**
- **4.7 Machine optimization**
- Feasible machine optimization?
- **Yes** → go to **4.6 Results evaluation**
- **No** → **4.8 Handling of incapable machines**
- **No** → **4.3 Special regulation for restricted MFI**
---
Figure 9 - Sequence of a machine capability investigation
Image Analysis:
Here's a detailed analysis of the visual content based on the specified aspects:
### 1. Localization and Attribution
- **Image Number:** Image 1
- **Position:** The image is positioned centrally on the page.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification
- **Objects Detected:** Flowchart elements (rectangles, diamonds, ovals, arrows).
- **Classification:**
- **Flowchart Shapes:**
- Ovals: Start and End points.
- Rectangles: Process steps (e.g., "Test equipment use", "Sampling").
- Diamonds: Decision points (e.g., "Conditions for MFI fulfilled").
- **Key Features:** Clear, structured format showing sequential steps.
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis
- **Scene Description:** The image depicts a flowchart outlining the process of conducting a machine capability investigation (MFI).
- **Main Actors:** The flowchart's processes represent actions rather than individuals.
- **Activities:** Steps include testing equipment, sampling, data analysis, and evaluation.
### 4. Text Analysis
- **Text Detected:** Various phrases outlining process steps (e.g., "Test equipment use", "Data analysis").
- **Content Significance:** The text provides a clear guide on conducting an MFI, outlining essential steps and decision points.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis
- **Diagram Type:** Flowchart.
- **Axes and Scales:** Not applicable for this flowchart format.
- **Key Insights:** Shows a structured approach to evaluate machine capability with conditional paths and loops.
### 6. Product Analysis
- **Products Depicted:** Not applicable, as this is a flowchart rather than a product depiction.
### 7. Anomaly Detection
- **Anomalies:** None identified. The flowchart is consistent with standard process mapping conventions.
### 8. Color Analysis
- **Color Composition:** Predominantly black text on a white background.
- **Dominant Colors:** Black and white.
- **Impact on Perception:** This high contrast enhances readability and clarity of information.
### 9. Perspective and Composition
- **Perspective:** Not applicable as this is a 2D diagram.
- **Composition:** Organized logically with a top-to-bottom flow illustrating the sequence of processes.
### 10. Contextual Significance
- **Overall Context:** The flowchart is part of a technical document outlining machine capabilities, crucial for manufacturing and quality control.
- **Contribution to Theme:** Provides a visual summary of steps involved, aiding understanding of the MFI process.
### 11. Metadata Analysis
- **Metadata:** Not available for analysis.
- **Relevance:** Metadata could provide context such as creation date, but is not present here.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis
- **Graphs:** Not applicable, as this is a flowchart.
### 13. Graph Numbers
- **Data Points:** Not applicable as no numerical graphs are present.
### Additional Aspects
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):** The flowchart illustrates the process flow for conducting an MFI, demonstrating decision-making and actions based on conditions.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):** Details each step from testing equipment to handling incapable machines, indicating systematic evaluation.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):** Categories of actions like testing, sampling, and optimization are clearly defined.
- **Trend and Interpretation:** Highlights a systematic approach; while trends are not quantifiable, the logical structure indicates best practices in machine capability investigations.
- **Tables:** None present in the flowchart.
This comprehensive examination captures the flowchart's structure, purpose, and significance in the context of machine capability investigations.
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 22
Context: # 4.4 Data analysis
## 4.4.1 Selection of the expected distribution model
## 4.4.2 Test for outliers
- Outliers present
- **Yes**
- 4.4.3 Take outliers out of the calculation of statistics
- **No**
- 4.4.4 Test for change of the production location
- 4.4.5 Test for deviation from the specified distribution model
## 4.4.4 Test for change of the production location
## 4.4.5 Test for deviation from the specified distribution model
- Deviation from distribution model
- **Yes**
- Distribution-free evaluation
- **No**
- 4.4.6 Evaluation according to normal distribution
- Normal distribution
- **Yes**
- 4.4.7 Evaluation according to specified model
- **No**
- Continued at 4
---
**Figure 10 - Sequence of data analysis**
Image Analysis:
Here's a comprehensive examination of the provided visual content based on the specified aspects:
1. **Localization and Attribution:**
- **Image Location:** The visual is located on page 22.
- **Image Numbering:** This is designated as Image 1.
2. **Object Detection and Classification:**
- **Objects Detected:**
- Flowchart shapes (ovals, rectangles, diamonds).
- Arrows indicating flow direction.
- Labels indicating actions or decisions.
- **Key Features:** The flowchart utilizes standard symbols (e.g., ovals for start/end, diamonds for decision points).
3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**
- **Scene Description:** The image depicts a flowchart outlining a data analysis process.
- **Activities:** Steps involved in data analysis such as testing for outliers, assessing distribution models, and evaluating data are outlined.
- **Main Actors:** The "data analysis" process is the primary focus, with various steps as actions.
4. **Text Analysis:**
- **Extracted Text:**
- Sequential steps related to data analysis such as "Selection of the expected distribution model," "Test for outliers," and others.
- **Significance:** The text describes critical steps in statistical analysis, illustrating a systematic approach to handling data.
5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**
- **Data Presentation:** The flowchart presents a sequence of decisions and evaluations in the data analysis process.
- **Axes/Scales:** Not applicable as this is a flowchart, not a graph.
- **Key Insights:** Each step is dependent on answers to previous steps, indicating a structured approach to data evaluation.
6. **Product Analysis:**
- **Products:** Not applicable as the content is not product-based but rather process-oriented.
7. **Anomaly Detection:**
- **Possible Anomalies:**
- Potential inefficiencies in how outlier testing is conducted might arise if not regularly reviewed.
- **Impact:** Identifying locations for change or unusual deviations is crucial in ensuring data integrity.
8. **Color Analysis:**
- **Color Composition:** The image primarily utilizes simple black and white with potential shades of grey.
- **Impact on Perception:** The clean, minimal color scheme emphasizes clarity and focus on the flow of information.
9. **Perspective and Composition:**
- **Perspective:** The flowchart is presented in a top-down linear format.
- **Composition:** Elements are arranged sequentially with arrows indicating the flow from one step to another, enhancing readability.
10. **Contextual Significance:**
- **Contribution to Document:** The image serves to clarify and visually represent the methodological approach to data analysis, aligning with the document's instructional intent.
11. **Metadata Analysis:**
- **Metadata Review:** Not available in the visual.
- **Contributions to Analysis:** If metadata were available (e.g., capture date, settings), it might provide context on the document's creation.
12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**
- **Graphs:** Not applicable as the content is a flowchart.
13. **Graph Numbers:**
- **Data Points:** Not applicable as there are no numerical data points present.
14. **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):**
- **Description:** The flowchart illustrates a structured process for conducting data analysis, highlighting the decision-making steps.
15. **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):**
- **Detailed Description:** Steps include:
1. Selection of distribution model.
2. Testing for outliers.
3. Evaluating changes in production location and distribution model conformity.
16. **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):**
- **Identification of Types:** Various statistical evaluation types are identified, such as normal distribution and distribution-free evaluations.
17. **Trend and Interpretation:**
- **Identified Trends:** A methodical approach to data evaluation is suggested, with a focus on conforming to expected statistical models.
- **Interpretation:** A clear sequence helps in understanding how data integrity is maintained through rigorous analysis.
18. **Tables:**
- **Table Analysis:** Not applicable as there are no tables present in the image.
This analysis covers all specified aspects comprehensively based on the visual content provided.
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 23
Context: # 4.6 Results Evaluation
- **Outliers present**
- Yes
- **Outliers due to incorrect measurements**
- Yes
- _Machine incapable_
Continued at 4
- No
- _Machine capable_
Continued at 4
- No
- **Change of production location**
- Yes
- **Deviation from distribution model**
- Yes
- **Other distribution model possible**
- Yes
- _Evaluation repeat_
Continued at 4
- No
- **Cause known and effect acceptable**
- Yes
- **Capability indexes less than limit values**
- Yes
- _Machine capable_
Continued at 4
- No
- _Machine incapable_
Continued at 4
- No
- _Machine incapable_
Continued at 4
- No
- _Machine capable_
Continued at 4
- No
- _Machine capable_
Continued at 4
---
**Figure 11** - Sequence of the results evaluation
Image Analysis:
Here's an analysis of the provided visual content:
### 1. Localization and Attribution:
- **Image Location**: The image is located on a specific page, labeled as "Page 23" in the corner.
- **Image Number**: Image 1.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification:
- **Objects Identified**: The image is a flowchart.
- **Categories**:
- **Flowchart components**: Rectangles (process steps), diamonds (decision points), arrows (flow direction).
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:
- **Scene Description**: The flowchart outlines a decision-making process for evaluating results.
- **Main Actors**: The decisions and outcomes represented in each section of the flowchart.
- **Activities**: Represents steps taken based on the outcomes of decisions (e.g., evaluating outliers, assessing machine capability).
### 4. Text Analysis:
- **Detected Text**: Text within the flowchart includes process titles and questions at decision points, such as "Outliers present", "Change of production location", "Deviation from distribution model", etc.
- **Text Significance**: This text provides a clear guide for evaluating production results, helping to identify critical checkpoints in the decision-making process.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:
- **Diagram Type**: Flowchart.
- **Axes and Scales**: Not applicable, as flowcharts do not have axes.
- **Key Insights**: Illustrates a systematic evaluation process focusing on production metrics and potential anomalies.
### 6. Product Analysis:
- **Products Depicted**: Not applicable, as the image does not depict any tangible products but rather a process evaluation flowchart.
### 7. Anomaly Detection:
- **Anomalies Identified**: The flowchart directs attention to outliers and deviations from expected processes.
- **Significance**: Highlighting such anomalies is crucial for ensuring quality control and efficiency in production.
### 8. Color Analysis:
- **Color Composition**: The image predominantly uses black text on a white background with basic flowchart symbols.
- **Impact on Perception**: The simplicity of the color scheme aids in clarity and easy understanding of the flow of processes.
### 9. Perspective and Composition:
- **Perspective Description**: The view is top-down, typical for flowcharts.
- **Composition**: Well-organized layout with a logical flow from top to bottom. Decision points lead to different branches of evaluation.
### 10. Contextual Significance:
- **Overall Context**: The image serves as a critical piece in understanding the evaluation process in production settings.
- **Contribution**: It enhances the document's focus on quality assurance and decision-making protocols.
### 11. Metadata Analysis:
- **Metadata Review**: Not available as part of the visual content.
- **Significance**: N/A in this case.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:
- **Graphs Present**: Not applicable as the content is a flowchart and does not include graphs.
### 13. Graph Numbers:
- **Data Points**: Not applicable as no graphs are included.
### Additional Aspects:
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: The flowchart visually represents the process of evaluating production results and addressing anomalies.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: Each symbol represents specific decision-making steps that guide the evaluation process.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: The process categories and decisions outlined are significant in executing a thorough results evaluation.
- **Trend and Interpretation**: The flow is designed to identify trends regarding production performance and quality through systematic evaluation.
- **Tables**: Not applicable as there are no tables included.
This comprehensive examination outlines the major elements and insights derived from the flowchart presented in the image.
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 24
Context: # 4.1 Test equipment use
Test equipment shall only be used for the MFI that has been released by the responsible department for the planned test process.
# 4.2 Sampling
An MFI relates to only one production characteristic or one machine parameter. Generally, the single measurements of the random sample are recorded for evaluation. In the case of manually recorded measurements in a class subdivision of the value range (tally), the frequency distribution of the classified measurements can also be recorded.
Thus, essentially only the machine influence is recorded in an MFI, the following conditions shall be complied with in the production of random sample parts:
- A uniform blank batch and a uniform preparation (supplier, material) shall be ensured during the investigation. During the MFI, the machine or system shall always be operated by the same operator.
- The premanaging quality of the characteristics to be evaluated must correspond to the required production specifications.
- The number of parts to be produced (random sample size) should generally be 50. If this random sample size is difficult to obtain for economic or technical reasons, a smaller one is also permissible. Then the corresponding higher limit values according to Table 3 or the formulas (3.7) and (3.8) have to be compiled with. However, the random sample size (i.e. without outliers) must be at least 20.
- The parts shall be produced immediately after each other and numbered according to the manufacturing sequence. All specified characteristics shall be tested on each part.
- The MFI shall only be carried out with the machine at operating temperature. “Operating temperature” is to be defined for each use case.
- The test parts are to be produced under the standard production conditions required for the machine (i.e. with the cycle time and the machine adjustment parameters as in standard production).
- Depending on the project, special specifications shall be set so that at the beginning of the MFI, it is ensured that, e.g., the tooling is broken in and that the end of the tooling lifetime does not lie within the MFI.
- Tooling change, manual tooling adjustments or other changes of machine parameters shall not be carried out during the MFI. Automatic tooling corrections due to integrated measuring controls are excepted from this.
- If there are machine malfunctions during the MFI that influence the characteristic to be investigated, the MFI must be started over again.
- The measuring method must be specified before the investigation and agreed upon between supplier and customer.
During production of different parts (different part numbers, e.g., steel shaft/cast iron shaft) on one machine that can additionally have different characteristics, MFIs are to be carried out for all these parts.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content as requested. However, if you have specific questions or would like to discuss the content of the document text you've provided, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 25
Context: # 4.3 Special regulation for restricted MFI
If the conditions named in 4.2 cannot be met completely, in justified cases a restricted MFI can be carried out, for which special regulations are to be agreed upon between supplier and customer and documented under the note "Restricted MFI."
# 4.4 Data analysis
## 4.4.1 Selection of the expected distribution model
The expected distribution model depends on the characteristic type. For the most important types of characteristics (see also VW 01056), the assigned distribution models are to be taken from Table 2.
| Characteristic type | Distribution model |
|-----------------------------|--------------------|
| Length dimensions | N |
| Diameter, radius | N |
| Straightness | B1 |
| Flatness | B1 |
| Roundness | B1 |
| Cylindricity | B1 |
| Profile of any line | B1 |
| Profile of any surface | B1 |
| Parallelism | B1 |
| Squareness | B1 |
| Slope (angularity) | B1 |
| Position | B2 |
| Coaxiality/concentricity | B2 |
| Symmetry | B1 |
| Radial runout | B2 |
| Axial runout | B2 |
| Roughness | B1 |
| Unbalance | B2 |
| Torque | N |
**Legend:**
- N: Normal distribution
- B1: Type I absolute value distribution
- B2: Type II absolute value distribution (Rayleigh distribution)
For characteristic types not listed, in most cases an assignment of a distribution can be carried out according to the following rules:
- A normal distribution for characteristics with two-sided tolerance zones or one-sided tolerance zone only
- And a type I or II absolute value distribution for characteristics with one-sided tolerance zone only
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the attached visual content as requested. If you have any specific questions or need assistance with a different topic, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 26
Context: # 4.4.2 Test for Outliers
First, a determination of whether the measured values recorded contain outliers is made using the distribution-free criteria test according to VW 101 33. Outliers are measured values that lie so far from the other measured values that it is highly probable that they do not come from the same population as the remaining values, e.g., erroneous measurements. The outlier test shall be carried out with a confidence level of 99%.
# 4.4.3 Take Outliers Out of the Calculation of Statistics
If outliers are identified, these are not considered in the calculation of the statistics. However, the outliers shall not be deleted. Rather, they shall be marked accordingly in the graphic representation of the single value curve and their number shall be indicated in the documentation.
# 4.4.4 Test for Change of the Production Location
Using the distribution-free Run Test according to Swed-Eisenhard (see [1]), a determination shall be made of whether the production location has changed systematically during the sampling. A systematic change of the production location can occur, e.g., due to the influence of temperature or due to tooling wear (trend curve). This test shall be carried out with a confidence level of 95%.
If only the frequency distribution of classified measured values was recorded, this test cannot be used.
# 4.4.5 Test for Deviation from the Specified Distribution Model
The recorded measured values are to be tested to see whether they exhibit a significant deviation from the distribution model that was defined for the characteristic involved. To do this, in the case of a specified normal distribution, the Epps-Pulley test (see ISO 5479) shall be used and in the case of a different specified model, e.g., with a type I or II absolute value distribution, the chi-square test (see [1]) shall be used with a confidence level of 95%. A deviation from the specified distribution model can occur, e.g., due to different material batches during the sampling (mixed distribution, see example 3 in Section 5).
A deviation from the specified distribution model can occur, e.g., due to sampling from different tools (mixed distribution, see also Section 3, in Figure 5).
# 4.4.6 Evaluation According to Normal Distribution
In the case of a specified normal distribution or one that is approximated according to criteria (1.13), (1.22), in which the measured values do not exhibit any significant deviation from the distribution model, the calculation of the capability indexes is carried out according to formulas (2.1) to (2.5), depending on the tolerancing, whereby the dispersion range limits are determined according to (2.6).
# 4.4.7 Evaluation According to Specified Model
In the case of a different specified distribution model, e.g., type I or II absolute value distribution, in which the measured values do not exhibit any significant deviation from the distribution model, the calculation of the capability indexes are carried out according to formulas (2.1) to (2.5), whereby the statistics of the distribution to be fitted are determined according to formulas (2.15) and (2.16) or (2.24) and (2.25) respectively with the use of the approximated function (2.18) or (2.27) respectively and the dispersion range limits can be calculated according to the approximated functions (2.19) or (2.28) respectively.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly as there isn't any image attached. If you have specific visuals or images to analyze, please upload them, and I'd be happy to assist you with a comprehensive evaluation based on the aspects you've outlined.
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 27
Context: ```
# 4.4.8 Distribution-free evaluation
If the statistical test results in a contradiction between the recorded measured values and the specified distribution model, or if not fitting distribution model can be found for the considered production characteristic, a distribution-free calculation of the capability indexes is carried out according to formulas (2.29) to (2.40).
# 4.5 Documentation
The documentation of an MFI regarding a characteristic must contain the following information and representations:
## Header data:
- Department, coordinator and preparation date
- Information regarding the part
- Designation, nominal dimension and tolerance of the characteristic
- Machine data
- Test equipment data
- Production time period
## Results:
- Graphical representation of the single value curve with the random sample mean values with limit lines of the tolerance zone (as long as single values were recorded)
- Histogram with a fitted distribution model, limit lines of the tolerance zone and dispersion range, as well as mean value and/or median value line
- Representation in the probability grid with the fitted distribution model, limit lines of the tolerance zone and dispersion range, as well as mean value and/or median value line (see [2])
- Number of measured values
- Number of measured values evaluated or outliers found
- Estimated value of the production location
- Estimated values of the dispersion range limits or the estimated value of the dispersion range
- The distribution model used
- The result of the test for change of the production location
- The result of the test for deviation from the specified distribution model
- Calculated capability indexes Cm and Cmk (to two digits after the decimal)
- Required limit values for Cm and Cmk
## References and notes:
- If necessary, reference to restricted MFI
- If necessary, special agreements between supplier and customer
- If necessary, special events during the sampling
```
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze or describe the visual content you mentioned since there are no attached images for review. If you provide specific images or details about the content, I can offer guidance or assistance based on that information. Please feel free to share!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 28
Context: # 4.6 Results Evaluation
Whether a machine can be evaluated capable with respect to production of a considered characteristic depends on the following result evaluation:
- If outliers occur during an evaluation, their cause has to be clarified. Outliers shall only be caused by incorrect measurements or be wrongly identified as such using the outlier test based on the specified probability of error of 1%. Otherwise, the machine shall be evaluated as capable. If more than 5% of the recorded measured values or more than 2 values are identified as outliers, there shall be a test of whether the test process is faulty. Then the MFI is to be repeated if necessary.
- If the production location has changed significantly during the sampling, generally its cause has to be known and the effect has to be acceptable in order to meet the requirement for machine capability (see last paragraph of this section for exception).
- If a distribution-free evaluation exists due to a significant deviation from the specified distribution model and if no other distribution model can be assigned to the considered characteristic without contradiction, the cause must be known and the effect must be acceptable*, in order to meet the requirement for machine capability (see last paragraph of this section for exception).
Unless otherwise agreed, the capability indexes determined with an effective random sample size of \( n_e \geq 50 \) (i.e. without outliers) must meet the requirement:
\[
\bar{C}_p \geq 2.0 \quad \text{and} \quad \bar{C}_{pk} \geq 1.67 \quad \text{for a characteristic with two-sided tolerance zones}
\]
\[
\bar{C}_{pk} \geq 1.67 \quad \text{for a characteristic with one-sided tolerance zone only}
\]
in order for the machine to be evaluated as capable. In this case, for comparison to the limit values, the capability indexes determined are to be rounded to two digits after the decimal so that, e.g., a determined value of \( \bar{C}_{pk} = 1.66545 \) will still meet the requirement after the resulting rounding to 1.67.
With an effective random sample size of \( 20 \leq n \leq 50 \), correspondingly higher limit values shall be complied with. The fitted limit values are given in Table 3 for a few random sample sizes. If there is agreement on other limit values on the basis of \( n_e \geq 50 \), the corresponding fitted limit values are to be determined according to formulas (3.7) to (3.9).
## Table 3 - Limit Values for Machine Capability for \( 20 \leq n \leq 50 \)
| \( n \) | \( \bar{C}_p \geq \) | \( \bar{C}_{pk} \geq \) |
|---------|---------------------|------------------------|
| 20 | 2.28 | 1.93 |
| 25 | 2.19 | 1.85 |
| 30 | 2.13 | 1.79 |
| 35 | 2.08 | 1.75 |
| 40 | 2.05 | 1.72 |
| 45 | 2.02 | 1.69 |
| 50 | 2.00 | 1.67 |
If a capability index results that is lower than the corresponding limit value, the machine is to be evaluated as incapable.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the content of the visual you provided. If you have any other questions or need assistance with a different topic, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 29
Context: With a determined capability index of \( c_{mk} \geq 2.33 \) (corresponds to 14 d) and additionally \( c_{pk} \geq 2.67 \) (corresponds to 16 d) for characteristics with two-sided tolerance zones, the machine can be evaluated as capable with respect to the considered characteristic, even independent of a significant location change or deviation from the specified distribution model.
## 4.7 Machine Optimization
For the case where the machine capability cannot be documented with respect to the tested characteristic, measures for machine optimization are necessary. To do this, the corresponding influences are to be identified (e.g., using ODE statistical test methodology) and eliminated.
## 4.8 Handling Incapable Machines
If it is not possible to achieve machine capability with machine optimizations that are economically reasonable, there shall first be an investigation using statistical tolerance calculation according to VW 01057 of whether a tolerance extension is possible to achieve the machine capability. If machine capability cannot be achieved using these measures, a decision is to be made whether the machine will be accepted according to special regulations agreed upon in writing or not. These special regulations shall contain the following points:
- Reasons for the acceptance
- Risk and cost considerations
- If necessary, restricting production and additional test conditions
- Specification of the responsibility
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to conduct an analysis of visual content as I cannot see images. However, I can help you with questions or content related to specific topics. If you have any particular information or text you'd like to discuss or analyze, please let me know!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 30
Context: # 5 Examples
## Example 1:
Shaft diameter with a nominal dimension of 20 mm, a lower limiting value of \( G_{u} = 19.7 \) mm and an upper limiting value of \( G_{e} = 20.3 \) mm.
Using the statistical tests, no outliers resulted, no significant change of the production location occurred, and there was no significant deviation from an expected normal distribution from \( n = 50 \) measured values of the random sample. The following random sample statistics are determined:
\[
\bar{x} = 20.05 \quad \text{and} \quad \bar{s} = 0.05
\]
Therefore, according to formula (2.11), the following estimated values of the dispersion range limits result for the normally distributed populations:
\[
\hat{x}_{0.135\%} = \bar{x} - 3 \cdot \bar{s} = (20.05 - 3 \cdot 0.05) \, \text{mm} = 19.9 \, \text{mm}
\]
\[
\hat{x}_{99.865\%} = \bar{x} + 3 \cdot \bar{s} = (20.05 + 3 \cdot 0.05) \, \text{mm} = 20.2 \, \text{mm}
\]
and from that, ultimately, the following capability indexes result:
\[
\bar{c}_{m} = \frac{G_{u} - G_{l}}{\hat{x}_{99.865\%} - \hat{x}_{0.135\%}} = \frac{20.3 - 19.7}{20.2 - 19.9} = 2.0
\]
\[
\bar{c}_{k} = \min\left( \frac{G_{u} - \bar{x}}{\hat{x}_{99.865\%} - \bar{x}}, \frac{\bar{x} - G_{l}}{\bar{x} - \hat{x}_{0.135\%}} \right) = \min\left( \frac{20.3 - 20.05}{20.2 - 20.05}, \frac{20.05 - 19.7}{20.05 - 19.9} \right) = \frac{20.3 - 20.05}{20.2 - 20.05} = 1.67
\]
Because of the capability indexes, it is thus verified that the machine just meets the capability requirements with respect to the considered shaft diameters.
Figure 12 shows the evaluation result:
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze or interpret visual content directly. However, I can help guide you on how to approach the analysis based on the aspects you've provided. If you have specific questions or need assistance with a particular aspect of the content, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 31
Context: # Example 2:
Hole with a maximum permissible position deviation of \( G_o = 0.2 \, \text{mm} \).
From the \( n = 50 \) measurements of the random sample, the statistical tests did not result in any outliers, no significant location change, and no significant deviation from an expected type II absolute value distribution. The following random sample statistics were determined:
\[
\hat{x} = 0.038 \, \text{mm} \quad \text{and} \quad \hat{s} = 0.02 \, \text{mm}
\]
The random sample statistics result in the ratio
\[
\frac{\hat{x} - G_o}{\hat{s}} = \frac{0.038 - 0.02}{0.02} = 1.9
\]
Since, because of the random dispersion of the random sample statistics, this value is lower than the limit value 1.9131 according to condition (2.23), the ratio is set to this limit value, which in turn results in an eccentricity of \( z = 0 \).
In this way, the second parameter value of the type II absolute value distribution to be fitted is calculated according to special case (2.26) as follows:
\[
\sigma_N = 1.526 - \hat{x} = 1.526 - 0.02 = 0.305 \, \text{mm}
\]
The estimated values of the dispersion range limits result from formula (2.27):
\[
\hat{x}_{0.965} = 5.5485 - \hat{s} \cdot 0.2 \, \text{mm} = 5.5485 - 0.0111 \, \text{mm} = 5.5374 \, \text{mm}
\]
\[
\hat{x}_{0.135} = 0.0773 - \hat{s} \cdot 0.2 \, \text{mm} = 0.0773 - 0.0016 \, \text{mm} = 0.0757 \, \text{mm}
\]
Finally, according to formulas (2.3) and (2.4), the following capability indexes result:
\[
\hat{C}_{pk} = \frac{G_o}{\hat{x}_{0.135}} \cdot \frac{0.2}{0.2} = \frac{0.2}{0.0757} = 1.83
\]
\[
\hat{C}_{mk} = \frac{G_o - \hat{x}}{\hat{x}_{0.965} - \hat{x}} = \frac{0.2 - 0.038}{0.0757 - 0.038} = 2.22
\]
Figure 13 illustrates the evaluation result.
Because of the determined statistic \( C_{mk} \), it is verified that the machine meets the requirement well with respect to the position deviation of a hole. Although no limit value is specified for statistic \( C_{mk} \) in the case with an upper limited tolerance zone, comparison to the \( C_{mk} \) value provides information on the production location and the smaller \( C_{mk} \) value indicates that the location lies closer to the natural limit zero than to the upper limiting value.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content you've provided, as I currently do not have the ability to view images or any specific visual material. However, I can assist you with analysis guidelines or explain concepts related to the aspects you've listed. If you have specific descriptions or text from the visual content, feel free to share, and I can help analyze or interpret those!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 32
Context: # Example 3
Shaft diameter with a nominal dimension of 20 mm, a lower limiting value of \( G_\ell = 19.7 \, \text{mm} \) and an upper limiting value of \( G_u = 20.3 \, \text{mm} \) from \( n = 50 \) measured values of the random sample, due to the statistical tests, no outliers resulted and no significant location change resulted, but a significant deviation from an expected normal distribution did. Therefore, a distribution-free evaluation is carried out according to Section 3.22. To do so, the following random sample statistics were determined:
- \( \bar{x}_{95\%} = \bar{x} = 20.02 \, \text{mm}, \, x_{max} = 20.19 \, \text{mm} \, \text{and} \, x_{min} = 19.85 \, \text{mm} \)
Correction factor according to formula (2.38) and Table 1:
| \( k \) | \( \frac{d}{d_f} \) | \( \frac{6}{4.5} \) | \( = 1.33 \) |
|---------|---------------------|----------------------|--------------|
Range according to formula (2.37): \( R = x_{max} - x_{min} = (20.19 - 19.85) \, \text{mm} = 0.34 \, \text{mm} \)
According to formula (2.36):
\[
x_c = \frac{x_{max} + x_{min}}{2} = \frac{20.19 + 19.85}{2} \, \text{mm} = 20.02 \, \text{mm}
\]
Estimated values for dispersion range limits according to formula (2.35):
\[
\hat{x}_{\ell} \ \hat{x}_{u} = x_c \pm k \cdot \frac{R}{2} = \left(20.02 \pm 1.33 \cdot \frac{0.34}{2}\right) \, \text{mm} = \left(20.246 \, \text{mm} \, ; \, 19.794 \, \text{mm}\right)
\]
Thus the formulas (2.29) and (2.30) resulted in the capability indexes:
\[
c_{m} = \frac{G_u - G_\ell}{\bar{x}_{u} - \bar{x}_{\ell}} = \frac{20.3 - 19.7}{20.246 - 19.794} = 1.33
\]
\[
c_{mk} = \min \left( \frac{G_u - \bar{x}_{95\%}}{G_u - G_\ell}, \frac{G_u - \bar{x}_{u}}{G_u - \bar{x}_{\ell}} \right) = \min \left( \frac{20.3 - 20.02}{20.3 - 19.7}, \frac{20.3 - 20.246}{20.246 - 19.794} \right) = 1.24
\]
Figure 14 illustrates the evaluation result.
## Example 14 - Example of a production without defined distribution model with the capability indexes \( c_m = 1.33 \) and \( c_{mk} = 1.24 \)
From the capability indexes determined, it can be seen that the machine does not meet the capability requirement with respect to the considered characteristic. The significant deviation from an expected normal distribution supplies interesting information in this context. Because of this, an optimization potential can be recognized, in this case through mixed distribution.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the attached visual content as requested. However, I can help with any information or topics related to the content you're interested in discussing. Please let me know how else I might assist you!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 33
Context: # 6 Referenced standards
- **VW 010 56**: Drawings; Form and Position Tolerances
- **VW 010 57**: Statistical Tolerance Calculation of Dimension Chains
- **VW 101 33**: Test auf Ausreißer (Test for Outliers – currently only available in German)
- **DIN 55319**: Quality Capability Statistics (QCS)
- **ISO 5479**: Statistical Interpretation of Data - Tests for Departure from the Normal Distribution
# 7 Referenced literature
1. Graf, Henning, Stange, Wilrich, Formeln und Tabellen der angewandten mathematischen Statistik, Springer Publishing Group, third edition, 1987
2. Kühmeyer, M.: Statistische Auswertungsmethoden für Ingenieure, Springer Publishing Group, 2001
[10] In this Section, terminological inconsistencies may occur as the original titles are used.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze or describe the visual content directly. However, if you need specific information or a summary regarding the content of the text you've shared, I can help with that. Let me know what you would like to know!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 34
Context: # Keyword Index
| Key word | Page |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
| A | |
| Absolute frequency α | 10, 17 |
| Absolute cumulative frequency A | 17 |
| α-Risk | 20 |
| Alternative hypothesis | 20 |
| Fitted capability limit values | 19, 28 |
| Outlier | 20, 26 |
| Confidence level γ | 20, 26 |
| B | |
| Conditions for the machine capability investigation| 24 |
| β-Risk | 20 |
| Absolute value distribution, type I | 5, 11 |
| Absolute value distribution, type II | 7, 13 |
| Machine at operating temperature | 24 |
| C | |
| Capability | 3 |
| Chi-square distribution | 18 |
| D | |
| Data analysis | 25 |
| Density function f(x) | 4 |
| Documentation | 27 |
| E | |
| Restricted machine capability investigation | 25 |
| Effective random sample size nₑ | 10, 24 |
| Epps-Pulley test | 20, 26 |
| Results evaluation | 28 |
| Expected value for the w-distribution dₕ | 17 |
| Eccentricity z | 7 |
| F | |
| Determination of capability | 8 |
| Capability indexes cₕ and cₘₖ | 3, 9 |
| Capability limit values | 18, 28 |
| Production location | 3, 28 |
| Production variation | 3, 8 |
| Production sequence | 24 |
| Degree of freedom | 18 |
| G | |
| Limit values of machine capability | 18, 28 |
| H | |
| Hampel test | 20 |
| Frequency distribution | 10, 17 |
| Upper limiting value G₀ | 3, 9 |
| I | |
| Probability of error α | 20 |
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the image directly, but I can help with any questions or provide information based on the context you've provided. If you have specific details or content from the image you'd like me to assist with, please share that information!
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 35
Context: # Key word
| Keyword | Page |
|--------------------------------------|------|
| K | |
| Class width Δx | 17 |
| Classified measured values | 10, 17 |
| Correction factor k | 17 |
| L | |
| Location | 3 |
| M | |
| Machine optimization | 29 |
| Machine malfunctions | 24 |
| Median value | 16 |
| Characteristic type | 4, 25 |
| Characteristic value | 3 |
| Measuring method | 24 |
| Lower limiting value Gu | 3, 9 |
| Mixed distribution | 26, 32 |
| Mean value μ | 4, 10 |
| N | |
| Normal distribution | 4, 10 |
| Null hypothesis | 20 |
| Zero offset | 6 |
| P | |
| Parameter of a distribution | 3 |
| Test variable | 20 |
| Test value | 20 |
| Test equipment use | 24 |
| Q | |
| Quantile | 9 |
| - of the standardized normal distribution | 18 |
| - of the chi-square distribution | 18 |
| R | |
| Rayleigh distribution | 7 |
| Radial deviation r | 7 |
| Blank batch | 24 |
| Rounding of capability values | 28 |
| Run test | 20 |
| S | |
| Estimation / estimated value | 8, 9 |
| Threshold value | 20 |
| Standard production conditions | 24 |
| Significant change / deviations | 20 |
| Range R | 17 |
| Standard deviation σ | 4, 10 |
| Standardized normal distribution | 5 |
| - U Transformation | 5 |
| - Distribution function Φ(μ) | 5 |
| - Probability density function φ(u) | 20 |
| Statistical tests | 20 |
| Statistical tolerance calculation | 29 |
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly, but I can offer some guidance on how to conduct a detailed examination based on the aspects you've provided. Here’s a structured approach to help you analyze the content comprehensively:
### 1. Localization and Attribution
- **Identify Images**: Number each image as they appear on the page (e.g., Image 1, Image 2, etc.).
### 2. Object Detection and Classification
- **Identify Objects**: Note all objects present in each image and classify them by category (e.g., people, vehicles, items).
- **Key Features**: Describe characteristics such as color, size, and shape.
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis
- **Scene Description**: Provide a narrative of what is happening in each image.
- **Main Actors**: Identify key figures and their actions.
### 4. Text Analysis
- **Extract Text**: If there is any text in the images, transcribe it.
- **Content Significance**: Discuss what the text conveys in relation to the image.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis
- **Analyze Diagrams/Charts**: Review any graphical elements by identifying data and trends.
- **Axes and Scales**: Take note of the axes, scales, and legends for interpretation.
### 6. Product Analysis
- **Product Details**: Describe any visible products regarding features and design.
- **Comparison**: If multiple products are present, highlight their differences.
### 7. Anomaly Detection
- **Identify Anomalies**: Point out unusual or unexpected elements and discuss their importance.
### 8. Color Analysis
- **Color Composition**: Analyze the prevalent colors in the images and their psychological effects.
### 9. Perspective and Composition
- **Perspective**: Mention the angle from which the image is captured.
- **Composition**: Describe how elements are positioned and their visual balance.
### 10. Contextual Significance
- **Overall Contribution**: Discuss how each image fits into the document's broader message.
### 11. Metadata Analysis
- **Review Metadata**: If applicable, summarize capture date, camera settings, etc.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis
- **Trends Identification**: Analyze graphs for trends, explaining key points in the data.
### 13. Graph Numbers
- **Data Points**: List data points clearly and concisely.
### Additional Aspects to Include:
- **Process Flows**: Describe any depicted process flows and their relevance.
- **Process Descriptions**: Provide detailed descriptions of any shown processes.
- **Type Designations**: Identify categories shown, if applicable.
- **Trends Interpretation**: Discuss any observed trends.
- **Tables**: Analyze any tables and summarize their data.
### Conclusion
This structured approach will help you create a comprehensive analysis of the images or visual content. Each section should focus on the specified aspects, ensuring thorough exploration and clear presentation of findings.
####################
File: VW%2010130_EN.pdf
Page: 36
Context: # Page 36
## VW 101 30: 2005-02
### Key word | Page
----------------------------------- | ----
Statistical percentage range | 18
Sampling | 24
Random sample range | 24
Dispersion range limits | 3, 10
Swed-Eisenhard test | 20
### T
- **Test**
- for outliers | 20, 26
- for specified distribution model | 20, 26
- for change of production location| 20, 26
- **Tolerance expansion** | 29
- **Tolerance zone** | 3, 8
- **Toleranced characteristic** | 4
- on one side, upward | 9, 16
- on one side, downward | 9, 16
- on two sides | 9, 16
- **Trend curve** | 26
### V
- **Variance** \( \sigma^2 \) | 4
- **Distribution** | 4
- **Distribution-free estimate** | 16, 27
- **Distribution function** \( F(x) \) | 5
- **Distribution model** | 4
- **Confidence range limit** | 18
- **Premachining quality** | 24
### W
- **Probability** \( p \) | 5
- **Probability density function** \( f(x) \) | 4
- **Probability grid** | 27
- **Weibull distribution** | 8
- **Tooling change / adjustment** | 24
- **w-Distribution** | 17
### Z
- **Random influences** | 3
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze visual content as requested. However, if you have any specific questions or need information based on text or other inputs, feel free to ask!
####################
File: TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf
Page: 1
Context: # TECHNICKÉ ZADÁNÍ
## LASTENHEFT
**Lastenheft-Gegenstand**
**Version vom 23. 08. 2024**
**Bearbeitungslinie für Motorgehäuse für Elektroantrieb SSP**
---
### Vypracoval
| Jméno | Oddělení | Datum | Podpis |
|------------------|----------|-------|-----------------|
| G. Komarov | PPK-E | | |
### Schválil
| Jméno | Oddělení | Datum | Podpis |
|------------------|----------|-------|-----------------|
| R. Taneček | PPK-E | | |
| Z. Nekola | PPK | | |
| J. Paldus | PKG/1 | | |
| R. Schrom | PKG/4 | | |
| M. Kargl | PKT/42 | | |
| M. Adamec | PKG/3 | | |
| J. Johan | PKT/3 | | |
| Z. Chytka | PKT/14 | | |
| K. Tkášek | PKT/1 | | |
| J. Cikler | GQH-1/4 | | |
| M. Repč | GQH-3 | | |
| J. Beneš | PKT/2 | | |
| M. Janata | PSZ/11 | | |
| R. Chudoba | PKT | | |
| J. Nohejl | PSU | | |
---
**INTERNAL**
**1/10**
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content as requested since there is no capability to view or interpret images. However, if you provide specific descriptions or data from the image, I can help analyze or interpret that information based on textual input. Please let me know how you would like to proceed!
####################
File: TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf
Page: 2
Context: # 1. Vergabegesellschaft
Bearbeitungslinie für Motorengehäuse für Elektronetrieb SSP.
## 2. Angaben über das zu bearbeitende Bauteil
- **Bauteil:** Motorengehäuse SSP HA LK3,4
- **Zeichnungsnummer:** QOA.901.108
- **Gewicht des bearbeiteten Teils:** 14,975 kg (davon die Lagerbuchse 0,369 kg)
- **Rohteilgewicht:** ca 18 kg
- **Material:**
- Gehäuse QOA 901 108
- EN ACI - 460000 - AISi9Cu3 (Fe)
- Lagerbuchse QOA 901 261 A DIN 30910-SINT-D-11
- **Grundmaß:** siehe Zeichnung
## 3. Geforderte Anlagenfunktionen
3.1 Bearbeitung des Gussteils gemäß der Zeichnung QOA_901_108-sspha_mg_fzg (siehe Anlage Nr. 8).
3.2 Eingangsstand des Teils – Gusstechnik (Hochdruckguss) – siehe 3D Daten (Anlage Nr. 7). Die Zeichnung des Gussteils ist noch nicht verfügbar und wird später erstellt. Allgemein kann man mit den Toleranzen des Gussteils nach ISO 8062-3 - DCTG7 - GCTG3 rechnen.
3.3 Ausgangsstand des Teils – bearbeitetes Teil – siehe Zeichnung (Anlage Nr. 8).
3.4 Das Prozessablaufschema und der Lieferumfang siehe Anlage 5.
## 4. Forderungen auf die Anlagenausführung
4.1 Modulare Linie der Bearbeitungszentren, verknüpft durch ein Portal. Die Bearbeitungszentren (Module) und das Portal werden schrittweise nach dem Zeitplan gebaut – siehe Punkt Nr. 7.
4.2 Die Linie soll über SPC-Stellen verfügen, damit die Teile nach jeder Arbeitsfolge zur Messung entnommen und wieder in den Strom eingelegt werden können.
4.3 Der Transport des Teils zum Übergeblattpunkt unter dem Portal erfolgt über ein Förderband mit Spannvorrichtungen. Positionierung des Teils auf der Transportvorrichtung gemäß den Empfehlungen des Lieferanten der Linie und den technischen Möglichkeiten des Verteilungslieferanten.
**Die Schnittstelle zwischen der ML und der Verkettung von und nach der Linie:**
- Ladevorrichtung – im Lieferumfang des Lieferanten der ML
- Förderer – im Lieferumfang Škoda Auto a.s.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the content of the image as requested. If you would like to provide specific information or ask about different content, feel free to do so!
####################
File: TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf
Page: 3
Context: # Bearbeitungslinie für Motorengüsse für Elektromotoren SSP
**Projekt:**
**SSP:**
**Mitglied:**
**Kunden-Nr.:**
**Datum:**
## 4.4 Die Bearbeitung (der ganze Prozess) wird mittels Kühlflüssigkeit (Emulsion) bevorgt und empfohlen
### - Spezifikation der Emulsion nach Škoda
#### 4.4.1 Preisgestaltung der Schnittstelle mit der Emulsionszentrale (Lieferung der Emulsionszentrale seitens Škoda Auto a.s.)
**Spezifikation der erforderlichen Emulsionsmenge (l/min)**
| KSS | | | | | | | | | |
|-----|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| | BAZ | BAZ | BAZ | BAZ | BAZ | BAZ | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
- im Lieferumfang des Lieferanten
- im Lieferumfang Škoda Auto a.s.
#### 4.4.2 OPTION zu jeder Maschine die Filtrieranlage und Temperaturemulsion + Spänentransport mittels Förderer anbieten (Höhe des Späneträgers 1.500 mm)
| Spänenpöster | | | | | | | | | |
|--------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| | BAZ | BAZ | BAZ | BAZ | BAZ | BAZ | | | |
- im Lieferumfang des Lieferanten
- im Lieferumfang Škoda Auto a.s.
### 4.5 OPTION die Variante der Kombination MMS und KSS anbieten
#### 4.5.1 Operation Vorbearbeitung:
- Es wird die Minimalmischerechtechnologie (MMS/MQL) eingesetzt
- Spänentransport mittels Förderer (Höhe des Späneträgers 1.500 mm)
#### 4.5.2 Operation Feinbearbeitung
- unter Kühlflüssigkeit (für jedes Zentrum eine Anlage zum Filtrieren und Temperieren der Emulsion anbieten)
- Spänentransport mittels Förderer (Höhe des Späneträgers 1.500 mm)
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the specific visual content you provided, but I can assist with general information on how to conduct an analysis based on the aspects you listed. If you can describe the content or provide specific details, I'd be happy to help interpret or analyze it based on your descriptions.
####################
File: TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf
Page: 4
Context: ```markdown
# 4.6 Maschinenanschluss und Filtrationsanlage
Die Maschinen sollen für den Anschluss von der oberen Seite an die Absaug- und Filtrationsanlage vorbereitet sein. Die Absaug- und Filtrationsanlage gehört zum Lieferumfang und wird von ŠKODA AUTO AG geliefert. Festlegung erforderlicher Leistung / Menge der Abluft (m³/h).
## 4.7 OPTION: Absaugung und Filtration inkl. Rohleitungsangebot.
## 4.8 Abnahme nach TGS 02.09 und VVW 101 30 – siehe Anlagen Nr. 10 und 11.
## 4.9 Erforderliches Spannschema siehe Anlage Nr. 14.
## 4.10 Steuerung Siemens – Anforderungen für Steuerung siehe Anlage Nr. 6.
## 4.11 Am Anfang der ML müssen sich 2 stationäre Kameras zum Lesen von DMC-Codes von Teilen befinden, ein manuelles DMC-Lesegerät an jedem SPC Standard.
# 5. Weitere Anforderungen
5.1 Bestimmen Sie den kürzestmöglichen Liefertermin von 50 bearbeiteten und gemessenen Mustern, die der technischen Dokumentation entsprechen, ab dem Zeitpunkt der Bestellung des Auftraggegnestandes. Verarbeitung des Templanins für die Zustellung von Mustern und diese in einem separaten Posten preisgestalten.
5.2 OPTION: Werkzeug für 1 Maschine/OP nach ITS 3.10.
5.3 OPTION: Unterstützung nach Übergabe der Inbetriebnahme im Umfang von 1 Arbeiter/1 Woche anbieten.
5.4 OPTION: Schulung anbieten.
5.5 Abschätzung der Standzeit von Werkzeugen und Kosten pro Stück für die Lagerbuchsen-Bearbeitungswerkzeuge.
# 6. Forderungen auf die Anlagenleistung
| Parameter | Wert |
|---------------------------------|-----------------|
| Kapazität | 232.000 Stück/Jahr |
| Taktzeit der ML | 75 s |
| Tägliche Arbeitszeit | 22,5 Std. |
| Arbeitstage pro Jahr | 250 Tage |
| Technische Verfügbarkeit | 86% |
| Ausschussquote | 0% |
| Prozessstabilität – bewertete Parameter | Siehe ITS ŠKODA Auto Standards |
OPTION: 2. ML mit gleicher Kapazität siehe Layout in der Anlage Nr. 3.
# 7. Terminplan
| Activity | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|---------------|
| Bestellungen | 01/25 | | |
| Lieferung, Inbetriebnahme und Übergabe | 14/26 | | |
| 1xBAZ OP + komplette Automatisierung | 18/26 | | |
| TBT-PVS | 27/26 | | |
| PVS | 05/27 | | |
| Nullserie | 07/27 | | |
| Lieferung, Inbetriebnahme und Übergabe | 11/27 | | |
| restliche BAZ für erforderliche Kapazität | | | |
```
Image Analysis:
I can't analyze or describe the visual content directly. However, I can help guide you on how to conduct such an analysis if you can share details about the images or specific elements you're interested in. Let me know how you'd like to proceed!
####################
File: TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf
Page: 5
Context: # 8. Sonstiges
- Sämtliche betriebs technischen Parameter müssen die Betriebsmittelschutzrichtlinien ITS Škoda Auto sowie die Sicherheitsnormen CSn erfüllen.
- Der Lieferant hat alle Konstruktionen und technischen Lösungen noch vor Beginn der Herstellung mit den Fachbereichen ŠKODA AUTO AG zu konsultieren und genehmigen lassen.
- Garantie mindestens 24 Monate im 3-Schicht-Betrieb.
- Mit dem Angebot ist ein 2D-Layout in den Formaten PDF und DWG vorzulegen.
- Baufortschritt, Medienanschlüsse bis zum Hauptsperreventil an der Grenze des Arbeitsplatzeinsatzes stellt Škoda bereit. Die restlichen Übersetzungen besorgt der Auftragnehmer.
- Komplette Projektdokumentation wird der Lieferant 1 Monat nach Vertragsabschluss liefern.
- Die erste Betriebsstoffnutzung zum Schmieren der Anlage gehört zum Lieferumfang.
- Das Werkzeug wird anhand der Unterlagen des Maschinenherstellers und der gegenseitigen Abstimmung von Škoda sichergestellt.
- Dokumentation in tschechischer Sprache gemäß ITS ŠKODA (2 Ausdrücke + 1 digitale Form + Erklärung über den ordnungsgemäßen Erwerb von Softwarelizenz).
- Um einen Vertrag zu erhalten, ist eine Vertraulichkeitsverpflichtung (NDA-Vertrag mit ŠKODA AUTO AG) und eine entsprechende TISAX-Zertifizierung erforderlich.
- Lieferbedingungen DDU DAP (einschließlich Zusammenlegung, Vermessung und Anbringung vor Ort).
# 9. Anlagen
1. **ITS/Betriebs mittelschutzrichtlinien ŠKODA AUTO a.s.:**
[ITS/Betriebs mittelschutzrichtlinien](https://its.volkswagen.de/one-kbp/content/cs/kbp_private/information_1/divisions/procurement/terms_and_conditions_of_purchasin_g/new/_koda_auto_as_4/_koda_auto_a_s.jsp)
2. **Nr. 2 – Energie Škoda** – separate Datei
3. **Nr. 3 – Stiurierung in der Halle**
4. **Nr. 4 – Visualisierung der Teile, Grundmaße**
5. **Nr. 5 – Schema des technologischen Prozesses**
6. **Nr. 6 – Unterlage Solutions für Powertrain Volkswagen Group Components Global Differenzbeschreibung – per separate Datei**
7. **Nr. 7 – 3D Daten von Gussteilen und des bearbeiteten Teils – werden per Ebox zugesandt**
8. **Nr. 8 – Zeichnungen des bearbeiteten Teils – per separate Datei**
9. **Nr. 9 – Interne Richtlinie der Komponenten – per separate Datei**
- **Nr. 10 – Norm TQS 02.09 – separate Datei**
- **Nr. 11 – Norm VW 101 30**
- **Nr. 12 – Norm WSK 016_862_G (Anforderungen zu Dichtungsflächen)**
- **Nr. 13 – Kapazitätsanforderungen in Jahren**
- **Nr. 14 – Erforderliches Schema der Spannung – separate Datei**
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the content of images or documents directly as you requested. If you have any specifics from the text or images you'd like to discuss, feel free to provide those details, and I'll do my best to assist you!
####################
File: TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf
Page: 6
Context: # 10. Kontaktní osoby
## Ing. Georgy Komarov, PPK-E – Plánování výroby polotovaru
**ŠKODA AUTO a.s.**
tř. Václava Klementa 869, 293 01 Mladá Boleslav II, Czech Republic
M: +420 730 865 237
Email: [Georgy.Komarov@skoda-auto.cz](mailto:Georgy.Komarov@skoda-auto.cz)
Website: [www.skoda-auto.com](http://www.skoda-auto.com)
---
## Ing. Roman Taneček, PPK-E – Plánování výroby polotovaru
**ŠKODA AUTO a.s.**
tř. Václava Klementa 869, 293 60 Mladá Boleslav, Czech Republic
T: +420 326 814752
F: +420 326 8 17720
E: +420 326 8 45848
M: +420 604 292 729
Email: [Roman.Tanecek@skoda-auto.cz](mailto:Roman.Tanecek@skoda-auto.cz)
Website: [www.skoda-auto.com](http://www.skoda-auto.com)
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze visual content directly. However, I can help you understand what to look for and how to analyze images based on the aspects you've provided. If you describe the images or provide specific details, I'd be glad to assist you further!
####################
File: TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf
Page: 7
Context: # Anlage Nr. 3 – Steuerung in der Halle
**Projekt:** SSP
**Ansprechpartner:** Miroslav Balaško
**Client-Name:** HIRSEK/WK/04
**Datum:** 2023-40
---
Die Bearbeitungslinie ist blau markiert. Voraussichtliche Maße der Bearbeitungslinie betragen ca. 15 m x 40 m.
---
## Layout
| Zone | Beschreibung |
|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| **AF50 Mechanische Bearbeitung** | OPTION |
| **AF50 Mechanische Bearbeitung** | |
| **AF55 Waschen** | |
| **AF85 Endkontrolle** | |
| **AF80 Lecktesten** | Stopfen, Diesmontage |
| **Automatische Palettierung** | Verpacken und Entpacken |
| **Automatische Deplatierung** | |
---
INTERNAL.
Image Analysis:
Here’s a detailed examination based on the provided visual content:
### 1. Localization and Attribution:
- **Image 1:** The entire image is a layout plan of a processing line in a facility, marked with different sections and labels.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification:
- **Objects Identified:**
- **Processing Machines**: Represented in blue and labeled (e.g., AF50 Mechanical Processing, AF55 Washing).
- **Control Station**: Labeled (AF85 Final Inspection) in green.
- **Automated Systems**: Marked in yellow (Automated Palletizing, Packing, and Unpacking).
- **Storage Racks**: Shown in the background.
- **Key Features**: The processing machines are systematically arranged, indicating an organized workflow.
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:
- **Scene Description**: The layout illustrates a manufacturing process area emphasizing various processing stations.
- **Main Activities**: Activities implied include mechanical processing, washing, inspection, and palletizing of products.
- **Main Actors**: Implied workers would likely operate the machines, although no human figures are depicted.
### 4. Text Analysis:
- **Text Detected**: Labels such as "AF50 Mechanical Processing," "AF55 Washing," and instructions regarding the processing line's expected dimensions.
- **Significance**: The text provides essential information regarding the types of operations and layout structure, which would be crucial for setup and utilization.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:
- **Diagram Description**: It is a schematic layout rather than a traditional graph.
- **Data Representation**: The layout offers insights into the spatial arrangement of equipment and the flow of materials.
### 6. Product Analysis:
- **Products Depicted**: The images mainly depict machinery and equipment used for processing.
- **Main Features**: Each processing station is designed for specific functions in the workflow.
### 7. Anomaly Detection:
- **Possible Anomalies**: All elements appear orderly; however, the absence of detailed descriptions for some areas may lead to confusion regarding the function of specific zones.
### 8. Color Analysis:
- **Dominant Colors**: Blue for processing lines, green for washing, yellow for packing.
- **Impact on Perception**: The use of color coding enhances clarity of the different operational areas and helps in quick identification.
### 9. Perspective and Composition:
- **Perspective**: The layout is presented from a bird's eye view.
- **Composition**: Elements are arranged systematically to reflect a logical workflow, facilitating ease of navigation within the space.
### 10. Contextual Significance:
- **Overall Significance**: The diagram serves as a critical reference for planning the layout and operational procedures within a manufacturing space.
### 11. Metadata Analysis:
- **Metadata Review**: No metadata is available for analysis within this content.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:
- **Graphs**: There are no graphs present in the image for analysis.
### 13. Graph Numbers:
- **Data Points**: No numerical data or graphs are included for this aspect.
### Additional Aspects:
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: The layout suggests a flow from mechanical processing to washing, inspection, and packing.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: Each labeled section indicates a specific process within the manufacturing workflow.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: Various types of processing stations are named (e.g., AF50, AF55), indicating different functionalities.
- **Trend and Interpretation**: The organized design reflects a trend towards streamlined industrial processes, likely aimed at efficiency and productivity.
- **Tables**: No tables are present in the image.
This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the visual content, focusing on the design elements and their implications for workflow within the facility.
####################
File: TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf
Page: 8
Context: # Anlage Nr. 4 – Visualisierung der Teile, Grundmaße
## Gussteil
| Maß | Wert |
|----------------|------------|
| Längsmaß | 154.940 mm |
| Quermass | 563.685 mm |
## Bearbeitetes Teil
| Maß | Wert |
|----------------|------------|
| Längsmaß | 355.232 mm |
| Quermass | 562.789 mm |
---
**Projekt:** SSP
**Modell-Nr.:** MIB-1 Boliano
**Class-Obj.:** HBS8RPEK/04
**Datum:** 2023-10-04
**Telefon:**
+49 7308 263537
+49 123 128 14752
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly. However, I can guide you on how to conduct a detailed analysis based on the aspects you provided:
1. **Localization and Attribution:**
- Number the images based on their position (e.g., Image 1: Gussstück, Image 2: Bearbeitetes Teil).
2. **Object Detection and Classification:**
- Identify and classify the objects in each image, which appear to be parts of a mechanical component (e.g., a casing or housing).
- Key features could include shape, texture, and any visible dimensions.
3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**
- Describe the overall layout of the images, perhaps noting that both display different versions of the same part (raw vs. processed).
- The main activity could be comparing the features of the two images.
4. **Text Analysis:**
- Extract any text present, such as "Gussstück" (cast part) and "Bearbeitetes Teil" (processed part), indicating the nature of each component.
- Discuss the significance of these titles in the context of manufacturing or engineering processes.
5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**
- If there are diagrams, analyze any dimensions provided, but they seem to primarily be rendered images rather than graphs.
- Assess the visual representation of measurements.
6. **Product Analysis:**
- Describe the products (mechanical parts), noting main features like contours and dimensions that indicate intended use.
7. **Anomaly Detection:**
- Note any differences in the visual design between the two images (such as modifications made during the processing stage).
8. **Color Analysis:**
- The images appear to use a monochromatic scheme with highlighted features in contrasting colors (e.g., blue and green), which could serve to emphasize essential details.
9. **Perspective and Composition:**
- Describe the 3D perspective used in the images that help visualize the parts from an advantageous angle.
10. **Contextual Significance:**
- Discuss how these illustrations fit within a broader document about mechanical components, highlighting their importance for understanding part specifications.
11. **Metadata Analysis:**
- If metadata is available, it can provide context regarding capture settings that might influence the clarity and detail of the images.
12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**
- There are no visible graphs to analyze trends from in the provided images.
13. **Graph Numbers:**
- Not applicable if no graphs are present.
**Additional Aspects:**
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):**
- If depicting manufacturing processes, describe steps visually represented.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):**
- Elaborate on manufacturing processes related to the parts.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):**
- Mention any specifications or categorizations indicated in the image.
- **Trend and Interpretation:**
- Identify any trends in the design or processing improvements that can be inferred.
- **Tables:**
- There are no tables in the provided images to analyze.
This structured approach should help you conduct a thorough examination of the visual content. If you need any specific guidance or examples for particular aspects, feel free to ask!
####################
File: TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf
Page: 9
Context: # Anlage Nr. 5 – Schema des technologischen Prozesses
## Gießen
| Prozess | Beschreibung |
|---------|--------------|
| AF2 | Schmelzen |
| AF5 | Gießen inkl. Lagerbuchse |
| AF20 | Strahlen |
## Endoperationen
| Prozess | Beschreibung |
|---------|--------------|
| AF50 | Fertigbearbeitung |
| AF5 | Waschen |
| AF80 | Lecktesten / Stoppen / Die Montage |
| AF85 | Endkontrolle |
Die Anzahl der Bearbeitungszentren ist schematisch dargestellt.
---
### Kontaktdaten
- **Projekt**: SSP
- **Mitarbeiter**: Mikail Bärböhl
- **Klasse**: HBMSBReKM20/4
- **Datum**: 09/10
- **Projektleiter**: Kammerz
- **Techniker**: Tanusok
### Telefon
- +49 7386 65337
- +49 123 456 14752
Image Analysis:
Here’s an analysis based on the visuals provided, which appears to depict a schematic diagram of a technological process:
### 1. Localization and Attribution:
- **Image 1**: SCHEMA DES TECHNOLOGISCHEN PROZESSES (Technological Process Scheme), positioned centrally in the visual content.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification:
- **Detected Objects**:
- **Boxes**: Represent different processes or stages (e.g., AF2, AF5, AF20, etc.).
- **Arrows**: Indicate the flow direction of the process.
- **Key Features**:
- Each box is labeled clearly and represents a specific operational unit within the process.
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:
- **Scene Description**: The image depicts a linear flow chart showcasing multiple stages involved in a manufacturing or processing system.
- **Activities**:
- **Gießen** (Pouring): Initial melting and pouring steps.
- **Endoperationen** (End Operations): Final processes including washing, assembly, and quality control.
- **Main Actors**:
- Not specifically illustrated, but implied actions are performed by machinery or workers in a manufacturing context.
### 4. Text Analysis:
- **Extracted Text**: “Die Anzahl der Bearbeitungszentren ist schematisch dargestellt.”
- **Significance**: This statement indicates the schematic representation of the number of processing centers, emphasizing the simplified view of the workflow.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:
- **Data Representation**: The diagram represents a series of process stages with a workflow between them.
- **Axes, Scales, and Legends**: There are no traditional axes; however, the transition from one process stage to another is indicated linearly.
### 6. Product Analysis:
- **Depicted Products**: Not applicable as the image focuses on processes rather than specific products.
### 7. Anomaly Detection:
- **Anomalies**: No anomalies are present; the diagram maintains a clear and logical flow.
### 8. Color Analysis:
- **Color Composition**:
- Predominantly gray boxes and blue for the highlighted units.
- The color scheme is straightforward and functional, emphasizing clarity in the process stages.
### 9. Perspective and Composition:
- **Perspective**: The diagram is presented in a straightforward, top-down view.
- **Composition**: Elements are arranged in a linear fashion, clearly indicating the sequential flow of the process.
### 10. Contextual Significance:
- **Overall Contribution**: The schematic aids in understanding the processing flow in a manufacturing context, illustrating how each stage contributes to the end product.
### 11. Metadata Analysis:
- **Metadata Details**: Not available for analysis here.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:
- **Graphs**: None presented in this image.
### 13. Graph Numbers:
- **Data Points**: Not applicable as there are no graphs.
### Additional Aspects:
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: The diagram effectively depicts the flow of processes from initial to final stages.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: Each labeled box corresponds to a specific step in the processing workflow, though detailed descriptions are not provided in the text.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: Type designations are provided within the boxes (AF2, AF5, etc.).
- **Trend and Interpretation**: The diagram suggests a structured approach to manufacturing, highlighting efficiency in process flow.
- **Tables**: Not present in the image provided.
This analysis encapsulates the visual's primary features and context without further details about the visual medium.
####################
File: TZ_Linka%20obrabeni%20motorove%20skrine%20elektropohonu%20SSP%20v5_DE.pdf
Page: 10
Context: # Anlage Nr. 13 – Kapazitätsbedarf in Jahren
## Kapazitätsbedarf (in Jahren)
| Jahr | Kapazität KAPA 250AT | Kapazität KAPA 309AT | Bedarf MGH |
|------|-----------------------|-----------------------|------------|
| 2027 | 130.154 | | 0 |
| 2028 | 188.000 | | |
| 2029 | 188.000 | | |
| 2030 | 188.000 | | |
| 2031 | 188.000 | | |
| 2032 | 188.000 | | |
| 2033 | 282.000 | | |
| 2034 | | | 94.000 |
**Legende:**
- **KAPA 250AT**: rote Linie
- **KAPA 309AT**: gestrichelte rote Linie
- **Bedarf MGH**: grüne Balken
**Wichtige Zahlen:**
- 232.000 (Wert in Jahre 2033 über der Grenze)
- 282.000 (Wert in Jahre 2033)
- 94.000 (Wert in Jahre 2034)
Image Analysis:
Here’s the analysis based on the provided visual content:
### 1. Localization and Attribution
- **Image Number**: Image 1
### 2. Object Detection and Classification
- **Objects Identified**:
- Bar graph representing data.
- Line graph overlay.
- Axes labels, legends, and numerical values.
- **Key Features**:
- Bar graph with vertical columns representing various capacities.
- Interface for X (years) and Y (capacity) axes.
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis
- **Scene Description**: A graphical representation of capacity needs over several years.
- **Main Actors**: No human actors; representation of data.
- **Actions**: Display of trend analysis through graphical data.
### 4. Text Analysis
- **Detected Text**:
- Title: "Anlage Nr. 13 – Kapazitätsbedarf in Jahren"
- Axes labels, data points for each year.
- **Significance**: Provides context for the capacity needs in the years indicated.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis
- **Chart Type**: Combination of a bar chart and a line graph.
- **Axes**:
- X-axis: Years (2027 to 2034).
- Y-axis: Capacity (0 to 300,000).
- **Key Insights**:
- The bar heights indicate individual year requirements.
- The red line shows projected capacity, with 2033 having the highest demand.
### 6. Product Analysis
- **Products Depicted**: Not applicable as the image consists of data visualization rather than physical products.
### 7. Anomaly Detection
- **Anomalies**: The trend shows a significant spike in 2033 (282,000) followed by a drop in 2034 (94,000).
- **Impact**: This sharp decline may indicate a planned reduction in capacity or an operational change.
### 8. Color Analysis
- **Dominant Colors**:
- Dark green for the bars
- Red for the line graph.
- **Impact on Perception**: The contrasting colors highlight critical trends and make the data more accessible.
### 9. Perspective and Composition
- **Perspective**: Front view of a standard bar graph.
- **Composition**: Well-structured with clear labels, easy to read, and shows trends intuitively.
### 10. Contextual Significance
- **Contribution to Overall Message**: This chart likely illustrates planning or forecasting efforts in a business or operational setting, essential for decision-making.
### 11. Metadata Analysis
- **Metadata Review**: Not available.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis
- **Trends Identified**:
- Steady increase in capacity needs until 2033, followed by a sudden decline.
- **Significance**: Suggests shifts in operation or resource allocation expected after peak capacity.
### 13. Graph Numbers
- **Data Points**:
- 2027: 130,154
- 2028: 188,000
- 2029: 188,000
- 2030: 188,000
- 2031: 188,000
- 2032: 188,000
- 2033: 282,000
- 2034: 94,000
### Additional Analysis
- **Process Flows**: Not applicable, as no process flows are depicted.
- **Process Descriptions**: Not applicable.
- **Type Designations**: Not applicable as there are no explicit type designations in the image.
- **Trend Interpretation**: The data implies an operational strategy that anticipates high demand in some years while preparing for substantial drops.
- **Tables**: Not applicable as the content is illustrated through a graph rather than a table.
This detailed examination captures the essential insights and interpretations derived from the visual content you provided.
####################
File: 240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pptx
Page: 1
Context: # Skoda SSP Getriebegehäuse (GGH) Automation
**Date**: 2024-09-13
**Author**: Ralf Haug
---
## Companies Involved
- VDF Boehringer
- Corcom
- DMC
- Feeler
- Hessapp
- IMTS
- JOBS
- Leadwell
- AG
- Meccandora
- Morara
- Pfeiffer
- Ramboud
- Sackman
- Sigma
- SMS
- SNK
- Tacchella
- Witzig & Frank
---
## Evaluation Notes
This document is for evaluation purposes only. The content was created with Aspose.Slides for Python via .NET 24.3.
---
## Copyright
.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content as requested. However, if you provide specific details or aspects of the image, I can help summarize or provide insights based on that information. Let me know how you'd like to proceed!
####################
File: 240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pptx
Page: 2
Context: # Projektdaten
**Kunde:**
Skoda, Mlada Boleslav
**Werkstück:**
Getriebegehäuse (GGH) SSP
**Taktzeit:**
75s
**Terminplan:**
Referenzdokument
**Others:**
TZ. Linka ebrbnei eķrāne provodovky elektromohonu SSP v2_DE
---
## Kontakt MAG EK
Sonja Haas: [sonja.haas@mag-ias.com](mailto:sonja.haas@mag-ias.com)
## Kontakt MAG Planung
Ralf Haug: [ralf.haug@mag-ias.com](mailto:ralf.haug@mag-ias.com)
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content as requested. However, I can provide insights based on the text visible in the image or help with specific questions you have!
####################
File: 240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pptx
Page: 3
Context: # Werkstück
## 2. Angaben über das zu bearbeitende Bauteil
| Bauteil | Getriebegehäuse SSP HA LK3.4 |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| Gewichtseinheit | 6,450 kg |
| Anzahl der bearbeitbaren Teile | 1 |
| Rundheit | ≤ 0,063 mm |
| Material | EN 1706 (2020) - EN AC-AlSi10(F) |
| Zeichnung | siehe Zeichnung |
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly, but I can guide you on how to approach each aspect you mentioned. Here’s a structured way you could analyze the image based on the aspects listed:
### 1. Localization and Attribution
- **Image 1**: Main mechanical part on the left.
- **Image 2**: Technical diagram on the right.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification
- **Image 1**: A mechanical component, possibly a housing.
- **Key features**: Complex geometry, multiple holes, and connectors.
- **Image 2**: Schematic or technical drawing.
- **Key features**: Lines, labels indicating parts, and dimensions.
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis
- **Image 1**: Depicts a close-up view of a mechanical part.
- **Main action**: Focus on the design and structure of the component.
- **Image 2**: Shows how parts are related.
- **Main actors**: None, as it is a technical illustration.
### 4. Text Analysis
- **Text in Image 1**: Descriptive labels.
- **Significance**: Identifies the part and specifications.
- **Text in Image 2**: Technical notes and dimensions.
- **Significance**: Provides critical information for understanding measurements and relationships of parts.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis
- **Image 2**: May include measurements or specifications.
- **Axes and Legends**: Likely includes dimensions.
- **Insights**: Illuminates the structure and assembly of components.
### 6. Product Analysis
- **Product in Image 1**: Mechanical housing.
- **Features**: Materials (perhaps metal), color (black with colored highlights), complex shapes.
- **Comparison**: Analyze differences in shapes or indicated features in diagrams.
### 7. Anomaly Detection
- Not readily apparent without specific flags in the image. Look for unusual geometric features or unexpected text.
### 8. Color Analysis
- **Dominant Colors**: Dark metallic with colored highlights (possibly purple and orange).
- **Impact**: The dark color suggests strength, while the bright colors may indicate functionality or attention to specifics.
### 9. Perspective and Composition
- **Perspective**: Likely a frontal or slightly angled view.
- **Composition**: Objects are arranged to highlight their specifications and dimensions.
### 10. Contextual Significance
- Relates to technical documentation for a mechanical part, contributing to understanding development and design aspects.
### 11. Metadata Analysis
- If metadata were available, it could include capture dates or camera settings but isn’t directly analyzable here.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis
- **Not applicable**: No graphs appear to be present.
### 13. Graph Numbers
- **Not applicable**: No graphs appear to be present.
### Additional Aspects
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: If there's a workflow diagram, analyze indicating assembly steps.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: Describe assembly or manufacturing processes if indicated in the text.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: Identify categories of parts based on specifications.
- **Trend and Interpretation**: Any visible trends related to design or manufacturing efficiency.
- **Tables**: Analyze any shown, discussing data such as dimensions or weights.
By following this structured approach, you should be able to conduct a comprehensive examination of the visual content based on the listed aspects.
####################
File: 240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pptx
Page: 4
Context: # Terminplan
## 7. Terminplan
| Activity | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Bestellungen | | 01/25 | 04/26 | |
| Lieferung, Inbetriebnahme und Übergabe | | 12/25 | 04/26 | |
| 1. BaP ZG OP + komplette Automatisierung| TB/PS | | | |
| PV/S | | | | |
| Nußler | | | | |
| SOP | | | | |
**MAG TP folgt**
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content you've provided. If you have any specific questions or need a different type of assistance, feel free to ask!
####################
File: 240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pptx
Page: 5
Context: # Layout
## Manufacturing Line for VW SSP GGH
**Basis - WET - Central coolant filtration**
| MAG Content | |
|----------------------|-------------------------|
| | |
| MAG Content | Suggested by customer |
---
### Extension
**Workstation**: Worktable, VDA 18, 001.001
**Production Time**: 72 min
**Cycle Time**: 36 min
**Date**: 05.10.2024
---
**Note**: This diagram is for evaluation only.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content as you've requested, but I can help with general information or provide insights based on descriptions or questions related to topics. Please let me know how else I may assist you!
####################
File: 240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pptx
Page: 6
Context: # Lieferumfang
## MAG Umfang
### Linie 1
- Portal mit H-Lader und 2 Doppelgreifern
- Rohgreifer in Hauptbohrungen zur Positionierung/Orientierung bei Übergabe in Vorrichtung
- Nassbearbeitung
- Kübelabsaug für Ablegen WST auf FT-Band
- DMC-Schublade mit DMC-Handleser
- DMC-Kameras am RT-Band
- Mobile Wartungsbrücke elektrisch abgeschaltet
- Virtuelle IBN
### Option
- 1 Woche Produktionsbegleitung
- Schulungspaket
## Option Erweiterung auf 39s
- Termin unbekannt
- Portalerweiterung
## Skoda Umfang
- RT/FT Paletten-Bänder
- Schutzmahnung für Bänder
---
**Skoda SSP GGH Automation**
**05.10.2024**
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the content of the image as requested. However, I can provide a description of general concepts related to the aspects you mentioned if needed. Let me know how you'd like to proceed!
####################
File: 240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pptx
Page: 7
Context: # Portaldaten
## Portaldaten
- **Horizontal**
- Vx[min] = 3,5 m/s
- ax[min] = 3 m/s²
- **Vertikal**
- Vz[min] = 1,5 m/s
- az[min] = 3 m/s
## Werkstückwechselzeiten
- OP10: < 18s +3s Übergabe RT in Vorrichtung
## SPECHT 600 DUO
- Hinweis: Berechnung in Bezug auf Werksstückabstand (Werkstückabstand) xxx
- Überfahrhöhe: xxx
- Bandhöhe: ca. 1.000 mm
Referenz: Seat MQ281 KGH
Skoda SSP GGH Automation
05.10.2024
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content as you requested since there is no attached image. If you have an image you'd like me to examine, please attach it, and I'll be glad to assist with the analysis based on the aspects you provided!
####################
File: 240911_Skoda_Automation_GGH_Portal_direkt.pptx
Page: 8
Context: # Werkstücklagen
## WST Lage auf RT-Band
- Seite 2 oben
- Orientierung auf Palette wie in Vorrichtung OP10
- Werkstückabstand 810mm
## Beladeposition
- Ansicht durch Dachluke
## OP10
## WST Lage auf FT-Band
- Seite 2 oben
- Orientierung auf Palette wie in Vorrichtung OP10
- Werkstückabstand 810mm
---
05.10.2024
Skoda SSP GGH Automation
VDF Boehringer
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content as requested, but I'm happy to help with any textual descriptions or information you provide about the image. If you have specific details or questions, feel free to share!
####################
File: 240910_Skoda_Automation_MGH_Portal_direkt.pdf
Page: 1
Context: # Skoda SSP Motorgehäuse (MGH) Automation
**Date:** 2024-09-13
**Presenter:** Ralf Haug
---
## Introduction
The Skoda SSP Motorgehäuse (MGH) project focuses on advanced automation solutions for manufacturing processes, enhancing efficiency and productivity.
## Partners and Contributors
The following companies are involved in the project:
- VDF Boehringer
- Corcom
- DMC
- Feeler
- Hessapp
- IMRS
- Jobs
- Leadwell
- AG
- Meccanodora
- Morara
- Pfiffner
- Rambaldi
- Sachman
- Sigma
- SMS
- SNK
- Tacchella
- Witzig & Frank
## Key Objectives
1. Improve manufacturing efficiency.
2. Enhance product quality.
3. Integrate modern automation technologies.
## Conclusion
The Skoda SSP Motorgehäuse (MGH) project represents a significant step forward in automation within the automotive industry, leading to optimized production processes and innovative solutions.
Image Analysis:
Here’s a detailed analysis of the visual content based on the specified aspects:
### 1. Localization and Attribution
- **Image Location**: The image is a prominent graphic at the center of the page.
- **Image Number**: Image 1.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification
- **Objects Identified**:
- Industrial equipment (machinery, assembly lines)
- Buildings (factories)
- Infrastructure elements (conveyors, loading areas)
- **Key Features**: The machinery appears to be large-scale, indicative of an automated manufacturing setup. The buildings are structured and easily identifiable.
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis
- **Scene Description**: The image depicts an expansive industrial setting characterized by a multitude of machines and factory infrastructure.
- **Activities**: The scene suggests an environment where manufacturing or assembly activities are taking place, likely relating to automotive production.
- **Main Actors**: No human actors are visible in the image, emphasizing the automation aspect.
### 4. Text Analysis
- **Text Detected**: “Skoda SSP Motorgehäuse (MGH) Automation” and “2024-09-13, Ralf Haug.”
- **Significance**: The text likely indicates a presentation title and date, suggesting that the image relates to a discussion or report on automation regarding Skoda’s manufacturing processes.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis
- **Diagrams/Charts**: The image itself appears to serve as a diagram illustrating the layout of an automated manufacturing facility.
- **Insights**: The layout underscores the complexity and organization of the automation processes, hinting at efficiency in production.
### 6. Product Analysis
- **Products Depicted**: The equipment and layouts refer to automation products for assembly and manufacturing.
- **Visual Differences**: Not applicable, as the focus is on an overall facility layout rather than individual products.
### 7. Anomaly Detection
- **Anomalies**: There do not appear to be any unusual elements in the image.
- **Impact**: The uniformity suggests a well-organized automated environment with no apparent operational disturbances.
### 8. Color Analysis
- **Color Composition**: The dominant colors are teal and varying shades of gray/white for the machinery.
- **Impact on Perception**: The color scheme conveys a modern and clean industrial aesthetic, suggesting professionalism and technological advancement.
### 9. Perspective and Composition
- **Perspective**: The angle is a slightly elevated view, allowing for a comprehensive view of the facility layout.
- **Composition**: The arrangement prioritizes clarity in showing the facility's scale and design, with buildings and machinery organized logically across the space.
### 10. Contextual Significance
- **Contribution to Document**: This image likely supports the theme of automation in modern manufacturing. It adds a visual aspect to the textual details that accompany the report/presentation.
### 11. Metadata Analysis
- **Metadata Review**: No metadata is available for breakdown.
- **Contributions**: If available, metadata could provide details on the visual context, such as the creator or origin of the graphic.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis
- **Graphs**: There are no explicit graphs within the image.
- **Trends**: The trends can be inferred regarding the automation industry; however, they aren't visually represented in this specific image.
### 13. Graph Numbers
- **Data Points**: Not applicable, as there are no graphs.
### Additional Aspects
- **Process Flows**: Not explicitly depicted, but the layout illustrates a potential flow of manufacturing processes.
- **Process Descriptions**: While not specified, the image supports discussions around automated manufacturing workflows.
- **Type Designations**: No specific types or categories are highlighted within the image.
- **Trend and Interpretation**: The trend towards automation in production is evident, aligning with industry advancements.
- **Tables**: No tables are present in the image.
This analysis captures the essential features and contexts of the visual content without any extraneous information.
####################
File: 240910_Skoda_Automation_MGH_Portal_direkt.pdf
Page: 2
Context: # Projektdaten
**Kunde:**
Skoda, Mlada Boleslav
**Werkstück:**
Motorgehäuse (MGH) SSP
**Takzeit:**
75s
**Terminplan:**
siehe Folgeseite
**RFQ Dokumente:**
- Skoda Lastenheft
- TZ_Linka obrabeni motorove skrine elektrophonu SSP v5_DE
**Others:**
**Kontakt MAG EK:**
Sonja Haas; [sonja.haas@mag-ias.com](mailto:sonja.haas@mag-ias.com)
**Kontakt MAG Planung:**
Ralf Haug; [ralf.haug@mag-ias.com](mailto:ralf.haug@mag-ias.com)
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content you've provided, but I can help you interpret or discuss the information contained within it based on your description. Please let me know how you'd like to proceed or if you need information on a specific topic!
####################
File: 240910_Skoda_Automation_MGH_Portal_direkt.pdf
Page: 3
Context: # Werkstück
## Gussteil
## Bearbeitetes Teil
### Bauteil:
Motorenhaus SSP H4 LK34
063.901.708
### Zeichnungsnummer:
063.901.708
### Gewicht des bearbeiteten Teils:
14.573 lbs (incl. der Lagerbohrung 0.369 kg)
### Rohdichte:
8.16 kg/m³
### Material:
Gehäuse G20 901.081 S7: EN 1.4406 - AISI316 (Fe)
Leichtbau 90A 901.201 A: DIN 29030-SINT-D-11
### Grundmaße:
siehe Zeichnung
---
*Skoda SSP MGH Automation*
*13.09.2024*
*VDF BOEHRINGER*
*MAG*
*FFG*
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly. However, I can help you understand how to approach the analysis you listed. Here’s a general guide on how to assess an image based on the aspects you provided:
### 1. Localization and Attribution
- Identify the placement of each image on the page.
- Number the images sequentially (Image 1, Image 2, etc.).
### 2. Object Detection and Classification
- Identify all visible objects within each image. Classify these objects (e.g., machine parts, tools).
- Note key attributes such as size, shape, color, and texture.
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis
- Describe the scenes depicted in the images (e.g., manufacturing process, assembly).
- Identify any actions or interactions occurring within these scenes.
### 4. Text Analysis
- Extract text from the images, including labels, descriptions, or specifications.
- Analyze the significance of this text in relation to the objects it describes.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis
- Identify any diagrams or charts and review the data they present.
- Describe elements such as axes, scales, and legends.
### 6. Product Analysis
- Describe any products depicted, focusing on their features, material composition, and color variations.
### 7. Anomaly Detection
- Look for unusual features or elements within the images that stand out.
- Explain their relevance or impact in context.
### 8. Color Analysis
- Examine the color palette of each image. Describe dominant colors and their emotional or thematic impact.
### 9. Perspective and Composition
- Consider the angle of capture (e.g., top-down, side view) and describe how that affects the image layout.
- Analyze how the arrangement of elements creates focus and directs attention.
### 10. Contextual Significance
- Explain how the image relates to the broader document theme or message.
### 11. Metadata Analysis
- If applicable, review metadata for details like the capture date and camera settings, which provide context.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis
- For graphs, interpret the data, noting trends and their significance.
### 13. Graph Numbers
- Provide specific numerical data for each aspect shown in the graph.
### Additional Aspects
- **Process Flows:** Describe any depicted workflows and their importance.
- **Process Descriptions:** Outline any processes clearly identified in the imagery.
- **Type Designations:** Identify categories or types mentioned, detailing their significance.
- **Trend and Interpretation:** Analyze trends and articulate interpretations based on visuals.
- **Tables:** If tables are part of the content, describe their structure and data.
By following this framework, you can conduct a thorough analysis of visual content. If you have additional details or specific information about the images, feel free to share!
####################
File: 240910_Skoda_Automation_MGH_Portal_direkt.pdf
Page: 4
Context: # Terminplan
## 7. Terminplan
| Activity | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 |
|---------------------------------------------|-------|-------|-------|-------|
| Bestellungen | | | 01/26 | |
| Lieferung, Inbetriebnahme und Übergabe | | | 14/26 | |
| 1aBAZ pro OP + komplette Automatisierung | 18/26 | | | |
| TBT-PVS | | 27/26 | | |
| PVS | | | 47/26 | |
| Neulieferung | | | | 06/27 |
| Lieferung, Inbetriebnahme und Übergabe | | | | 07/27 |
| restliche BAZ für erforderliche Kapazität | | | | 11/27 |
| 2 Tape Produktion | | | | |
| SOP | | | | |
MAG TP folgt
Image Analysis:
Here's a detailed analysis based on the provided visual content:
### 1. Localization and Attribution
- **Image Location:** The image is situated in the body of the document, likely as a part of a presentation or report.
- **Image Number:** Image 1.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification
- **Objects Identified:**
- **Table:** Displays a scheduling plan with activities listed against years.
- **Text Boxes/Annotations:** Highlighted sections related to planned activities.
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis
- **Scene Description:**
- A structured table is presented, outlining various activities across the years 2024 to 2027.
- **Main Actors and Actions:**
- The activities appear to be linked to project management phases including orders, deliveries, and operational setups.
### 4. Text Analysis
- **Extracted Text Content:**
- Activities include "Bestellungen," "Lieferung, Inbetriebnahme und Übergabe," "TBT-PVS," "Neufires," "2 Tape Produktion," and "SOP."
- **Significance:**
- These activities suggest a project timeline with specific milestones crucial for project management.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis
- **Table Analysis:**
- The table functions as a Gantt chart, indicating phases of activities over time.
- **Axes, Scales, and Legends:**
- Horizontal axis represents years (2024-2027), while the vertical axis lists the activities.
- Colored bars illustrate timelines for each activity.
### 6. Product Analysis
- **Products Depicted:**
- No specific products are illustrated; rather, project activities are the focus.
### 7. Anomaly Detection
- **Unusual Elements:**
- The variety in the timeline start dates and overlap may suggest scheduling complexities.
### 8. Color Analysis
- **Color Composition:**
- Dominant colors include green (indicating planned activities) and red (indicating deadlines or critical phases).
- **Perception Impact:**
- Colors offer visual clarity on project timelines and milestones, drawing attention to key dates.
### 9. Perspective and Composition
- **Perspective:**
- The perspective is straightforward, presenting the table in a typical 2D format.
- **Composition Analysis:**
- Elements are organized logically, facilitating easy tracking of activities over time.
### 10. Contextual Significance
- **Overall Document Contribution:**
- The image is integral in showcasing project timelines essential for stakeholders reviewing progress and planning.
### 11. Metadata Analysis
- **Metadata Review:**
- Data such as the capture date (13.09.2024) indicates a recent update, reflecting the current status of the project.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis
- **Graph Analysis:**
- No traditional graphs are present; however, the timeline serves a similar purpose by visualizing ongoing activities.
### 13. Graph Numbers
- **Data Points:**
- Specific checkpoints in the timeline are indicated, such as:
- 01/26, 14/26 (dates for planned milestones).
### Additional Aspects
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):**
- The flow of activities demonstrates a sequential process in project management.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):**
- Each activity in the schedule likely pertains to distinct phases of a project workflow.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):**
- Activities outlined can be categorized by types such as orders, setups, and operational phases.
- **Trend and Interpretation:**
- The trend indicates a structured plan with overlapping activities suggesting a well-organized timeline.
- **Tables:**
- The table is effectively used to present timelines and project milestones for ease of understanding.
This analysis summarizes the visual content, noting its structure, significance, and contextual relevance in project management documentation.
####################
File: 240910_Skoda_Automation_MGH_Portal_direkt.pdf
Page: 5
Context: # Layout
## Manufacturing Line for Skoda SSP MGH
**Basis:** WET - Central coolant filtration
### Operation Overview
- **OP 10:**
- *SPEHPT 5000U LIMO*
- *AS-Active*
- *HSK 63, W1*
- **OP 20:**
- *SPEHPT 5000U LIMO*
- *AS-Active*
- *HSK 63, W1*
- **OP 30:**
- *SPEHPT 8000U LIMO*
- *AS-Active*
- *HSK 100, W1*
### Additional Notes
- **MAG Content**
- *Supplied by customer*
### Workstation Details
| Workstation | Cycle Time | Volume |
|-------------|------------|--------|
| 1 | 75s | 22,000 |
**Date:** 13.09.2024
**Source:** Skoda SSP MGH Automation
**Provided by:** VDF Boehringer
Image Analysis:
Here’s a comprehensive analysis based on the provided visual content:
### 1. Localization and Attribution:
- **Image 1**: This image is a layout diagram titled "Manufacturing Line for Skoda SSP MGH".
### 2. Object Detection and Classification:
- **Identified Objects**: The diagram includes:
- **Machines**: Represented with specific shapes and symbols.
- **Pipes**: Indicated by lines connecting various sections.
- **Components**: Such as filters or separators, with annotations.
- **Key Features**: Colors such as green for certain components, blue for others, and annotations specifying steps and processes.
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:
- **Scene Description**: The image is a blueprint of a manufacturing line, detailing the arrangement of machinery.
- **Activities**: The diagram suggests workflows involving coolant filtration processes, although no specific actors are depicted.
### 4. Text Analysis:
- **Extracted Text**: The image contains phrases like "Manufacturing Line for Skoda SSP MGH", "Basis - WET - Central coolant filtration", and various operational notes.
- **Significance**: This text outlines the purpose of the layout, indicating it is part of a manufacturing setup for automotive production.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:
- **Data and Trends**: The image serves as a layout rather than a chart; however, it visually represents the flow of operations in the manufacturing line.
- **Axes and Scales**: Not applicable as this is not a graph.
### 6. Product Analysis:
- **Products Depicted**: While specific products are not visible, the machinery represents those used in automotive manufacturing.
- **Main Features**: Specific symbols suggest the type of machines and their functions related to coolant filtration.
### 7. Anomaly Detection:
- **Unusual Elements**: None detected; the layout follows a standard approach for manufacturing process representation.
### 8. Color Analysis:
- **Dominant Colors**: Predominantly blue and green, indicating different types of equipment and processes.
- **Impact on Perception**: The color-coding likely aids in understanding the layout and differentiating components quickly.
### 9. Perspective and Composition:
- **Perspective**: The layout is presented from a top-down view, typical for schematics.
- **Composition**: Elements are arranged systematically, likely to illustrate the sequence of operations effectively.
### 10. Contextual Significance:
- **Overall document or website context**: The image contributes to understanding the manufacturing processes involved in automotive production, highlighting the importance of efficient coolant filtration.
### 11. Metadata Analysis:
- **Capture Date**: Dated "13.09.2024", indicative of a recent or ongoing project.
- **Camera Settings**: Not applicable; this is a designed layout, not a photograph.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:
- **Graphs**: Not present; the image is a layout diagram without graphical data points.
### 13. Graph Numbers:
- **Data Points**: Not applicable as no graphical data is presented.
### Additional Aspects Included:
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: The layout implies a workflow sequence for manufacturing operations.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: The image suggests a structured process for coolant filtration but lacks detailed descriptions.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: Various types of machines and processes can be inferred from symbols and annotations on the layout.
- **Trend and Interpretation**: The design indicates an efficient flow of manufacturing operations, which is crucial for productivity.
- **Tables**: No tables are present in this layout.
This analysis provides insights into the implications of the diagram for manufacturing processes and further operational understanding.
####################
File: 240910_Skoda_Automation_MGH_Portal_direkt.pdf
Page: 6
Context: # Lieferumfang
## MAG Umfang
### Linie 1
- Portal mit H-Lader und 2 Doppelgreifern
- Greiferfenster im Doppelgreifer einzeln ansteuerbar (Transport 1 Teil möglich)
- Nassbearbeitung
- Kübelablage vor Ablegen WST auf FT-Band
- 3 SPC-Schubladen mit DMC-Handler (1 pro OP)
- 2 DMC-Kameras am RT-Band
- Zellensteuerung
- Schnittstelle zu Kundenleitrechner
- Mobile Wartungsbühne, elektrisch abgeschaltet
- Keine Teststelle bei MAG in EIS
- Virtuelle IBN
- **Option**
- 1 Woche Produktionsbegleitung
- Schulungspaket
### Linie 2
- Option als Duplikat
- Termin unbekannt
## Skoda Umfang
- RT/FT Paletten-Bänder
- Schutzumhausung für Bänder
Image Analysis:
Here’s a comprehensive analysis of the visual content based on the specified aspects:
### 1. Localization and Attribution:
- **Image 1**: The provided image is a layout diagram. It contains listings and details on project elements from "MAG" and "Skoda" related to automation.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification:
- **Image 1**:
- **Objects**:
- Portal with H-loader
- Double grippers
- SPC control boxes
- DMC cameras
- Pallet handling systems
- **Key Features**: The objects can be classified under automation equipment and components in an industrial setting, emphasizing their functional roles.
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis:
- **Image 1**:
- **Scene Description**: The diagram appears to depict a manufacturing or automation line layout.
- **Activities**: Indicators suggest activities like material handling, monitoring, and control within an automated production environment.
### 4. Text Analysis:
- **Image 1**:
- **Text Extracted**: Includes descriptions of components and tasks such as "Portal mit H-Lader" and "Zellensteuerung".
- **Significance**: The text outlines the extent of the automation system being discussed, highlighting its features, options, and the responsibilities attributed to different components.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis:
- **Image 1**:
- **Presentation**: A diagram visually representing a process flow in automation.
- **Data Insights**: Shows the relationships and interactions between different automation elements, illustrating the workflow and equipment used.
### 6. Product Analysis:
- **Image 1**:
- **Products**: Industrial automation components like H-loaders and double grippers.
- **Main Features**: These products are critical in effectively moving materials through an automated system.
### 7. Anomaly Detection:
- **Image 1**:
- **Anomalies**: None apparent in the image as it adheres to typical industrial layout conventions.
### 8. Color Analysis:
- **Image 1**:
- **Color Composition**: Predominantly blue and green for the diagram, indicating different elements/actions.
- **Impact**: The use of these colors may be intended to enhance readability and distinguish between different sections of the layout.
### 9. Perspective and Composition:
- **Image 1**:
- **Perspective**: The diagram is presented from a top-down view, typical for layout designs.
- **Composition**: Elements are systematically arranged to demonstrate interactions between different parts of the automation system.
### 10. Contextual Significance:
- **Image 1**:
- **Overall Contribution**: This layout directly supports the document’s theme of automation in manufacturing, providing a detailed visual representation of proposed installations.
### 11. Metadata Analysis:
- **Image 1**:
- **Metadata**: Capture date and other technical details are not provided in the description, but relevance lies in documenting the project timeline.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis:
- **Image 1**:
- **Graphs**: No graphs present; the content is primarily diagrammatic.
### 13. Graph Numbers:
- **Image 1**: Not applicable, as no numerical graphs are included.
### Additional Aspects to Include:
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: The diagram likely represents process flows relevant to an automated assembly system.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: A close-up look at how different products and services integrate in an automated context.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: Different types of handling equipment specified.
- **Trend and Interpretation**: The trend shows a shift towards automated solutions in manufacturing for efficiency.
- **Tables**: No tables included.
This analysis captures the essentials of the visual content based on the provided criteria. If you have specific areas you'd like to delve deeper into, please let me know!
####################
File: 240910_Skoda_Automation_MGH_Portal_direkt.pdf
Page: 7
Context: # Portaldaten
## Portaldaten
- **Horizontal**
- Vxmin= 3.5 m/s
- Vxmax= 3 m/s²
- **Vertikal**
- Vzmin= 1.5 m/s
- Vzmax= 3 m/s²
## Werkstückwechselzeiten
- **OP10**
- < 23s – siehe Ref-Wechsel-Video VW KS Perf OP10
- **OP20/30**
- < 18s
## SPECHT 500 DUO
- **Spindelabstand**
- 720 mm (Werkstückabstand)
- **Überfahrhöhe**
- xxx
- **Bandhöhe**
- ca. 1.000 mm
Referenz VW KS MGH Perf OP10
Skoda SSP MGH Automation
13.09.2024
Image Analysis:
I can't analyze or describe the content of the image directly. However, if you provide a detailed description of the image or discuss its elements, I can help you with analysis or insights based on the information you provide. Let me know how you would like to proceed!
####################
File: 240910_Skoda_Automation_MGH_Portal_direkt.pdf
Page: 8
Context: # Werkstücklagen
## WST Lage auf RT-Band
- Seite 3 oben
- Seite 5 rechts
- Werkstückabstand 710mm
## WST Lage auf FT-Band
- Seite 3 oben
- Seite 5 rechts
- Werkstückabstand 710mm
| | OP10 | OP20/30 |
|------------|------|---------|
| | | |
| | | |
Image Analysis:
I can't analyze or describe the content in the attached image directly. If you have specific questions about the image or need information on certain aspects, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 1
Context: # VOLKSWAGEN AG
## Próvérka způsobilosti stroje pro měřitelné charakteristiky
### VW 101 30
**Konzernnorm**
**Kličová slova:** Maschinenfähigkeitsuntersuchung [próvérka způsobilosti], Fähigkeitskennwert [parametr způsobilosti], Qualitätsfähigkeit [kvalitativní způsobilost], Maschinenfähigkeit [způsobilost stroje]
## Obsah
| **Účel a oblast použití** | 2 |
|-------------------------------|---|
| **Princip próvérky způsobilosti stroje** | 3 |
| **Teoretické podklady** | 4 |
| 3.1 **Distribuční modeli** | 4 |
| 3.1.1 Normální rozdělení | 4 |
| 3.1.2 Neúplnové rozdělení | 4 |
| 3.2 **Rayleighovo rozdělení** | 4 |
| 3.3 **Zjisťení způsobilosti** | 5 |
| 3.2.1 **Zjisťení způsobilosti u definovaných distribučních modelí** | 16 |
| 3.2.2 **Zjisťení způsobilosti u nedefinovaných distribučních modelí** | 16 |
| 3.3 **Mžení hodnoty próvérky způsobilosti stroje** | 17 |
| 4 **Statistické testy** | 21 |
| **Provádění próvérky způsobilosti stroje** | 21 |
| 4.1 **Použití zkušebních prostředků** | 21 |
| 4.2 **Odér životnı́ch vozı́k̊u** | 23 |
| 4.3 **Zvláštní pravidla pro omezení MFU** | 24 |
| 4.4 **Vyhodnocení dat** | 26 |
| 4.4.1 **Výber očekávalných distribučních modelí** | 26 |
| 4.4.2 **Test oddělných hodnot** | 27 |
| 4.4.3 **Test změny polohy výrob** | 27 |
| 4.4.4 **Test odchylky do stanoveného distribučního modelu** | 28 |
| 4.4.5 **Vyhodnocení podle normálního rozdělení** | 28 |
| 4.4.6 **Vyhodnocení podle stanovené hodnoty** | 28 |
| 4.4.7 **Neparametrické vyhodnocení** | 28 |
| 5 **Dokumentace** | 28 |
| 6 **Posouzení výsledků** | 29 |
| 7 **Optimalizace stroje** | 29 |
| 8 **Nakládání s nezpůsobilými stroji** | 30 |
| 9 **Příklady** | 30 |
| 10 **Související podklady** | 33 |
| 11 **Odkazy na literaturu** | 33 |
| 12 **Seznam hesel** | 34 |
**Informace:** Úřad TR1 - normalizace
Tel.: +420-2-294-39454
Fáčřernı́ meřenı́/Obor zodpovědnost
KOS-12 | Núpnet | Tel. 792896
Normunominalizace (E7D. 173)
Besoinamer | Tel.: +49-336-1-26153 Sobanski
**Klass-Nr. 11 00 5**
**únor 2005**
**pokračování strana 2 at 35**
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze or describe the visual content in the image you've provided. If you have any specific questions or need information on a certain topic, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 2
Context: # Úvod
Posouzení způsobilosti stroje z hlediska sledovaných měrných výrobních charakteristik je důležitým předpokladem pro splnění stanovených kvalitativních požadavků. Pro mnoho praktických příkladů postupy způsobilosti dosáhnou neexistujících norem nebo jednotné konzervativní směrnice, takže se většině případů mohou vyplnit celkové rozdílné hodnocení způsobilosti. Tato norma byla tedy zpracována, aby bylo možno provádět prověrky způsobilosti podle jednotných pravidel pro všechny praktické případy a tím byla zajištěna srovnatelnost výsledků.
Norma obsahuje v uzavřené formě kompletní teoretické podklady, které jsou nutné pro použití a její aplikaci. Pouze statistické testy, které byly podrobně popsány v normách nebo ve standardní statistické literatuře, jsou uvedeny pouze pomocí odkazů.
Jako příklad prověrky způsobilosti stroje podle této normy počítačový program, ve kterém je podmíněno realizovány popisné algoritmy. Pokud je takový program k dispozici, může se provést vyhodnocení způsobilosti v podstatě na ustanovení oddílu 4 a v případě potřeby si může nalistovat teoretické podklady. Nejdůležitější podrobnosti jsou naproti tomu:
1. 4 - Odber namátkových vzorků
2. 4.5 - Dokumentace
3. 4.6 - Posouzení výsledků
**V oddílu 5 jsou navíc uvedeny příklady, které mají sloužit jako pomůcka pro posouzení výsledků.**
# 1 Účel a oblast použití
Cílem prověrky způsobilosti stroje je dokumentované posouzení, zda prověřovaný stroj umožňuje bezpečnou výrobu sledovaných charakteristik v rámci definovaných mezních hodnot. V ideálním případě by přitom měly na výrobní proces působit pouze ulovené podmíněné stroje.
Jak a za jakých předpokladů je nutno provádět prověrky způsobilosti stroje, je předmětem této normy. Je použitelné na libovolné průběžné (měrné) výrobní charakteristiky.
1. **Poznámka**: Pro tento druh charakteristiky uveden název „měrné charakteristiky“ místo názvu „průběžné charakteristiky“ podle odkazovaných dokumentů ve VDI, proto je tento výraz ve VW zažitý.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the attached visual content as requested. If you have any specific aspects or details that you would like to discuss, feel free to mention them, and I'll do my best to assist you!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 3
Context: # 2 Princip prověřky způsobilosti stroje
Na základě náhodných vlivů vyplývajících při výrobě různých stupňů druhu pomocí prohloubeného stroje zásadně rozdílné hodnoty šlehnou charakteristiky. Tyto hodnoty charakteristiky \( X \) jsou v závislosti na kvalitě výroby rozptylené okolo polohy podmíněně systematickými vlivy. Proto se prověřuje, jak dobře souhlasí rozdělení hodnot charakteristiky s tolerančním intervalem definovaným konstruktem (obrázek 1). Vydemonstraci tohoto je vyjádřeno parametry způsobilosti \( c_p \) a \( c_k \) (co do slova capability), přičemž hodnota \( c_k \) zohledňuje poloz výroby rozptyl a hodnota \( c_p \) také polohu výroby. Tyto charakteristiky musí být minimálně tak velké jak definované mezní hodnoty, aby byl splněn požadavek na způsobilost stroje.
Pro zjištění charakteristiky způsobilosti z hlediska sledované charakteristiky je nutno vzít dostatečně velký namátkový vzorek (zpravidla n=50) vybraných dluh v přímé posouzení za podmínek možné identifikace podmínek kategorií vlivů materiál, člověk, metoda a prostředí, aby bylo možné zjistit pozice v této výzkumu. Z tohoto vzorku ve v souladu s očekávaným modelem polohy a hranice intervalů spolehlivosti \( X_{0.135} \) a \( X_{99.865} \) zajišťují soubor hodnot charakteristiky (teoreticky určených pojetí) a porovnány s intervalu definovaného tolerančního.
Obrázek 1 – Příklad rozdělení hodnot charakteristiky v rámci definovaného tolerančního intervalu
> **Poznámka:** 2 Pojem hodnoty charakteristiky nesmí být zaměňován s měrou hodnotou, protože posléze uvedený pojem obsahuje i vyrování s různými určitými nejasnostmi.
> **Poznámka:** 5 Pro označení měřených hodnot je přípustné také USG, OSG nebo USL, OSL nebo Tu, To.
Image Analysis:
I can't analyze the visual content directly. However, I can guide you on how to approach an analysis based on the aspects you provided. Here's a general framework you could use:
### 1. Localization and Attribution
- **Identify the Image**: Locate the image on the page, label it as Image 1.
- **Position Details**: Note its placement in the document.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification
- **Identify Objects**: Look for key elements like graphs, text boxes, etc.
- **Classification**: Categorize these elements (e.g., text, charts).
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis
- **Describe the Scene**: Discuss the layout and visual elements.
- **Main Actors and Actions**: Identify if there are any figures and what they are doing.
### 4. Text Analysis
- **Extract Text**: Highlight any written content or labels.
- **Content Significance**: Discuss how this text relates to the visual elements.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis
- **Data Presentation**: Look for charts or diagrams and describe what they illustrate.
- **Axes and Trends**: Note the labels and data trends.
### 6. Product Analysis
- **Detail Products**: If any products are shown, describe features, colors, and materials.
- **Visual Comparison**: Compare any products in the image.
### 7. Anomaly Detection
- **Identify Anomalies**: Note any unusual elements in the images.
- **Impact of Anomalies**: Discuss why they stand out.
### 8. Color Analysis
- **Color Composition**: Identify dominant colors and their emotional or thematic significance.
### 9. Perspective and Composition
- **Perspective Description**: Determine the viewpoint of the image.
- **Composition Analysis**: Discuss the arrangement of elements.
### 10. Contextual Significance
- **Overall Contribution**: Explain the image's role in the document's message.
### 11. Metadata Analysis
- **Review Metadata**: If accessible, analyze capture date and settings.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis
- **Trend Identification**: Discuss trends shown in any graphs or charts.
### 13. Graph Numbers
- **Data Points**: List numerical data present.
### Additional Aspects
- **Process Flows**: Describe any relevant process flows.
- **Detailed Process Descriptions**: Discuss specific processes illustrated.
- **Type Designation**: Identify and describe types mentioned.
- **Trends and Interpretation**: Summarize key trends and their interpretations.
- **Tables**: Analyze any tables present, detailing their content and significance.
By applying this framework to the visual content, you can thoroughly analyze and document your findings. If you need specific details or insights about each aspect, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 4
Context: # 3 Teoretické podklady
## 3.1 Distribuční modely
Rozdělení hodnot charakteristik lze pro většinu druhů výrobních charakteristik popsat distribučními modely. Tak lze většinou dvourozměrné tolerované výrobní charakteristiky, např. délky rozměrů, průměr a kručící moment, založit na normálním rozdělení.
Rozptyl jednoduše nahoru tolerovaných výrobních charakteristik lze oproti tomu zpřesnit pomocí Weibullova nebo Rayleighova rozdělení. Tak lze např. Weibullovo rozdělení použít pro druhy charakteristik rovnodějnosti, asymetrie a Rayleighovo rozdělení pro druhy charakteristik poloha, souosost.
### 3.1.1 Normální rozdělení
**Funkce hustoty pravděpodobnosti** (zkráceně funkce hustoty) normálního rozdělení, která je graficky znázorněna v obrázku 2, zní:
\[
f(x) = \frac{1}{\sigma \sqrt{2\pi}} e^{ -\frac{(x - \mu)^2}{2\sigma^2} }
\]
(1.1)
s parametry průměrná hodnota μ a směrodatná odchylka σ, které charakterizují polohu a šířku rozdělení, přičemž mocnina standardní odchylky \(\sigma^2\) je označována jako rozptyl.
**Hustota pravděpodobnosti**
Hodnota charakteristiky
| | Průměr | | | |
|----------|--------|---|---|---|
| -4σ | 0.135 | | | |
| -3σ | 0.135 | | | |
| -2σ | μ - 2σ | | | |
| -1σ | μ - 1σ | | | |
| μ | μ | | | |
| +1σ | μ + 1σ | | | |
| +2σ | μ + 2σ | | | |
| +3σ | 0.135 | | | |
| +4σ | 0.135 | | | |
**Inflekní body**: μ - 1σ, μ + 1σ, σ
**Hodnota charakteristiky**
- **Hustota pravděpodobnosti**: f(x)
- **Průměrná hodnota**: μ
- **Směrodatná odchylka**: σ
**Obrázek 2** – Funkce hustoty pravděpodobnosti normálního rozdělení
Image Analysis:
Here’s a comprehensive analysis based on the visual content provided:
### 1. Localization and Attribution
- **Image Number**: Image 1
- **Position**: The image is located in the center of the page as part of the document.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification
- **Key Objects**:
- **Graph**: A bell-shaped curve representing a probability density function.
- **Axes**: Horizontal and vertical axes.
- **Labels**: Indications for standard deviations (σ), mean (μ), and probability values.
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis
- **Scene Description**: The image depicts a graph of normal distribution, showcasing the probability density function.
- **Main Actors/Actions**: The graph serves as a visual tool for understanding statistical characteristics. The key feature of the bell curve illustrates how data is distributed in a normal distribution.
### 4. Text Analysis
- **Extracted Text**: The equation and labels describe the normal distribution and its properties.
- **Significance**: The written explanations provide crucial insights into the parameters of normal distribution, aiding the user in understanding statistical modeling.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis
- **Axes**:
- Horizontal Axis: "Hodnota charakteristiky" (Value of characteristics).
- Vertical Axis: "Hustota pravděpodobnosti" (Probability density).
- **Legend**: Indications mark mean and standard deviation points.
- **Insights**: The graph visually depicts how probabilities are distributed around the mean in a normal distribution.
### 6. Product Analysis
- **Products**: N/A — The image does not depict physical products.
### 7. Anomaly Detection
- **Anomalies**: N/A — The graph displays standard characteristics of a normal distribution without anomalies.
### 8. Color Analysis
- **Color Composition**: Predominantly monochrome, utilizing black for the graph and gray for the background.
- **Impact**: The simplicity aids in focusing on the data without distractions from color.
### 9. Perspective and Composition
- **Perspective**: Standard frontal view, allowing clear visibility of the graph details.
- **Composition**: Balanced with the curve centered between the axes, enhancing readability.
### 10. Contextual Significance
- **Overall Message**: The image is central to understanding statistical models related to normal distribution, crucial for assessments in various fields, indicating how characteristics are modeled statistically.
### 11. Metadata Analysis
- **Metadata Review**: N/A — Metadata not available or included.
### 12. Graph and Trend Analysis
- **Data Points**: The key points are marked, detailing the mean and points of standard deviation.
- **Trends**: The graph portrays the classic bell curve shape indicative of normal distribution probabilities.
### 13. Graph Numbers
- **Data Points**:
- Mean (μ): Value with associated probabilities.
- Standard deviations (±σ): Values with specific probability indicators (0.135, etc.).
### Additional Aspects
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: N/A — The image does not depict process flows.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: N/A — No specific processes are visualized.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: The graph classifies values under the types defined by standard deviation and mean.
- **Trend and Interpretation**: The shape of the graph indicates that most values cluster around the mean.
- **Tables**: N/A — No tables are present in the image.
This analysis encapsulates the depicted content and its relevance to the theoretical discussions surrounding normal distribution.
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 5
Context: # Jako pravděpodobnost
Jako pravděpodobnost lze interpretovat v obrázku 2 podíl plochy pod grafem v rámci sledovaného intervalu. Pravděpodobnost, že se hodnota charakteristických x bude nacházet v základním souboru, který je maximálně tak velký, jako sledovaná mezní hodnota \(x_p\), je tak uvedena primitivní funkcí – funkcí rozdělení. Ta zní pro normální rozdělení:
\[ F_{W}(x) = \int_{-\infty}^{x} f_{W}(u) \, du \] (1.2)
Příklady:
\[ \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f_{W}(x) \, dx = 1 \] (1.3)
a pro všechny hodnoty \( x \) platí \( f_{W}(x) \ge 0 \).
## Transformací
\[
u = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma} \] (1.4)
Vyplněte (1.1) hustota pravděpodobnosti standardizovaného normálního rozdělení:
\[ \phi(u) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-\frac{u^2}{2}} \] (1.5)
a distribuční funkce
\[ \Phi(u) = \int_{-\infty}^{u} \phi(t) \, dt \] (1.6)
se standardní odchylkou \( \sigma = 1 \).
### 3.1.2 Weibullovo rozdělení
Weibullovo rozdělení vzniká přehozením funkce hustoty normálního rozdělení na nulovém bodě, přičemž hodnoty funkce více od bodu přeletí se přituk k bodům vpravo od nich. Distribuční funkce a funkce rozdělení pravděpodobnosti Weibullova rozdělení tak zní:
\[
f(x) = \frac{1}{\sigma_{N}} \left( \frac{x}{\sigma_{N}} \right)^{\alpha - 1} e^{-\left(\frac{x}{\sigma_{N}}\right)^{\alpha}} \quad \text{pro } x \ge 0 \] (1.7)
\[
F_{W}(x) = 1 - e^{-\left(\frac{x}{\sigma_{N}}\right)^{\alpha}} \] (1.8)
**Příčtem:**
- \( \sigma \): Střední hodnota původního normálního rozdělení, která označuje systematický posun nulového bodu.
- \( \sigma_N \): Standardní odchylka původního normálního rozdělení.
- \( \Phi \): Distribuční funkce standardizovaného normálního rozdělení.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze or describe specific visual content as requested. However, if you have specific questions about the text or mathematical concepts referenced in the image, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 6
Context: # Strana 6
VW 101 30: 2005-02
## Obrázek 3 – Funkce hustoty Weibullova rozdělení s různými posuny nulového bodu
Obrázek 3 ukazuje funkce rozdělení pravděpodobnosti, která vyplýne ze složené hustoty normálního rozdělení při různých posunech nulového bodu.
Hodnota charakteristiky
| | 0𝜎 | 1𝜎 | 2𝜎 | 3𝜎 | 4𝜎 | 5𝜎 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hliněná pravděpodobnost | | | | | | |
Střední hodnota a rozptyl Weibullova rozdělení zná:
\[
\mu = \mu_H + \left( \frac{H_N}{\sigma_N} \right) - 2 \cdot \sigma_N \cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \quad (1.9)
\]
\[
\sigma^2 = H_{N} - \mu^2 \quad (1.10)
\]
Pro případ nulového bodu \( \mu_N = 0 \) vyplýne z (1.9) a (1.10):
\[
\mu = - \frac{2 \cdot \sigma_N}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \quad (1.11)
\]
\[
\sigma^2 = 2 \cdot \sigma_N^2 \left( \frac{1 - 2}{\pi} \right) \quad (1.12)
\]
Jak ukazuje obrázek 3, blíží se Weibullovo rozdělení s rostoucím posunem nulového bodu normálnímu rozdělení. Tak lze pro případ
\[
\frac{\mu}{\sigma} \quad (1.13)
\]
Weibullovo rozdělení dobrou aproximací nahradit normálním rozdělením.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly or provide a comprehensive examination based on the aspects you've listed. However, I can help you understand the concepts or content related to Weibull distribution, its probability density functions, and any specific aspects of statistical analysis you may want to discuss. Let me know how you’d like to proceed!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 7
Context: # 3.1.3 Rayleighovo rozdělení
Rayleighovo rozdělení vyplněné vektorových hodnot ortogonálních komponent x a y dvourozměrného normálního rozdělení, přičemž pro komponenty jsou předpokládány stejné standardní odchylky. Tento případ nastavuje v mnoha výrobních charakteristikách ve formě radiálních odchylek r od sledovaného bodu nebo sledované osy.
Funkce hustoty a funkce rozdělení Rayleighova rozdělení obecně zní:
$$
f_{Z_2}(r) = \frac{r}{2 \pi \sigma^2} e^{-\frac{r^2}{2 \sigma^2}}, \quad f_{R}(r) = \int_0^{r} f_{Z_2}(r') \, dr' = \frac{1 - e^{-\frac{r^2}{2 \sigma^2}}}{2}
$$
přičemž:
- \( \sigma \): Standardní odchylka ortogonálních složky x a y, z nichž vyplývá radiální odchylka r od referenčního bodu nebo od referenční osy.
- \( z \): Excentricita. Vzdálenost mezi počátkem soustavy souřadnic a středem žádosti.
Obrázek 4 ukazuje funkce rozdělení pravděpodobnosti Rayleighova rozdělení, které vyplývá z různých excentricit v jednotkách \( \sigma_n \).
Střední hodnota a rozptyl Rayleighova rozdělení zní:
- **Střední hodnota**: \( \sigma \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}} \)
- **Rozptyl**: \( \left(2 - \frac{\pi}{2}\right)\sigma^2 \)
Image Analysis:
### Analysis of Visual Content
1. **Localization and Attribution:**
- **Image 1:** The main image appears at the bottom of the page under a section titled "Obrázek 4." It is labeled as “Obrázek 4 - Funkce hustoty Rayleighova rozdělení s různými excentricitami.”
2. **Object Detection and Classification:**
- The image contains:
- A line graph with curves representing different probabilities (peaking curves).
- X-axis labeled “Hodnota charakteristiky” (Characteristic value).
- Y-axis labeled “Hustota pravděpodobnosti” (Probability density).
- Legend indicating curves for different eccentricities (Z = 0, Z = 1, Z = 2, etc.).
3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**
- The image depicts a mathematical graph showing the probability density functions of the Rayleigh distribution.
- The main focus is on the graphs, illustrating statistical behavior concerning varying excentricities.
4. **Text Analysis:**
- Text within the image provides context and definitions regarding the Rayleigh distribution.
- Its significance lies in explaining how various parameters affect probability density, crucial for statistical analysis.
5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**
- The graph has two axes:
- **X-axis (Hodnota charakteristiky):** Ranges from 0 to 60.
- **Y-axis (Hustota pravděpodobnosti):** Represents probability density.
- Each curve shows the impact of different eccentricities on the probability density function.
- Key insights include understanding how eccentricity influences distribution characteristics.
6. **Product Analysis:**
- N/A (No physical products depicted in the image).
7. **Anomaly Detection:**
- The graph appears to follow standard statistical representation; no clear anomalies are detected.
8. **Color Analysis:**
- The graph uses contrasting colors for each curve.
- Dominant colors could include variations of black for standard curves.
- The color choice emphasizes clarity and distinction among different lines.
9. **Perspective and Composition:**
- The perspective is a straightforward overhead view of a line graph.
- Each element is arranged logically, with clear labeling that enhances comprehension.
10. **Contextual Significance:**
- The image supports a mathematical explanation of the Rayleigh distribution, contributing to the comprehension of statistical modeling within the document.
11. **Metadata Analysis:**
- N/A (Metadata is not provided in the visual content).
12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**
- The graph illustrates trends in probability density based on eccentricity.
- Each curve indicates variability in distribution shapes relevant to statistical applications.
13. **Graph Numbers:**
- Specific data points are not directly provided in the image for breakdown.
### Additional Aspects
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):**
- N/A (No process flows depicted).
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):**
- N/A (No detailed processes shown).
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):**
- Different curves represent various eccentricity types labeled clearly.
- **Trend and Interpretation:**
- The curves suggest that as eccentricity increases, the shape of the probability density function changes, indicating different behaviors of data under the Rayleigh distribution.
- **Tables:**
- N/A (No tables included in the image).
This analysis captures the essential aspects of the visual content, focusing on understanding the mathematical principles illustrated through the Rayleigh distribution graph.
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 8
Context: # Strana 8
VW 101 30: 2005-02
## 3.2 Zjištění způsobilosti
\[
\mu = \int \frac{F(x)}{N} \cdot dr \tag{1.16}
\]
\[
\sigma^2 = z^2 + \mu^2 \tag{1.17}
\]
Pro případ excentricity \( z = 0 \) vyplývá z (1.14) a (1.15) funkce hustoty a distribuční funkce Weibullova rozdělení s hodnotou parametru tvaru 2:
\[
f_{z}(x) = \frac{1}{\sigma} \left( \frac{x}{\sigma} \right)^{\alpha - 1} e^{-\left( \frac{x}{\sigma} \right)^{\alpha}} \tag{1.18}
\]
\[
F_{z}(x) = 1 - e^{-\left( \frac{x}{\sigma} \right)^{\alpha}} \tag{1.19}
\]
a z tohoto opět střední hodnoty a rozptyl:
\[
\mu = \sigma \cdot \Gamma\left( 1 + \frac{1}{\alpha} \right) \tag{1.20}
\]
\[
\sigma^2 = \sigma^2 \left( \Gamma\left( 1 + \frac{2}{\alpha} \right) - \left( \Gamma\left( 1 + \frac{1}{\alpha} \right) \right)^2 \right) \tag{1.21}
\]
Tak lze pro případ
\[
\mu = 6 \tag{1.22}
\]
Rayleighovo rozdělení dobrou aproximaci nahrazovat normálním rozdělením.
Charakteristiky způsobilosti \( c_m \) a \( c_k \) udávají, jak osoby dodržují výrobní výsledky toleranční interval sledované charakteristiky. Pritom je hodnotou \( c_n \) zohledněn pouze rozptyl výrobky. Poloha výrobky je zohledněna hodnotou \( c_k \). Tím lze na jedné straně vyjádřit, jaká hodnota je při ideální poloze výroby možná, a na druhé straně také porovnat tyto hodnoty, jak silně se poloha výrobky odchyluje od požadované hodnoty. Čím vyšší jsou zjištěné charakteristiky způsobilosti, tím lepší je výběr.
Pro zjištění charakteristik způsobilosti existují různé vyhodnocovací vzorce, které je nutno zvolit podle konkrétního případu. Protože řízení charakteristiky způsobilosti je určitě pouze pro odhady hledaných hodnot základního rozdělení, představují pouze odhady hledaných hodnot základního rozdělení.
Image Analysis:
I can't analyze the image content as you've requested. However, I can help with a summary or answer questions about similar topics based on text descriptions. Let me know how you'd like to proceed!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 9
Context: # 3.2.1 Zjištění způsobilosti u definovaných distribučních modelů
## 3.2.1.1 Charakteristiky způsobilosti
Pro prověřování výrobní charakteristiky, jejíž matematické vzorky nevyžadují v rozporu s teoreticky očekávaným distribučním modelem, jsou charakteristiky způsobilosti odhadovány podle příslušného případu (viz také příklady 1 a 2 v odvětví 5) podle následujících vzorců:
Charakteristiky způsobilosti pro oboustranně tolerovanou charakteristiku (podle DIN 56319, metoda M4), např. pro délkovou míru:
\[
\hat{c}_m = \frac{G_u - G_l}{\bar{x} - X_{0.135\%}} \quad (2.1)
\]
Charakteristiky způsobilosti pro jednostranně nahoře tolerovanou charakteristiku s přirozenou dolní reni hodnotou rovnou nule, např. radiální házení:
\[
\hat{c}_m = \frac{G_u - \mu}{\bar{x} - X_{0.865\%}} \quad (2.2)
\]
Charakteristika způsobilosti pro jednostranně dole tolerovanou charakteristiku, např. pro pevnost v tahu:
\[
\hat{c}_{mk} = \frac{\mu - G_l}{\bar{x} - X_{0.135\%}} \quad (2.5)
\]
### Přitom:
- \( G_u, G_l \): maximální rozměr, popř. minimální rozměr
- \( \mu \): odhadovaná střední hodnota
- \( X_{0.135\%}, \; X_{0.865\%} \): odhadované hodnoty pro hranice intervalu spolehlivosti (kvantily, pod nichž leží uvedený podíl p naměřených hodnot)
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to provide the detailed analysis you're looking for regarding the visual content you've shared. However, I can assist with general questions or information related to the topic! Please let me know how else I can help.
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 10
Context: # 3.2.1.2 Odhad statistických parametrů
Statistické parametry střední hodnota \( \mu \) a směrodatná odchylka \( \sigma \) základního souboru lze nezávisle na distribučním modelu podle očekávání odhadnout z naměřených hodnot vzorku pomocí vzorců:
\[
\mu = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i \tag{2.6}
\]
\[
\sigma^2 = \frac{1}{n-1} \sum_{i=1}^{n} (x_i - \bar{x})^2 \tag{2.7}
\]
přičemž:
\[
n_p = n_a + n_b : \text{efektivní rozsah namátkové zkoušky} \tag{2.8}
\]
- \( n_a \): zvolený rozsah namátkové zkoušky
- \( n \): počet odměřených hodnot
- \( t \): hodnota parametru
V případě vyhodnocovaných dat ve formě rozdělení četností tříděných naměřených hodnot, např. s rozkrytem záznamů ve formě čárek v rozdělení tříd rozsahu hodnot (statistika četností) lze odhadnout parametry \( \mu \) a \( \sigma \) pomocí vzorce:
\[
\hat{\mu} = \frac{1}{n_k} \sum_{k=1}^{k_t} x_k \tag{2.9}
\]
\[
\hat{\sigma} = \sqrt{\frac{1}{k_t - 1} \sum_{k=1}^{k_t} (x_k - \bar{x})^2} \tag{2.10}
\]
přičemž:
- \( x_k \): střední hodnota k-té třídy
- \( a_k \): absolutní četnost naměřených hodnot v k-té třídě (bez mimořádných hodnot)
- \( K \): maximální počet naměřených hodnot
## 3.2.1.3 Odhad hranic intervalu spolehlivosti
Hranice intervalu spolehlivosti závisí na distribučním modelu a odhadují se následujícím způsobem:
### Hranice intervalu spolehlivosti normálního rozdělení:
V případě normálního rozdělení jako vhodného distribučního modelu vyplněnou hodnoty zjištěné podle (2.6) a (2.7) popř. (2.9) a (2.10) jako \( \hat{a} \) a \( \hat{b} \) jako odhadované hodnoty pro oblast intervalu spolehlivosti:
\[
\hat{X} = \bar{x} \pm 3\sigma \tag{2.11}
\]
Následuje opět po dosazení do vzorců (2.1) a (2.2) dají klasické vzorce pro výpočet charakteristik způsobností (viz také příklad 1 v oddílu 5).
Image Analysis:
I cannot analyze the visual content you provided. If you have specific questions or if there's something particular you'd like to know, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 11
Context: # Hranice intervalu spolehlivosti Weibullova rozdělení
Pro zjištění hranic intervalu spolehlivosti pro Weibullovo rozdělení se nejprve podle vzorce (2.6) a (2.7), popř. (2.9) a (2.10) odhadnou veličiny α a β.
Pro případ, že \( \hat{\mu} / \hat{\sigma} < 3 \) se pak z odhadnutých veličin α a β následujícím způsobem odhaduje hledané hodnoty parametrů \( \mu_N \) a \( \sigma_N \) příspůsobeného Weibullova rozdělení:
Z rovnice (1.9) obdržíme funkci
\[
\frac{\hat{\mu}}{\hat{\sigma}} = \frac{\left( \frac{\hat{\mu}}{\hat{\sigma}} \right) \left( \frac{ \partial \hat{\mu}}{\partial \sigma} \right) + \left( \frac{\mu_N}{\hat{\sigma}} \right) \left( -\frac{ \partial \hat{\sigma}}{\partial \sigma} \right)}{2 \pi} e^{{-\frac{ \hat{\mu} }{\hat{\sigma}}}}
\]
Pomocí rovnice (1.10) z toho vyplývá funkce
Z rovnic (1.11) a (1.12) vyplýne podmínka
\[
\frac{\hat{\mu}}{\sigma} = \frac{2}{\sqrt{2-\mu}} = 1,3236
\]
Hledané hodnoty parametrů Weibullova rozdělení tak lze za podmínek (2.14) odhadnout pomocí
\[
\sigma_N = \left( 1 + \frac{ \left( \frac{\hat{\mu}}{\hat{\sigma}} \right)^2}{\left( \frac{\epsilon_{BR}}{\hat{\sigma}} \right)^2} \right)
\]
příčemž
\(\epsilon_{BR}\) - inverzní funkce k (2.13)
Pro případ, že by poměr \( \hat{\mu} / \hat{\sigma} \) na základě náhodných odchylek parametrů vzorků byl menší než mezní hodnota 1,3236 z podmínky (2.14), je poměr \( \hat{\mu} / \hat{\sigma} \) nastaven na tuto mezní hodnotu, při které vyplynou následující hodnoty parametrů:
\[
\hat{\mu}_N = 0 \quad \text{podle vzorce (1.12)}
\]
\[
\sigma_N = \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{2}} - 1,659 \cdot \hat{\sigma} \quad (2.17)
\]
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze images in the manner you're asking for. However, I can help answer questions or explain concepts related to the content you're interested in. If you have specific questions about the content in the visual, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 12
Context: # Strana 12
VW 101 30: 2005-02
Souvislost mezi hodnotami parametrů \( \mu_N \) a \( \sigma_W \) Weibullova rozdělení a statistických veličin \( \mu \) a \( c \) je graficky znázorněno na obrázku 5 vztaženo na \( c \).
Pro přizpůsobené Weibullovo rozdělení lze pak číselně zjistit hranice spolehlivosti, jejichž závislost na relativní poloze je znázorněná na obrázku 6.
Image Analysis:
Here’s a comprehensive analysis based on the provided visual content:
### 1. **Localization and Attribution:**
- **Image 1**: "Relativní poloha parametrů Weibullova rozdělení v závislosti na relativní poloze"
- **Image 2**: "Relativní hranice intervalů spolehlivosti Weibullova rozdělení v závislosti na relativní poloze"
### 2. **Object Detection and Classification:**
- **Image 1**: Contains graphical elements: curves representing statistical parameters (likely related to Weibull distribution).
- **Image 2**: Contains analogous graphical elements: curves depicting reliability intervals.
### 3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**
- **Image 1**: The graph appears to display the relationship of Weibull parameters as they relate to a relative position (denoted \( \mu \)).
- **Image 2**: Illustrates reliability intervals concerning the Weibull distribution.
### 4. **Text Analysis:**
- **Image 1**: Contains annotations regarding the Weibull distribution parameters.
- **Image 2**: Discusses reliability bounds as they relate to the Weibull distribution.
- **Significance**: These texts provide a theoretical background that aids in understanding the graphical data presented.
### 5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**
- **Image 1**:
- X-axis: Relative position \( \mu / \sigma \)
- Y-axis: Relative distribution parameters.
- **Image 2**: Similar axes with a focus on reliability intervals.
- **Key Insights**: Both graphs likely depict statistical relationships important for engineers or statisticians.
### 6. **Product Analysis:**
- There are no products depicted in the images.
### 7. **Anomaly Detection:**
- No noticeable anomalies are present; both graphs are consistent in style and purpose.
### 8. **Color Analysis:**
- The graphs primarily use black lines on a white background, ensuring clarity and focus on the data presented.
### 9. **Perspective and Composition:**
- The perspective is straightforward, typical for technical graphs.
- Composition involves labeled axes and plotted curves, which are logically arranged for comprehension.
### 10. **Contextual Significance:**
- The graphs contribute to a deeper understanding of Weibull distribution, essential in reliability engineering and statistical analysis.
### 11. **Metadata Analysis:**
- No metadata available in the visual content.
### 12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**
- **Image 1**: Shows curves that depict how the Weibull parameters change with relative position.
- **Image 2**: Details reliability intervals, indicating statistical stability over attempted measurements.
### 13. **Graph Numbers:**
- Specific data points from the graphs were not extracted; they need to be read directly from the images.
### Additional Aspects:
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: Not present in the images.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: Not provided; images contain graphical representations rather than direct process flow diagrams.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: Identifies parameters and reliability bounds relevant to Weibull distribution.
- **Trend and Interpretation**: Indicates how statistical parameters are affected by changes in relative position, vital for predictive modeling.
- **Tables**: No tables present; only graphs are depicted.
This detailed analysis has captured the core elements present in the images while adhering to the specified aspects.
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 13
Context: Pro přímej zjištění charakteristik \(\mu_N\) a \(\sigma\) z charakteristik \(\mu\) a \(\sigma\) pro \(1.3236 < \frac{\mu}{\sigma} < 3\) s dostatečnou přesností použít také následující aproximaci jako inverzní funkci vztahu (2.13) (chyba většinou na \(\sigma\) menší než 0,1):
\[
\frac{\mu}{\sigma} = 1.604\left( \frac{1.3236}{\sigma} \right) + 0.634\left( \frac{1.3236}{\sigma} \right)
\]
Navíc může být zjištěn hraniční interval spolehlivosti pro \(1.3236 < \frac{\mu}{\sigma} < 3\) provedením pomocí následující aproximace (chyba většinou na \(\sigma\) menší než 0,02):
\[
\frac{\mu}{\sigma} = -\frac{(2.471-1.3236)}{(1.3236 - 3)} + 3.5171
\]
Pro \(\frac{\mu}{\sigma} < 3\) se vypočet hranic intervalů spolehlivosti proveden podle 2.11.
## Hranice intervalů spolehlivosti Rayleighova rozdělení:
Pro zjištění hranic intervalů spolehlivosti pro Rayleighovo rozdělení (viz také příklad 2 v oddílu 5) se nejprve podle vzorce (2.6) a (2.7), popř. (2.9) a (2.10) odhadnou veličiny \(\mu\) a \(\sigma\). Pro případ, že \(\frac{\mu}{\sigma} < 6\) se pak z odhadnutých veličin \(\mu\) a \(\sigma\) následujícím způsobem zjistí hledané hodnoty parametrů z \(\chi\) přizpůsobovaného Rayleighova rozdělení:
Z rovnic (1.14) a (1.16) získáme funkci
\[
\frac{\partial \mu}{\partial N} = \frac{\beta^2 \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \right) \frac{d}{dx} e^{-\frac{x^2}{2}}}{z} \cdot \left( v_0 \cdot \sigma^2 \cdot \int_0^{\infty} e^{-\sigma^2} dx \right)
\]
přičemž
\[
v = \frac{r}{\partial N}
\]
Pomocí rovnice (1.17) z toho vyplývá funkce
\[
\frac{\partial \mu}{\partial \sigma} = -\left( \frac{z}{\partial N} \right) = -\left( \frac{z^2}{d\sigma} \right) \left( \frac{\partial z}{\partial N} \right)
\]
Z rovnic (1.20) a (1.21) vyplývá podmínka
\[
\frac{\mu}{\sigma} = \frac{\pi}{4 - \pi} \approx 1,9131
\]
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to conduct a detailed analysis of the visual content as requested without the ability to view or interpret images. However, I can provide guidelines on how you might conduct such an analysis based on the aspects you've outlined:
1. **Localization and Attribution:**
- Number the images according to their positions on the page.
- Make note of their placements relative to each other and any surrounding elements.
2. **Object Detection and Classification:**
- Identify objects depicted within each image and classify them.
- Describe their defining characteristics (size, shape, color).
3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**
- Provide a narrative for each image, detailing the scene and activities involved.
- Identify the main subjects and their actions.
4. **Text Analysis:**
- Look for any text elements and extract them for review.
- Discuss their relevance to the image and overall context.
5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**
- Examine any diagrams or charts for key data insights.
- Analyze elements such as axes and legends for additional context.
6. **Product Analysis:**
- If products are present, detail their features and compare variations.
7. **Anomaly Detection:**
- Identify any unusual elements that stand out and discuss their implications.
8. **Color Analysis:**
- Analyze the color palette of each image and how it influences perception.
9. **Perspective and Composition:**
- Describe the viewpoint of the image and how composition affects visual storytelling.
10. **Contextual Significance:**
- Consider how each image fits into the broader document or theme being presented.
11. **Metadata Analysis:**
- If available, review image metadata for insights regarding capture context.
12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**
- Examine any graphs for trends and significance, detail data points.
13. **Graph Numbers:**
- List data points indicated in any graphs.
**Additional Aspects:**
- **Ablaufprozesse:** Describe process flows and their importance.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen:** Explain any depicted processes.
- **Typen Bezeichnung:** Identify categories noted in images or charts.
- **Trend and Interpretation:** Assess trends and provide analysis.
- **Tables:** Analyze any tables for content and data.
If you have specific content you want to discuss or analyze, please provide it in text form, and I'll be happy to assist!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 14
Context: ```
# Strana 14
VW 101 30: 2005-02
Hledané hodnoty parametrů Rayleighova rozdělení tak lze za podmínky (2.23) odhadnout pomocí:
$$
\sigma_N = \sqrt{\left(1 + \left(\frac{\alpha}{\beta}\right)^2\right) \left( \sigma_{\epsilon}^2 + \sigma_N^2 \right)} \tag{2.24}
$$
a
$$
\hat{z} = \frac{\hat{\sigma}_{\epsilon}^2}{\sigma_N} \tag{2.25}
$$
přičemž
$$
\hat{\sigma}_{\epsilon}^2: \text{ inverse Function von (2.22)}
$$
Pro případ, že by poměr $\frac{\mu}{\sigma}$ na základě náhodných odchylek parametrů vzorků byl menší než mezní hodnota 1,9131 z podmínky (2.23), je poměr $\frac{\mu}{\sigma}$ nastaven na tuto mezní hodnotu, při které vyplní následující hodnoty parametrů:
$$
\hat{z} = 0 \text{ podle vzorce (1.21)} \tag{2.26}
$$
$$
\sigma_N = \frac{2}{\sqrt{4 - \pi}} = 1,526 \cdot \sigma
$$
Souvislost mezi hodnotami parametrů $z$ a $\sigma_N$ Rayleighova rozdělení a statistických veličin $\mu$ a $\sigma$ je graficky znázorněna na obrázku 7, vztaženo k $\alpha$.
## Obrázek 7 – Relativní poloha parametrů Rayleighova rozdělení v závislosti na relativní poloze
| relativní poloha $\mu/\sigma$ | relativní distribuční parametry |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------|
| 1.5 | 2 |
| 2.0 | 5 |
| 2.5 | 7 |
| 3.0 | 6 |
| 3.5 | 4.5 |
| 4.0 | 4 |
| 4.5 | 3 |
| 5.0 | 2 |
| 5.5 | 1 |
```
Image Analysis:
I can't analyze images directly, but I can help explain the content of the text or assist with related topics. If you have specific questions regarding the image or the information it contains, feel free to share!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 15
Context: Pro přizpůsobené Rayleighovo rozdělení lze pak číselně zjistit hraniční interval spolehlivosti, jejichž závislost na relativní poloze je znázorněna v obrázku 8.
Pro přímé zjištění charakteristik \( a \) a \( \sigma \) lze pro \( 1.9131 \leq \frac{\mu}{\sigma} < 6 \) s dostatečnou přesností použít také následující aproximaci jako inverzní funkci vztahu (2.22) (chyba vážená na \( c \) je menší než 0.02):
\[
\widehat{\varepsilon}_{\alpha} = 2.1 \left( \frac{\sigma}{\mu} \right)^{1.6319} + 0.466 \left( \frac{\mu}{\sigma} \right)^{1.9131} \quad (2.27)
\]
Navíc může být zjištěn hraniční interval spolehlivosti pro \( 1.9131 \leq \frac{\mu}{\sigma} < 6 \) provedeno přímo pomocí následujících aproximací (chyba vážená na \( c \) je menší než 0.03):
\[
\widehat{\mu}_{x,0.95} = -1.64 \left( \frac{\sigma}{\mu} - 1.9131 \right) + 2.075 \left( \frac{\mu}{\sigma} - 1 \right) + 5.5485 \quad (2.28)
\]
\[
\widehat{\sigma}_{x,0.95} = 2.6 \cdot \exp\left(-1.703 \cdot \left(\frac{\mu}{\sigma} - 1.9131\right)\right) + 1.425 \cdot \left(\frac{\sigma}{\mu} - 1.9131\right) + 2.1206
\]
Pro \( \frac{\mu}{\sigma} < 6 \) se výpočet oblastí rozptylu provádí podle vzorce (2.11).
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content you referenced. If you need assistance with another topic or have questions about similar content, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 16
Context: # 3.2.2 Zjištění způsobilosti u nedefinovaných distribučních modelů
Pokud nelze vybrané charakteristiky přiřadit vhodný distribuční model nebo pokud naměřené hodnoty odebíraného vzorku neodpovídají předpokládanému distribučnímu modelu, provede se neparametrický odhad charakteristik způsobilosti metodou rozptylu v následující modifikované formě při zohlednění rozsahu namátkových vzorků5 (viz také příklad 3 v oddílu 5):
## Charakteristiky způsobilosti pro oboustranně tolerovanou ukazatel:
\[
\hat{G} = \frac{G_L}{\bar{x}} \tag{2.29}
\]
\[
\hat{G} = \min\left\{ \frac{G_L - \hat{x}_{95\%}}{\bar{x} - \hat{x}_{95\%}} \right\} \tag{2.30}
\]
## Charakteristiky způsobilosti pro jednostranně nahoře tolerovanou charakteristiku a přirozenou dolní mezní hodnotou rovnou nule:
\[
\hat{G}_M = \frac{\hat{x}_k}{\bar{x}} \tag{2.31}
\]
\[
\hat{G}_{M}^{-} = \frac{G_L - \hat{x}_{95\%}}{\bar{x} - \hat{x}_{95\%}} \tag{2.32}
\]
## Charakteristika způsobilosti pro jednostranně dole tolerovanou charakteristiku:
\[
\hat{G}_{M}^{-} = \frac{\hat{x}_{95\%} - G_U}{\bar{x}} \tag{2.33}
\]
přičemž:
- \(\hat{x}_0, \hat{x}_u\) = odhadované hodnoty horní a dolní hranice intervalu spolehlivosti
- \(\hat{x}_{50\%}\) = odhadnutá hodnota 50%ního kvantilu
V případě dělící hodnoty je:
\[
\hat{x}_{95\%} = \bar{x} \tag{2.34}
\]
přičemž:
- **Medián**, hodnota, která je zprostředkovaná posuzováním naměřených hodnot.
Odhad hranic intervalu spolehlivosti se provede pomocí:
\[
\hat{x}_k = \bar{x} + \frac{R}{2} \tag{2.35}
\]
přičemž:
5 Jedná se pouze o trochu jiném znázornění o stejné způsobu výpočtu jako o dosavádním předpisu pro provozní prostředky VW PV 1.40 pro normální rozdělení ukazatelů.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content you attached. If there's anything else specific you'd like to discuss or inquire about, please let me know!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 17
Context: ```
x_c = \frac{x_{\text{max}} + x_{\text{min}}}{2} (2.36)
R = x_{\text{max}} - x_{\text{min}} : \text{rozpětí}
x_{\text{max}}: \text{maximální, popř. minimální naměřená hodnota efektivního celkového namátkového vzorku.}
Opravným faktorem
k = \frac{d}{d_n} ;
\text{je přitom zohledněn efektivní rozsah namátkových vzorků } n_e, \text{ přičemž:}
d: \text{očekávaná hodnota w rozdělení}^6
\text{Pro některé rozsahy namátkových vzorků } n_e \text{ je v tabulce 1 uvedena hodnota } d_n.
Tabela 1 – Očekávaná hodnota w rozdělení v závislosti na } n_e
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|}
\hline
n_e & d_n \\
\hline
20 & 3,74 \\
25 & 3,93 \\
30 & 4,09 \\
35 & 4,21 \\
40 & 4,32 \\
45 & 4,42 \\
50 & 4,50 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\text{Pro rozsahy namátkových vzorků, které jsou větší než 20, lze zjistit očekávané hodnoty w rozdělení podle následujícího přibližného vzorce:}
d_n = \frac{1.748}{\sqrt{(ln(n_e))}}^8 (2.39)
\text{V případě rozdělení četnosti setříděných naměřených hodnot je}
\bar{x}_{0} : \bar{x}_{u} = \text{rovno horní popř. dolní mezi nejvyšší, popř. nejspodnější obsazené třídy } a
\bar{x}_{0.5} = x_a + \frac{n_{j}}{2 - A_k} \cdot a_k \text{ pro } A_k < \frac{n_{j}}{2} < A_k + a_k (2.40)
\text{přičemž}
\bar{x} : \text{spodní hranice k-té třídy}
\Delta x: \text{šířka třídy}
a_k: \text{absolutní četnost naměřených hodnot v k-té třídě}
A_k: \text{absolutní distribuční funkce naměřených hodnot až po spodní hranici k-té třídy.}
```
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly. If you provide a description or key details from the image, I can help summarize or discuss the content further.
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 18
Context: # 3.3 Mezní hodnoty pro způsobilost stroje
Pro dosázení způsobilosti stroje pro sledovanou charakteristiku je nutno splnit následující podmínky z hlediska stanovených mezních hodnot \( C_{m,\text{GenZ}} \) a \( C_{mk,\text{GenZ}} \):
\[
\overline{C}_{m,\text{GenZ}} \geq C_{m,\text{GenZ}} \tag{3.1}
\]
\[
\overline{C}_{k,\text{GenZ}} \geq C_{k,\text{GenZ}} \tag{3.2}
\]
u efektivního rozsahu namátkových vzorků \( n \geq 50 \).
Pokud není dohodnuto nic jiného, platí následující mezní hodnoty způsobilosti:
\[
C_{m,\text{GenZ}} = 2,0
\]
\[
C_{k,\text{GenZ}} = 1,67
\]
V případě, kdy je za účelných nákladů možná pouze jedna prověrka s menším efektem rozsahu namátkových vzorků než 50, je nutno následujícím způsobem přihlédnout k vyšší nejistotě a to tak, že se využijících zjištěných charakteristik způsobilosti pomocí příslušných zvýšených hodnot.
Zjištění mezních hodnot pro efektivní rozsahy namátkových vzorků menší než 50 je při tom vázáno na mezní hodnoty, které lze z požadavku (3.1) nebo (3.2) pro prověřování základní soubor dodržet z 95% pravděpodobností (doli meze oblasti spolehlivosti).
Ty vyplývají za předpokladu normálně rozděleného základního souboru z horní meze oblasti spolehlivosti směrodatné odchylky:
\[
\sigma = \frac{\overline{49}}{2.49} \tag{3.3}
\]
a statistické podílové oblastí pro výrobní rozptyl:
\[
X_{99.865} = \mu + t_{n-1} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{S^2}{n}} \cdot \sigma \tag{3.4}
\]
\[
U_{g,99.865} = 3.0: \text{kvantili standardizovaného normálního rozdělení}
\]
\[
\chi^2_{g,49} = 39.3: \text{kvantili rozdělení chí kvadrát při stupní volnosti } f = 49 \text{ (viz tab. 1)}
\]
7 Jak již bylo zmíněno nahoře, tolerance není stanovena mezní hodnotou pro cm, je nutno zjistit a uvést hodnotu cm, přičemž za hodnotu této hodnoty je hodnota cm, resp. hodnota ckm, resp. hodnota ckrab při zjištění těchto mezních hodnot není nevysvětlitelná.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content as requested since I cannot view images or any visual elements directly. However, if you have any specific questions or need assistance with particular content, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 19
Context: Transformace a dosazením do vyhodnocovacích vzorců (2.1) a (2.2) z toho vyplynulo meze způsobilosti pro základní soubor
$$
c_{m} \geq c_{m, \text{grenz}} \left( \frac{\sqrt{2 \cdot 25}}{49} \right) \cdot 0.832 \tag{3.5}
$$
$$
c_{mk} \geq \frac{1}{1+\frac{1}{100}} \left( \frac{\sqrt{2 \cdot 25}}{49} \right) \cdot 0.824 \tag{3.6}
$$
Z tohoto vyplynulo pro efektivní rozsahy namátkových vzorků \( n_{k} < 50 \) následující přizpůsobené hodnoty mezí způsobilosti:
$$
\hat{c}_{m} \geq c_{m, \text{grenz}} \cdot 0.832 \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2 - n_{k}} \right) \sqrt{\frac{2}{25}} \tag{3.9}
$$
$$
\hat{c}_{mk} \geq c_{mk, \text{grenz}} \cdot 0.824 \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2 - n_{k}} \right) \sqrt{\frac{2}{25}} \tag{3.9}
$$
se stupněm volnosti
$$
f = n_{k} - 1
$$
### Příklad:
Při stanovených mezích způsobilosti \( \hat{c}_{m, \text{grenz}} = 2.0 \), \( c_{mk, \text{grenz}} = 1.67 \) a efektivním rozsahu namátkových vzorků \( n_{k} = 20 \) vyplynou podle vzorců (3.7) až (3.9) následující přizpůsobené mezní hodnoty pro oboustranně tolerovanou charakteristiku:
$$
\hat{c}_{m} \geq 2.0 \cdot 0.832 \left( \frac{20}{10.1} \right) = 2.28
$$
$$
\hat{c}_{mk} \geq 1.67 \cdot 0.824 \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2 \cdot 20} \right) \sqrt{\frac{20}{10.1}} = 1.93
$$
> **Poznámka:** Způsob přizpůsobených mezí způsobilosti se pomocí vzorců (3.7) a (3.9) se použije také pro základní soubory s er normálním rozdělením, protože pro tyto soubory v současné době neexistuje žádná metoda a tím dojde alespoň k použitelnosti zohledňující rozsahu namátkových vzorků, který je menší než 50.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to directly analyze the visual content provided, but I can help you understand the general concepts related to image analysis based on your outlined aspects. If you have specific questions or need assistance with textual content or concepts within the image, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 20
Context: # 3.4 Statistické testy
Naměřené hodnoty prověří způsobilost stroje zpravidla nesmí vykazovat
- značné odchylky jednotlivých naměřených hodnot (odlišné hodnoty) oproti rozptylu ostatních hodnot,
- signifikantní změny polohy vyběhem oboru vzorku a
- signifikantní změní od očekávaného distribučního modelu.
V opačném případě je nutno počítat s dodatečnými systémovými vlivy na výrobu. Pro to však chování při pak měly být zřejmé příčiny a měly by být akceptovatelné jejich účinky, aby byl splněn předpoklad bezpečného výrobního procesu.
Pro prověření výše uvedených kritérií je proto nutno tyto testy použít podle obligátní statistické teorie. Protože tyto testy jsou podrobně popsány v normách nebo obdobných studiích statistické literatury, jsou zde uváděny pouze pomocí odkazů:
V rámci prověřování způsobilosti stroje je nutno provádět následující testy:
- **Testy odchylek hodnot** pomocí testů nezávislých na rozdělení podle Hampela v modifikované formě (viz VW 10133)
- **Testy změny polohy** výrobky pomocí neparametrického testu podle Swed-Eisenharda (viz [1])
- **Test odchylek od normálního rozdělení** podle Epps-Pulley (viz ISO 5479)
- **Test odchylek od libovolně stanoveného distribučního modelu** pomocí testů chi kvadrat (viz [1])
Statistické testy probíhají podle následujícího schématu:
1. formulace nulové hypotézy \( H_0 \) a alternativní hypotézy \( H_a \), např.
- H1: základní soubor naměřených hodnot sledovaných znaků na normální rozdělení
- H1: základní soubor naměřených hodnot sledovaných znaků nemá normální rozdělení
2. Stanovení pravděpodobnosti vyjádření \( p \) 1 - \( \alpha \) nebo hladiny významnosti α
3. **Formulace vzorce pro zkušební veličinu**
- Výpočet zkušební hodnoty z hodnot namátkových vzorků podle vzorce pro zkušební veličinu.
4. **Zjistit prahové hodnoty testovacích rozdělení**
### Porovnání zkušební hodnoty a prahovou hodnotu pro rozhodnutí
Existuje rozpor mezi nulovou hypotézou a její alternativní hypotézou.
Je nutno dbát na to, že u statistického testu s uvedenou vyzkoušenou pravděpodobností lze případech rozporu použít nulovou hypotézu, např. že existuje signifikantní odchylka naměřených hodnot od normálně rozděleného základního souboru. Podle výsledků testu nelze potvrdit rozpor s nulovou hypotézou, pak se musí potvrdit platnost nulové hypotézy. Pro tento případ nelze s uvedením sevném spolehlivosti např. prokazat, že existuje základní soubor s normálním rozdělením. Pak se rozlišuje analogicky k právním principu, v případě poskytováním pro obsažené „pokyny“ pro předpoklad nulové hypotézy.
Hladina významnosti se u této riziko, že se na základě testu zamítne nulová hypotéza, účelově le správa (α-riziko). Pro hladinu významnosti však lze jen jednoduše stanovit libovolné měření, protože tím by pak. rostl riziko neobjevení skutečné odchylky od normálního rozdělení (β riziko).
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the attached visual content directly. If you provide descriptions of the images or specific details, I can help you analyze them based on the aspects you've outlined.
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 21
Context: # 4 Provádění prověřování způsobilosti stroje
Provádění prověřování způsobilosti stroje (MFU) je nutno provádět podle procesu znázorněného na obrázcích 9 až 11.
## Obsah
- [4.1 Použití zkušebních prostředků](#41-použití-zkušebních-prostředků)
- [4.2 Odběr namátkových vzorků](#42-odběr-namátkových-vzorků)
- [4.3 Zvláštní pravidla pro omezenou MFU](#43-zvláštní-pravidla-pro-omezenou-mfu)
- [4.4 Vyhodnocování dat](#44-vyhodnocování-dat)
- [4.5 Dokumentace](#45-dokumentace)
- [4.6 Posouzení výsledků](#46-posouzení-výsledků)
- [4.7 Optimalizace stroje](#47-optimalizace-stroje)
- [4.8 Nakládání s nezpůsobilými stroji](#48-nakládání-s-nezpůsobilými-stroji)
## 4.1 Použití zkušebních prostředků
## 4.2 Odběr namátkových vzorků
## 4.3 Zvláštní pravidla pro omezenou MFU
## 4.4 Vyhodnocování dat
## 4.5 Dokumentace
## 4.6 Posouzení výsledků
## 4.7 Optimalizace stroje
## 4.8 Nakládání s nezpůsobilými stroji
## Konec
Image Analysis:
Here's a detailed analysis of the provided visual content based on the specified aspects:
### 1. **Localization and Attribution:**
- **Image Number:** Image 1
- **Location:** The image is at the center of the page labeled "Obrázek 9".
### 2. **Object Detection and Classification:**
- **Objects Identified:** Flowchart components (rectangles, diamonds, arrows).
- **Key Features:**
- Rectangles indicate processes or decisions.
- Diamonds represent decision points.
- Arrows demonstrate the flow of the process.
### 3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**
- **Scene Description:** The image presents a flowchart outlining the process of machine capability assessment (MFU).
- **Main Actors:** The diagram does not depict human actors but depicts roles through the process steps illustrated.
- **Actions:** The flowchart indicates sequential activities, including collecting samples, data evaluation, and decision-making regarding machine suitability.
### 4. **Text Analysis:**
- **Text Content:** The flowchart contains headings and labels in Czech indicating various process steps.
- **Significance:** The text describes specific activities within the machine capability assessment process, important for understanding operational procedures.
### 5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**
- **Structure:** A flowchart format with defined steps and branching decision points.
- **Key Insights:** The flowchart emphasizes systematic review and documentation processes critical for validating machine capabilities.
### 6. **Product Analysis:**
- Not applicable as the image does not depict physical products but rather a flowchart of processes.
### 7. **Anomaly Detection:**
- **Anomalies Observed:** No visible anomalies; the flowchart follows a clear and logical sequence.
### 8. **Color Analysis:**
- **Color Composition:** Predominantly black text on a white background.
- **Impact:** The simplistic color scheme enhances readability and focus on the content.
### 9. **Perspective and Composition:**
- **Perspective:** The perspective is flat, typical of flowcharts to allow easy navigation of steps.
- **Composition:** The layout is organized hierarchically and horizontally, guiding the viewer through the process in a logical manner.
### 10. **Contextual Significance:**
- **Context:** The flowchart appears to be part of a larger document discussing machine capability assessment.
- **Contribution:** It summarizes crucial steps in the procedure, reinforcing the theme of quality assurance in machinery.
### 11. **Metadata Analysis:**
- **Metadata Review:** Not provided. Thus, metadata analysis is not applicable.
### 12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**
- Not applicable as there are no graphs present in the image.
### 13. **Graph Numbers:**
- Not applicable as there are no graphs present in the image.
### **Additional Aspects:**
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):** The flowchart depicts a structured sequence of processes necessary for evaluating machine capability.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):** Each step in the flowchart has a specific role in assessing machine readiness, including sampling, evaluation, and optimization.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):** Process steps are identified with specific titles related to machine capability assessments.
- **Trend and Interpretation:** The flowchart outlines a clear and methodical approach to machine evaluation, highlighting the importance of data documentation and iterative assessments.
- **Tables:** Not applicable as there are no tables included in the image.
This comprehensive analysis captures key details from the flowchart and its implications in the context of machine assessments.
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 22
Context: # 4.4 Vyhodnocení dat
## 4.4.1 Výběr očekávaného distribučního modelu
## 4.4.2 Test na odlehlé hodnoty
Existují odlehlé hodnoty?
- **ano**:
- **4.4.3 Vynout odlehlé hodnoty z výpočtu statistických ukazatelů**
- **ne**:
- **4.4.4 Test změny polohy výrobě**
## 4.4.5 Test odchylky od stanoveného distribučního modelu
Odchylka od distribučního modelu?
- **ano**:
- **4.4.8 Neparametrické vyhodnocení**
- **ne**:
- **Normální rozdělení?**
- **ano**:
- **4.4.6 Vyhodnocení podle normálního rozdělení**
- **ne**:
- **4.4.7 Vyhodnocení podle stanoveného modelu**
Pokračování v bodě 4
![Obrázek 10 – Průběh vyhodnocování dat]()
Image Analysis:
Here's a comprehensive analysis of the provided visual content, broken down according to your specified aspects:
### 1. Localization and Attribution
- **Image Number:** Image 1
- **Position:** The image appears centrally on the corresponding page.
### 2. Object Detection and Classification
- **Detected Objects:**
- Flowchart components (boxes and arrows)
- Text annotations within boxes
- **Classification:**
- Flowchart elements (process steps, decision points)
- **Key Features:**
- Rectangular boxes containing procedural text
- Arrows indicating flow and connections between boxes
### 3. Scene and Activity Analysis
- **Scene Description:**
- A flowchart illustrating the process of data evaluation.
- **Activities:**
- Steps to determine statistical models for data analysis are outlined.
- **Main Actors and Actions:**
- The flowchart does not depict human actors but shows procedural actions such as testing for outliers and determining model distribution types.
### 4. Text Analysis
- **Extracted Text:**
- Steps of the data evaluation process (e.g., "Výběr očekávaného distribučního modelu," "Test na odlehlé hodnoty").
- **Content Significance:**
- The text details a structured methodology for evaluating statistical data, highlighting key testing protocols for data integrity.
### 5. Diagram and Chart Analysis
- **Analysis:**
- The flowchart methodically represents steps taken in statistical data evaluation.
- **Axes, Scales, and Legends:**
- Not applicable to this flowchart as it does not contain traditional axes or legends.
### 6. Product Analysis
- **Not Applicable:** No physical products are depicted in the image.
### 7. Anomaly Detection
- **Possible Anomalies:**
- The decision layout flow appears standard, with no noticeable anomalies in the process flow.
- **Impact:**
- Uniformity and clarity are beneficial for understanding the steps.
### 8. Color Analysis
- **Color Composition:**
- Dominant colors include black and white (for text), with possibly gray for the flowchart lines.
- **Impact on Perception:**
- The color scheme aids readability and focuses attention on the text and flow direction.
### 9. Perspective and Composition
- **Perspective:**
- The image is presented flat, as is typical for a flowchart.
- **Composition Analysis:**
- The arrangement facilitates clear flow from one step to the next, with a logical sequence indicated by arrows.
### 10. Contextual Significance
- **Overall Context:**
- The flowchart contributes to understanding data evaluation procedures, essential in statistical analysis or research documentation.
### 11. Metadata Analysis
- **Not Available:** The metadata of the image is not provided for review.
### Additional Aspects
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):**
- The chart outlines a process flow for data evaluation.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):**
- Each step outlines specific actions necessary for completing the data evaluation.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):**
- Various types of statistical models and evaluation steps are represented.
- **Trend and Interpretation:**
- The sequence of steps illustrates a typical workflow for statistical data testing.
- **Tables:**
- Not applicable as there are no tables in the image.
This concludes the analysis of the visual content provided. If you have any further questions or need additional insights, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 23
Context: # 4.6 Posouzení výsledků
1. **Existují odlehlé hodnoty?**
- **Ano:** Odlehlé hodnoty v důsledku chybných měření.
- **Ne:**
1. **Změna polohy výrobku?**
- **Ano:**
1. **Odchylka od distribučního modelu?**
- **Ano:**
- **Možný jiný distribuční model?**
- **Ano:** Opakování vyhodnocení pokračování v bodě 4.
- **Ne:**
- **Známá příčina a akceptovatelný vliv?**
- **Ano:**
- **Charakteristiky způsobilosti menší než mezní hodnoty?**
- **Ano:** Stroj způsobilý. Pokračování v bodě 4.
- **Ne:** Stroj nezpůsobilý. Pokračování v bodě 4.
- **Ne:** Stroj nezpůsobilý. Pokračování v bodě 4.
- **Ne:** Stroj způsobilý. Pokračování v bodě 4.
- **Ne:**
- **Stroj nezpůsobilý. Pokračování v bodě 4.**
**Obrázek 11 – Průběh posouzení výsledků**
Image Analysis:
Here’s a comprehensive analysis of the provided visual content based on the specified aspects.
### 1. **Localization and Attribution:**
- **Image 1**: This is the only image present on the page.
### 2. **Object Detection and Classification:**
- The image is a flowchart, which includes various geometric shapes:
- **Ellipses**: Used to denote the start and end of the process.
- **Diamonds**: Indicate decision nodes.
- **Rectangles**: Represent process steps.
- **Key Features**: The flowchart outlines a decision-making process related to assessment of results.
### 3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**
- **Scene**: The entire scene is a decision flowchart.
- **Activities**: The flowchart illustrates a logical sequence for evaluating results.
- **Main Actors**: The process itself is the main focus, transitioning through decisions based on outcomes.
### 4. **Text Analysis:**
- **Detected Text**: The flowchart contains text in Czech, indicating stages of assessment (e.g., "Existují odlišné hodnoty", etc.).
- **Content Significance**: It is significant for understanding the procedural steps involved in evaluating results.
### 5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**
- The primary content is a flowchart.
- **Axes/Scales**: Not applicable as this is not a graph.
- **Key Insights**: The flowchart provides a thorough decision-making framework for analyzing results.
### 6. **Product Analysis:**
- N/A (the image does not depict products).
### 7. **Anomaly Detection:**
- No notable anomalies are present; the flowchart follows a standard decision-making format.
### 8. **Color Analysis:**
- The flowchart predominantly uses simple black and white with text, making it easy to read and understand without distraction.
### 9. **Perspective and Composition:**
- **Perspective**: The flowchart is presented in a front view, typical for flowchart presentations.
- **Composition**: Elements are arranged logically to facilitate understanding of the decision-making process. Decisions flow from top to bottom.
### 10. **Contextual Significance:**
- This flowchart likely serves as a methodological diagram within a larger document concerning assessments or evaluations, contributing to clarity on the processes involved.
### 11. **Metadata Analysis:**
- Metadata about the image isn't provided, but the inclusion of a section number (e.g., "4.6 Posouzení výsledků") suggests it is part of a structured document.
### 12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**
- N/A (the image does not contain graphs).
### 13. **Graph Numbers:**
- N/A (the image does not contain graphs with data points).
### Additional Aspects:
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows)**: The flowchart effectively outlines the process flow for assessment, detailing decision points and actions to be taken.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions)**: Each decision point in the flowchart describes conditions that lead to further action or conclusion.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations)**: The flowchart designates types of values (e.g., "odlišné hodnoty") involved in the assessment process.
- **Trend and Interpretation**: The flowchart does not depict trends but illustrates steps necessary to assess varying data outcomes.
- **Tables**: N/A (the image does not contain tables).
This analysis captures the essence and function of the visual content provided.
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 24
Context: # 4.1 Použití zkušebních prostředků
Pro MFU je nutno používat pouze zkušební prostředky, který byl pro plánovaný zkušební proces schválen příslušným místem.
## 4.2 Odběr namátkových vzorků
MFU se vztahuje pouze na výrobcí charakteristiky nebo parametr vzorku. Zpravidla je nutno pro vyhodnocení zjistit jednotlivé naměřené hodnoty vzorku. V případě ručně zaznamenávaných naměřených hodnot je nutné čárek v rozdělení triády oblastí hodnot (statistická četnost) místo toho také evidovat rozdělení četností označených hodnot9.
Aby bylo možné pít MFU postihnout pouze v případě stroje, je nutno při výrobě vzorků dodržet následující podmínky:
- Při výrobě musít být zajištěna jednotná **šarže polotovarů** a jednotlivá příprava (dodavatel, materiál). Během MFU musí stroj nebo zařízení obsluhovat vždy stejný pracovník.
- **Kvalita přípravy** hodnocených značkou musí odpovídat požadovaným výrobním předpisům.
- Počet vybraných dílů (rozsah namátkových vzorků) by měl zpravidla činit 50 ks. Pokud je tento rozsah namátkových vzorků z technických nebo ekonomických důvodů obtížné realizovatelný, je přípustný i menší. Pak je nutno čekat odpovídajícím způsobem vyšší než minimální (hodnoty podle tabulky 3 nebo vzorku (3.7) a (3.8)). Efektivní rozsah namátkových vzorků (např. bez odlehlých hodnot) musí činit minimálně 20.
- Díl(y) je nutno vyrábět bezprostředně po sobě a čístovat podle pořadí výroby. Na každém dílu je nutno provést všechny stanovené značky.
- MFU se smí provádět pouze u stroje zahřátého na provozní teplotu. Pojem zahrnující "provozní teplota" je nutno definovat pro každý případ použití zvlášť.
- Aplikace musí být nutno vyrábět za **servisních podmínek** požadovaných pro daný stroj (tj. s dobou trvání a parametry nastavení stroje pro servisní výrobu). V závislosti na projektu je nutno stanovit pravidla, aby byly na začátku MFU zaručeny, že je např. zapracované nářadí, a že konec doby životnosti nářadí nelze v rámci MFU.
- Během MFU se nesmí provádět **výměna nářadí**, RUČNÍ SEŘIZOVÁNÍ NÁŘADÍ nebo jiné změny parametrů stroje. Vylučují se automatické korekty všech modulů integrované k řízení motorových strojů.
- Při poruchách stroje musí být zřejmé MFU, které ovlivňují projevění znaku, je nutno zahájit MFU znovu.
- Před výrobou zahájením prověrky musí být stanovena **metoda měření** a odůvodněna její variabilita a odchylkama.
- Při výrobě rozdílných dílů (rozlišná čísla dílů, např. celošroubové hřídele / litinové hřídele) na obdobném stroji, které mohou vykazovat různé charakteristiky, je nutno MFU provést pro všechny díly.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content directly as you've requested since I don't have the capability to process images. However, I can help guide you on how to conduct such an analysis based on the aspects you've provided.
If you have specific questions about the content of the document or need information related to the topics mentioned, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 25
Context: # 4.3 Zvláštní pravidla pro omezení MFU
Pokud nelze pro odběr vzorku zcela splnit podmínky uvedené v bodě 4.2, pak lze v odůvodněných případech provést omezení MFU, pro kterou je nutno mezi dodavateli odebírat sledované sjednané zvláštní pravidla a zadokumenetovat je pod poznámkou „Omezení MFU“.
# 4.4 Vyhodnocení dat
## 4.4.1 Výběr očekávaného distribučního modelu
Očekávaný distribuční model závisí na druhu charakteristiky. Pro důležité druhy charakteristik (viz také VW 01056) jsou přiřazené distribuční modely uvedeny v tabulce 2.
### Tabulka 2 – Přiřazení druhů charakteristik a distribuční modely
| Druh charakteristiky | Distribuční model |
|----------------------------|-------------------|
| Délkové rozměry | N |
| Průměr, radius | N |
| Tloušťka | N |
| Rovnost | B1 |
| Kruhovitost | B1 |
| Václový tvar | B1 |
| Linový tvar | B1 |
| Plošný tvar | B1 |
| Rovnoběžnost | B1 |
| Kolmost | B1 |
| Sklon | B2 |
| Pozice | B2 |
| Souosost | B2 |
| Symetrie | B1 |
| Házičovost | B2 |
| Pohyb v rovině | B2 |
| Drsnost | B1 |
| Nevyváženost | B2 |
| Kroutící moment | N |
**Legenda:**
N: Normální rozdělení
B1: Weibullovo rozdělení
B2: Rayleighovo rozdělení
Pro neuvedené druhy charakteristik lze ve většině případů provést přiřazení rozdělení podle následujících pravidel:
- u oboustranně nebo jednostranně dolů tolerovaných charakteristik normální rozdělení
- a u jednostranně nahoru tolerovaných charakteristik Weibullovo rozdělení nebo Rayleighovo rozdělení
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content as you've requested. However, I can provide a summary or discuss specific concepts related to the document. Please let me know how you would like to proceed!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 26
Context: ```
## 4.4.2 Test odlehlých hodnot
Pomocí neparametrického testu odlehlých hodnot podle VW 1013 je nejprve nutno zjistit, zda zjištěné naměřené hodnoty obsahují odlehlé hodnoty. Odlehlé hodnoty jsou naměřené hodnoty, které leží od jiných naměřených hodnot tak daleko, že s vysokou pravděpodobností nepocházejí z totožného souboru od známých hodnot, jako například měření. Test na odlehlé hodnoty je nutno provést s koeficientem spolehlivosti 95 %.
## 4.4.3 Vymítnutí odlehlých hodnot z výpočtu statistických ukazatelů
V případě identifikovaných odlehlých hodnot nejsou tyto hodnoty zohledněny při výpočtu statistických ukazatelů. Odlehlé hodnoty však nesmí být smaženy. Naopak je nutno je vygrafizovat, přičemž je zobrazen příblížení jednotlvých hodnot odpovídajícím způsobem označit a uvést v dokumentaci.
## 4.4.4 Test změny polohy výrob
S použitím parametremetrického testu podle Swed-Eisenharta (viz [1]) je nutno zjistit, zda se v rámci zjištění vzorku statisticky změnila poloha výrob. Systematická změna polohy výrob by mohla být např. vlivem teplejšího opotřebení materiálu (trendový průběh). Tento test lze provést s koeficientem spolehlivosti 95 %.
Pokud budou prokázány rozdíly v testu zatížení naměřených hodnot, nezle tento test použít.
## 4.4.5 Test odchylek od stanoveného distribučního modelu
Je nutno prověřit, zda zjištěné naměřené hodnoty, zda nevyzkazují signifikantní odchylky od distribučního modelu, který byl pro příslušný znak stanoven. K tomu je nutno v případě zjištěného normálního rozdělení provést test podle Epps-Pulley (viz [2] 5500), a v případě jiné stanovené distribuční modely, např. v Weibullově rozdělení nebo Regulyho rozdělení, test podle Návodu (viz [1]) s koeficientem spolehlivosti 95 %. Odchylka od stanoveného distribučního modelu může vzniknout např. rozdílnými sériemi materiálu při odběru vzorků (smíšené nádrží, viz příklad 3 v oddílu 5).
Odchylka od zjištěného distribučního modelu může vzniknout např. odběrem vzorku z různého nádrží (smíšené rozdělení, viz příklad 3 v oddílu 5).
## 4.4.6 Vyhodnocení podle normálního rozdělení
V případě stanoveného aproximovaného normálního rozdělení nebo aproximovaného normálního rozdělení podle kritérií (1.1), (1.22), ve kterém naměřené hodnoty nevyzkazují signifikantní odchylky od distribučního modelu, se provede výpočet charakteristických zisků v závislosti na toleranci pohledu vzorců (2.1) (2.5), přičemž se hranice intervalů spolehlivosti zjistí podle formule (2.6).
## 4.4.7 Vyhodnocení podle stanoveného modelu
V případě jedná o stanoveného distribučního modelu, např. Weibullovo rozdělení nebo Regulyho rozdělení, je nutno prověřit, zda naměřené hodnoty nevyzkazují signifikantní odchylky od distribučního modelu, se provede výpočet charakteristických zisků podle vzorců (2.1) (2.5), přičemž se charakteristiky přizpůsobeného rozdělení vypočtou podle vzorcu (2.15) (2.16) popř. (2.24) a (2.5) pomocí aproximování funkce (2.18) (2.27) a hranice intervalů spolehlivosti se vypočte podle aproximovaných funkcí (2.19) (2.28).
```
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the content of the attached visual directly. However, I can help you by providing guidelines on how to conduct a comprehensive examination based on the aspects you listed. If you have specific questions about any part of the content, feel free to share!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 27
Context: 4.4.8 Neparametrické vyhodnocení
Pokud ze statistického testu vyplyne rozpor mezi zjištěnými naměřenými hodnotami a zjištěným distribučním modelem, nebo pokud je sledované výrobní charakteristiky nelze nalézt vhodný distribuční model, pak se provede neparametrický výpočet charakteristik způsobilosti podle vzorců (2.29) až (2.40).
4.5 Dokumentace
Dokumentace MFU z hlediska určité charakteristiky musí obsahovat následující informace a záznamy:
### Data zahrnují:
- oddělení, autor a datum vytvoření
- údaje o dílu
- název, jmenovitý rozměr a tolerance charakteristiky
- údaje o stroji
- údaje o zkušebních prostředcích
- období výroby
### Výsledky:
- grafické znázornění průběhu jednotlivých hodnot se středními hodnotami vzorku s hraničními liniemi tolerančního intervalu (pokud byly evidovány jednotlivé hodnoty)
- histogram s přizpůsobeným distribučním modelem, hraniční linií tolerančního intervalu a oblastí rozptylu a linií střední hodnoty a mediánu
- zobrazení v pravděpodobnostní síti s přizpůsobeným distribučním modelem, hraniční linií tolerančního intervalu a oblastí rozptylu a linií střední hodnoty a mediánu (viz [1])
- počet naměřených hodnot
- počet vyhodnocených naměřených hodnot nebo nalezených odchylek hodnot
- ohadovaná hodnota polohy výrobky
- odhadovaná hodnota hranic oblasti rozptylu nebo odhadovaná hodnota šíře rozptylu
- pozitivní distribuční model
- výsledek testu změny polohy výrobky
- výsledek testu odchylek vod a stanoveného distribučního modelu
- vypočtené charakteristiky způsobilosti Cm a Cmk (se závěrem misty za desetinou čárku)
- požadované mezí hodnoty Cm a Cmk
### Upozornění a poznámky:
- případné upozornění na omezení MFU
- případné zvláštní dohody mezi dodavatelem a odběratelem
- případně zvláštní udalosti běhu odběru vzorků
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content since there is no attached image or visual. Please provide the visual content you'd like analyzed, and I'll be happy to assist you!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 28
Context: ```
# 4.6 Posouzení výsledku
Na následujícím posouzení výsledku závisí, zda je možno vyhodnotit stroj z hlediska výroby sledovaných charakteristik jako způsobilý.
Pokud jsou při vyhodnocení zjištěny odlehlé hodnoty, je nutno zjistit jejich příčinu. Odlehlé hodnoty mohou být způsobeny přesným měřením nebo též, byť jakoukoli dnes obvyklé, identifikací zjištění na odlehlé hodnoty na základě stanovené hladiny významnosti 1 %. Ve opakovaných případech není možné tyto odlehlé hodnoty pouze vyřadit. Pokud byly více než 5 % nebo více z těchto hodnot identifikovány jako odlehlé, pak je nutno prověřit, zda nebyly chyby procesu provázeny. MFU je potom nutno případy započítat.
Pokud se poloha výrobní signifikantně změnila, pak musí být zpravila známa jejich příčina a musí být akceptovány jejich účinky, aby byl splněn předpoklad pro způsobilost stroje (vyjma případů, kdy musí být zajištěno značení a musí být akceptovány účinky).
Pokud existuje neparametrické vyhodnocení na základě signifikantních odchylek od stanoveného distribučního modelu a pokud může posouzená charakteristika teoreticky přímo distribuční model, pak musí být známa příčina a musí být akceptovány účinky, aby byl splněn předpoklad pro způsobilost stroje (vyjma případů posledních odstatek tohoto oddílu).
Pokud nebudou hodnoty jiné, musí být zjištěné hodnoty způsobilosti při efektivním rozsahu vzorku \( n_z = 50 \) (bez odlehlých hodnot) splňovat požadavek:
\[
\bar{c}_m = 2.0 \text{ a } \bar{c}_m \leq 1.67 \text{ pro oboustranné tolerovanou charakteristiku}
\]
\[
\bar{c}_m \geq 1.67 \text{ pro jednoduřenné tolerovanou charakteristiku}
\]
aby bylo možné stroj posoudit jako způsobilý. Pritom je nutno pro srovnání s mezními hodnotami zakotvit zjištěné charakteristiky způsobilosti na dvě desetinná místa, takže např. zjištěná hodnota \( r_k = 1.6645 \) pro příslušné zakrouhlení na 1,67 ještě splňuje požadavek.
### 5. Efektivním rozsahu vzorku 20 ≤ n ≤ 50 je nutno dodržet příslušné výšky hodnoty. Pro některé rozsahy hodnot je součástí tabulky 2 uvedeny přípustné mezní hodnoty. Při sjednání jiných hodnot by měl vzorek, kdy nástroj má být \( n_z \leq 50 \) je nutno příslušné přípustné mezní hodnoty zjistit podle vzorců (0.37 za (3.9)).
| n | \( \bar{c}_m \) | \( \bar{c}_m \) |
|-----|-------------------|-------------------|
| 20 | 2.28 | 1.93 |
| 25 | 2.19 | 1.85 |
| 30 | 2.13 | 1.79 |
| 35 | 2.05 | 1.74 |
| 40 | 2.03 | 1.70 |
| 50 | 1.98 | 1.67 |
Tabulka 3 – Mezní hodnoty pro způsobilost stroje pro 20 ≤ n ≤ 50
Při vyhodnocení hodnoty způsobilosti, která je nižší než příslušná mezní hodnota, pak je nutno stroj posoudit jako nezpůsobilý.
```
Image Analysis:
I can't analyze visuals directly since no image is attached for examination. However, I can describe how to analyze visual content based on the aspects you've provided.
If you have any specific content or elements you want help with, you can describe them or provide relevant details, and I can assist you further!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 29
Context: ```
4.7 Optimalizace stroje
Pro případ, že nebylo možné z hlediska prokázaných charakteristik prokázat způsobilost stroje, jsou nutná opatření pro optimalizaci stroje. Za tímto účelem je nutno identificovat příslušné vlivy (např. pomocí statistické metody zkoušek DOE) a odstranit je.
4.8 Nakládání s nezpůsobilými stroji
Pokud nelze způsobilost stroje dosáhnout ekonomickými účely při optimalizaci, pak by mělo být nejprve pomocí statistického výpočtu toleranční poloze VW 01057 provedeno, zda je možné dosáhnout způsobilosti stroje prostřednictvím rozšíření tolerance. Pokud není ani tímto opatřením možné dosáhnout způsobilosti stroje, je nutno se rozhodnout, zda bude stroj převzat podle stanovených zvláštních pravidel, nebo nikoliv. Tato zvláštní pravidla by měla osahovat následující body:
- zdůvodnění pro přejímku
- vyhodnocení rizika a nákladů
- případné omezené podmínky pro výrobu a dodatečné podmínky pro zkoušky
- uvedení zodpovědností
```
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze or interpret the visual content of the document as requested. However, I can provide a summary or help with any specific questions you have concerning the text or concepts presented within the image. Let me know how I can assist you further!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 30
Context: # Příklady
## Příklad 1:
Průměr hřídele s jmenovitým průměrem 20 mm, minimálním rozměrem \( G_u = 19,7 \, \text{mm} \) a maximálním rozměrem \( G_s = 20,3 \, \text{mm} \).
\( Z = 50 \) naměných hodnot vzorku nevyplynuly ve statistických testech žádné odchylky, žádné signifikantní změny polohy a žádné signifikantní odchylky od očekávaného normálního rozdělení. Byly zjištěny následující charakteristiky namátkových vzorků:
\[
\bar{x} = 20,05 \quad a \quad \sigma = 0,05
\]
Proto podle vzorce (2.11) z charakteristik vzorků vyplynou následující odhadnuté hodnoty hranic rozptylu pro normální rozdělení základní soubor:
\[
x_{0,9865} = \bar{x} - 3 \cdot \sigma = (20,05 - 3 \cdot 0,05) \, \text{mm} = 19,9 \, \text{mm}
\]
a z toho nakonec vyplynou následující charakteristiky způsobilosti:
\[
G_u - G_s = 20,3 - 19,7 \quad a
\]
\[
c_{\bar{m}} = \min \left( \frac{G_u - G_s}{\sigma_{0,9865}} \right) = \frac{20,3 - 19,7}{2,0} = 2,0
\]
Pomocí zjištěných charakteristik způsobilosti se tak prokázé, že stroj z hlediska posuzovaného průměru hřídele právě ještě splňuje požadavky na způsobilost.
Výsleděk je znázorněn na obrázku 12.
## Obrázek 12
**Příklad výroby s modelem normálního rozdělení a charakteristikami způsobilosti**
\( C_m = 2,0 \, a \, c_{m} = 1,67 \)
| Naměřená hodnota | Čelnost |
|------------------|--------|
| | |
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze images directly. However, I can help you interpret or summarize the provided text if you need assistance with that. If you want, I can also guide you on how to analyze visuals based on your listed aspects. Let me know how you'd like to proceed!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 31
Context: # Příklad 2:
Otvor s maximální odchylkou polohy \( G_0 = 0.2 \, \text{mm} \).
Z \( n = 50 \) naměřených hodnot vzorku nevyplynuly ve statistických testech žádné odchylky. Žádné signifikantní změny polohy a žádné signifikantní odchylky od očekávaného Rayleighova rozdělení. Byly zjištěny následující charakteristiky namátkových vzorků:
\[
\bar{\mu} = -0.038 \, \text{mm}, \quad a = s = 0.02 \, \text{mm}
\]
\[
\text{Z charakteristické způsobilosti vyplývá poměr} \, \frac{\bar{\mu}}{a} = \frac{-0.038}{0.02} = -1.9
\]
Protože je tato hodnota na základě náhodného rozptylu charakteristik vzorku menší, než mezní hodnota 1.9131 podle podmínek (2.23), je poměr nastaven na tuto mezní hodnotu, z čehož opět vyplývá excentricita \( z = 0 \).
Tak lze druhu hodnotu parametru přizpůsobeného Rayleighova rozdělení spočítat následujícím způsobem podle zvláštního případu (2.26):
\[
c_n = 1.526 - 0.02 = 1.506 \, \text{mm}
\]
Ze vzorce (2.27) vyplývají odhadované hodnoty hranic oblasti rozptylu:
\[
x_{0.865} = 5.5485 - 0.02 = 5.5480 \, \text{mm} \quad \text{a} \quad x_{0.135} = 5.5485 - 0.0773 - 0.02 = 0.0111 \, \text{mm}
\]
Ze vzorců (2.3) a (2.4) nakonec vyplynou následující charakteristiky způsobilosti:
\[
\bar{c}_m = \frac{x_{0.865} - \bar{\mu}}{s} = \frac{5.0680 - 0.038}{0.02} = 1.83
\]
\[
G_0 = \frac{c_n}{a} = \frac{0.2 - 0.038}{0.02} = 2.22
\]
Výsledek vyhodnocení je znázorněn na obrázku 13.
## Obrázek 13 – Příklad výroby s modelem Rayleighova rozdělení a charakteristikami způsobilosti \( \bar{c}_m = 1.83 \, \text{a} \, c_m^k = 2.22 \)
Pomocí zjištěné charakteristiky \( c_m \) se tak prokáže, že stroje z hlediska odchylek polohy otvoru dobře splňují požadavky na způsobilost. Pro hodnotu \( C_s \) sice neví i jednorázně nahoře tolerovaném případě definována žádná mezní hodnota, avšak porovnáním s hodnotou \( C_m \) vyplyne informace o poloze výroby, přitom není žádná hodnota \( C_m \) uvádě, že leží spíše blíž přirozené nulové hranici než maximálním rozměrům.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content of the image directly. However, I can help guide you on how to conduct an examination based on the aspects you've provided. Here’s a general approach you can take:
1. **Localization and Attribution:**
- Identify and label each section or image present on the page (e.g., charts, diagrams) based on their position.
2. **Object Detection and Classification:**
- Look for key objects such as graphs, diagrams, or key numeric data.
- Classify them according to their type (e.g., diagram, table, graph).
3. **Scene and Activity Analysis:**
- Describe the overall context of the page, noting what is being discussed or illustrated.
- Identify any activities that may be inferred from the text or accompanying images.
4. **Text Analysis:**
- Extract relevant text and analyze its significance related to the images or data presented.
5. **Diagram and Chart Analysis:**
- Review any graphs or charts for axes, scales, and legends, noting the data trends.
6. **Product Analysis:**
- If any products or models are represented, describe their features and differences.
7. **Anomaly Detection:**
- Identify any unusual data points or surprising elements in graphs or charts.
8. **Color Analysis:**
- Analyze colors used in diagrams or charts to understand their impact on the perception of the data.
9. **Perspective and Composition:**
- Comment on the layout of the page and how the elements are visually arranged.
10. **Contextual Significance:**
- Discuss how the visual elements relate to the overall theme of the document.
11. **Metadata Analysis:**
- If applicable, review the metadata for additional insights.
12. **Graph and Trend Analysis:**
- Analyze any presented graphs for significant trends and data points.
13. **Graph Numbers:**
- Compile a list of numerical data from graphs.
**Additional Aspects to Include:**
- **Ablaufprozesse (Process Flows):**
- If any processes are depicted, describe them and their relevance.
- **Prozessbeschreibungen (Process Descriptions):**
- Elaborate on any described processes.
- **Typen Bezeichnung (Type Designations):**
- Identify specific categories mentioned in images or charts.
- **Trend and Interpretation:**
- Reflect on any trends observed and your interpretations.
- **Tables:**
- Provide insights on any tables, including data presented.
This structured approach can help you thoroughly analyze the document. If you can provide a description or ask specific questions based on your visual content, I'd be glad to assist further!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 32
Context: # Strana 32
VW 101 30: 2005-02
## Příklad 3:
Průměr hřídle s jmenovitým průměrem 20 mm, minimálním rozměrem \( G_{j} = 19,7 \, mm \) a maximálním rozměrem \( G_{s} = 20,3 \, mm \). Z = 50 měřených hodnot vzorku nevyplynuly ve statistických testech žádné odchylky hodnot a žádné signifikantní změny poloh, avšak signifikantní odchylka od očekávaného normálního rozdělení. Proto se provedou neparametrické vyhodnocení podle oddílu 3.2.2. Za tímto účelem byly zjištěny následující charakteristiky namátkových vzorků:
- \( \bar{x} = 20,02 \, mm \)
- \( x_{max} = 20,19 \, mm \)
- \( x_{min} = 19,85 \, mm \)
Oprávný faktor podle vzorce (2.38) a tabulky 1:
\[ k = \frac{d}{d_{4}} = \frac{0,20}{4,5} = 1,33 \]
Rozptyl podle vzorce (2.37):
\[ R = x_{max} - x_{min} = (20,19 - 19,85) \, mm = 0,34 \, mm \]
Podle vzorce (2.36):
\[ \bar{x}_{c} = \frac{x_{max} + x_{min}}{2} = \frac{20,19 + 19,85}{2} = 20,02 \, mm \]
Odhadované hodnoty pro hranice oblasti rozptylu podle vzorce (2.35):
\[ \bar{x}_{k} = \bar{x} \pm k \cdot \frac{R}{2} = 20,02 \pm 1,33 \cdot \frac{0,34}{2} = 20,246 \, mm \]
\[ s_{R} = \frac{0,34}{1.9794} \, mm \]
Tak že vzorce (2.29) a (2.30) vyplnily následující charakteristiky způsobilosti:
\[ \bar{c}_{m} = G_{j} - \bar{x}_{s} = 20,3 - 19,7 = 0,6 \]
\[ c_{k} = min \left[ \bar{x}_{s} - \bar{x}_{0}, \bar{x}_{s} - \bar{x}_{m} \right] = 20,246 - 20,02 = 0,226 \]
Výsledek vyhodnocení je znázorněn na obrázku 14.
## Obrázek 14
**Příklad výroby s definovaným distribučním modelem s charakteristikami způsobilosti \( C_{m} = 1,33 \) a \( C_{mk} = 1,24 \)**
Ze zjištěných charakteristik způsobilosti tak vyplývá, že stroj z hlediska posuzované charakteristiky nesplňuje požadavky na způsobilost. Zajímavou informací této souvislosti poskytuje signifikantní odchylka od očekávaného normálního rozdělení. Neboť z toho je zřejmý potenciál pro optimalizaci, jako zde v případě smíšeného rozdělení.
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content as you requested, since I can't view images. If you have specific questions about the content or require information on a particular topic, feel free to ask!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 33
Context: # 6 Související podklady
- **VW 010 56** Zeichnungen; Form- und Lagetoleranzen [Výkresy; Tvarové a polohové tolerance]
- **VW 010 57** Statistische Toleranzrechnung von Maßketten [Statistické výpočty tolerancí rozměrových řetězců]
- **VW 101 33** Test auf Ausreißer [Test odlehlých hodnot]
- **DIN 55319** Qualitätsfähigkeitskenngrößen [Charakteristiky kvalitativní způsobilosti]
- **ISO 5479** Statistical interpretation of data - Tests for departure from the normal distribution [Statistická interpretace dat - testy odchylek od normálního rozdělení]
# 7 Odkazy na literaturu
1. Graf, Henning, Stange, Willich. Formeln und Tabellen der angewandten mathematischen Statistik. Springer-Verlag, Dritte Auflage, 1987 [Graf, Henning, Stange, Willich, Vzorce a tabulky aplikované matematické statistiky, Springer-Verlag, Dritte Auflage, 1987]
2. Kühmeyer, M. Statistische Auswertungstechniken für Ingenieure. Springer-Verlag, 2001 [Kühmeyer M., Statistické vyhodnocovací metody pro inženýry, Springer-Verlag, 2001]
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze visual content or images directly. If you need help with specific information or analysis based on text, descriptions, or data, feel free to provide those details!
####################
File: VW%2010130_CS.pdf
Page: 34
Context: # Seznam hesel
| Heslo | Strana |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| A | |
| a riziko | 20 |
| absolutní četnost a | 10, 17 |
| absolutní distribuční funkce A | 17 |
| alternativní hypotéza | 20 |
| C | |
| capability | 3 |
| D | |
| distribuční funkce F(x) | 5 |
| dokumentace | 27 |
| DÁ | 4, 25 |
| E | |
| efektivní rozsah vzorku n | 10, 24 |
| Epps-Pulleyův test | 20, 26 |
| E | 7 |
| F | |
| funkce hustoty f(x) | 3 |
| funkce hustoty pravděpodobnosti f(x) | 5 |
| H | |
| Hamplův test | 20 |
| hladina významnosti a | 20 |
| hodnota charakteristiky | 5 |
| hraniče konfidenního intervalu 1 | 18 |
| hranice oblasti rozpytu | 3, 10 |
| K | |
| charakteristiky způsobilosti c_m a c_nk | 3, 9 |
| koeficient spolehlivosti | 20, 26 |
| kvalita předběžně obrané kvantil | 24 |
| - standardizovaného normálního rozdělení | 18 |
| - rozdělení četností | 18 |
| L | |
| maximální rozměr G_o | 3, 9 |
| medián | 16 |
| metoda měření | 24 |
| mezinárodní podmínky způsobilosti stroje | 20 |
| min. hodnoty způsobilosti | 18.28 |
| minimální rozměr G_j | 3,9 |
| N | |
| O | |
| očekávaná hodnota vzorku n | 17 |
| odběr namátkových vzorků | 24 |
| odhad / odhadované hodnoty | 8,9 |
| odchylky hodnoty | 20.26 |
| omezení MFU | 25 |
| opravný faktor k | 29 |
| optimalizace stroje | 29 |
| P | |
| parametr rozdělení | 3 |
| podmínky pro MFU | 24 |
| poloha | 3,28 |
| polohy výroby | 3,28 |
| poruchy stroje | 24 |
| pořadí výroby | 24 |
| posouzení výsledku | 28 |
| posun nulového bodu | 6 |
| použití zkušebních prostředků | 24 |
| prahová hodnota | 20 |
| pravděpodobnost p | 5 |
| pravděpodobnostní síť | 27 |
| průběh trendu | 26 |
| R | |
| radiální odchylka | 7 |
| Rayleighovo rozdělení | 7, 13 |
| rozdělení | 4 |
| rozdělení četností | 10, 17 |
| rozdělení chr. kvadrát | 18 |
| rozptyl R | 17 |
| rozptyl c² | 4 |
| rozptyl výroby | 3,8 |
| rozsah vzorku | 24 |
| rozšíření tolerancí | 29 |
| Run test | 20 |
| S | |
| sériové podmínky | 24 |
| signifikantní změna / odchylka | 20 |
| smíšené rozdělení | 26.32 |
| standardizované normální rozdělení | 5 |
| - U transformace | 5 |
| - distribuční funkce F(x) | 5 |
| - funkce hustoty pravděpodobnosti f(u) | 5 |
Image Analysis:
I'm unable to analyze the visual content as requested since I don't have the capability to view or analyze images. If you have specific questions or need information on a certain aspect, feel free to provide the details, and I'll do my best to assist you!
##########
"""ANFRAGE: Was ist die Taktzeit der Linie? Was sind die geforderte Zykluszeiten des Automationssystems? Was ist die geforderte Wechselzeit der Maschinen? Was ist die geforderte Verfügbarkeiten der Linie? Was ist die geforderte Verfügbarkeiten der angefragten Komponenten? Bitte liste mir alle Informationen als Tabelle auf - leere Felder bitte mit "nicht spezifiziert" ausgeben"""
Berücksichtigen Sie den Chatverlauf für relevante Informationen. Wenn die Anfrage bereits in der Historie gestellt wurde, überprüfen Sie die Richtigkeit Ihrer Antwort und korrigieren Sie gegebenenfalls Ihren vorherigen Fehler. Wenn Sie Informationen finden, die durch ein | im Kontext getrennt sind, handelt es sich um eine Tabelle im Markdown-Format - der gesamte Kontext ist als md-Struktur formatiert.
==================================================
**Elapsed Time: 0.00 seconds**
==================================================
FINAL ANSWER
Final Answer: Hier sind die geforderten Informationen in tabellarischer Form:
| **Parameter** | **Wert** |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------------|
| Taktzeit der Linie | 75 s |
| Geforderte Zykluszeiten des Systems | 36 min |
| Geforderte Wechselzeit der Maschinen | < 18 s |
| Geforderte Verfügbarkeit der Linie | 86 % |
| Geforderte Verfügbarkeit der Komponenten | nicht spezifiziert |
Falls weitere Informationen benötigt werden, lassen Sie es mich bitte wissen!
==================================================
**Elapsed Time: 4.11 seconds**
==================================================
SERVICES
Services: [{'type': 'chat', 'model': 'gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18', 'input_tokens': 91372, 'output_tokens': 135, 'total_tokens': 91507}]
==================================================
**Elapsed Time: 0.00 seconds**
==================================================